StarkEx Appchains excel at fee isolation and predictability because they operate as dedicated, single-application validity rollups. This architectural choice guarantees that your application's gas costs are shielded from the congestion and fee volatility of a shared network. For example, dYdX (v3) and Immutable X leverage StarkEx to offer users consistently low, predictable fees, a critical feature for high-frequency trading and NFT minting platforms where cost certainty is paramount.
LABS
Comparisons
StarkEx Appchains vs StarkNet: Fee Isolation
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects on fee predictability, cost models, and architectural trade-offs between StarkEx Appchains and the StarkNet L2.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Fee Predictability Imperative
For high-volume dApps, predictable transaction costs are a non-negotiable requirement for sustainable operations and user experience.
StarkNet takes a different approach by being a permissionless, general-purpose ZK-Rollup. This results in a shared fee market where all applications compete for block space, similar to Ethereum L1 but at a lower cost. The trade-off is that while base fees are lower, they can still spike during network-wide demand surges from popular protocols like Ekubo or Nostra, introducing cost variability for your users.
The key trade-off: If your priority is absolute fee predictability and isolation for a high-throughput application, choose a StarkEx Appchain. If you prioritize composability with a broader ecosystem and can tolerate some fee variability, the shared StarkNet L2 is the suitable choice.
tldr-summary
StarkEx Appchains vs StarkNet
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs for fee isolation at a glance.
01
StarkEx Appchain: Predictable, Isolated Costs
Guaranteed fee isolation: Each appchain is a dedicated validity rollup with its own sequencer, gas token, and fee model. This prevents congestion from other dApps, ensuring stable and predictable transaction costs. This matters for financial applications like perpetuals (dYdX v3) or payment systems where cost certainty is critical.
< $0.01
Avg. Trade Cost (dYdX)
03
StarkNet: Shared Security & Composability
Native cross-dApp interoperability: All smart contracts on the L2 network share state and security, enabling seamless composability like money legos in DeFi. This matters for protocols requiring deep liquidity integration (e.g., lending protocols interacting with AMMs) where atomic transactions across contracts are essential.
$1.3B+
Peak TVL
FEE ISOLATION & PERFORMANCE
Feature Comparison: StarkEx Appchains vs StarkNet
Direct comparison of fee structures, performance, and operational models for StarkEx Appchains and the StarkNet L2.
| Metric / Feature | StarkEx Appchain | StarkNet L2 |
|---|---|---|
Fee Model & Isolation | Dedicated capacity, no shared congestion | Shared network, subject to global demand |
Avg. Transaction Cost (Est.) | $0.01 - $0.10 | $0.10 - $1.50 |
Throughput (Peak TPS) | 9,000+ | 100+ |
Settlement to Ethereum | Immediate per batch (~15 min) | Proven per batch (~15 min) |
Custom Token for Fees | ||
Protocol Upgrade Control | App owner decides | StarkNet governance |
Shared Sequencer |
pros-cons-a
Fee Isolation Deep Dive
StarkEx Appchains: Pros and Cons
A technical comparison of fee isolation models, highlighting the trade-offs between dedicated capacity and shared network effects.
01
StarkEx Appchain: Predictable, Isolated Costs
Guaranteed fee isolation: Your application's transaction costs are determined solely by your own chain's activity and gas price. This prevents cost spikes from unrelated network congestion (e.g., a popular NFT mint on another dApp). This matters for enterprise-grade DeFi and gaming where predictable operational costs are non-negotiable for P&L calculations.
~$0.10
Typical L2 TX Cost
02
StarkEx Appchain: Tailored Performance
Dedicated sequencer & prover: You control the resource allocation and upgrade schedule. This enables custom throughput (e.g., 9,000+ TPS for a high-frequency exchange like dYdX) and custom data availability modes (Validium vs Rollup). This matters for protocols needing specific SLAs or regulatory compliance that a shared chain cannot guarantee.
9K+ TPS
Peak (dYdX v3)
03
StarkNet: Shared Liquidity & Composability
Native cross-dApp composability: Your protocol interacts seamlessly with other contracts on the same L2 (e.g., lending on zkLend, swapping on Ekubo, all in one tx). This unlocks network effects and capital efficiency impossible on an isolated chain. This matters for DeFi legos, social apps, and NFT ecosystems where value is derived from interconnectedness.
$1.3B+
TVL (Shared)
04
StarkNet: Lower Operational Overhead
No infrastructure management: StarkWare operates and secures the core sequencer and prover network. Your team avoids the DevOps burden and security risk of running your own validator set. This matters for lean engineering teams or projects that want to focus purely on application logic rather than blockchain consensus.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
StarkEx Appchains vs StarkNet: Fee Isolation
Key strengths and trade-offs for predictable transaction costs at a glance.
01
StarkEx Appchain Pro: Guaranteed Fee Isolation
Dedicated throughput and capacity: Each appchain has its own sequencer and prover, ensuring its users never compete for block space with unrelated dApps. This provides predictable, stable gas fees regardless of network-wide congestion. This matters for high-frequency trading (dYdX) or enterprise-grade gaming where cost certainty is critical.
02
StarkEx Appchain Con: Operational Overhead & Liquidity Fragmentation
Significant setup and maintenance cost: Teams must run their own sequencer, manage data availability, and handle upgrades. This creates ~$500K+ annual operational overhead. It also fragments liquidity and composability, as assets are siloed from the broader StarkNet ecosystem. This matters for smaller teams or applications that rely on cross-protocol interactions.
03
StarkNet Pro: Native Composability & Shared Security
Unified liquidity and security: All dApps share the same L2 state, enabling seamless composability (e.g., a DeFi protocol on StarkNet can directly integrate with an NFT marketplace). Security and upgrades are managed by the StarkNet Foundation and core developers. This matters for DeFi ecosystems, social apps, and permissionless innovation where network effects are paramount.
04
StarkNet Con: Variable Fees Under Congestion
Competitive fee market: During peak demand (e.g., major NFT mint or airdrop), all dApps compete for the same block space, leading to spikes in transaction costs. While still cheaper than Ethereum L1, fees are not isolated. This matters for applications requiring absolute, SLA-grade fee predictability for every user transaction.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: Choose Based on Your Use Case
StarkEx Appchains for DeFi
Verdict: The superior choice for established, high-volume protocols like dYdX or ImmutableX. Strengths:
- Fee Isolation & Predictability: Your application's performance and costs are completely insulated from network congestion, crucial for perpetuals and order books.
- Customizability: Tailor the sequencer, data availability (ZK-Rollup vs Validium), and token for gas. Supports complex logic via Cairo 0.
- Proven Scale: Handles 1000+ TPS with sub-second latency, proven by dYdX v3's $1B+ daily volume.
StarkNet for DeFi
Verdict: Best for experimental, composable DeFi primitives seeking network effects. Strengths:
- Native Composability: Seamless interaction with other protocols (e.g., lending on zkLend, swapping on Ekubo) within a shared state.
- Developer Ecosystem: Access to a broader pool of Cairo 1.0 developers, libraries, and tooling like StarkScan.
- Long-term Vision: Aligns with StarkWare's roadmap for decentralized sequencing and proof generation. Key Trade-off: You compete for block space, making fees volatile during peak demand.
STARKEX APPCHAINS VS STARKNET
Technical Deep Dive: How Fee Isolation Works
Fee isolation is a critical design choice for scaling and cost predictability. This section breaks down the architectural differences between StarkEx's dedicated appchains and StarkNet's shared L2, and how they impact transaction costs and performance for your dApp.
StarkEx Appchains are significantly cheaper for dedicated, high-volume applications. They achieve fee isolation by operating a dedicated sequencer and prover for a single dApp (like dYdX or Sorare), eliminating competition for block space. This allows for predictable, sub-cent fees. On StarkNet, all dApps share the same sequencer, so fees can spike during network congestion, making costs less predictable for high-frequency operations.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Recommendation
Choosing between StarkEx appchains and StarkNet's shared L2 depends on your protocol's tolerance for cost variability versus its need for sovereignty.
StarkEx Appchains excel at predictable, isolated fee markets because they are dedicated, single-application chains. This design ensures your protocol's users are not competing for block space with unrelated, high-volume dApps like dYdX or ImmutableX, which can cause fee spikes. For example, a gaming app on its own StarkEx chain can maintain sub-cent transaction costs consistently, regardless of NFT minting frenzies on other networks.
StarkNet takes a different approach by offering a shared, composable L2. This results in a powerful network effect where assets and smart contracts (like those from Argent X or Braavos) can interact seamlessly. The trade-off is a unified fee market; during periods of high demand, your protocol's users will experience the same elevated gas costs as everyone else, as seen in historical fee surges during major airdrops or DeFi events.
The key trade-off: If your priority is cost predictability and sovereignty for a high-throughput application (e.g., a dedicated exchange or game), choose a StarkEx appchain. If you prioritize maximum composability, developer ecosystem access, and are willing to accept shared L2 fee volatility for broader integration, choose StarkNet.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall