Managed Subgraph Services (like The Graph Network, SubQuery, or Goldsky) excel at operational simplicity and global performance. They abstract away the complexities of node operation, indexing orchestration, and query load balancing, offering a 99.9%+ SLA. For example, The Graph Network's decentralized network serves over 1 trillion queries monthly, providing built-in redundancy and pay-as-you-go query pricing via GRT.
LABS
Comparisons
Managed Subgraph Services vs Self-Hosted Graph Node
A technical analysis comparing hosted subgraph platforms like The Graph Network, SubQuery, and Goldsky against running your own Graph Node. We evaluate operational overhead, cost, performance, and security for engineering leaders.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Subgraph Infrastructure Decision
Choosing between a managed service and self-hosted Graph Node is a foundational decision that dictates your team's operational overhead, cost structure, and scalability.
Self-Hosted Graph Node takes a different approach by providing full control over your data pipeline. This results in a significant trade-off: you gain sovereignty over indexing logic, hardware specs, and upgrade schedules, but you inherit the operational burden of managing PostgreSQL databases, IPFS nodes, and Ethereum clients, which can require a dedicated DevOps team.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer velocity, predictable OpEx, and leveraging a battle-tested global CDN, choose a managed service. If you prioritize absolute data control, custom hardware optimization, or have strict regulatory requirements for data locality, choose self-hosted. The decision often hinges on whether your engineering budget is better spent on core protocol development or infrastructure management.
tldr-summary
Managed Service vs Self-Hosted
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
Core trade-offs between operational simplicity and architectural control for your subgraph infrastructure.
01
Managed Service: Operational Simplicity
Zero infrastructure management: No DevOps overhead for node setup, RPC failover, or database scaling. Services like The Graph's Hosted Service or Subgraph Studio handle uptime, indexing speed, and query performance. This matters for teams with limited DevOps resources or those needing to launch subgraphs in days, not weeks.
99.9%
Typical SLA
< 1 min
Deploy Time
03
Self-Hosted: Full Control & Customization
Architectural sovereignty: Complete control over the Graph Node version, database (PostgreSQL), and indexing logic. You can fork and modify the node, implement custom data sources, and integrate directly with any EVM or non-EVM chain. This matters for protocols with unique requirements, like indexing private chains or needing bespoke performance optimizations.
Any
Chain Support
Unlimited
Query Complexity
04
Self-Hosted: Cost & Data Privacy
Predictable costs and data isolation: Avoid per-query fees (GRT) and potential vendor lock-in. All data resides in your own infrastructure (AWS, GCP), which is critical for compliance-sensitive applications or high-volume indexing where network query costs would be prohibitive. This matters for enterprise backends, analytics pipelines, or protocols processing 10M+ events/day.
$0.01/1M
Est. Query Cost
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Managed Subgraph Services vs Self-Hosted Graph Node
Direct comparison of operational and technical metrics for The Graph indexing solutions.
| Metric / Feature | Managed Service (e.g., Subgraph Studio, Hosted Service) | Self-Hosted Graph Node |
|---|---|---|
Monthly Infrastructure Cost (Est.) | $200 - $2,000+ | $50 - $500+ |
Setup & Deployment Time | < 1 hour | 2 - 8 hours |
Uptime SLA Guarantee | 99.9% | null |
Requires DevOps/Infra Expertise | ||
Direct Node & Database Access | ||
Supported Chains (Beyond Ethereum) | 20+ (Polygon, Arbitrum, Base) | All Graph Node-compatible chains |
Automated Indexer Updates |
PREDICTABLE FEES VS HIDDEN OVERHEAD
Managed Subgraph Services vs Self-Hosted Graph Node: Cost Analysis
Direct comparison of total cost of ownership, operational complexity, and performance for indexing blockchain data.
| Cost & Operational Metric | Managed Service (e.g., The Graph, Subsquid) | Self-Hosted Graph Node |
|---|---|---|
Monthly Base Cost (Est.) | $300 - $2,000+ | $0 (Infrastructure Only) |
Infrastructure & DevOps Overhead | ||
Query Latency SLA Guarantee | ||
Indexing Speed (Blocks/sec) | 1,200+ | 500 - 800 (Typical) |
Team Size for Maintenance | 1-2 Engineers | 3-5 Engineers |
Uptime & Monitoring Responsibility | Provider | Your Team |
Cost Scaling with Query Volume | Predictable, per-query | Variable (Infra scaling) |
pros-cons-a
Managed vs Self-Hosted Graph Node
Managed Subgraph Services: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs and architects deciding on indexing infrastructure.
02
Managed Service: Built-in Reliability & Scale
Guaranteed uptime and performance: Providers offer SLAs (e.g., 99.9%+ uptime), automated failover, and global CDN caching. They manage indexing speed and query load scaling, which is critical for production dApps like Uniswap or Aave that require consistent, low-latency data access for thousands of users.
99.9%
Typical SLA
04
Self-Hosted: Predictable & Lower Long-Term Cost
No recurring query fees: After the initial setup cost, operational expenses are fixed (server costs). For high-query-volume applications (e.g., an analytics dashboard processing 10M+ queries/day), this can be significantly cheaper than the pay-per-query model of decentralized networks like The Graph Network.
$0
Marginal Query Cost
06
Self-Hosted: Protocol Agnostic & Future-Proof
Avoid vendor lock-in: Your indexing stack is independent of any single provider's roadmap or pricing changes. You can index any chain (including nascent L2s or non-EVM chains like Solana or Cosmos) that the open-source Graph Node supports, ensuring long-term flexibility.
pros-cons-b
MANAGED SERVICES VS. SELF-HOSTED
Self-Hosted Graph Node: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for The Graph's decentralized indexing layer at a glance.
01
Managed Service: Pros
Zero-ops indexing: Services like The Graph Network's hosted service or Chainbase handle node provisioning, indexing logic, and query routing. This matters for teams prioritizing developer velocity over infrastructure management.
99.9%
Typical SLA
Minutes
Deploy Time
02
Managed Service: Cons
Cost and lock-in: While free tiers exist, high-volume dApps (e.g., Uniswap, Aave) face unpredictable costs. You rely on the provider's roadmap and multi-chain support (e.g., for Base, Arbitrum, Polygon). This matters for budget-conscious or multi-chain native protocols.
Variable
Query Cost
03
Self-Hosted: Pros
Full control and cost predictability: Run your own Graph Node, Postgres, and IPFS. This enables custom data transformations, deterministic hosting costs, and independence from service outages. This matters for enterprise-grade applications requiring data sovereignty or complex subgraph logic.
Fixed
Infra Cost
04
Self-Hosted: Cons
Operational overhead: Requires dedicated DevOps to manage Ethereum/Polygon node sync, database maintenance (handling 1TB+ chains), and subgraph upgrades. This matters for lean teams without SRE resources or those needing instant global scaling.
Weeks
Setup & Tuning
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Managed Service (The Graph, Goldsky) for Speed
Verdict: The clear choice for rapid development and scaling. Strengths: Zero infrastructure overhead. Services like The Graph's Hosted Service and Goldsky provide instant subgraph deployment, automatic indexing, and global CDN caching. This translates to sub-second query latency from day one. For teams launching a new DeFi protocol (e.g., a Uniswap v4 fork) or NFT collection that needs real-time data dashboards, the managed path eliminates weeks of DevOps work. Trade-off: You accept the service's SLA and have less control over the underlying Graph Node version and database tuning.
Self-Hosted Graph Node for Speed
Verdict: Only if you require extreme, predictable low-latency and can invest heavily in infrastructure. Considerations: With a self-hosted cluster (using Postgres, IPFS nodes), you can optimize every layer for your specific chain and subgraph. This is critical for high-frequency trading dashboards or real-time gaming leaderboards where every millisecond counts. However, achieving and maintaining this performance requires dedicated SRE resources and deep knowledge of Graph Node, Postgres indexing, and blockchain RPC node performance.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between a managed service and self-hosting is a fundamental trade-off between operational overhead and control.
Managed Subgraph Services (like The Graph Network, SubQuery, or Goldsky) excel at developer velocity and operational reliability. They abstract away the complexities of running a Graph Node, indexing orchestration, and query infrastructure, offering >99.9% uptime SLAs and global CDN distribution. For example, a protocol like Uniswap or Aave can deploy a new subgraph and have it serving production queries in minutes, scaling automatically with user demand without dedicating DevOps resources.
Self-Hosted Graph Node takes a different approach by granting teams full sovereignty over their data pipeline. This results in complete control over indexing logic, upgrade schedules, hardware specs, and query performance tuning. The trade-off is significant: you must manage the entire stack—Postgres databases, IPFS nodes, Ethereum archive nodes—which requires deep expertise and can lead to weeks of setup and ongoing maintenance, often costing 2-3x more in engineering time than the cloud bill of a managed service.
The key trade-off: If your priority is speed-to-market, cost predictability, and eliminating DevOps burden, choose a Managed Service. This is ideal for startups, hackathon projects, or teams whose core competency is application logic, not infrastructure. If you prioritize maximum data sovereignty, custom indexing logic (beyond GraphQL), or have extreme query volume requirements, choose Self-Hosted. This path suits large, established protocols like Lido or Compound that have dedicated infra teams and regulatory needs to own their data stack.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall