Chainstack excels at providing a deeply integrated, compliance-first platform for enterprises building complex multi-chain applications. Their SOC 2 Type II attestation is part of a broader enterprise suite that includes dedicated node deployments, advanced security groups, and granular access controls via IAM. This makes them a strong choice for protocols like Aave or Compound, where managing treasury operations and smart contract interactions requires auditable, permissioned access controls and predictable performance, often citing 99.9%+ SLA-backed uptime across their Ethereum and Polygon nodes.
LABS
Comparisons
Chainstack vs QuickNode: SOC 2 Type II Compliance
A technical analysis of Chainstack and QuickNode's SOC 2 Type II audit reports, focusing on security, availability, and confidentiality controls critical for enterprise procurement.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: Why SOC 2 Type II is the Enterprise RPC Gatekeeper
For CTOs managing institutional capital, SOC 2 Type II certification is the non-negotiable baseline, transforming RPC providers from infrastructure vendors into strategic risk-management partners.
QuickNode takes a different approach by pairing its SOC 2 Type II compliance with unparalleled network breadth and developer-centric tooling. They support over 25 blockchains out-of-the-box, including emerging chains like Solana and Sui, and provide built-in analytics, enhanced APIs, and WebSocket stability. This results in a trade-off: while Chainstack offers deeper configuration for hardened environments, QuickNode provides faster time-to-market for applications needing to interact with a diverse, ever-expanding set of networks without managing separate vendor relationships.
The key trade-off: If your priority is deep, configurable security and governance for core treasury or DeFi operations on primary networks, choose Chainstack. If you prioritize rapid deployment across the widest possible chain ecosystem with robust, compliant infrastructure, choose QuickNode. Both certifications are table stakes, but the surrounding platform dictates the fit.
tldr-summary
SOC 2 Type II Compliance
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A side-by-side breakdown of how Chainstack and QuickNode approach enterprise-grade security and compliance.
01
Chainstack: Unified Compliance Framework
Specific advantage: Offers a single, integrated SOC 2 Type II report covering all core services (nodes, APIs, RPCs). This matters for regulated DeFi protocols and institutional clients who need to streamline vendor audits and demonstrate comprehensive security controls across their entire blockchain stack.
02
Chainstack: Granular Access & Audit Logs
Specific advantage: Provides detailed, immutable audit trails for all API calls and user actions. This matters for financial services and public sector projects requiring strict adherence to data governance policies (like GDPR) and the ability to trace every query for forensic analysis.
03
QuickNode: Compliance as a Core Product
Specific advantage: Markets SOC 2 Type II compliance as a foundational, non-negotiable feature across all its plans. This matters for rapidly scaling startups and enterprises who prioritize a "compliance-by-default" infrastructure to accelerate their own security reviews and go-to-market timelines.
04
QuickNode: Network-Specific Security Posture
Specific advantage: Maintains and can provide evidence of security controls tailored to the consensus mechanisms and risks of 40+ supported blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon). This matters for multi-chain dApp developers and asset managers who need validated security for each unique network they operate on.
CHAINSTACK VS QUICKNODE
SOC 2 Type II Compliance Feature Matrix
Direct comparison of SOC 2 Type II compliance features and security controls for enterprise blockchain RPC providers.
| Security & Compliance Metric | Chainstack | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
SOC 2 Type II Certification | ||
Report Access for Customers | ||
Penetration Testing Frequency | Quarterly | Semi-Annually |
Data Center Tier Certification | Tier III & IV | Tier III |
DDoS Protection (Max Scale) |
|
|
Private Endpoint Support | ||
Audit Log Retention Period | 365 days | 90 days |
Compliance Frameworks Supported | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR | SOC 2, GDPR |
pros-cons-a
ENTERPRISE SECURITY SHOWDOWN
Chainstack vs QuickNode: SOC 2 Type II Compliance
A data-driven comparison of how Chainstack and QuickNode implement SOC 2 Type II compliance, the gold standard for enterprise-grade security and operational controls.
01
Chainstack's Compliance Edge
Dedicated, audited infrastructure: Chainstack operates its own physical data centers and network, allowing for end-to-end control over the compliance audit scope. This matters for enterprises with strict data sovereignty requirements (e.g., EU GDPR) who need to know exactly where their node data resides and who has access.
100%
Owned Infrastructure
02
Chainstack's Potential Trade-off
Less geographic redundancy on lower tiers: While enterprise plans offer multi-region deployment, lower-tier plans may have fewer geographic failover options compared to hyperscale cloud providers. This matters for global applications requiring ultra-high availability (e.g., perpetual DEX frontends) who may need instant failover between continents.
03
QuickNode's Compliance Edge
Hyperscale cloud provider integration: QuickNode's SOC 2 compliance is built atop AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure's own extensive compliance frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, PCI DSS). This matters for enterprises already embedded in a cloud ecosystem, as it simplifies vendor risk assessments and leverages cloud-native security tools like AWS GuardDuty or Azure Sentinel.
3
Major Cloud Providers
04
QuickNode's Potential Trade-off
Shared responsibility model complexity: Security is a shared responsibility with the underlying cloud provider. Enterprises must trust and manage the security of both QuickNode's layer and the cloud platform's infrastructure. This matters for highly regulated industries (e.g., fintech, healthcare) where audit trails must be unambiguous and control boundaries clearly defined.
pros-cons-b
SOC 2 Type II Compliance Deep Dive
QuickNode: Pros and Cons for Enterprise Security
A balanced look at how Chainstack and QuickNode approach the critical enterprise requirement of SOC 2 Type II compliance, based on public attestations and feature sets.
02
Chainstack: Con - Less Public Security Brand Recognition
Specific trade-off: While compliant, Chainstack has lower public mindshare for security audits compared to larger rivals. This matters for enterprise procurement teams who rely on established vendor reputations and may require additional due diligence.
04
QuickNode: Con - Primarily AWS-Centric Deployment
Specific trade-off: Infrastructure heavily optimized for AWS. This matters for enterprises with a multi-cloud or hybrid-cloud strategy who may face integration challenges or prefer the flexibility of deploying on Google Cloud or Azure natively.
SECURITY & COMPLIANCE
Technical Deep Dive: Interpreting the Audit Reports
For CTOs managing enterprise risk, a SOC 2 Type II report is a critical due diligence document. This section breaks down what the independent audits for Chainstack and QuickNode actually mean for your infrastructure's security posture and operational reliability.
QuickNode's SOC 2 Type II report is typically more recent. QuickNode undergoes annual audits, with reports often published within the same calendar year. Chainstack's public attestation, while valid, may reference a period from the prior year. For the most current status, always request the latest report directly from each vendor's security team, as recency is a key indicator of ongoing compliance rigor.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: Which Provider Fits Your Use Case?
Chainstack for Enterprise
Verdict: The clear choice for regulated entities. Strengths: Chainstack's SOC 2 Type II certification is a non-negotiable asset for financial institutions, public companies, and any project handling sensitive user data. It provides documented, audited proof of security controls over time, which is critical for enterprise procurement, insurance, and compliance with frameworks like GDPR or CCPA. Their Private Blockchain and Dedicated Node offerings integrate seamlessly into existing VPCs and security postures. Considerations: This enterprise-grade assurance comes at a premium cost and may involve more rigid deployment processes compared to purely developer-focused services.
QuickNode for Enterprise
Verdict: Suitable for scale-ups with less stringent audit requirements. Strengths: QuickNode offers robust infrastructure with SOC 2 Type I compliance, indicating their system design is suitable for security at a point in time. They excel in global low-latency performance and multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, etc.), which is vital for applications serving a global user base. Their Business Plan includes advanced features and SLAs. Considerations: The lack of a Type II report may be a blocker for Fortune 500 or highly regulated fintech deployments where continuous control verification is mandated.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown of how Chainstack and QuickNode's SOC 2 Type II compliance impacts your infrastructure choice.
Chainstack excels at providing a transparent, protocol-agnostic compliance framework because it treats SOC 2 as a foundational layer across its entire multi-chain node and data service portfolio. For example, its compliance covers core RPC services, the GraphQL-based Unified API, and dedicated node deployments on networks like Ethereum, Polygon, and Avalanche, ensuring a consistent security posture regardless of your blockchain choice. This is critical for enterprises building on multiple chains who need a single, audited vendor.
QuickNode takes a different approach by deeply integrating its compliance certification with its high-performance, low-latency global infrastructure. This results in a trade-off where its SOC 2 Type II audit is a testament to the reliability of its premium, optimized endpoints—often boasting sub-50ms latency and 99.9%+ uptime SLA—but may be perceived as more tightly coupled to its proprietary performance stack rather than a blanket protocol guarantee.
The key trade-off: If your priority is vendor consolidation and multi-chain standardization under one certified roof, choose Chainstack. Its audit provides broad coverage for diverse deployment needs. If you prioritize peak performance and latency-sensitive dApps where compliance validates the reliability of that specific high-speed infrastructure, choose QuickNode. Its SOC 2 badge directly underwrites the performance metrics that are its core differentiator.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall