The Graph excels at providing high-performance, decentralized indexing for specific smart contracts via its subgraph ecosystem. Its architecture allows developers to define custom data schemas and mappings, resulting in sub-second query latency for applications like Uniswap and Aave. This specialization enables complex queries on specific protocol events, but requires developers to build and maintain their own subgraphs.
LABS
Comparisons
The Graph vs Covalent: Blockchain Data Indexing
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating The Graph's decentralized subgraph model against Covalent's unified API for querying historical blockchain data. We analyze architecture, cost, developer experience, and ideal use cases.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for On-Chain Data
A data-driven comparison of The Graph and Covalent, the leading protocols for querying and indexing blockchain data.
Covalent takes a different approach by providing a unified API that indexes the entire blockchain, offering a single endpoint for over 200+ supported networks. This results in a trade-off: while queries may not be as fast for hyper-specific use cases, you gain instant access to rich, normalized data like wallet balances, NFT metadata, and transaction histories without any upfront development work. Their Network ABI automatically decodes contract data.
The key trade-off: If your priority is ultra-low latency queries on a specific protocol's data and you have the engineering resources to build a subgraph, choose The Graph. If you prioritize rapid development, multi-chain support, and access to broad historical data without infrastructure management, choose Covalent.
tldr-summary
The Graph vs Covalent
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A direct comparison of architectural trade-offs, supported networks, and ideal use cases for two leading blockchain data providers.
03
The Graph: Decentralized Network & Censorship Resistance
Relies on a decentralized network of Indexers. Data queries are served by a permissionless set of node operators, aligning with Web3 ethos. This matters for dApps requiring maximum uptime and censorship resistance, though it can introduce query fee complexity (GRT tokens).
1,000+
Indexers
04
Covalent: Simplified Pricing & Historical Depth
Predictable, credit-based pricing model without gas fees. Provides full historical data from genesis block, not just indexed events. This is critical for analytics platforms, tax tools, and auditors needing complete, reproducible historical state without building archival nodes.
200+
Blockchains
Genesis
Data Depth
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
The Graph vs Covalent: Blockchain Data Indexing
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for decentralized data indexing solutions.
| Metric / Feature | The Graph | Covalent |
|---|---|---|
Primary Data Model | Subgraph-defined schemas | Unified API across 200+ chains |
Supported Chains | 50+ (EVM & non-EVM) | 200+ |
Query Pricing Model | GRT-based query fees | CQT-based subscription tiers |
Historical Data Access | From subgraph deployment | Full chain history (genesis) |
Data Freshness (Block Lag) | ~1-2 blocks | < 1 block |
Native Token | GRT | CQT |
Decentralized Network | ||
Managed Service Option | The Graph Hosted Service | Covalent API |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Use Which: A Scenario-Based Guide
The Graph for DeFi
Verdict: The go-to for composable, real-time, on-chain data. Strengths: Unmatched for building complex, reactive DeFi applications like Uniswap or Aave. Its subgraph ecosystem provides a massive library of pre-built schemas for major protocols (ERC-20, AMMs, lending markets). The decentralized network ensures high availability and censorship resistance for critical financial data. Querying with GraphQL allows for precise, nested data fetching in a single request, which is essential for dashboards and smart contract integrations. Key Metric: Over 3,000+ active subgraphs powering the majority of top-tier DeFi frontends.
Covalent for DeFi
Verdict: Superior for historical analytics, multi-chain portfolio tracking, and batch data exports. Strengths: Provides a unified API across 200+ blockchains, making it ideal for cross-chain DeFi dashboards and wallet services like Zerion or DeBank. Its Historical API offers granular, time-series data (e.g., "all DEX trades for this wallet in Q1") without needing to build and maintain a subgraph. Better for backtesting trading strategies or generating compliance reports where complete historical context is required. Key Metric: Single API endpoint structures data from billions of transactions, normalized across chains.
pros-cons-a
BLOCKCHAIN DATA INDEXING
The Graph vs Covalent: Pros and Cons
A technical breakdown of the leading decentralized indexing protocols. Choose based on your application's need for custom logic vs. comprehensive, unified data.
05
The Graph: Cons & Trade-offs
Higher initial development overhead: Building and maintaining a production subgraph requires Solidity/GraphQL expertise. Chain support is granular: While broad, you must deploy a unique subgraph per chain, increasing management complexity for multi-chain apps.
06
Covalent: Cons & Trade-offs
Less query flexibility: You work within their unified data model. Complex, application-specific logic (e.g., a custom AMM pricing calculation) is harder to implement vs. a custom subgraph. Cost structure: Pricing is based on API credits, which can be less predictable than The Graph's query fee market for very high-scale, public dApps.
pros-cons-b
BLOCKCHAIN DATA INDEXING
The Graph vs Covalent: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading data indexing solutions. Use this to guide your infrastructure decision.
02
The Graph: Subgraph Flexibility
Core Strength: Developers define custom data schemas and indexing logic via GraphQL-based subgraphs. This matters for complex, application-specific queries (e.g., NFT rarity scores, custom DAO metrics). Over 1,000 subgraphs power major dApps like Uniswap and Aave.
1,000+
Active Subgraphs
03
The Graph: Query Cost & Complexity
Key Trade-off: Query costs are paid in GRT, introducing gas-like pricing variability and requiring wallet integration. Managing subgraph deployments and Indexer curation adds operational overhead. This matters for teams wanting a simple, predictable API.
05
Covalent: Rich Historical Data
Core Strength: Indexes full historical state (wallet balances, NFT metadata, transaction logs) and offers granular, time-series endpoints. This matters for on-chain analytics, portfolio dashboards, and compliance reporting where deep history is critical.
06
Covalent: Centralized Service Model
Key Trade-off: Operates as a managed API service, not a decentralized protocol. This introduces single-point-of-failure risk and vendor lock-in. Pricing is subscription-based, which matters for protocols requiring maximal decentralization guarantees.
THE GRAPH VS COVALENT
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture & Query Models
A technical comparison of two leading blockchain data indexing solutions, focusing on their core architectural designs, query languages, and performance trade-offs for developers and protocols.
The Graph uses a decentralized network of indexers for specific subgraphs, while Covalent operates a unified API serving data from a centralized, managed data warehouse. The Graph's architecture is application-specific, requiring developers to define and deploy subgraphs (smart contracts that index specific events). Covalent, in contrast, provides a 'one-stop' API that indexes entire blockchains into a single, queryable dataset, abstracting the underlying chain complexity.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide your infrastructure choice between The Graph and Covalent.
The Graph excels at high-performance, real-time querying for custom smart contract data because of its decentralized network of indexers and subgraphs. For example, Uniswap and Aave rely on its subgraphs to power their frontends, querying millions of transactions with sub-second latency. Its strength lies in enabling developers to define and index precisely the data their dApp needs, making it the go-to for complex DeFi and NFT applications requiring bespoke, low-latency data.
Covalent takes a different approach by providing a unified, historical API that indexes the entire blockchain ledger. This results in a trade-off: you gain instant access to rich, normalized historical data across 200+ blockchains without writing a single line of indexing logic, but queries for highly specific, real-time state may not match The Graph's sub-second speed. Its Class A unified API is ideal for analytics dashboards, portfolio trackers, and applications needing broad, multi-chain historical context.
The key trade-off: If your priority is custom, low-latency data from specific smart contracts (e.g., building a novel DeFi protocol), choose The Graph. If you prioritize rapid development with rich, historical, multi-chain data out-of-the-box (e.g., building a cross-chain wallet or analytics platform), choose Covalent. Your decision hinges on the specificity of your data needs versus the breadth and development speed you require.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall