Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Ethers.js vs Viem: Ethereum JavaScript Libraries

A technical comparison of the two leading Ethereum JavaScript libraries, analyzing ecosystem maturity, type safety, performance, and bundle size to guide CTOs and lead developers in choosing the right tool for their dApp.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Battle for Ethereum's JavaScript Interface

A data-driven comparison of Ethers.js and Viem, the two dominant libraries for building on Ethereum and EVM chains.

Ethers.js excels at providing a comprehensive, battle-tested toolkit for complex dApp development because of its extensive API surface and long-standing community support. For example, its ethers.providers namespace offers deep, granular control over JSON-RPC interactions, WebSocket management, and event filtering, which is critical for high-reliability applications like DeFi dashboards or NFT marketplaces monitoring millions in TVL. Its maturity is evidenced by its integration as the default library in major frameworks like Hardhat and its role in securing protocols with billions in value.

Viem takes a different approach by prioritizing modularity, type safety, and bundle size efficiency. This results in a trade-off: developers gain a more modern, tree-shakable architecture with first-class TypeScript support and significantly smaller final builds, but may need to compose lower-level primitives for advanced tasks. Its performance is measurable; a basic wallet connection and balance read can result in a ~70% smaller bundle compared to Ethers v6, directly impacting dApp load times and user experience.

The key trade-off: If your priority is developer familiarity, extensive documentation, and a 'batteries-included' experience for a monolithic application, choose Ethers.js. If you prioritize bundle size, strict type safety, and a modular, composable architecture for a modern, performant frontend, choose Viem. The decision often hinges on whether your team values the stability of a mature ecosystem or the performance and developer experience of a next-generation toolkit.

tldr-summary
Ethers.js vs Viem

TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance

A direct comparison of the two dominant Ethereum JavaScript libraries, highlighting their core architectural philosophies and primary use-case fits.

01

Ethers.js: The Established Standard

Mature & Comprehensive: 7+ years of development with 1M+ weekly npm downloads. Offers a full-featured, object-oriented SDK covering wallets, providers, contracts, and utilities. This matters for prototyping, educational content, and teams needing a single, all-in-one toolkit.

02

Ethers.js: The Trade-off

Monolithic Bundle Size: The full library is ~450KB (minified). While modular, tree-shaking is less effective than Viem. This matters for frontend/browser applications where bundle size directly impacts user load times and performance.

03

Viem: The Modern Modular Toolkit

Type-Safe & Lightweight: Built with TypeScript-first design, offering superior type inference and a modular architecture. Individual client imports can be < 50KB. This matters for production dApps requiring strict type safety, optimal performance, and fine-grained dependency control.

04

Viem: The Trade-off

Lower-Level Abstraction: Requires more boilerplate for common tasks (e.g., wallet connection) and has a steeper initial learning curve. This matters for new developers or projects that prioritize rapid development over ultimate optimization.

05

Choose Ethers.js If...

  • You are building a prototype or MVP quickly.
  • Your team is already experienced with its API.
  • You need extensive documentation and community examples (45k+ GitHub stars).
  • You're writing educational material targeting the widest audience.
06

Choose Viem If...

  • You are building a performance-critical production dApp.
  • Your stack is heavily TypeScript-based and benefits from end-to-end type safety.
  • You are integrating with a modern framework like Next.js, Nuxt, or SvelteKit.
  • You plan to use Wagmi for React hooks (Viem is its native engine).
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Feature Matrix: Ethers.js vs Viem Head-to-Head

Direct comparison of key technical metrics and adoption factors for Ethereum JavaScript libraries.

MetricEthers.js v6Viem v2

Bundle Size (gzipped)

~80 KB

~25 KB

Tree-shaking Support

TypeScript Native

EIP-712 Typed Data

Wallet Client (Browser)

Public Client (RPC)

Smart Account (ERC-4337)

Initial Release

2016

2022

pros-cons-a
LIBRARY COMPARISON

Ethers.js vs Viem: The Developer's Choice

A data-driven breakdown of the two dominant Ethereum JavaScript libraries, highlighting their architectural philosophies and ideal use cases.

03

Ethers.js Trade-off: Bundle Size & Legacy Patterns

Monolithic Architecture: The all-in-one design leads to larger client-side bundles, impacting dApp load times. Historical Baggage: While v6 streamlined the API, some patterns (e.g., BigNumber) feel less modern compared to native bigint. Can be overkill for simple, targeted interactions where you only need a subset of functionality.

04

Viem Trade-off: Learning Curve & Younger Ecosystem

Conceptual Shift: Its modular, composable design (clients, transports, actions) requires a steeper initial learning curve for developers accustomed to Ethers.js's class-based approach. Ecosystem Maturity: While growing rapidly, it has fewer third-party tutorials, plugins, and Stack Overflow answers compared to the entrenched Ethers.js ecosystem, which can slow down troubleshooting.

pros-cons-b
ETHERS.JS VS VIEM

Viem: Pros and Cons

A data-driven comparison of the two leading Ethereum JavaScript libraries, highlighting key architectural differences and performance trade-offs.

01

Viem: Type-Safe & Modern

Built with TypeScript-first design and ABI-inferred types. This eliminates entire classes of runtime errors (e.g., incorrect argument types) and provides superior IDE autocompletion. This matters for large-scale dApp development and teams prioritizing developer experience and safety.

02

Viem: Performance & Bundle Size

~30% smaller bundle size and faster execution due to a modular, tree-shakable architecture. Core utilities are ~80kb vs Ethers' ~150kb. This matters for frontend applications where load time directly impacts user retention and for high-frequency operations like wallet connection and signing.

03

Viem: Learning Curve & Ecosystem

Steeper initial learning curve due to its functional, composable API vs Ethers' class-based OOP. Smaller, though growing, ecosystem with fewer third-party plugins and tutorials. This matters for rapid prototyping or teams with deep, existing Ethers.js expertise.

04

Ethers.js: Maturity & Breadth

Battle-tested over 5+ years with massive adoption (used by MetaMask, Uniswap). Extensive documentation and vast community support (4,000+ GitHub stars, 500+ contributors). This matters for mission-critical production systems where stability and available developer talent are paramount.

05

Ethers.js: Wallet & Provider Abstraction

Comprehensive built-in provider and signer abstractions (JsonRpcProvider, Web3Provider). Simplifies integration with wallets like MetaMask and complex multi-signer setups. This matters for applications requiring broad wallet compatibility without managing low-level RPC details.

06

Ethers.js: Bundle Bloat & Legacy Code

Larger bundle size due to monolithic structure and legacy code paths. Some APIs are less ergonomic for modern React/Vue patterns, requiring more boilerplate. This matters for performance-sensitive web apps and teams wanting to adopt a purely functional architecture.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

When to Choose Which: A Scenario-Based Guide

Viem for Speed & Developer Experience

Verdict: The clear winner for modern, high-performance applications. Strengths: Viem is built with TypeScript-first design, offering superior type safety and autocompletion. Its modular, tree-shakable architecture results in smaller bundle sizes (often 40-50% smaller than Ethers). It uses native fetch and ES modules, leading to faster cold starts in serverless environments like Vercel or AWS Lambda. For raw RPC call speed and efficient batching, Viem's multicall and optimized request handling are unmatched. Example Use: Building a high-frequency dashboard, a performant backend indexer, or a lean frontend where bundle size is critical.

Ethers.js for Speed & DX

Verdict: The reliable, comprehensive choice for projects prioritizing ecosystem stability over cutting-edge performance. Strengths: While larger, Ethers.js is exceptionally well-documented with a vast array of examples and community Q&A. Its monolithic bundle can be simpler for quick prototyping. For developers deeply familiar with its API, iteration speed can be high due to predictable patterns and extensive utility functions out-of-the-box. Trade-off: You accept larger bundle sizes and less granular control over performance optimizations for the sake of proven patterns and easier debugging for common tasks.

LIBRARY COMPARISON

Migration Path: From Ethers.js to Viem

A technical breakdown for developers and architects evaluating the shift from the established Ethers.js library to the modern Viem toolkit for Ethereum interaction.

Yes, Viem is generally faster for most common operations. It uses a smaller bundle size (~15kb vs Ethers.js's ~100kb), optimized tree-shaking, and a more efficient request batching system. This results in faster application load times and snappier interactions, especially in browser environments. However, for complex contract abstraction tasks, the performance difference may be less pronounced.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Decision Framework

A data-driven breakdown to guide your choice between Ethers.js and Viem for your next Ethereum project.

Ethers.js excels at providing a comprehensive, battle-tested toolkit for complex dApp development because of its extensive API surface and long-standing ecosystem dominance. For example, its BigNumber utilities, robust contract abstraction, and deep integration with wallets like MetaMask have made it the de facto standard, powering over 70% of major dApps according to ecosystem surveys. Its modular v6 architecture offers flexibility, but the sheer scope can lead to larger bundle sizes, impacting frontend performance.

Viem takes a radically different approach by prioritizing type safety, bundle size, and developer experience through a modular, low-level RPC client strategy. This results in a superior developer experience with full TypeScript autocompletion and significantly smaller bundles (often 30-50% smaller than Ethers v6), but requires a steeper initial learning curve for developers accustomed to Ethers' abstractions. Its performance in benchmarks, such as transaction serialization and ABI encoding, consistently outperforms Ethers by 2-5x.

The key trade-off: If your priority is stability, extensive documentation, and a familiar paradigm for a large team, choose Ethers.js. Its maturity and vast community support reduce onboarding friction. If you prioritize modern TypeScript development, optimal frontend performance, and are building a new, performance-critical application, choose Viem. Its design is better aligned with the future of Ethereum tooling, especially for protocols integrating with Layer 2s like Arbitrum or Optimism where RPC efficiency is paramount.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team