Petra excels at Move-based transaction security and developer experience because it is natively built for the Aptos blockchain and its Move VM. For example, its transaction simulation and signing flow are deeply integrated with Move's resource model, providing clearer safety guarantees for complex DeFi interactions on protocols like Aries Markets and Liquidswap. This native integration results in fewer failed transactions and better support for novel primitives like object-centric assets.
LABS
Comparisons
Petra vs Phantom: New L1 Wallets
A data-driven comparison for CTOs and protocol architects choosing a primary wallet for Aptos or Solana development and user onboarding.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The New L1 Wallet Battle
A data-driven comparison of Petra and Phantom, the dominant wallets for Aptos and Solana, focusing on their architectural alignment with their respective L1s.
Phantom takes a different approach by optimizing for high-frequency, low-cost interactions on Solana. This results in a trade-off: its architecture prioritizes speed and composability across a vast ecosystem (e.g., seamless swaps via Jupiter, staking with Marinade) but can be more exposed to network congestion and fee volatility. Its massive user base, often cited at over 3 million monthly active users, is a testament to its success in this high-throughput environment.
The key trade-off: If your priority is security-first design for novel financial primitives and a growing Aptos ecosystem, choose Petra. If you prioritize maximum liquidity, established DeFi integrations, and serving a massive existing user base on Solana, choose Phantom. The decision fundamentally hinges on your target chain and the user experience its architecture demands.
tldr-summary
Petra vs. Phantom: New L1 Wallets
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for Aptos and Solana's flagship wallets.
01
Petra's Edge: Move Language & Aptos Core
Native Aptos & Move Integration: Petra is built for the Aptos MoveVM, offering first-class support for Move-based tokens (Coin<T>), resource-oriented accounts, and table storage. This matters for developers building on Aptos who need precise control over assets and security patterns inherent to Move.
02
Petra's Edge: Transaction Previews
Human-Readable Simulation: Petra provides detailed, pre-execution transaction previews showing exact resource changes, function calls, and fee breakdowns. This matters for high-value DeFi users and institutions requiring maximum transparency before signing, reducing error risk.
03
Phantom's Edge: Solana Ecosystem Scale
Dominant Market Share & Integration: With over 3M+ monthly active users, Phantom is the de facto standard for Solana, ensuring near-universal dApp compatibility (e.g., Jupiter, Raydium, Tensor) and extensive community support. This matters for users prioritizing access to the deepest DeFi, NFT, and consumer app ecosystem.
04
Phantom's Edge: Multi-Chain Expansion
Ethereum & Polygon Support: Beyond Solana, Phantom natively supports Ethereum and Polygon networks, allowing a single wallet interface for EVM and Solana ecosystems. This matters for power users and portfolios diversified across multiple leading L1/L2 chains.
05
Choose Petra For...
Aptos-native development and high-security applications.
- Building or using Move-based dApps (e.g., Pontem, Liquidswap).
- Transactions where auditable resource changes are critical.
- Engaging with the Aptos DeFi ecosystem (Aries, Amnis Finance).
06
Choose Phantom For...
Maximum ecosystem liquidity and multi-chain convenience.
- Accessing the largest Solana dApp suite and NFT markets.
- Managing a cross-chain portfolio (SOL, ETH, MATIC) in one place.
- Prioritizing user base size and community-driven tooling.
L1 WALLET COMPARISON
Petra vs Phantom: Head-to-Head Feature Matrix
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for Aptos and Solana primary wallets.
| Metric | Petra (Aptos) | Phantom (Solana) |
|---|---|---|
Native Chain TPS (Peak) | 30,000+ | 65,000+ |
Avg. Transaction Cost | $0.001 - $0.01 | $0.00025 |
Multi-Chain Support | ||
Built-in Staking | ||
NFT Display Standard | Aptos Digital Asset | Metaplex |
Open Source | ||
Hardware Wallet Support | Ledger | Ledger, Trezor |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Petra vs Phantom
Petra for DeFi on Aptos
Verdict: The native, high-performance choice for Aptos DeFi. Strengths: Built by Aptos Labs for first-class integration with the Move-based ecosystem. Offers direct access to high-throughput protocols like Aries Markets, Thala, and Liquidswap. Transaction pre-execution and simulation are highly accurate due to native client support. Security is paramount with formal verification of Move contracts, which Petra is optimized to interact with. Considerations: Ecosystem is newer and TVL is growing but currently trails established chains. You are locked into the Aptos ecosystem.
Phantom for DeFi on Solana & SVM
Verdict: The dominant gateway to the high-liquidity Solana DeFi landscape. Strengths: Unmatched access to deep liquidity pools on Raydium, Jupiter, MarginFi, and Kamino. Handles Solana's high TPS (2-4k) and low fees ($0.001-$0.01) seamlessly. Multi-chain expansion via Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to Eclipse and Monad provides future-proofing. The built-in swap aggregator finds optimal routes across all major DEXs. Considerations: Less ideal for non-SVM chains. Past network congestion events have impacted wallet UX, though client-side improvements help.
pros-cons-a
PETRA VS PHANTOM
Petra (Aptos) Wallet: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs choosing a wallet for their L1 ecosystem. Data based on Q1 2024 metrics.
01
Petra: Native Aptos Integration
First-party wallet for Move-based execution: Built by Aptos Labs, Petra offers deep integration with the Aptos MoveVM, enabling seamless interaction with Aptos-native standards like Coin and Token. This matters for developers building on Aptos who require reliable, low-level access to the chain's unique features like parallel execution and table resources.
~10K TPS
Aptos Peak Capacity
02
Petra: Emerging Ecosystem Focus
Gatekeeper to high-growth Aptos DeFi: Petra is the default entry point for protocols like Aries Markets, Thala Labs, and Pontem Network. This matters for projects aiming to capture early market share in a less saturated ecosystem with a $500M+ TVL and aggressive grant programs from the Aptos Foundation.
03
Phantom: Solana Scale & Liquidity
Dominant wallet for high-throughput applications: Phantom provides unparalleled access to Solana's deep liquidity and user base, supporting $4B+ DeFi TVL and protocols like Jupiter, Raydium, and Marinade. This matters for applications requiring maximum user reach and access to mature financial primitives.
>2M MAU
Active Users
04
Phantom: Multi-Chain Expansion
Unified interface for Ethereum & Solana: Phantom now supports EVM-compatible chains (Ethereum, Polygon) alongside Solana, reducing user fragmentation. This matters for teams operating across ecosystems or planning a multi-chain strategy, as it simplifies user onboarding and asset management across $50B+ in combined TVL.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Petra vs Phantom: New L1 Wallets
A technical breakdown of the leading native wallets for Aptos (Petra) and Solana (Phantom). Key strengths and trade-offs for developers and power users.
01
Phantom (Solana): Ecosystem Dominance
Massive user base and integration: 3M+ monthly active users and near-universal dApp support. This matters for consumer-facing applications requiring maximum reach and seamless onboarding. The wallet is the de facto standard for Solana DeFi (e.g., Jupiter, Raydium) and NFTs (Tensor, Magic Eden).
02
Phantom (Solana): Feature Velocity
Advanced DeFi & NFT tooling: Built-in staking, token swaps, NFT marketplace aggregation, and bridging. This matters for power users and traders who want a unified interface. Features like portfolio visualization and compressed NFT support reduce the need for external dashboards.
03
Petra (Aptos): Move Language Security
Formal verification and resource-centric model: Built for the Aptos Move VM, offering enhanced security for asset management. This matters for institutional and high-value applications where predictable transaction outcomes and strong ownership semantics are critical (e.g., Pontem Network, Econia).
04
Petra (Aptos): Performance & UX Focus
Optimized for Aptos's parallel execution: Fast transaction simulations and a clean, responsive interface. This matters for developers building high-throughput dApps (gaming, social) who need reliable fee estimation and a smooth user experience that matches the chain's low-latency (<1s finality) capabilities.
05
Phantom (Solana): Network Volatility Risk
Exposure to Solana congestion: During peak demand (e.g., meme coin launches), transaction failures and fee spikes directly impact wallet UX. This matters for applications requiring consistent reliability, as users face failed transactions and the need for priority fees.
06
Petra (Aptos): Smaller Ecosystem
Limited dApp integration and user base: Aptos's TVL (~$500M) and developer activity are fractions of Solana's. This matters for projects seeking immediate liquidity and users, as the available DeFi protocols (Aries Markets, Amnis Finance) and NFT collections are less established.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide your wallet infrastructure choice based on your protocol's specific needs.
Petra excels at providing a deeply integrated, high-performance experience for the Aptos ecosystem. Built by Aptos Labs, it leverages the network's Move VM and parallel execution for fast, secure transaction handling. For example, its native support for Aptos-specific standards like AptosToken and its seamless interaction with high-throughput dApps like Pontem Network make it the default choice for developers building exclusively on Aptos. Its focus results in superior UX for features like batch transactions and staking within its native interface.
Phantom takes a different approach by prioritizing multi-chain accessibility and massive user adoption. Its strategy is to be a universal wallet layer, currently supporting Solana, Ethereum, Polygon, and Bitcoin, with a user base exceeding 3 million monthly active users. This results in a trade-off: while it offers broad reach and a familiar interface for users from other chains, its Aptos integration is an extension rather than a native core, which can sometimes lag behind Petra in supporting the latest Aptos protocol upgrades and primitives.
The key trade-off is between deep, optimized integration and broad, multi-chain distribution. If your priority is building a high-performance dApp that fully utilizes Aptos's unique capabilities (like parallel execution and Move-based security) and you want the most reliable wallet for your users, choose Petra. If you prioritize user acquisition from established ecosystems like Solana and Ethereum, need to manage assets across multiple chains, and value a single wallet interface for your team or community, choose Phantom.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall