QuickNode excels at raw performance and global scale, operating over 25 blockchain networks with a 99.9% SLA and sub-50ms response times. Its strength lies in a developer-first, self-serve platform optimized for high-throughput dApps and trading protocols. For example, its multi-chain support and dedicated node tiers are critical for projects like Uniswap or Aave that demand low-latency access to Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon.
QuickNode vs Figment: Infra Focus
Introduction: The Infrastructure Crossroads
A data-driven comparison of QuickNode and Figment, two leading RPC providers, to guide infrastructure decisions for high-stakes applications.
Figment takes a different approach by emphasizing institutional-grade security, compliance, and deep protocol expertise, particularly for proof-of-stake networks. This results in a trade-off: a more curated, enterprise-focused service model that may have a higher barrier to entry but provides unparalleled staking infrastructure, governance participation tools, and dedicated support for protocols like Cosmos, Polkadot, and Avalanche.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer velocity, multi-chain deployment, and cost-effective, high-performance RPCs, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize staking operations, protocol governance, and enterprise-grade security/compliance for PoS ecosystems, choose Figment.
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs and architects.
Choose QuickNode for Scale & Developer Velocity
Global low-latency network: 16+ global clusters with <50ms p95 latency. This matters for high-frequency trading bots and real-time analytics dashboards that cannot tolerate node sync delays.
Rapid prototyping: Instant access to 30+ chains via unified API, including Solana, Aptos, and Sui. Enables teams to test multi-chain strategies without managing separate node infrastructure.
Choose Figment for Security & Institutional Staking
Institutional-grade security: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 certified infrastructure with dedicated, air-gapped validators. This matters for regulated DeFi protocols and custodians requiring auditable, compliant node operations.
Staking-as-a-Service leader: One of the largest providers with $10B+ in assets staked across 40+ PoS networks. Critical for foundations managing treasuries or protocols needing reliable, non-custodial yield.
QuickNode's Trade-off: Cost at Scale
Pay-per-request pricing can become expensive for data-heavy applications like block explorers or NFT indexing services making millions of daily RPC calls. While powerful, the premium global network has a higher operational cost than regional providers.
Figment's Trade-off: Developer Experience
Primary focus on staking and security means their core RPC/API product, while robust, may lack the extensive middleware suite (e.g., Webhooks, Enhanced APIs) and self-serve agility that fast-moving dApp teams require for rapid iteration.
QuickNode vs Figment: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key technical specs, service levels, and commercial terms for blockchain node infrastructure.
| Metric / Feature | QuickNode | Figment |
|---|---|---|
Supported Blockchains | 40+ | 70+ |
Guaranteed Uptime SLA | 99.9% | 99.5% |
Archive Data Retention | Full history | Rolling 90 days |
Enterprise Support Tiers | ||
Free Tier Available | ||
Staking-as-a-Service | ||
Average Global Latency | < 50 ms | < 100 ms |
Dedicated Node Pricing (est.) | $300/month | $500/month |
QuickNode vs Figment: Infra Focus
A data-driven comparison of two leading enterprise-grade RPC providers. Evaluate based on performance, ecosystem support, and operational needs.
QuickNode Pro: Performance & Global Scale
Global low-latency network: 30+ geo-distributed clusters with sub-50ms P95 latency for Solana and EVM chains. This matters for high-frequency trading bots and real-time NFT minting platforms that cannot tolerate propagation delays.
QuickNode Con: Cost for Scale
Tiered pricing with premium add-ons: Advanced features like dedicated nodes, real-time alerts, and enhanced APIs (e.g., NFT API) require higher-tier plans. This matters for bootstrapped startups or protocols with unpredictable traffic spikes where cost predictability is critical.
Figment Pro: Staking & Governance Focus
Institutional-grade staking infrastructure: Deep expertise in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) protocols like Cosmos, Polkadot, and Solana, with dedicated support for governance participation. This matters for DAO treasuries and foundations managing validator operations and on-chain voting.
Figment Con: Breadth vs. Specialization
Ecosystem depth over universal breadth: While strong in PoS, their service and tooling for emerging EVM L2s (e.g., Base, Blast) or non-EVM chains (e.g., Sui, Aptos) may not match the deployment speed of broader infra providers. This matters for multi-chain dApps seeking a single provider for all chains.
Figment: Strengths and Trade-offs
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs evaluating enterprise-grade node infrastructure.
Developer-First Tooling & Support
Specific advantage: Deep protocol expertise with dedicated developer advocates and comprehensive documentation for 40+ networks, including Cosmos, Solana, and Polkadot. This matters for teams building complex dApps who need direct access to protocol specialists and SDKs like DataHub.
Staking & Governance Specialization
Specific advantage: A core business built on institutional staking services, providing secure, non-custodial validation and governance participation tools. This matters for protocols and DAOs that require robust delegation infrastructure and active on-chain governance management.
Trade-off: Breadth vs. Depth
Specific consideration: While supporting 40+ chains, the core infrastructure focus is on major Proof-of-Stake ecosystems. For teams requiring ultra-high-performance nodes for Ethereum L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism) or newer L1s (Sui, Aptos), QuickNode's broader, performance-tuned network of 28+ chains may offer more consistent global latency.
Trade-off: Product Velocity & API Features
Specific consideration: Figment's roadmap is closely tied to validator and staking ecosystem growth. Teams prioritizing rapid access to the latest API enhancements (e.g., NFT APIs, enhanced debug traces, WebSocket streams) may find QuickNode's aggressive feature release cycle and dedicated API suite more aligned with fast-paced development needs.
Decision Framework: Choose Based on Your Use Case
QuickNode for DeFi
Verdict: The robust, enterprise-grade choice for high-value, multi-chain applications. Strengths: Unmatched reliability and global node distribution ensure 99.9%+ uptime for critical operations like arbitrage, liquidations, and oracle price feeds. Advanced APIs (e.g., Token API, NFT API) simplify building complex dashboards for protocols like Aave or Uniswap. Superior support for private transactions and dedicated endpoints is crucial for MEV protection and secure contract deployments. Considerations: Premium pricing model; overkill for simple indexers.
Figment for DeFi
Verdict: The staking and governance specialist, ideal for protocols with native token economies. Strengths: Deep expertise in Proof-of-Stake infrastructure, offering best-in-class staking-as-a-service, validator operations, and governance delegation tools. Datahub's APIs provide reliable access for building governance dashboards or integrating with protocols like Lido or Compound. Strong focus on security and compliance for institutional token holders. Considerations: Less emphasis on high-frequency trading optimizations compared to QuickNode.
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture and Performance
A data-driven comparison of QuickNode and Figment's core architectures, performance benchmarks, and technical trade-offs for CTOs and architects.
Yes, QuickNode typically offers lower latency for standard RPC calls. Benchmarks across Ethereum and Solana mainnets show QuickNode's global edge network delivers median response times under 50ms, while Figment's enterprise-grade nodes prioritize stability, often resulting in 80-120ms. For high-frequency trading bots or real-time dashboards, QuickNode's speed is a key advantage. However, Figment's architecture is optimized for consistent uptime and data integrity during network congestion, which may be preferable for staking services or institutional reporting.
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between QuickNode and Figment hinges on your project's stage, scale, and tolerance for infrastructure management.
QuickNode excels at providing high-performance, self-serve infrastructure for developers prioritizing speed and global reach. Its platform is built for scale, offering dedicated RPC endpoints, multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, etc.), and a 99.9%+ SLA. For example, its global network of bare-metal nodes delivers sub-100ms latencies, which is critical for high-frequency trading bots or real-time NFT minting applications. The extensive suite of add-ons, like enhanced APIs and data indexing tools, allows for rapid feature development without significant DevOps overhead.
Figment takes a different approach by focusing on comprehensive institutional-grade staking, governance, and data services, with a strong emphasis on security and compliance. This results in a more consultative, white-glove service model ideal for protocols and enterprises needing deep chain-specific expertise (e.g., Cosmos ecosystem, Ethereum, Polkadot) and managed validator operations. The trade-off is a less self-serve, potentially higher-touch engagement model compared to QuickNode's instant-access dashboard, which may impact initial setup speed for simple RPC needs.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer velocity, global low-latency performance, and a vast array of self-service tools for building scalable dApps, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize institutional security, hands-on staking and governance support, and deep protocol-specific partnership for treasury or foundation needs, choose Figment. For most fast-moving development teams and applications requiring reliable, high-throughput node access, QuickNode's performance and breadth present the most versatile foundation.
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.