Chainstack's Full Layer excels at high-performance, low-latency operations for real-time applications because it maintains only the most recent 128 blocks of state data. For example, this allows for sub-second query times for current balances on EVM chains like Ethereum and Polygon, which is critical for DEX aggregators and live dashboards. The reduced data footprint translates to lower operational costs and faster sync times for new nodes.
LABS
Comparisons
Chainstack's Archive Layer vs Full Layer
A technical analysis for CTOs and architects comparing Chainstack's infrastructure layers, focusing on historical data depth, performance, cost, and optimal use cases.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Data Depth Dilemma
Choosing between Chainstack's Archive and Full Layer is a foundational decision that balances data completeness against performance and cost.
Chainstack's Archive Layer takes a different approach by providing complete historical state access, storing every single state change since genesis. This results in a trade-off of higher storage costs and slower query speeds for deep historical data, but it is non-negotiable for protocols requiring flawless audit trails, complex analytics, or on-chain dispute resolution, such as lending protocols like Aave or tax compliance tools.
The key trade-off: If your priority is cost-efficiency and speed for live applications (e.g., wallets, trading bots), choose the Full Layer. If you prioritize uncompromising historical data integrity for compliance, advanced analytics, or security audits, the Archive Layer is essential.
tldr-summary
Chainstack Archive vs Full Layer
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for blockchain node infrastructure.
01
Archive Layer: Unmatched Historical Data
Full historical state access: Query any transaction, log, or state from genesis block. Essential for on-chain analytics (e.g., Dune Analytics, Nansen), compliance reporting, and advanced DeFi strategies requiring deep historical context.
Genesis+
Data Depth
02
Archive Layer: Cost-Effective for Queries
Optimized for read-heavy workloads without the resource overhead of a full node. Lower operational costs for applications that primarily query past data rather than submit transactions. Ideal for block explorers and data indexing services.
03
Full Layer: Real-Time Validation & Submission
Participate in consensus and broadcast transactions directly to the network. Non-negotiable for protocols running validators, bridges requiring instant finality proofs, and dApps needing the lowest-latency writes.
P2P Network
Direct Access
04
Full Layer: Maximum Sovereignty & Security
Fully verify all blockchain rules independently. Provides the highest security model for custodial services, oracles (Chainlink), and institutional applications that cannot rely on third-party data integrity.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Comparison: Chainstack Archive Layer vs Full Layer
Direct comparison of node access tiers for historical and real-time blockchain data.
| Metric / Feature | Archive Layer | Full Layer |
|---|---|---|
Historical Data Access | ||
Block Depth | From genesis block | Last 128 blocks (Ethereum) |
Use Case | Analytics, Auditing, Indexing | Real-time dApps, Wallets |
Typical Query Type | Complex historical queries | Latest state & transactions |
Data Storage | Petabyte-scale archive | Recent chain state only |
Node Sync Time | Days to weeks (initial) | Hours (from snapshot) |
Infrastructure Cost | Higher (storage-heavy) | Standard |
pros-cons-a
ARCHIVE LAYER VS FULL LAYER
Pros and Cons: Chainstack Archive Layer vs Full Layer
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs choosing between historical data depth and real-time performance.
01
Archive Layer: Unmatched Historical Depth
Full historical state access: Query any transaction, balance, or event from genesis block. This matters for on-chain analytics, compliance audits, and complex DeFi protocol dashboards that require analyzing past states (e.g., tracking a wallet's entire history).
Genesis
Data From
02
Archive Layer: Lower Cost for Deep Queries
Optimized for read-heavy workloads with specialized indexing. This matters for batch data processing, backtesting trading strategies, and generating historical reports where query volume is high but latency is less critical than cost efficiency.
03
Full Layer: Real-Time Performance
Sub-2 second block propagation and immediate state access. This matters for high-frequency dApps, live dashboards, arbitrage bots, and NFT minting platforms where milliseconds impact user experience and profitability.
< 2 sec
Block Latency
04
Full Layer: Lower Latency for Common Operations
Optimized for the latest 128 blocks (Ethereum). This matters for wallet balances, recent transaction status, and DeFi position management where users and applications primarily interact with the most recent chain state.
pros-cons-b
FULL LAYER vs ARCHIVE LAYER
Pros and Cons: Chainstack Full Layer
Key strengths and trade-offs for real-time data access versus historical analysis.
01
Full Layer: Real-Time Performance
Optimized for live queries: Provides the latest 128 blocks with low-latency access (< 100 ms p95). This matters for building dApps, wallets, and exchanges that require immediate state updates and transaction confirmations.
02
Full Layer: Cost Efficiency
Lower operational overhead: No storage of historical state, leading to reduced infrastructure costs. This matters for high-throughput applications like gaming or social protocols where most logic interacts with the current chain state.
03
Archive Layer: Complete Data Sovereignty
Full historical access: Stores the entire blockchain state from genesis, enabling queries for any past block. This matters for on-chain analytics, tax reporting, and forensic analysis (e.g., using Dune Analytics or building custom dashboards).
04
Archive Layer: Enhanced Developer Experience
Simplified debugging and indexing: Developers can trace transactions and state changes across time without gaps. This matters for protocol auditors and teams building complex DeFi smart contracts that need to verify historical interactions and events.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Use Which Layer
Chainstack Full Node for Developers
Verdict: The default for most application development and testing. Strengths: Provides real-time access to the latest ~128 blocks of blockchain state. Offers full write capabilities (send transactions) and read capabilities (call contracts, query balances). Essential for building and testing dApps that require interaction with the live network, such as deploying smart contracts, submitting transactions, or reading recent events. Use Case: Building a new DeFi frontend, testing a minting contract, or running a blockchain bot that reacts to new blocks.
Chainstack Archive Node for Developers
Verdict: Critical for data-intensive applications, analytics, and compliance. Strengths: Provides complete historical data from genesis. Enables complex queries about past state, such as an address's balance at block #12,450,000 or all transactions for a specific contract over the last year. Required for on-chain analytics, generating historical reports, recalculating rewards, or auditing. Use Case: Building a blockchain explorer, a tax reporting tool, a protocol analytics dashboard, or verifying historical events for a dispute resolution system.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict and Final Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown to guide your infrastructure choice between Chainstack's Archive and Full Node layers.
Chainstack's Full Node Layer excels at high-performance, low-latency access to the latest blockchain state, making it ideal for real-time applications. It provides the most recent 128 blocks by default, ensuring fast sync times and optimal performance for dApps, wallets, and exchanges that require immediate transaction confirmation. For example, a DeFi protocol executing flash loans needs sub-second block propagation, which the Full Node's optimized infrastructure delivers, often with >99.9% historical uptime SLA.
Chainstack's Archive Layer takes a different approach by providing a complete, immutable historical record of the entire chain. This results in a trade-off of higher storage costs and potentially slower query times for deep historical data, but it is non-negotiable for specific use cases. This layer is essential for on-chain analytics platforms like Dune Analytics or Nansen, comprehensive compliance reporting, and advanced smart contract debugging that requires tracing transactions from genesis.
The key trade-off is between performance and completeness. If your priority is cost-efficiency and speed for live chain interactions, choose the Full Node. It's the default for building and scaling live applications. If your priority is deep historical data analysis, auditing, or data sovereignty for reporting, the Archive Layer is mandatory. Consider the Full Node for your production front-end and the Archive Node for your back-office analytics to create a cost-optimal, hybrid architecture.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall