OP Stack Appchains excel at providing dedicated, predictable capacity because they are sovereign chains with isolated state and execution. For example, an appchain like Base or Zora Network can achieve high, stable throughput (e.g., 100+ TPS) for its specific applications without competing for block space with unrelated protocols. This guarantees low, predictable transaction fees and enables custom gas tokenomics, making it ideal for high-frequency applications like gaming or social platforms.
LABS
Comparisons
OP Stack Appchain vs Optimism Mainnet: Capacity
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating dedicated appchain capacity versus shared mainnet throughput, focusing on TPS, cost, and operational trade-offs.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Dedicated vs. Shared Capacity Dilemma
Choosing between a dedicated appchain and a shared mainnet is a fundamental architectural decision that balances control against network effects.
Optimism Mainnet takes a different approach by aggregating demand into a shared, high-security environment. This results in a powerful network effect—over $7B in TVL and deep liquidity across DeFi protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Sonne Finance—but introduces variable fees and potential congestion during network-wide demand spikes. Its capacity is a shared resource, offering lower initial overhead but less control over performance.
The key trade-off: If your priority is guaranteed performance, predictable costs, and technical sovereignty for a specific high-volume application, choose an OP Stack Appchain. If you prioritize immediate access to a massive, composable ecosystem and maximal security from day one, choose Optimism Mainnet.
tldr-summary
OP Stack Appchain vs Optimism Mainnet
TL;DR: Key Capacity Differentiators
A high-level comparison of throughput, cost, and control trade-offs for protocol architects.
01
OP Stack Appchain: Sovereign Throughput
Dedicated block space: Your chain's capacity is not shared with other protocols. This enables predictable, high throughput (e.g., 2,000+ TPS) for your specific application, regardless of mainnet congestion. This matters for high-frequency trading, gaming, or social apps requiring consistent performance.
Dedicated
Block Space
2,000+
Potential TPS
02
OP Stack Appchain: Custom Gas Economics
Full control over fee markets: You can set your own gas token (e.g., USDC, native token) and adjust parameters like block gas limits and minimum base fees. This allows for ultra-low, predictable transaction costs tailored to your users. This matters for mass-market dApps where user onboarding cost is critical.
Configurable
Gas Token
< $0.01
Target Tx Cost
03
Optimism Mainnet: Shared Security & Liquidity
Inherited security from Ethereum: Transactions are batched and settled on Ethereum L1, providing the highest security guarantee in the Optimism ecosystem. This comes with immediate access to $800M+ OP Mainnet TVL and deep liquidity pools. This matters for DeFi protocols where security and composability are non-negotiable.
Ethereum L1
Security Root
$800M+
TVL
04
Optimism Mainnet: Instant Composability
Native interoperability with Superchain: Your protocol operates on the same layer as Aave, Uniswap V3, and other major dApps, enabling trustless, atomic composability. This eliminates bridging friction for users. This matters for protocols that are components in a larger DeFi stack or rely on existing liquidity.
Native
Composability
100+
Integrated DApps
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
OP Stack Appchain vs Optimism Mainnet: Capacity Comparison
Direct comparison of key capacity and performance metrics for custom chains vs the shared mainnet.
| Metric | OP Stack Appchain | Optimism Mainnet |
|---|---|---|
Throughput (Theoretical Max TPS) | 2,000 - 10,000+ | ~2,000 |
Transaction Cost (Avg. Simple Swap) | $0.001 - $0.01 | $0.05 - $0.20 |
Block Time | 2 seconds | 2 seconds |
Sovereign Gas Limit | ||
Custom Data Availability Layer | ||
Shared Sequencer | ||
Time to Finality (L1) | ~12 minutes | ~12 minutes |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
OP Stack Appchain vs Optimism Mainnet: Capacity
Key architectural trade-offs for throughput, cost, and control. Choose based on your application's scale and resource requirements.
01
OP Stack Appchain: Dedicated Throughput
Guaranteed block space: Your chain has its own sequencer, eliminating competition for block space from protocols like Uniswap or Aave. This provides predictable, high throughput for your application's specific transactions.
02
OP Stack Appchain: Custom Gas Economics
Tailored fee markets: You control the base fee and priority fee parameters. This allows for ultra-low, stable transaction costs for your users, decoupled from the volatile demand on Optimism Mainnet.
03
Optimism Mainnet: Inherited Security & Liquidity
Shared security pool: Benefits from the collective value secured by the Superchain's fault proof system and the ~$7B TVL on Optimism Mainnet. Direct access to deep, native liquidity from DEXs like Velodrome and Curve.
04
Optimism Mainnet: Operational Simplicity
Zero infra overhead: No need to run and maintain sequencers, proposers, or verifier nodes. Your protocol deploys directly onto a live, battle-tested network with established tooling (The Graph, Blocknative) and indexers.
pros-cons-b
OP Stack Appchain vs Optimism Mainnet: Capacity
Optimism Mainnet: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for teams evaluating shared security versus sovereign capacity.
01
Pros: Unmatched Shared Security & Liquidity
Inherits Ethereum's security via Optimism's fault proofs. This matters for protocols like Aave and Uniswap that require the highest assurance for billions in TVL. Access to Mainnet's liquidity pool (~$1B+ TVL) without bridging friction.
$1B+
Mainnet TVL
Ethereum L1
Security Base
02
Pros: Seamless Composability & Network Effects
Native interoperability with all Mainnet dApps (e.g., Synthetix, Velodrome). This matters for projects needing instant access to a mature DeFi ecosystem and user base. No custom bridging required for users or assets.
03
Cons: Fixed Throughput & Congestion Risk
Shared block space with all Mainnet sequencers. This matters for high-frequency applications like Perpetual DEXs or gaming, where peak demand can lead to variable latency and gas fees. Capacity is capped by the collective chain's ~2,000 TPS theoretical limit.
~2,000 TPS
Shared Capacity
04
Cons: Limited Customization & Upgrade Control
Governed by Optimism Collective upgrades and parameters. This matters for teams needing specific precompiles (e.g., for ZK-proof verification), custom gas token, or immediate feature deployment. You trade sovereignty for standardization.
CAPACITY PRIORITIES
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
OP Stack Appchain for DeFi
Verdict: The strategic choice for sovereignty and tailored economics. Strengths: Full control over gas fee markets and MEV capture (e.g., via custom sequencer). Can implement protocol-specific fee subsidies or rebates. Enables dedicated block space, eliminating competition from memecoins or NFTs during congestion. Proven by protocols like Lyra Finance and Aevo. Trade-offs: Requires bootstrapping your own validator set and liquidity. Security is a shared responsibility with the chosen Data Availability (DA) layer (e.g., Celestia, EigenDA).
Optimism Mainnet for DeFi
Verdict: The optimal launchpad for immediate liquidity and network effects. Strengths: Instant access to the Superchain's aggregated liquidity and shared security (canonical bridges to Ethereum). Benefits from the collective growth of the OP Stack ecosystem (Base, Zora). Transaction ordering and censorship resistance are managed by a decentralized sequencer set. Trade-offs: Fixed gas token (ETH) and fee model. Must compete for block space with all other Mainnet applications, which can lead to variable fees during high demand.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between an OP Stack appchain and Optimism Mainnet is a strategic decision between sovereignty and network effects.
OP Stack Appchains excel at providing dedicated, predictable capacity and full sovereignty because they are independent Layer 2 (L2) chains. For example, a high-throughput DeFi protocol like Lyra or Perpetual Protocol can configure its own block space, gas limits, and sequencer to achieve sub-second finality and near-zero fees for its users, completely insulated from congestion on other chains. This model is ideal for applications requiring custom precompiles, unique fee tokens, or specific governance models.
Optimism Mainnet takes a different approach by aggregating demand into a single, shared superchain. This results in superior liquidity and security through the collective TVL of protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Synthetix, but introduces the trade-off of variable fees and potential contention for block space during network spikes. Its capacity is a function of the shared sequencer's performance and the aggregated activity of all its applications.
The key trade-off: If your priority is guaranteed, scalable performance and technical sovereignty for a specific application, choose an OP Stack Appchain. If you prioritize immediate access to deep liquidity, maximal security, and the strongest network effects from day one, choose Optimism Mainnet. For projects with proven product-market fit needing to scale, an appchain is a strategic evolution. For new applications seeking users and capital, the mainnet's shared security and composability are invaluable.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall