Dedicated Node Providers like Chainstack, Blockdaemon, and Alchemy's dedicated tier excel at providing exclusive, high-performance infrastructure. This isolation guarantees consistent low-latency RPC calls, predictable throughput, and full control over node configuration. For example, a high-frequency DeFi protocol like Uniswap or a high-TPS gaming application requires the sub-100ms response times and 99.9%+ uptime SLA that dedicated nodes provide, ensuring user transactions are not bottlenecked by shared network noise.
LABS
Comparisons
Dedicated Node Providers vs Shared Node Providers
A technical and commercial analysis comparing single-tenant dedicated node infrastructure with multi-tenant shared node pools. This guide examines performance isolation, cost structures, and resource guarantees to help infrastructure decision-makers choose the right architecture.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Core Architectural Divide
The fundamental choice between dedicated and shared node providers defines your application's performance, cost, and control.
Shared Node Providers such as Infura's standard tier, QuickNode's shared plans, and public RPC endpoints take a different approach by pooling resources across multiple clients. This results in a significant trade-off: dramatically lower costs and instant scalability, but with variable performance and potential rate-limiting during network congestion. Shared infrastructure is the backbone for most dApp development, prototyping, and applications with sporadic, non-critical traffic, where cost-efficiency outweighs the need for guaranteed peak performance.
The key trade-off: If your priority is performance, security, and control for a production-grade application with heavy, predictable load, choose a dedicated node provider. If you prioritize rapid development, cost minimization, and scalability for applications with variable or lower traffic volumes, a shared node provider is the pragmatic starting point. The decision often evolves from shared to dedicated as your protocol's TVL, user base, and transaction volume grow.
tldr-summary
Dedicated vs. Shared Node Providers
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A rapid-fire comparison of the core trade-offs between dedicated and shared node services for enterprise blockchain applications.
01
Dedicated: Performance & Control
Guaranteed resources: Full, isolated CPU, RAM, and I/O for your application. This matters for high-frequency trading bots (e.g., on-chain arbitrage) and real-time analytics dashboards where latency and uptime are critical.
02
Dedicated: Security & Compliance
Isolated execution environment: No risk of "noisy neighbor" attacks or data leakage from other protocols. This is mandatory for institutional DeFi (e.g., Aave, Compound) and enterprise applications requiring audit trails and strict regulatory compliance (SOC2, GDPR).
03
Shared: Cost Efficiency
Fractional cost: Pay only for the requests you use (RPC calls), not for idle infrastructure. This matters for early-stage dApps, NFT projects, and wallets (e.g., MetaMask) where traffic is variable and capital efficiency is paramount.
04
Shared: Operational Simplicity
Zero infrastructure management: No need to handle node upgrades, chain reorganizations, or hardware failures. This is ideal for rapid prototyping, hackathons, and teams without dedicated DevOps who need to integrate with multiple chains (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum) quickly.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Dedicated vs. Shared Node Providers: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of performance, cost, and operational metrics for blockchain node infrastructure.
| Metric | Dedicated Node Provider | Shared Node Provider |
|---|---|---|
Node Resource Isolation | ||
Guaranteed Requests per Second (RPS) | 10,000+ | ~500 |
Avg. Request Latency (P95) | < 100 ms | 200-500 ms |
Monthly Cost (Est.) | $1,500 - $5,000+ | $0 - $300 |
Custom Configuration & Logs | ||
Multi-Region Deployment | ||
SLA Guarantee | 99.9% - 99.99% | 99.5% - 99.9% |
Time to Provision | 1-24 hours | < 5 minutes |
pros-cons-a
A Data-Driven Breakdown
Dedicated Node Providers: Pros and Cons
Choosing between dedicated and shared infrastructure is a foundational decision. This comparison uses real metrics to highlight the trade-offs for performance, security, and cost.
01
Dedicated: Performance & Reliability
Guaranteed resources: Full CPU, RAM, and I/O isolation ensures consistent performance, critical for high-frequency trading bots (e.g., on Uniswap or dYdX) or real-time indexers. Uptime SLAs often exceed 99.9%, minimizing API call failures and missed blocks.
99.9%+
Typical SLA
< 100ms
P99 Latency
02
Dedicated: Security & Control
Private endpoint isolation eliminates the "noisy neighbor" risk of shared RPCs. Enables custom security configurations (firewalls, access controls) and direct chain data access for auditors or on-chain analytics platforms like Dune or Flipside. Essential for protocols managing >$100M TVL.
03
Shared: Cost Efficiency
Dramatically lower cost structure: Pay-per-request models (e.g., Alchemy's Pay-As-You-Go) or free tiers from providers like Infura are viable for early-stage dApps, wallets, or projects with < 10K daily active users. No hardware management overhead reduces DevOps spend.
$0-$300/mo
Typical Startup Cost
04
Shared: Developer Velocity
Instant provisioning: Get an RPC endpoint in seconds via dashboard (e.g., QuickNode, GetBlock). Managed services include automatic failover, load balancing, and multi-region deployment without engineering effort. Ideal for hackathons, MVPs, or integrating Web3 into existing apps via Moralis or Thirdweb.
pros-cons-b
DEDICATED VS. SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE
Shared Node Providers: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating blockchain node infrastructure. Use this matrix to align your choice with protocol requirements and budget constraints.
01
Dedicated: Performance & Control
Guaranteed resources: Your instance is not shared, ensuring consistent RPC latency (< 100ms p95) and high request throughput. This is critical for high-frequency trading bots (e.g., on Uniswap) and real-time NFT minting platforms that cannot tolerate variable performance.
< 100ms
P95 Latency
99.9%+
SLA Uptime
02
Dedicated: Security & Compliance
Isolated environment reduces attack surface and meets strict regulatory requirements (e.g., SOC2, GDPR). Essential for institutional DeFi protocols (like Aave) and custodial services that must maintain audit trails and data sovereignty, avoiding risks from noisy neighbors.
03
Shared: Rapid Scalability & Cost
Elastic, pay-as-you-go pricing (e.g., Alchemy's Pay-As-You-Go plan) allows scaling from 0 to millions of requests per day without provisioning. Ideal for rapidly growing dApps and hackathon projects where upfront capital and capacity planning are barriers.
$0.01
Avg. Cost/1K Reqs
04
Shared: Managed Operations
Zero DevOps overhead: Providers like Infura and QuickNode handle node upgrades, chain reorganizations, and archive data. This allows smaller engineering teams to focus on core product development instead of infrastructure maintenance, significantly reducing time-to-market.
05
Dedicated: Custom Configuration
Full control over Geth/Erigon/Besu client settings, tracing options, and log verbosity. Necessary for blockchain analytics firms (e.g., Dune Analytics, Nansen) and indexing services (The Graph) that require deep, customized data access beyond standard JSON-RPC.
06
Shared: Global Redundancy
Built-in multi-region failover and load balancing across provider networks. Provides inherent resilience for global consumer dApps that need to guarantee availability from multiple geographic points-of-presence without managing complex orchestration.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose: Decision by Use Case
Dedicated Node Providers for High-Throughput Apps
Verdict: Mandatory for production-grade applications. Strengths: Guaranteed, uncapped request rates (RPS) and dedicated compute/storage prevent performance throttling during peak loads. Essential for high-frequency DEX arbitrage bots, real-time gaming backends, and NFT minting platforms where shared node latency or rate limits cause failed transactions and lost revenue. Providers like Chainstack, Alchemy, and QuickNode offer dedicated plans with SLAs.
Shared Node Providers for High-Throughput Apps
Verdict: A significant bottleneck and single point of failure. Strengths: None for this use case. Shared infrastructure introduces unpredictable latency and strict rate limits (e.g., 100-500 RPS). During network congestion, your application competes with others, leading to timeouts. Not suitable for any system where consistent, low-latency response is critical.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide infrastructure decisions based on performance, cost, and control requirements.
Dedicated Node Providers (e.g., Blockdaemon, Chainstack, Alchemy Dedicated) excel at providing uncontested, predictable performance and full administrative control because they allocate isolated hardware and network resources to a single client. For example, dedicated setups can guarantee 99.9%+ uptime SLAs, sub-100ms latency, and the ability to handle high-throughput applications like a high-frequency trading DApp on Solana or a large NFT mint on Ethereum without performance degradation from noisy neighbors.
Shared Node Providers (e.g., Infura, QuickNode, public RPCs) take a different approach by pooling infrastructure across multiple users. This results in a significant cost-efficiency and developer velocity trade-off, as you sacrifice some performance predictability for a managed, pay-as-you-go model. While shared endpoints can achieve high reliability (e.g., Infura's public Ethereum endpoint), they are susceptible to rate-limiting and shared-resource bottlenecks during network congestion, which can impact user experience for applications with spiky demand.
The key trade-off is control vs. convenience. If your priority is maximum performance, security, and compliance (e.g., a CEX, institutional DeFi protocol, or any application requiring custom node configurations, archival data access, or MEV strategies), choose a Dedicated Provider. If you prioritize rapid prototyping, cost predictability for low-to-mid traffic applications, and avoiding DevOps overhead (e.g., a new DeFi frontend, a wallet, or a hackathon project), a Shared Provider is the optimal starting point. The decision often follows a lifecycle: start shared for speed, migrate to dedicated for scale and sovereignty.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall