Optimistic Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) excel at minimizing immediate transaction fees by leveraging fraud proofs. They assume transactions are valid, posting only minimal data to Ethereum L1 and deferring costly verification. This results in extremely low, predictable fees for users—often under $0.10 per swap on protocols like Uniswap or SushiSwap. Their EVM-equivalence simplifies developer migration, leading to dominant TVL and deep liquidity pools.
LABS
Comparisons
Optimistic vs ZK Rollups: Cost per Swap
A technical analysis comparing the transaction cost structures for swaps on leading Optimistic and ZK Rollups, including Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync, and Starknet. We break down the components of L2 fees, analyze real-world data, and provide a decision framework for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The L2 Cost Equation for DeFi
A breakdown of how Optimistic and ZK Rollups approach transaction costs, the primary driver for DeFi protocol selection.
ZK Rollups (e.g., zkSync Era, StarkNet) take a different approach by using validity proofs (ZK-SNARKs/STARKs). Every batch of transactions is cryptographically verified on L1 before finality, eliminating the need for a long challenge period. This results in higher fixed proving costs but offers near-instant finality and superior security. While swap fees can be competitive, the architecture often requires new tooling (e.g., Cairo, Zinc) and faces challenges with general EVM compatibility.
The key trade-off: If your priority is minimizing user cost today and maximizing composability with existing Ethereum tooling, choose an Optimistic Rollup. If you prioritize the strongest security guarantees, instant finality, and are building a new application that can adopt a non-EVM framework, a ZK Rollup is the forward-looking choice. The landscape is evolving, with ZK-EVMs like Polygon zkEVM bridging the compatibility gap.
OPTIMISTIC VS ZK ROLLUPS
Cost per Swap: Head-to-Head Breakdown
Direct comparison of transaction cost and performance metrics for leading rollup architectures.
| Metric | Optimistic Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) | ZK Rollups (e.g., zkSync Era, StarkNet) |
|---|---|---|
Avg. Swap Cost (L2 Gas) | ~$0.10 - $0.30 | ~$0.01 - $0.05 |
Withdrawal Time to L1 | 7 days (Challenge Period) | ~1 hour (Validity Proof Verified) |
L1 Data Cost (Calldata) per TX | High (Full tx data) | Low (Compressed proof + state diff) |
Prover Cost Overhead | Low (No complex proof gen) | High (ZK-SNARK/STARK generation) |
Native Token for Fees | false (Uses ETH) | true (Often requires custom gas token) |
Account Abstraction Support | Limited (EIP-4337) | Native (e.g., zkSync, StarkNet) |
Mainnet Maturity | 2021 (Arbitrum One) | 2023 (zkSync Era Mainnet) |
pros-cons-a
Cost per Swap Analysis
Optimistic Rollups: Cost Profile & Trade-offs
A direct comparison of transaction cost structures between Optimistic (Arbitrum, Optimism) and ZK Rollups (zkSync Era, StarkNet).
01
Optimistic Rollups: Lower Fixed Costs
Immediate cost advantage: No expensive proof generation. A swap on Arbitrum One typically costs $0.10-$0.30, compared to L1 Ethereum's $5+. This matters for high-frequency trading and routine DeFi interactions where predictable, low fees are critical.
$0.10-$0.30
Avg. Swap Cost
7 Days
Withdrawal Delay
03
ZK Rollups: Higher Base, Lower Net Cost
Higher per-tx, lower net settlement: Proof generation makes individual swaps slightly more expensive (e.g., $0.15-$0.40 on zkSync Era). However, instant L1 finality eliminates bridge costs and delay penalties. This matters for exchanges and payment rails where capital efficiency is paramount.
$0.15-$0.40
Avg. Swap Cost
~10 min
Finality to L1
pros-cons-b
Optimistic vs ZK Rollups: Cost per Swap
ZK Rollups: Cost Profile & Trade-offs
A data-driven breakdown of transaction cost structures, finality times, and economic trade-offs for protocol architects.
01
Optimistic Rollups: Lower Fixed Costs
Lower proving overhead: No expensive ZK-SNARK/STARK generation per transaction. This results in a lower baseline cost for simple swaps on chains like Arbitrum One and Optimism, where fees are dominated by L1 data posting. This matters for high-volume, low-value DeFi where minimizing fixed cost per TX is critical.
$0.10 - $0.50
Typical Swap Cost
7 Days
Withdrawal Delay
03
ZK Rollups: Predictable Finality Cost
No withdrawal delays: Instant cryptographic finality (10-30 min) on L1 after proof submission, as seen on zkSync Era and Starknet. This eliminates bridge premiums, making the posted fee the total cost. This matters for exchanges, payment rails, and gaming where user experience depends on swift, guaranteed settlement.
< 30 min
Guaranteed Finality
$0.01 - $0.20
Proving Cost (Amortized)
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which Model
Optimistic Rollups for DeFi
Verdict: The current incumbent for high-value, complex applications. Strengths: Arbitrum One and Optimism dominate with massive TVL (billions), deep liquidity, and a battle-tested ecosystem of protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and GMX. Smart contract compatibility is near-perfect, allowing for easy porting of existing Solidity code. The 7-day challenge period is a manageable trade-off for established protocols where capital efficiency and user trust are paramount. Key Metric: ~$15-20B combined TVL.
ZK Rollups for DeFi
Verdict: The emerging challenger for cost-sensitive, high-frequency operations. Strengths: zkSync Era and Starknet offer significantly lower cost per swap once fully settled, with fees often under $0.01. Their instant cryptographic finality (after proof generation) is superior for arbitrage and MEV-sensitive strategies. Native account abstraction improves UX. However, ecosystem maturity and EVM equivalence (e.g., zkEVM performance quirks) are still catching up. Key Metric: ~$1-2B TVL, but growing rapidly.
OPTIMISTIC VS ZK ROLLUPS
Technical Deep Dive: Deconstructing the Fee Components
Understanding the true cost of a swap requires dissecting the distinct fee models of Optimistic and ZK Rollups. This analysis breaks down the fixed and variable components that determine your final transaction price.
For a single swap, ZK Rollups are typically cheaper. On networks like zkSync Era or StarkNet, a swap can cost $0.01-$0.10, while on Optimism or Arbitrum, it's often $0.10-$0.50. This is because ZK proofs compress data more efficiently, reducing the fixed L1 data publishing cost per transaction. However, this advantage can shift with network congestion.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict: Strategic Cost Considerations for Builders
A data-driven breakdown of the fundamental cost trade-offs between Optimistic and ZK Rollups for on-chain swaps.
Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism) excel at minimizing transaction fees for users by default. This is because they batch transactions without immediate verification, deferring the computationally intensive fraud-proof process. For example, a simple swap on Arbitrum One typically costs $0.10-$0.50, significantly lower than Ethereum L1. This model prioritizes low upfront cost and developer familiarity with the EVM, making it ideal for bootstrapping user adoption and high-frequency, low-value DeFi activity.
ZK Rollups (zkSync Era, StarkNet, Polygon zkEVM) take a different approach by using validity proofs, which incur higher fixed proving costs per batch but enable instant finality. This results in a trade-off: while proving adds overhead, the aggregated cost per transaction can become extremely low at high throughput. Protocols like dYdX leverage this for high-performance order books, where the cost per swap becomes negligible within a large batch, and users benefit from capital efficiency with near-instant withdrawals.
The key trade-off is between predictable, low user fees versus scalable, ultra-low batch costs with superior security guarantees. If your priority is minimizing immediate user-facing costs and maximizing EVM compatibility for a broad application suite, choose an Optimistic Rollup. If you prioritize institutional-grade finality, data compression for extreme scalability, and are building a high-throughput, specialized dApp where batch economics dominate, a ZK Rollup is the strategic choice.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall