Alchemy vs BlockPI: EVM vs Aptos

Unmatched ecosystem breadth: Supports Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and 10+ other EVM chains. This matters for projects building multi-chain dApps or requiring deep liquidity from established L1/L2 networks like Uniswap, Aave, or OpenSea.

Native Aptos architecture: Built from the ground up for the Move-based Aptos blockchain, offering lower latency and higher reliability for Aptos-native calls than generalized providers. This matters for projects like Pontem Network, Econia, or Aries Market that require optimal performance on Aptos.

Comprehensive product suite: Beyond RPCs, offers the Alchemy SDK, enhanced APIs (Transfers, NFTs), and powerful debugging tools like Alchemy Debug Trace. This matters for teams that need to accelerate development, monitor complex transactions, and reduce time-to-market.

Transparent, usage-based pricing: Often more cost-effective for high-throughput Aptos applications compared to premium EVM providers. Offers flexible node configurations and dedicated endpoints. This matters for high-frequency trading protocols or gaming dApps on Aptos with predictable, scalable costs.

Proven 99.9%+ SLA and global edge network: Trusted by top protocols like OpenSea and 0x for mission-critical reads and writes. Features like Webhook Alerts and Notify API provide real-time monitoring. This matters for applications where uptime and data consistency are non-negotiable.

Deep Aptos protocol expertise: Direct engagement with the Aptos core dev community and early access to new features like Aptos Objects. This matters for projects pushing the limits of the MoveVM or requiring close partnership with infrastructure experts on a newer, evolving chain.

Deep EVM Integration: Supports 20+ chains including Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum. Offers specialized APIs like alchemy_getTokenBalances and trace_block. This matters for DeFi and NFT projects requiring rich on-chain data and historical state.

Proven Scale & Reliability: Processes 300B+ requests/month with >99.9% uptime. This matters for high-traffic dApps where reliability is non-negotiable.

Extensive Tooling Suite: Bundles with Alchemy SDK, Notify webhooks, Mempool watcher, and Enhanced APIs. This matters for teams wanting an all-in-one platform to accelerate development.

Massive Developer Adoption: Used by 70%+ of top Ethereum dApps (Uniswap, OpenSea). This matters for CTOs seeking a battle-tested, community-vetted provider.

EVM-Centric: Limited first-party support for non-EVM chains (e.g., Solana, Aptos). This matters for teams building multi-chain or Aptos-native applications.

Pricing Complexity: Enterprise-tier pricing can be opaque for high-volume use cases. This matters for budget-conscious VPs needing predictable, scalable costs.

Native Aptos & Sui Infrastructure: Built from the ground up for Move-based chains, offering optimized RPC endpoints and indexers. This matters for protocols launching on Aptos or Sui who need a provider that understands the Move VM.

High-Performance Architecture: Leverages a global distributed node network for low-latency access. This matters for real-time trading or gaming dApps requiring sub-second finality.

Pay-As-You-Go Model: Transparent pricing based on request volume, often more granular than flat-rate enterprise plans. This matters for startups and projects with variable traffic.

Multi-Chain Support (EVM included): Provides services for Aptos, Sui, and major EVM chains (Ethereum, BSC). This matters for teams operating across both EVM and Move ecosystems.

Smaller Market Share: Less proven at the extreme scale of Alchemy's top-tier EVM traffic. This matters for CTOs who prioritize vendor stability above all else.

Younger Ecosystem: Developer tools and SDKs are less mature compared to Alchemy's extensive suite. This matters for teams that rely heavily on pre-built abstractions and plugins.

Market leader for Ethereum & EVM chains: Processes over $200B in annualized on-chain transaction value. This matters for protocols requiring deep liquidity, extensive tooling (like Alchemy's NFT API, Notify webhooks), and a proven track record with giants like OpenSea and Uniswap.

Unmatched developer experience: Features like debug tracing, Mempool streaming, and the most comprehensive documentation reduce integration time. This matters for teams prioritizing rapid iteration and leveraging the full EVM ecosystem of wallets (MetaMask), oracles (Chainlink), and frameworks (Hardhat).

Higher cost structure for scale: Pay-as-you-go pricing can become expensive for high-throughput applications (>100M requests/month). This matters for bootstrapped projects or those with unpredictable, spiky traffic patterns where BlockPI's subscription model may offer better predictability.

First-mover in Move-based chains: Offers optimized, low-latency RPC for Aptos (<100ms p95 latency) and Sui. This matters for teams building on these high-performance L1s who need a provider with deep protocol-level expertise and dedicated infrastructure.

Simple subscription model: Fixed monthly fees for high request volumes (e.g., 300M requests/month plans). This matters for enterprises and high-growth dApps requiring cost certainty and unlimited requests without overage charges.

Less mature EVM offering: While supporting Ethereum, Polygon, and BSC, its tooling (e.g., WebSocket stability, archive data depth) lags behind Alchemy's. This matters for complex DeFi applications on EVM chains that require advanced indexing and real-time data feeds.