Aave excels at security, deep liquidity, and multi-chain deployment because of its battle-tested, community-governed codebase and its status as a DeFi blue chip. For example, its Ethereum v3 market holds over $12B in Total Value Locked (TVL), offering unparalleled asset diversity and robust risk parameters for major assets like ETH, USDC, and wBTC. Its portal architecture and GHO stablecoin further cement its position as a full-stack liquidity layer.
LABS
Comparisons
Aave vs Solend: Lending Liquidity
A technical comparison of Aave and Solend, analyzing liquidity depth, ecosystem dependencies, and architectural trade-offs for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction
A data-driven comparison of Aave and Solend, the leading lending protocols on Ethereum and Solana, to guide infrastructure decisions.
Solend takes a different approach by optimizing for speed, low cost, and Solana-native integration. This results in a trade-off between the extensive, conservative security audits of Ethereum L1 and the raw performance of a high-throughput L1. Solend leverages Solana's sub-second block times and sub-$0.01 transaction fees to enable near-instantaneous liquidations and a seamless user experience, currently managing over $600M in TVL as the dominant lending venue on its chain.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum security, institutional-grade risk frameworks, and deploying across multiple ecosystems (Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche), choose Aave. If you prioritize ultra-low latency, minimal transaction costs, and building exclusively within the high-performance Solana stack, choose Solend.
tldr-summary
AAVE VS SOLEND
TL;DR: Key Differentiators
Aave dominates with deep liquidity and institutional-grade features, while Solend offers a streamlined, high-speed experience for the Solana ecosystem.
01
Choose Aave for Institutional & Cross-Chain Depth
Multi-chain liquidity hub: Deployed on 7+ networks (Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche). $12B+ TVL provides superior capital efficiency and lower slippage for large positions. Features like risk-adjustable rates and permissioned pools cater to institutional needs. This matters for protocols requiring deep, stable liquidity or building on multiple chains.
$12B+
Aggregate TVL
7+
Networks
03
Choose Solend for Native Solana Speed & Cost
Sub-second transactions & sub-penny fees: Built for Solana's high-throughput architecture, enabling near-instant loan origination and liquidation. ~$0.0001 average transaction cost makes micro-transactions and frequent position management viable. This matters for high-frequency strategies, NFT collateralization, or user experiences where speed and cost are critical.
< $0.001
Avg. Tx Cost
~400ms
Tx Finality
LENDING LIQUIDITY HEAD-TO-HEAD
Feature Comparison: Aave vs Solend
Direct comparison of key technical and market metrics for DeFi lending protocols.
| Metric | Aave | Solend |
|---|---|---|
Total Value Locked (TVL) | $12.5B | $450M |
Supported Networks | Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, etc. (10+) | Solana |
Avg. Borrowing APY (USDC) | ~8.5% | ~12.0% |
Native Stablecoin (e.g., GHO, USDY) | GHO | USDY |
Isolated Markets / Risk Pools | ||
Flash Loans | ||
Governance Token | AAVE | SLND |
pros-cons-a
PROTOCOL COMPARISON
Aave vs Solend: Lending Liquidity
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs choosing a lending protocol foundation. Data as of Q1 2024.
01
Aave: Multi-Chain Dominance
Largest TVL and Market Reach: Over $12B in TVL across 7+ networks (Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche). This matters for protocols requiring deep, established liquidity and cross-chain user access.
- Standard Setter: Aave V3 is the de facto liquidity layer for major ecosystems.
- Institutional Trust: Audited by top firms and integrated with institutional custodians.
$12B+
Total TVL
7+
Networks
03
Solend: Solana Native Performance
Ultra-Low Latency & Cost: Sub-second block times and fees under $0.001. This matters for high-frequency trading strategies, leveraged yield farming, or applications where user experience is paramount.
- Native Integration: Deeply optimized for Solana's parallel execution, enabling unique features like instant liquidity oracle updates.
- Simplified UX: Clean, focused interface reduces integration complexity.
< $0.001
Avg. Tx Cost
400ms
Block Time
pros-cons-b
PROTOCOL COMPARISON
Aave vs Solend: Lending Liquidity
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs and architects choosing a lending protocol foundation.
01
Aave's Multi-Chain Dominance
Established scale and security: Deployed across 7+ networks (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum) with over $12B in TVL. Audited by top firms like OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits. This matters for institutional-grade applications requiring maximum security and deep liquidity across ecosystems.
$12B+
Aggregate TVL
7+
Networks
02
Aave's Feature Depth
Advanced risk & capital efficiency: Features like eMode for correlated assets, stable rate borrowing, and GHO stablecoin integration. This matters for sophisticated DeFi strategies and protocols building complex financial products on top of the lending layer.
03
Solend's Solana Performance
Native speed and low cost: Built for Solana's high-throughput architecture, offering sub-second transactions and fees under $0.001. This matters for high-frequency trading bots, social/gamified dApps, and any use case where user experience depends on instant, feeless interactions.
< $0.001
Avg. Tx Cost
< 1 sec
Finality
04
Solend's Focused Integration
Deep Solana ecosystem synergy: Tight integration with Serum DEX order books, Jupiter aggregator, and leading Solana wallets. This matters for teams fully committed to the Solana stack who prioritize seamless composability with other native protocols over cross-chain flexibility.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
User Scenarios: When to Choose Which
Aave for DeFi Builders
Verdict: The default choice for multi-chain, battle-tested security and deep liquidity. Strengths:
- Battle-Tested Contracts: Aave's V3 codebase is the most audited and forked in DeFi, with a proven security record across multiple chains (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base).
- Deep, Multi-Chain Liquidity: Over $12B TVL provides immense borrowing depth and stability for large institutional positions.
- Advanced Features: Offers sophisticated risk parameters, isolation mode for new assets, and permissioned pools for compliant institutions. Considerations: Higher gas costs on Ethereum L1 and a more complex governance process for listing new assets.
Solend for DeFi Builders
Verdict: The premier choice for high-throughput, low-cost applications on Solana. Strengths:
- Solana-Native Performance: Sub-second block times and sub-$0.001 transaction fees enable novel, fast-paced lending applications.
- Developer Experience: Simple, composable SDKs and a streamlined on-chain governance model for rapid iteration.
- Capital Efficiency: High leverage loops and integrations with Serum/Orca for seamless margin trading strategies. Considerations: Ecosystem risk is tied to Solana's uptime and security. TVL (~$300M) is substantial but less diversified than Aave's.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict and Final Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown to guide your protocol's choice between the Ethereum-native liquidity giant and the Solana-native speed specialist.
Aave excels at providing deep, battle-tested liquidity and unparalleled security within the broader Ethereum ecosystem. Its multi-chain deployment across Ethereum, Polygon, and Avalanche, combined with over $12 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL), creates a robust and reliable liquidity backbone for institutional-grade protocols. Its governance model, powered by the AAVE token and decentralized autonomous organization (Aave DAO), offers mature risk parameter management and a proven track record of handling market stress events, making it the default choice for risk-averse builders prioritizing asset safety and cross-chain composability with protocols like Uniswap and Curve.
Solend takes a radically different approach by leveraging Solana's high throughput and low transaction fees to optimize for capital efficiency and user experience. Its architecture enables near-instantaneous liquidations and oracle updates, which allows for higher loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and more aggressive lending markets. This results in a trade-off: you gain superior speed and lower costs for users, but you inherit the technical and consensus risks of the Solana network itself. Its TVL, while significant on Solana, is a fraction of Aave's, reflecting its narrower ecosystem focus but also allowing for more agile product iterations tailored to Solana-native assets like mSOL and JitoSOL.
The key trade-off is between ecosystem breadth and technical performance. If your priority is maximum security, deep liquidity, and Ethereum-centric composability, choose Aave. It is the institutional standard. If you prioritize sub-second transactions, sub-penny fees, and are building exclusively within the high-performance Solana stack, choose Solend. It offers a seamless, optimized experience for users and developers native to that chain.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall