Alchemy excels at providing a robust, unified API layer for high-throughput applications because of its global node infrastructure and proprietary Supernode technology. For example, its Ethereum mainnet RPC service consistently delivers sub-100ms response times and maintains >99.9% uptime, supporting protocols like OpenSea and Aave that process billions in daily transaction volume. This makes it the de facto choice for applications where developer experience and API reliability are paramount.
LABS
Comparisons
Alchemy vs P2P.org: Infra Platforms
A data-driven comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating blockchain infrastructure providers. We analyze core services, performance, cost structures, and ideal use cases to inform your technical stack decision.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Infrastructure Layer Decision
Choosing between Alchemy and P2P.org is a foundational decision that dictates your application's scalability, reliability, and cost structure.
P2P.org takes a different approach by focusing on a decentralized, non-custodial validator network and institutional-grade staking services. This results in a trade-off: while its core strength is in secure, trust-minimized staking for assets like Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos, its developer-facing RPC and node APIs are often seen as secondary to its staking-as-a-service platform, which secures over $4 billion in total value locked (TVL).
The key trade-off: If your priority is a developer-first API suite with superior documentation, WebSocket support, and enhanced APIs (like alchemy_getTokenBalances), choose Alchemy. If you prioritize non-custodial staking infrastructure, multi-chain validator operations, and building financial primitives around Proof-of-Stake security, choose P2P.org.
tldr-summary
Alchemy vs P2P.org
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for enterprise infrastructure selection.
01
Alchemy's Strength: Developer-First Tooling
Superior API & SDK ecosystem: Offers enhanced APIs (Transfers, Webhooks, Notify) and robust SDKs for Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana. This matters for teams building complex dApps that require real-time data, transaction simulation, and advanced debugging tools.
99.9%
API Uptime SLA
02
Alchemy's Strength: Enterprise-Grade Scale
Proven at massive scale: Processes billions of requests daily for top protocols like OpenSea and Aave. This matters for applications with high, unpredictable traffic that demand consistent performance and deep historical data access.
10M+
Daily RPC Requests
03
P2P.org's Strength: Multi-Chain Staking & Validation
Non-custodial staking as a core service: Operates validators across 40+ networks (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos). This matters for protocols and DAOs needing to stake treasury assets or for users seeking a unified staking dashboard with institutional-grade security.
40+
Supported Networks
04
P2P.org's Strength: Cost-Effective Node Operations
Lower operational overhead: Provides managed node infrastructure with a focus on staking economics and MEV optimization. This matters for projects that run their own validators or nodes and want to maximize rewards while minimizing slashing risk and hardware costs.
05
Choose Alchemy For
Building and scaling production dApps. If your primary need is a high-performance RPC, advanced APIs for wallet activity, NFT data, and seamless integration with frameworks like Hardhat and Foundry, Alchemy is the industry standard.
06
Choose P2P.org For
Institutional staking and multi-chain node management. If your core requirement is securing Proof-of-Stake assets, earning yields on treasury holdings, or deploying reliable nodes across Cosmos, Ethereum L2s, or other ecosystems with a unified interface.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Alchemy vs P2P.org: Infra Platforms
Direct comparison of core infrastructure metrics and features for CTOs and architects.
| Metric / Feature | Alchemy | P2P.org |
|---|---|---|
Supported Chains | Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Solana, 20+ total | Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, Polkadot, Avalanche, 40+ total |
Core Service Focus | Developer APIs & Node Infrastructure | Staking-as-a-Service & Node Operations |
Enterprise SLA Guarantee | ||
Historical Data Access | Full archive nodes, 100% data completeness | Varies by chain, typically 30-90 days |
Enhanced APIs | Supernode APIs (Transfers, NFTs), Webhooks | Staking APIs, Governance APIs |
Global Node Distribution | 15+ regions, multi-cloud | 80+ regions, bare-metal emphasis |
Pricing Model | Pay-as-you-go & custom enterprise | Custom enterprise, often stake-based |
pros-cons-a
STRENGTHS AND TRADE-OFFS
Alchemy vs P2P.org: Infra Platforms
A data-driven comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure. Key differentiators in reliability, feature depth, and cost structure.
01
Alchemy's Core Strength: Developer Experience & Reliability
Industry-leading uptime and tooling: 99.99% SLA for core APIs, with proprietary Supernode architecture. Offers the most comprehensive suite of developer tools, including Enhanced APIs (Transfers, Token, NFT), Webhooks, and Mempool streaming. This matters for high-throughput dApps (e.g., OpenSea, 0x) requiring absolute reliability and advanced data indexing.
99.99%
SLA Uptime
02
Alchemy's Trade-off: Cost & Centralization
Premium pricing model: Pay-as-you-go and enterprise plans can become expensive at scale, especially for high RPC call volumes. Relies on a centralized, managed infrastructure stack, which is a consideration for protocols prioritizing decentralized infra or cost-sensitive scaling.
03
P2P.org's Core Strength: Validator-Centric & Cost-Effective
Deep validator expertise with integrated staking: A top-10 Ethereum validator by stake, offering seamless non-custodial staking and MEV-boost services. Provides a unified platform for both node infrastructure (RPC, archival) and staking operations. This matters for protocols and DAOs (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool) that need to manage treasury staking alongside their dApp's node needs.
Top 10
Ethereum Validator
04
P2P.org's Trade-off: Breadth of Developer Tools
Focus on core node services: While reliable, the suite of enhanced APIs and specialized developer tooling (e.g., NFT APIs, complex event filtering) is less extensive than Alchemy's. This matters for rapidly iterating consumer dApps that rely on turnkey solutions for data aggregation and user analytics.
pros-cons-b
Alchemy vs P2P.org
P2P.org: Strengths and Trade-offs
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure.
01
P2P.org: Non-Custodial Staking & Validation
Core competency in institutional staking: Operates 40,000+ validators across 40+ networks (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos). This matters for protocols and DAOs needing secure, compliant delegation without custody risk. Offers MEV-boost relays and slashing insurance.
40+
Networks
$4B+
Staked Assets
02
P2P.org: Enterprise-Grade Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure with dedicated, air-gapped validator setups. This matters for regulated entities (tradfi, large funds) requiring audited operational security, geographic distribution, and 24/7 monitoring with <99.9% uptime guarantees.
SOC 2
Certified
99.9%
Uptime SLA
03
Alchemy: Superior Developer Experience & Tooling
Industry-leading APIs and SDKs: Powers 70%+ of top dApps with enhanced APIs (NFT, Transfers) and robust Webhooks. The Alchemy Build suite (Notify, Mempool) accelerates development. This matters for teams prioritizing rapid prototyping and scaling complex applications like OpenSea and 0x.
70%
Top dApps
<100ms
Avg. Latency
04
Alchemy: Unmatched Ecosystem & Multi-Chain Reach
Broadest chain support and deepest liquidity access: Native APIs for Ethereum, L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base), Polygon, and Solana. Integrates with The Graph for indexing and offers seamless cross-chain capabilities. This matters for protocols deploying across multiple ecosystems or needing aggregated liquidity data.
15+
Networks
$200B+
TVL Served
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which Platform
Alchemy for Developers
Verdict: The premier choice for core application development and debugging. Strengths: Unmatched developer experience with robust APIs (Enhanced, NFT, Transfers), comprehensive SDKs (Alchemy SDK, AA SDK), and superior tooling (Webhook Notifications, Mempool Streaming). The Alchemy Notify suite and Debug API drastically reduce development time for complex DeFi and NFT logic. Seamless integration with frameworks like Hardhat and Foundry. Considerations: Higher cost structure for premium features and high-volume RPC calls.
P2P.org for Developers
Verdict: A strong alternative for cost-sensitive projects and node operations. Strengths: Competitive Free Tier and transparent, volume-based pricing. Offers a solid foundation of core JSON-RPC methods. The P2P.org Validator services provide a natural on-ramp for projects needing staking infrastructure alongside node access. Simpler, more predictable billing. Considerations: Lacks the depth of specialized APIs and advanced developer tooling (e.g., no native NFT API, limited debugging endpoints).
ALCHEMY VS P2P.ORG
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture and Performance
A data-driven comparison of two leading Web3 infrastructure platforms, focusing on architectural decisions, performance benchmarks, and the trade-offs that matter for enterprise-grade applications.
Yes, Alchemy generally offers faster global RPC response times. Alchemy's proprietary Supernode architecture and global edge network are optimized for low-latency data retrieval, often delivering sub-100ms p95 latency. P2P.org, while reliable, uses a more distributed validator-based infrastructure that can prioritize consensus participation over raw API speed, leading to slightly higher average latencies in the 150-300ms range for complex queries.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown of the core trade-offs between Alchemy's comprehensive managed services and P2P.org's staking-centric infrastructure.
Alchemy excels at providing a unified, developer-first API suite for high-throughput dApps because of its deep investment in node reliability and global distribution. For example, its Supernode infrastructure consistently delivers 99.9%+ uptime and sub-100ms latency across chains like Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum, abstracting away the complexities of direct node management. This makes it the default choice for protocols like OpenSea and Aave, which require robust, scalable data access and notification systems (WebSockets) without operational overhead.
P2P.org takes a different approach by anchoring its platform on non-custodial staking-as-a-service, with node infrastructure supporting this core offering. This results in a trade-off: while its validator services for networks like Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos are top-tier—securing billions in TVL—its general-purpose JSON-RPC APIs are more utilitarian, focusing on reliability for staking operations rather than the extensive tooling suite (e.g., Enhanced APIs, Mempool streaming) offered by Alchemy. Their strength is deep integration with proof-of-stake economics.
The key trade-off: If your priority is building and scaling a complex dApp with minimal infra debt, choose Alchemy. Its battle-tested APIs, superior developer tooling (Alchemy SDK, Notify), and multi-chain support accelerate time-to-market. If you prioritize maximizing yield from protocol treasuries or building products deeply integrated with validator economics, choose P2P.org. Its non-custodial staking infrastructure, MEV optimization, and governance participation tools provide strategic advantages that a generic RPC provider cannot match.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall