GetBlock vs Infura: Monthly Request Packages

Industry-standard uptime: Backed by ConsenSys, with a proven track record for large-scale dApps like MetaMask and Uniswap. This matters for mission-critical production applications where 99.9%+ SLA is non-negotiable.

Native tooling suite: Seamless integration with MetaMask, Truffle, and Hardhat. Offers advanced features like the Trace API for debugging. This matters for Ethereum-native teams who want a frictionless dev experience within the ConsenSys ecosystem.

Extensive network support: Access to 50+ blockchains (Solana, Avalanche, TON) from a single API. This matters for cross-chain protocols and aggregators that need unified infrastructure without managing multiple vendor contracts.

Clear, request-based tiers: No complex credit systems. Plans like 400K requests/day for ~$299/month offer straightforward scaling. This matters for bootstrapped projects and startups needing to forecast infrastructure costs accurately.

Fixed-rate monthly plans with clear request limits (e.g., 5M requests for $299). No surprise overage charges. This matters for budget-conscious teams who need to forecast infrastructure costs accurately and avoid the variable billing of pay-as-you-go models.

Access to 50+ blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Cosmos, etc.) included in all paid tiers. This matters for protocols building cross-chain applications or teams managing multiple networks, reducing the need for separate provider contracts.

Smaller developer community and tooling integration compared to Infura. Fewer native SDKs and plugins for frameworks like Hardhat or Foundry. This matters for teams that prioritize battle-tested, community-vetted toolchains and extensive documentation.

Fewer enterprise-grade features like dedicated archive nodes, enhanced APIs (e.g., Trace, Debug), or real-time alerts. This matters for DeFi protocols or on-chain analysts requiring deep historical data and advanced transaction inspection.

Processes over 1 trillion requests monthly with 99.9%+ uptime SLA. The de facto standard used by MetaMask, Uniswap, and Compound. This matters for mission-critical production applications where network stability is non-negotiable.

Native integration with the Ethereum stack (Hardhat, Truffle, web3.js, ethers.js). First-party support for core Ethereum APIs and the fastest access to new EIPs. This matters for Ethereum-native teams who want seamless development and minimal configuration.

Pay-as-you-go model with compute units (CUs) that can lead to unpredictable bills. High-volume applications can see costs escalate quickly. This matters for high-TPS applications or public RPC endpoints where request volume is difficult to cap.

Separate, add-on pricing for non-Ethereum chains (Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum). Scaling across multiple networks significantly increases cost. This matters for multi-chain strategies where cost efficiency per chain is a key decision factor.

Consensus Infrastructure: Operated by ConsenSys, providing battle-tested infrastructure with 99.9%+ SLA and deep integration with the Ethereum ecosystem (MetaMask, Truffle). This matters for mission-critical dApps requiring maximum uptime and institutional trust.

Request Capping: The 'Unlimited' plan has undisclosed fair-use limits, with throttling and potential service degradation under heavy load. This matters for high-throughput applications (NFT mints, gaming) that need predictable, guaranteed request capacity.

Clear Request Tiers: Offers 40+ supported blockchains with explicit monthly request limits (e.g., 400K, 1M, 5M requests). This matters for multi-chain protocols or projects needing predictable, auditable costs without hidden throttling.

Emerging Player: While growing rapidly, it lacks the native tooling integrations (e.g., Hardhat plugins, MetaMesh) and decade-long track record of Infura. This matters for teams prioritizing vendor stability and seamless developer experience within the Ethereum stack.