ERC-1155 excels at gas-efficient batch operations and interoperability because it's the dominant standard on Ethereum and its L2s. For example, projects like Enjin and The Sandbox leverage it to mint thousands of gaming items in a single transaction, drastically reducing costs on networks like Arbitrum and Polygon. Its widespread adoption is reflected in a TVL of hundreds of millions across major marketplaces like OpenSea.
LABS
Comparisons
ERC-1155 vs SPL Token-2022: Multi-Asset Token Standards
An in-depth technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating Ethereum's batch-oriented ERC-1155 standard against Solana's extensible SPL Token-2022 for managing complex token ecosystems.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Multi-Asset Supremacy
A data-driven comparison of ERC-1155 and SPL Token-2022, the leading standards for managing multiple token types in a single contract.
SPL Token-2022 takes a different approach by baking advanced features directly into the Solana runtime. This results in native support for confidential transfers, transfer hooks, and non-transferable tokens without needing separate smart contracts. The trade-off is that it's newer and less battle-tested than ERC-1155, with adoption currently led by protocols like Metaplex and Jupiter rather than a vast, established ecosystem.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing ecosystem reach, tooling maturity, and cross-chain compatibility (via bridges like Wormhole), choose ERC-1155. If you prioritize native, high-performance features like privacy and immutable token logic on a high-throughput chain, choose SPL Token-2022.
tldr-summary
ERC-1155 vs SPL Token-2022
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
A side-by-side breakdown of the leading multi-asset token standards. Choose based on your primary ecosystem, required features, and target use cases.
01
ERC-1155: Dominant Ecosystem
Massive Network Effect: Native to Ethereum and deployed across all major EVM L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon). This matters for projects needing instant compatibility with thousands of existing wallets (MetaMask, Rainbow), marketplaces (OpenSea, Blur), and DeFi protocols (Aave, Uniswap).
EVM
Native Chain
1000s
Integrated DApps
03
SPL Token-2022: Native Solana Performance
Sub-Second Finality & Sub-Penny Fees: Built for the Solana runtime, offering native-speed transfers and interactions. This matters for high-frequency applications like real-time gaming, high-volume marketplaces (Tensor, Magic Eden), and social apps where user experience depends on near-instant, feeless transactions.
< 0.4s
Finality
$0.0001
Avg. Fee
05
Choose ERC-1155 If...
Your project is EVM-native and prioritizes:
- Maximum Interoperability with existing DeFi and NFT infrastructure.
- Developer Speed using well-audited libraries like OpenZeppelin.
- Gaming/Collectibles where batch operations and gas savings on L2s are critical.
Example: Launching a cross-chain game asset on Arbitrum and Polygon.
06
Choose SPL Token-2022 If...
Your project is Solana-native and requires:
- Native High-Performance for consumer-scale apps.
- Advanced On-Chain Features like transfer hooks for enforced royalties or confidential transfers.
- Building Novel Primitives (e.g., SBTs, compliant RWA tokens) without custom contract risks.
Example: Minting a privacy-focused loyalty token with immutable on-chain rules.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Matrix: Head-to-Head Technical Specs
Direct comparison of key technical capabilities for multi-asset token standards on Ethereum and Solana.
| Metric / Feature | ERC-1155 (Ethereum) | SPL Token-2022 (Solana) |
|---|---|---|
Native Transfer Fees (1 Token) | $1.50 - $15.00 | < $0.001 |
Native Batch Transfer | ||
Transfer Hook Support | ||
Confidential Transfers | ||
Permanent Delegate Authority | ||
Token Metadata Standard | ERC-1155 Metadata URI | SPL Token Metadata v1.0 |
Mainnet Launch Year | 2018 | 2022 |
pros-cons-a
PROS & CONS ANALYSIS
ERC-1155 vs SPL Token-2022: Multi-Asset Token Standards
A data-driven comparison of the leading multi-asset token standards for EVM and Solana ecosystems. Evaluate trade-offs for gaming, NFT marketplaces, and DeFi composability.
01
ERC-1155: Key Strength
Unmatched EVM Composability: Native integration with the entire Ethereum ecosystem, including OpenSea, Blur, and major DeFi protocols. This matters for projects requiring instant liquidity and marketplace support for semi-fungible assets.
02
ERC-1155: Key Limitation
Limited Native Functionality: Lacks built-in features like transfer hooks, confidential transfers, or interest-bearing logic. Projects must implement complex, gas-inefficient extensions (e.g., via EIPs) for advanced use cases like royalties enforcement.
03
SPL Token-2022: Key Strength
Built-in Advanced Features: Offers native, on-chain support for transfer fees, confidential transfers, non-transferable tokens, and interest-bearing tokens. This matters for compliant financial products and gaming assets requiring embedded logic.
04
SPL Token-2022: Key Limitation
Ecosystem Immaturity: Limited adoption outside core Solana DeFi (e.g., Jupiter, Raydium). Major NFT marketplaces and cross-chain bridges have slower integration timelines compared to the battle-tested ERC-1155 standard.
05
Choose ERC-1155 For
- Ethereum L2/L3 Gaming Ecosystems (e.g., Immutable, Arbitrum).
- Projects prioritizing existing NFT marketplace liquidity (OpenSea, Blur).
- Teams with deep EVM/Solidity expertise seeking maximum composability.
06
Choose SPL Token-2022 For
- Solana-native financial instruments requiring transfer hooks or fees.
- Gaming or loyalty programs needing non-transferable (soulbound) tokens.
- Applications demanding confidential transaction amounts on-chain.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
SPL Token-2022 vs ERC-1155: Multi-Asset Token Standards
A technical breakdown of the leading multi-asset token standards. Choose based on your protocol's core requirements for flexibility, security, and ecosystem reach.
02
SPL Token-2022: Performance & Cost
Specific advantage: Parallel execution on Solana enables ~5,000 TPS for token operations with <$0.001 average transaction fees. This matters for high-frequency applications like gaming assets or micro-transactions where cost and speed are critical.
<$0.001
Avg. Tx Fee
~5k TPS
Token Throughput
03
ERC-1155: Ecosystem Dominance
Core Advantage: The de facto standard for Ethereum and EVM chains (Arbitrum, Polygon, Base) with $20B+ in gaming/NFT TVL. This matters for projects prioritizing maximum liquidity, wallet support (MetaMask), and existing marketplace integration like OpenSea.
$20B+
Ecosystem TVL
04
ERC-1155: Developer Maturity
Specific advantage: 5+ years of production use, with battle-tested tools (OpenZeppelin), extensive tutorials, and 4,000+ forked repositories on GitHub. This matters for teams seeking reduced audit risk, faster iteration, and a large hiring pool of experienced Solidity developers.
4k+
GitHub Forks
05
SPL Token-2022: Trade-off - Immature Tooling
Key Limitation: Limited wallet and DEX support (e.g., Phantom full support in progress, limited AMM integration). This matters for consumer-facing dApps that cannot afford user friction from incomplete ecosystem tooling.
06
ERC-1155: Trade-off - Cost & Congestion
Key Limitation: High and variable gas fees on Ethereum L1 ($5-$50 per batch mint) and throughput limited by block gas limits. This matters for mass-scale asset deployments or low-value items where cost efficiency is a primary constraint.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: Choose Based on Your Use Case
ERC-1155 for Gaming & NFTs
Verdict: The established, versatile standard for complex in-game economies and NFT collections. Strengths: Native batch transfers and semi-fungibility are perfect for managing thousands of game items (e.g., potions, skins) in a single contract, as pioneered by Enjin and The Sandbox. Its EIP-1155 standard is widely supported by major marketplaces like OpenSea and infrastructure like OpenZeppelin. The ability to mint multiple token types atomically reduces gas costs for initial drops and bundle sales. Considerations: Lacks native on-chain royalties enforcement and advanced transfer controls, often requiring supplementary standards or off-chain logic.
SPL Token-2022 for Gaming & NFTs
Verdict: A powerful next-gen contender with native features that eliminate middleware, ideal for innovative on-chain game mechanics. Strengths: Built-in transfer hooks enable complex logic (e.g., taking a fee or triggering an event on every item transfer). Native permanent royalties and confidential transfers (via zk-proofs) are game-changers for creator monetization and player privacy. The metadata pointer allows for efficient, updatable on-chain data. Considerations: Ecosystem tooling (wallets, explorers, marketplaces) is still maturing compared to Ethereum's deeply integrated ERC-1155 stack.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between ERC-1155 and SPL Token-2022 is a strategic decision based on ecosystem priorities and technical requirements.
ERC-1155 excels at ecosystem liquidity and developer adoption because it is the de facto standard for NFTs and fungible tokens on Ethereum and EVM-compatible chains like Polygon and Arbitrum. For example, its massive network effect is evident in the billions of dollars in trading volume on marketplaces like OpenSea and Blur, which have native support for the standard. Its composability with tools like OpenZeppelin and its use in major gaming projects like The Sandbox provide a proven, low-risk development path.
SPL Token-2022 takes a different approach by prioritizing advanced, native functionality at the protocol level. This results in a trade-off: while it offers groundbreaking features like confidential transfers, transfer hooks, and non-transferable tokens directly in the Solana runtime, it currently lacks the deep, established tooling and wallet support of its Ethereum counterpart. Its adoption is growing within the Solana DeFi and gaming sectors, but it operates in a more nascent ecosystem with a total value locked (TVL) that is a fraction of Ethereum's.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing reach, liquidity, and leveraging a mature toolchain for applications like gaming asset marketplaces or cross-chain bridges, choose ERC-1155. If you prioritize building novel financial primitives, privacy features, or deeply integrated on-chain logic and are committed to the high-throughput Solana ecosystem, choose SPL Token-2022.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall