Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Immutable zkEVM vs Arbitrum Nova for Cross-Game Asset Portability

A technical analysis for CTOs and protocol architects comparing ZK-rollup and Optimistic-rollup approaches to gaming-specific L2s, focusing on asset composability, bridging latency, and ecosystem tooling.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Battle for Gaming's Settlement Layer

A technical comparison of Immutable zkEVM and Arbitrum Nova for enabling seamless asset interoperability across game ecosystems.

Immutable zkEVM excels at providing a purpose-built, high-throughput environment for native web3 gaming assets because it is a dedicated zk-rollup on Ethereum, optimized for the ERC-1155 standard and Immutable's own IMX token. For example, its architecture enables 9,000+ TPS in its current scaling roadmap, with near-instant transaction finality and gas fees as low as $0.001, creating a predictable cost model crucial for microtransactions.

Arbitrum Nova takes a different approach by leveraging AnyTrust technology, a hybrid between optimistic and validium rollups, which prioritizes ultra-low costs by posting data to a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This results in a trade-off: while it achieves sub-cent transaction fees and supports general-purpose smart contracts (including gaming assets via standards like ERC-721), it introduces a slight trust assumption in the DAC, unlike the pure cryptographic security of a zk-rollup.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum security, EVM-equivalence for complex game logic, and a vertically integrated gaming ecosystem (with tools like Immutable Passport), choose Immutable zkEVM. If you prioritize absolute minimal cost for asset transfers today, compatibility with the broader Arbitrum ecosystem (Nova, One, Orbit), and a more generalized chain for mixed-use applications, choose Arbitrum Nova.

tldr-summary
Immutable zkEVM vs. Arbitrum Nova

TL;DR: Core Differentiators for Gaming

Key strengths and trade-offs for cross-game asset portability at a glance.

01

Choose Immutable zkEVM for...

Native Gaming Ecosystem & Standards: Built by Immutable, the leading web3 gaming platform. Offers native integration with Immutable Passport (non-custodial wallet) and Orderbook for high-performance NFT trading. This matters for studios wanting a full-stack, opinionated solution with proven gaming tooling.

02

Choose Immutable zkEVM for...

Superior Security & Composability**: A Type 2 zkEVM that is bytecode-equivalent to Ethereum L1. This ensures maximum security for high-value in-game assets and seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling (MetaMask, Etherscan, The Graph). This matters for AAA studios where asset security and developer familiarity are non-negotiable.

03

Choose Arbitrum Nova for...

Ultra-Low, Predictable Transaction Costs**: Uses AnyTrust technology, moving data availability off-chain to Data Availability Committees (DACs). This results in sub-cent fees (consistently <$0.01), crucial for microtransactions and mass-scale in-game actions. This matters for hyper-casual or high-volume social games where cost-per-action is the primary constraint.

04

Choose Arbitrum Nova for...

Established Gaming Footprint & Liquidity**: Home to major gaming titles like The Beacon and Pirate Nation. Benefits from the broader Arbitrum ecosystem (Arbitrum One) for deep DeFi liquidity and cross-chain asset bridges. This matters for games that need immediate user traction and want assets to be portable to a large DeFi ecosystem.

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Immutable zkEVM vs Arbitrum Nova: Cross-Game Asset Portability

Direct comparison of key metrics for developers prioritizing asset interoperability and composability across gaming ecosystems.

MetricImmutable zkEVMArbitrum Nova

Primary Data Availability Layer

Ethereum (via zk-Proofs)

Ethereum + Data Availability Committee (DAC)

Native Asset Standard

ERC-721 & ERC-1155 (EVM-native)

ERC-721 & ERC-1155 (EVM-native)

Avg. Transaction Cost (Mint/Transfer)

< $0.01

< $0.001

Time to Finality (L1 Inclusion)

~15-20 minutes

~5-10 minutes

Native Marketplace Integration

EVM Compatibility

Full (zkEVM)

Full (Optimistic Rollup)

Primary Gaming Ecosystem

Immutable, Illuvium, Guild of Guardians

TreasureDAO, The Beacon, BattlePlan

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS

Immutable zkEVM vs Arbitrum Nova: Cross-Game Asset Portability

Key architectural and economic trade-offs for moving assets between game worlds.

01

Immutable zkEVM: Native ZK Security

Zero-knowledge proofs for asset integrity: Every asset state change is cryptographically verified on Ethereum L1, providing mathematical security guarantees for cross-game item provenance. This matters for high-value, rare assets (e.g., Legendary NFTs) where forgery or duplication would break game economies.

02

Immutable zkEVM: EVM-Equivalent Standardization

Full compatibility with Ethereum tooling: Supports ERC-721, ERC-1155, and ERC-20 standards natively, enabling seamless integration with major wallets (MetaMask), indexers (The Graph), and marketplaces (OpenSea via Immutable's orderbook). This reduces development friction for studios porting existing Ethereum games.

03

Arbitrum Nova: Ultra-Low, Predictable Fees

Data Availability via DAC reduces cost: By posting data to a Data Availability Committee (DAC) instead of full calldata on Ethereum, transaction fees are consistently below $0.01. This matters for mass-adoption games with high-frequency, low-value microtransactions (e.g., consumable potions, crafting materials).

04

Arbitrum Nova: Battle-Tested Gaming Ecosystem

Established network effects with major titles: Hosts live production games like TreasureDAO's 'The Beacon' and 'BattlePlan', demonstrating proven cross-game asset frameworks. The MAGIC ecosystem provides a ready-made economy for asset interoperability, reducing cold-start liquidity problems.

05

Immutable zkEVM: Higher Baseline Cost

ZK proof generation and Ethereum calldata increase fees: While cheaper than Ethereum mainnet, transactions are typically 2-5x more expensive than Nova due to full data posting on L1. This can be prohibitive for fully on-chain games with constant state updates.

06

Arbitrum Nova: Trusted Data Assumption

Relies on a permissioned Data Availability Committee: Asset portability security inherits the trust assumption of the DAC (currently managed by Offchain Labs and partners). This matters for studios requiring maximal, Ethereum-level decentralization for their asset layer, as it introduces a potential centralization vector.

pros-cons-b
PROTOCOL COMPARISON

Immutable zkEVM vs. Arbitrum Nova: Cross-Game Asset Portability

Key technical and economic trade-offs for building interoperable game economies at a glance.

03

Immutable zkEVM: Key Limitation

Ecosystem Maturity & Liquidity Fragmentation: As a newer chain, its DeFi and cross-protocol liquidity is nascent compared to the Arbitrum ecosystem. Bridging assets to other chains may require more steps and have less optimal routes. This matters if your game assets need to be instantly composable with major DeFi protocols on other L2s.

04

Arbitrum Nova: Key Limitation

Not EVM-Equivalent, Gaming-Tailored: While EVM-compatible, it lacks native gaming SDKs and asset standards (like Immutable's). Integrating complex in-game economies requires more custom work. The AnyTrust model relies on a DAC, which is less decentralized than pure rollups. This matters for games demanding maximum security guarantees or seamless plug-and-play tooling.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: Choose Based on Your Use Case

Immutable zkEVM for Gaming

Verdict: The superior choice for high-throughput, asset-centric ecosystems. Strengths:

  • Native Gaming Focus: Built by Immutable, with SDKs and marketplaces (Immutable X Marketplace, Immutable Passport) designed for seamless integration.
  • True Asset Portability: Native ERC-1155 and ERC-721 standards with zk-proof security, enabling verifiable ownership and transfer of in-game items across the ecosystem.
  • High Performance: 9,000+ TPS with instant trade confirmation and rapid finality (~2 minutes) via zk-rollup proofs, critical for real-time gameplay.
  • Developer Experience: Full EVM equivalence simplifies deploying existing Solidity smart contracts for game logic.

Arbitrum Nova for Gaming

Verdict: A viable, cost-effective alternative for social/community-focused games. Strengths:

  • Ultra-Low Fees: Uses AnyTrust technology with a Data Availability Committee (DAC) to minimize costs, ideal for high-volume, low-value microtransactions.
  • Established Ecosystem: Part of the massive Arbitrum network, benefiting from existing bridges (Arbitrum Bridge) and wallets.
  • Trade-off: Relies on a DAC for data availability, which is a trust assumption compared to zkEVM's cryptographic guarantees, potentially a concern for high-value assets.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation

A data-driven conclusion for CTOs choosing between Immutable zkEVM and Arbitrum Nova for cross-game asset interoperability.

Immutable zkEVM excels at providing a high-security, unified ecosystem for native web3 gaming because it is a ZK-rollup secured by Ethereum with native ERC-721 and ERC-1155 support. For example, its ~$1.4B ecosystem fund and partnerships with studios like Illuvium and MetalCore are designed to create a seamless, composable asset layer where items can move frictionlessly between games built on the same L2. This native integration, coupled with sub-$0.01 transaction fees and instant transaction finality, is optimized for high-frequency in-game microtransactions and true asset portability within its walled garden.

Arbitrum Nova takes a different approach by prioritizing massive-scale, low-cost social and gaming applications through its AnyTrust security model. This results in a trade-off: it achieves ultra-low fees (often < $0.001) and high throughput by using a Data Availability Committee (DAC), which offers slightly weaker security guarantees than pure rollups but is still far more secure than a sidechain. Its strength is as a general-purpose L2 with proven adoption, hosting giants like Reddit's Community Points and TreasureDAO, making it ideal for projects that need cheap transactions and want to tap into an existing, large user and developer base.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum security, deep native gaming tooling (Passport, Orderbook), and building within a curated, interoperable gaming ecosystem, choose Immutable zkEVM. Its architecture is purpose-built for asset sovereignty and cross-game utility. If you prioritize absolute minimum cost, maximum scalability for user onboarding, and leveraging a vast, established general-purpose L2 with strong network effects, choose Arbitrum Nova. It is the pragmatic choice for games expecting viral growth or needing to integrate with broader DeFi and social applications.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Immutable zkEVM vs Arbitrum Nova for Cross-Game Asset Portability | ChainScore Comparisons