Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Jito vs BlazeStake: Solana Staking & MEV

A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating Solana's leading staking pools. We analyze Jito's MEV-integrated model against BlazeStake's performance-optimized, low-fee structure.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Solana Staking Pool Dilemma

Choosing between Jito and BlazeStake requires understanding the fundamental trade-off between MEV extraction and pure staking yield.

Jito excels at maximizing validator and delegator rewards by capturing and redistributing Maximum Extractable Value (MEV). Its network of Jito-Solana validators runs specialized software to bundle transactions, auctioning off priority space to searchers. This generates substantial extra income, with MEV rewards historically contributing 5-15%+ to overall APY on top of base staking returns. For example, during periods of high on-chain arbitrage activity, Jito's MEV-boosted yields have demonstrably outperformed standard pools.

BlazeStake takes a different approach by focusing on simplicity, decentralization, and direct protocol support. Operated by the Solana Foundation, it forgoes MEV extraction to provide a straightforward, non-custodial staking service. This results in a trade-off of potentially lower yields for greater ecosystem alignment and reduced complexity. Its stake is distributed across hundreds of independent validators, strengthening network resilience without the operational nuances of MEV management.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing total return and you are comfortable with the added complexity of MEV dynamics, choose Jito. If you prioritize supporting network decentralization, preferring a simple, foundation-backed stake pool with predictable base yields, choose BlazeStake.

tldr-summary
Jito vs BlazeStake

TL;DR: Core Differentiators

Key strengths and trade-offs for Solana staking and MEV at a glance.

01

Jito: MEV-Centric Staking

Specializes in MEV extraction: Runs the dominant Solana validator client (Jito-Solana) and a private mempool to capture and redistribute maximal extractable value. This matters for stakers seeking enhanced yield beyond base staking rewards, as MEV can significantly boost APY.

> 30%
Solana Validator Share
02

Jito: Liquid Staking Token (JitoSOL)

High utility LST: JitoSOL is the second-largest Solana LST by TVL (~$1.5B). It's integrated with DeFi protocols like Kamino, Marginfi, and Solend for leveraged staking strategies. This matters for users who want to stake while maintaining liquidity for yield farming and collateralization.

$1.5B+
TVL
03

BlazeStake: Simplicity & Protocol Support

Official partner of the Solana Foundation: Focuses on simplicity, security, and direct protocol support. A portion of fees funds public goods and ecosystem development via the BlazeDAO. This matters for stakers who prioritize supporting core protocol infrastructure and prefer a straightforward, non-MEV-enhanced yield.

0%
Commission (Promotional)
04

BlazeStake: Broader Validator Decentralization

Distributes stake across 100+ validators: Actively promotes network health and censorship resistance by delegating to a diverse set of operators, including smaller nodes. This matters for users and protocols whose primary concern is maximizing the decentralization and resilience of the Solana network.

100+
Delegate Validators
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Jito vs BlazeStake: Solana Staking & MEV Comparison

Direct comparison of key metrics and features for two leading Solana liquid staking protocols.

Metric / FeatureJitoBlazeStake

Primary Value Proposition

MEV rewards + Staking yield

Maximized staking yield

Liquid Staking Token

JitoSOL (jSOL)

bSOL

Avg. MEV Reward Distribution

~0.5-1.5% APY boost

0% (No MEV program)

Validator Selection Strategy

Performance-based (MEV + Uptime)

Yield-optimized (Delegation Program)

Protocol Fee on Rewards

4% + 5% MEV fee

5%

Native Governance Token

JTO (fee accrual & governance)

Total Value Locked (TVL)

$1.8B+

$600M+

Integrated DeFi Protocols

Jupiter, Marinade, Kamino, Marginfi

Marinade, Solend, Kamino, Orca

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS

Jito vs BlazeStake: Solana Staking & MEV

A data-driven comparison of two leading Solana liquid staking protocols, focusing on MEV rewards, validator selection, and governance.

01

Jito's Key Strength: MEV-Boosted Yields

Maximizes staking rewards via MEV extraction: Jito operates the dominant Solana MEV network, capturing and redistributing arbitrage and liquidation profits. This results in a ~0.5-1.5% APR boost over base staking yields. This matters for yield-sensitive institutions and protocols like Kamino Finance and Marginfi that integrate JitoSOL for optimal capital efficiency.

~0.5-1.5%
APR Boost from MEV
02

Jito's Key Trade-off: Centralization Concerns

High concentration in its validator set: Jito's delegation is heavily weighted towards its own Jito-Solana validators to optimize MEV capture. This raises network health concerns. This matters for protocol architects prioritizing decentralization and censorship resistance, as it contrasts with the distributed approach of the Solana Foundation.

03

BlazeStake's Key Strength: Foundation-Aligned Decentralization

Delegates exclusively to the Solana Foundation's validator set: This ensures maximal network security and decentralization, aligning with the base layer's health goals. This matters for CTOs with a long-term, security-first mandate and protocols like Marinade Finance that also prioritize validator diversity.

04

BlazeStake's Key Trade-off: Forfeits MEV Premium

Sacrifices MEV revenue for decentralization: By not operating an MEV network, BlazeStake yields are limited to standard staking rewards, typically lagging Jito by the MEV boost amount. This matters for VPs of Engineering managing a $500K+ treasury where marginal yield differences represent significant annual capital.

No MEV Boost
Standard Staking APR Only
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS

Jito vs BlazeStake: Solana Staking & MEV

Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading Solana liquid staking protocols at a glance.

01

Jito's Key Strength: MEV Rewards

Direct MEV Distribution: Jito's validator client captures MEV from arbitrage and liquidations, distributing 90% of the proceeds directly to stakers via JitoSOL. This matters for maximizing yield, especially during high on-chain activity. Stakers benefit from a yield premium over base staking rewards.

02

Jito's Key Strength: Validator Network

High-Performance Validator Set: Jito operates a curated, high-uptime validator client used by top-performing operators. This matters for network security and consistent rewards. The focus on infrastructure quality helps optimize block production and MEV extraction.

03

Jito's Trade-off: Centralization & Complexity

Validator Client Reliance: Rewards are tied to the performance and adoption of the proprietary Jito-Solana client. This matters for decentralization purists, as it concentrates influence. The MEV model also adds a layer of economic complexity compared to vanilla staking.

04

BlazeStake's Key Strength: Simplicity & DeFi Integration

Native Stake Pool Protocol: Uses Solana's native Stake Pool program (SPL Stake Pool), offering a transparent, on-chain standard. This matters for developers and users who prioritize protocol simplicity and auditability. bSOL is deeply integrated across Solana DeFi (e.g., Marinade, Solend).

05

BlazeStake's Key Strength: Community & Governance

DAO-Governed Fee Structure: Managed by the Solana Foundation, with fees (currently 5%) directed to a community treasury for grants and ecosystem development. This matters for stakeholders who value aligned incentives and contributing to the broader Solana public good.

06

BlazeStake's Trade-off: No Native MEV

Vanilla Staking Rewards Only: Provides standard Solana staking yields without a built-in mechanism for MEV redistribution. This matters for yield-optimizing users who may leave potential revenue on the table compared to JitoSOL, especially in volatile market conditions.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: When to Choose Which

Jito for DeFi

Verdict: The superior choice for MEV-aware protocols. Strengths: Jito's MEV rewards directly boost validator APY, attracting high-quality stake and enhancing network security for your protocol. Its JitoSOL liquid staking token (LST) is the most integrated LST in Solana DeFi, with deep liquidity on platforms like Jupiter, Orca, and Kamino. For protocols like lending markets or perps DEXs, Jito's stake-weighted voting ensures alignment with the most performant validators. Considerations: The MEV reward stream adds complexity for stakers but is a net positive for protocol security.

BlazeStake for DeFi

Verdict: A streamlined, cost-effective LST for basic integrations. Strengths: BlazeStake's 0% commission on standard staking rewards is its primary draw, maximizing base yield for users. Its bSOL token is straightforward and widely accepted. For protocols where MEV extraction is not a core concern and you prioritize simplicity and maximum base yield passthrough, BlazeStake is a solid, no-frills dependency. Key Differentiator: Lacks the integrated MEV auction system of Jito, which can result in lower aggregate yield over time.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Recommendation

A decisive breakdown of the Jito and BlazeStake trade-offs for Solana staking and MEV.

Jito excels at maximizing validator rewards through MEV extraction because its core protocol is built around the Jito-Solana client and a permissionless MEV auction network. For example, Jito validators consistently capture a significant portion of Solana's MEV, with the JitoSOL stake pool's TVL exceeding $1.5B, demonstrating massive institutional and retail trust. Its architecture directly integrates with the Jito Bundles and Jito Block Engine, offering the most direct path to MEV-boosted yields for sophisticated stakers who prioritize raw APY over simplicity.

BlazeStake takes a different approach by prioritizing accessibility, security, and ecosystem alignment through its official partnership with the Solana Foundation. This results in a trade-off: while it forgoes direct MEV extraction for a simpler, more conservative yield model, it provides unparalleled trust minimization via on-chain, non-custodial staking and direct support for the Solana Foundation Delegate program. Its focus is on providing a reliable, foundational staking layer that benefits the entire network's health and decentralization.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum potential yield and you have the technical capacity to run or delegate to MEV-optimized validators, choose Jito. Its ecosystem is built for yield maximization. If you prioritize protocol security, ease of use, and contributing directly to Solana's network health with a straightforward yield stream, choose BlazeStake. It is the definitive choice for risk-averse institutions and protocols seeking a trusted, foundational staking partner.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Jito vs BlazeStake: Solana Staking & MEV Comparison | ChainScore Comparisons