QuickNode excels at providing a unified, multi-chain API because of its early focus on Ethereum and subsequent expansion to over 30 chains including Arbitrum, Polygon, and Base. This results in a consistent developer experience for teams building across ecosystems, with a single dashboard, billing, and support system. For example, a protocol deploying a multi-chain NFT marketplace can manage all its RPC, indexing, and node infrastructure from one provider, simplifying operations.
LABS
Comparisons
QuickNode vs Helius: Solana vs Ethereum RPC Comparison
A technical analysis comparing QuickNode's multi-chain infrastructure with Helius's Solana-specialized API suite. We evaluate performance, cost, developer experience, and ideal use cases for engineering leaders.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Multi-Chain Generalist vs. The Solana Specialist
A foundational look at the core architectural and strategic differences between QuickNode's broad infrastructure support and Helius's deep Solana specialization.
Helius takes a fundamentally different approach by specializing exclusively on the Solana blockchain. This deep focus allows for hyper-optimized infrastructure, custom RPC methods like the getPriorityFeeEstimate for optimal transaction scheduling, and tools like the Webhook API for real-time event streaming. This results in a trade-off: unparalleled performance and feature depth for Solana at the cost of chain-agnostic flexibility. Their infrastructure is built to handle Solana's high throughput, which consistently processes ~4,000 TPS with sub-second finality.
The key trade-off: If your priority is multi-chain deployment, operational consolidation, and a battle-tested Ethereum foundation, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize maximizing performance, accessing deep Solana-specific tooling, and building exclusively on the highest-throughput L1, choose Helius. Your stack's geography dictates the optimal provider.
tldr-summary
QuickNode vs Helius
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. This is a comparison of infrastructure providers, not the underlying blockchains. The choice is dictated by your primary protocol focus and performance needs.
01
Choose QuickNode for Multi-Chain
Multi-chain dominance: Supports 30+ chains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base). This matters for dApps and enterprises building across ecosystems who need a single, unified API and billing dashboard. Offers dedicated RPC nodes for predictable performance.
30+
Supported Chains
02
Choose Helius for Solana Hyper-Optimization
Solana-native performance: Built from the ground up for Solana's architecture. This matters for high-frequency trading bots, NFT mints, and real-time analytics requiring sub-100ms response times and deep access to Solana's data (e.g., WebSocket streams for mempool, DAS API for compressed NFTs).
< 100ms
Typical Latency
03
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Proven infrastructure & SLAs: Offers 99.9%+ uptime SLAs, global edge network, and advanced features like enhanced APIs (Debug & Trace) and dedicated node hardware. This matters for institutional clients, exchanges, and protocols where reliability, compliance, and deep Ethereum tooling are non-negotiable.
99.9%
Uptime SLA
QUICKNODE VS HELIUS: SOLANA VS ETHEREUM
Feature Matrix: Head-to-Head Specifications
Direct comparison of core blockchain infrastructure metrics and features.
| Metric / Feature | QuickNode (Ethereum Focus) | Helius (Solana Focus) |
|---|---|---|
Avg. Transaction Cost (Simple Transfer) | $0.50 - $2.00 | $0.00025 |
Peak TPS (Sustained, Real-World) | ~45 TPS | ~5,000 TPS |
Time to Finality | ~15 minutes | < 1 second |
Native RPC Speed (P99 Latency) | < 100 ms | < 50 ms |
Enhanced APIs (e.g., NFT, Token) | ||
WebSocket Support | ||
Archive Data Access | ||
Primary Blockchain Ecosystem | Ethereum, L2s, 20+ chains | Solana |
SOLANA (HELIUS) VS ETHEREUM (QUICKNODE)
Performance & Reliability Benchmarks
Direct comparison of core blockchain performance and reliability metrics for infrastructure decisions.
| Metric | Ethereum (via QuickNode) | Solana (via Helius) |
|---|---|---|
Peak TPS (Sustained) | ~50 TPS | ~5,000 TPS |
Avg. Transaction Cost (Simple) | $0.50 - $5.00 | < $0.001 |
Time to Finality | ~15 minutes | < 2 seconds |
Historical Data Access | Full archive node required | Native compressed history |
RPC Latency (p95, Global) | < 100 ms | < 50 ms |
Uptime SLA Guarantee | 99.9% | 99.9% |
Primary Consensus | Proof-of-Stake (PoS) | Proof-of-History (PoH) + PoS |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
QuickNode vs Helius: Solana vs Ethereum
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs evaluating core infrastructure providers.
01
QuickNode: Multi-Chain Breadth
Specific advantage: Supports 30+ chains including Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and Arbitrum. This matters for protocols building cross-chain applications or teams managing infrastructure across multiple ecosystems, reducing vendor sprawl.
30+
Blockchains
02
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Specific advantage: Industry-leading 99.9% SLA and global edge network. This matters for high-frequency trading platforms and financial applications where downtime directly translates to lost revenue. Offers dedicated nodes and advanced security features.
03
Helius: Solana-Native Optimization
Specific advantage: Deep integration with Solana's architecture, offering tools like the Enhanced WebSocket API for real-time transaction updates and Geyser plugins for custom data ingestion. This matters for Solana-native DeFi and NFT projects requiring sub-second latency and custom indexers.
< 0.5s
Notification Latency
04
Helius: Developer Experience & Cost
Specific advantage: Transparent, usage-based pricing and free tier for the Solana devnet. This matters for early-stage startups and rapid prototyping where cost predictability and easy onboarding are critical. APIs are tailored for common Solana patterns (e.g., NFT mints, DEX interactions).
05
QuickNode: Cons - Solana Depth
Specific trade-off: While broad, its Solana-specific tooling (e.g., for parsing complex transaction formats or custom indexing) is less specialized than a native provider. This can lead to higher development overhead for advanced Solana use cases compared to Helius.
06
Helius: Cons - Chain Agnosticism
Specific trade-off: Exclusive focus on Solana. This matters for teams planning multi-chain expansion (e.g., launching on Ethereum L2s), as it necessitates managing a second RPC provider, increasing operational complexity and potential integration costs.
pros-cons-b
QuickNode vs Helius: Solana vs Ethereum
Helius: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Helius is a Solana-native powerhouse, while QuickNode offers multi-chain breadth.
01
Helius: Solana-Native Performance
Ultra-low latency access: Built from the ground up for Solana's high-throughput architecture, offering sub-100ms response times for RPC calls. This matters for high-frequency trading bots, real-time NFT mints, and gaming applications where every millisecond counts.
02
Helius: Enhanced Solana APIs
Proprietary data endpoints: Offers unique APIs like getAsset for compressed NFTs and getPriorityFeeEstimate for optimal transaction pricing. This matters for protocols building on Solana's state compression or requiring precise fee management, providing capabilities beyond standard JSON-RPC.
03
Helius: Cons - Ecosystem Lock-in
Solana-only service: While a strength for performance, it's a limitation for multi-chain strategies. This matters for CTOs managing portfolios across Ethereum L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism), Avalanche, or Polygon, forcing them to manage multiple RPC providers and increasing operational complexity.
04
Helius: Cons - Maturity & Tooling
Younger ecosystem: Compared to Ethereum's established tooling (The Graph, Alchemy's suite), Solana's developer tools are still evolving. This matters for teams requiring deep, battle-tested observability, debugging suites, and extensive historical data archives that are more mature on Ethereum-focused platforms.
05
QuickNode: Multi-Chain Dominance
One-stop infrastructure: Supports 30+ chains including Ethereum, its L2s, Solana, and other EVMs. This matters for enterprises and protocols operating in a multi-chain world, reducing vendor sprawl and providing a unified dashboard, billing, and support experience across all networks.
06
QuickNode: Enterprise Reliability
Proven global infrastructure: Offers 99.9% SLA, dedicated endpoints, and advanced features like transaction tracing and debug APIs across all supported chains. This matters for institutions, exchanges, and wallets where uptime, compliance, and deep chain introspection are non-negotiable requirements.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: Choose Based on Your Use Case
QuickNode (Ethereum) for DeFi
Verdict: The established standard for security and composability. Strengths: Unmatched ecosystem of battle-tested protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Compound. High Total Value Locked (TVL) provides deep liquidity. Superior security model with mature tooling (Hardhat, Foundry) and extensive audits. EVM standardization ensures seamless integration with existing infrastructure like MetaMask and The Graph. Considerations: High gas fees during congestion can impact user experience for micro-transactions. Slower block times (~12 seconds) and finality compared to Solana.
Helius (Solana) for DeFi
Verdict: High-performance contender for low-fee, high-throughput applications. Strengths: Sub-second block times and ~400ms finality enable near-instant trade execution. Transaction fees are fractions of a cent, ideal for high-frequency trading and novel DeFi mechanics. Native support for parallel execution (Sealevel) improves scalability. Protocols like Jupiter (DEX aggregator) and Kamino (lending) leverage this speed. Considerations: Ecosystem is younger with less proven economic security. Composability can be more complex due to state architecture. Reliance on centralized RPC providers like Helius for optimal performance is higher.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between QuickNode and Helius is a strategic decision between a multi-chain Swiss Army knife and a Solana-native performance specialist.
QuickNode excels at providing a standardized, reliable gateway to multiple blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and over 30 others. Its strength lies in operational consistency and a unified API experience, making it ideal for teams managing multi-chain applications or requiring predictable, enterprise-grade SLAs. For example, its global network of bare-metal nodes ensures high uptime and low latency for high-frequency trading bots or NFT marketplaces operating across ecosystems.
Helius takes a fundamentally different approach by being a Solana-native infrastructure provider. This deep specialization results in superior performance and access to Solana-specific features like the Geyser plugin for real-time account updates, enhanced RPC methods for compressed NFTs, and WebSocket connections that are critical for high-throughput DeFi applications. The trade-off is a singular focus; you choose Helius for Solana, not for a broader chain-agnostic strategy.
The key trade-off: If your priority is multi-chain flexibility, enterprise support, and a proven track record across ecosystems like Ethereum and its L2s, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize maximizing performance, accessing deep Solana tooling, and building applications that leverage the chain's unique 50k+ TPS architecture, choose Helius. Your stack's primary blockchain is the ultimate deciding factor.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall