Tenderly excels at real-time, developer-centric observability and debugging. Its core strength is providing a unified platform for monitoring contract events, simulating transactions, and alerting on anomalies with sub-second latency. For example, its Debugger allows engineers to step through failed transactions line-by-line, a critical tool for protocols like Aave or Uniswap V3 managing complex, high-value smart contracts. This integrated environment prioritizes immediate insight and rapid incident response over raw data scalability.
LABS
Comparisons
Tenderly vs The Graph: Contract Event Monitoring & Indexing
A technical analysis comparing Tenderly's real-time simulation platform with The Graph's decentralized indexing protocol. This guide helps CTOs and protocol architects choose the optimal solution for querying and monitoring smart contract events based on use case, data needs, and infrastructure philosophy.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: Two Philosophies for Blockchain Data
Tenderly and The Graph represent divergent architectural approaches to extracting and serving on-chain data, each optimized for distinct developer workflows.
The Graph takes a different approach by specializing in decentralized, historical data indexing and querying via GraphQL. Its subgraph model allows developers to define custom data schemas and transformation logic, creating highly optimized APIs for dApp frontends. This results in a trade-off: while queries for indexed data are extremely fast and cost-effective (e.g., serving thousands of requests per second for dApps like Uniswap or Balancer), there is an inherent latency in indexing new blocks and a development overhead to build and maintain subgraphs.
The key trade-off: If your priority is real-time monitoring, alerting, and deep transaction analysis for operational reliability, choose Tenderly. If you prioritize serving scalable, customized historical data to end-users in a decentralized manner, choose The Graph. The former is an operational command center; the latter is a public data infrastructure layer.
tldr-summary
TENDERLY VS THE GRAPH
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A data-driven comparison of two leading platforms for blockchain data access. Tenderly is a managed platform for real-time monitoring and debugging, while The Graph is a decentralized protocol for querying historical data.
01
Choose Tenderly for Real-Time Monitoring
Live contract state & event streaming: Monitor transactions, event logs, and contract state changes in real-time with sub-second latency. This matters for building alerting systems, dashboards, and user notifications that require immediate feedback. Ideal for DeFi protocols like Aave or Uniswap that need to track liquidations or large swaps as they happen.
02
Choose The Graph for Historical Queries
Decentralized indexing of on-chain data: Query vast, aggregated historical data across multiple blocks using GraphQL. This matters for building analytics dashboards, NFT explorers, and data-heavy dApp frontends that need complex, filtered queries. Used by protocols like Uniswap and Decentraland for their front-end data layers.
03
Choose Tenderly for Developer Experience
Integrated debugging & simulation suite: Debug failed transactions, simulate forks, and test contract interactions in a sandboxed environment. This matters for rapid development, security auditing, and pre-production testing without deploying to a testnet. Features like Gas Profiler and State Diff are unique to Tenderly's platform.
04
Choose The Graph for Decentralization & Composability
Open, permissionless subgraph ecosystem: Build and publish reusable data indices (subgraphs) that any application can query. This matters for protocols that prioritize censorship resistance, data provenance, and community-driven indexing. The Graph's decentralized network of Indexers ensures data availability and integrity.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Tenderly vs The Graph: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for blockchain data access and monitoring.
| Metric / Feature | Tenderly | The Graph |
|---|---|---|
Primary Function | Real-time DevOps & Debugging | Historical Data Indexing & Querying |
Data Latency | < 2 seconds | ~1 block (12-15 sec on Ethereum) |
Query Language | GraphQL (for debug data) | GraphQL (primary interface) |
Smart Contract Support | EVM chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, etc.) | Multi-chain (EVM, Cosmos, NEAR, etc.) |
Real-time Alerts | ||
Simulation & Forks | ||
Requires Subgraph Deployment | ||
Pricing Model | Freemium SaaS | Query fees (GRT), Hosted Service free tier |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS
Tenderly vs The Graph: Contract Event Monitoring & Indexing
A data-driven breakdown of strengths and trade-offs for two leading solutions in blockchain data access.
01
Tenderly: Real-Time Debugging & Observability
Specific advantage: Live transaction simulation and debugging suite. This matters for developers needing immediate insight into contract behavior, gas optimization, and failure analysis. Offers a full-stack observability platform with alerting, forking, and a visual debugger, making it ideal for rapid development and production monitoring on EVM chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon.
30+
Supported Chains
02
Tenderly: Centralized Simplicity & Speed
Specific advantage: Managed, high-performance infrastructure with sub-second query latency. This matters for teams prioritizing developer velocity and operational simplicity over decentralization. Tenderly handles indexing, caching, and API management, reducing DevOps overhead. However, this introduces a single point of failure and vendor lock-in risk compared to decentralized alternatives.
03
The Graph: Decentralized & Verifiable Data
Specific advantage: Open, decentralized network of Indexers powered by the GRT token. This matters for protocols requiring censorship resistance, data verifiability, and long-term data availability. Subgraphs (open APIs) are hosted by a distributed network, aligning with Web3 ethos. Used by major dApps like Uniswap and Aave for transparent, chain-agnostic indexing.
40+
Supported Networks
04
The Graph: Subgraph Development Complexity
Specific advantage: Custom, schema-defined data pipelines via GraphQL. This matters for complex querying needs and historical data aggregation. However, it requires significant upfront development effort to write, test, and deploy subgraphs in AssemblyScript. This creates a steeper learning curve and higher maintenance burden compared to Tenderly's point-and-click event tracking.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Tenderly vs The Graph: Contract Event Monitoring & Indexing
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading approaches to blockchain data access.
03
Tenderly Con: Centralized Service Model
Vendor lock-in and single point of failure: Tenderly is a managed SaaS platform. Your data pipeline depends on their infrastructure and pricing tiers. This matters for protocols requiring maximum decentralization or those with strict data sovereignty requirements, as opposed to The Graph's permissionless network.
04
Tenderly Con: Limited Historical Query Flexibility
Optimized for real-time, not complex historical analysis: While great for recent events, performing complex aggregations or joining data across many blocks (e.g., calculating a 90-day TVL trend) is not its core strength. This matters for dApps needing rich, custom historical analytics which are better served by a dedicated indexer.
07
The Graph Con: Development & Maintenance Overhead
Requires subgraph development and hosting: You must write, test, and deploy mapping logic in AssemblyScript. Maintaining subgraph syncing and managing GRT payments for queries adds operational complexity. This matters for teams wanting a turnkey solution and lacking resources for dedicated data engineering.
08
The Graph Con: Latency for Real-Time Use Cases
Indexing lag vs. direct RPC calls: Subgraphs sync with a block confirmation delay (often 2+ blocks). This matters for high-frequency trading dashboards or live fraud detection systems where seeing the absolute latest state (<1 sec) is critical, a area where Tenderly's direct node access excels.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Use Tenderly vs The Graph
Tenderly for Developers
Verdict: Choose for real-time debugging, simulation, and proactive monitoring of your own contracts. Strengths:
- Real-time Debugging: Step-through transaction execution with full state inspection. Essential for debugging failed DeFi swaps or NFT mints.
- Gas Profiling & Simulation: Use the
tenderly.simulateAPI to test transactions before broadcast, preventing costly on-chain reverts. - Alerting & Monitoring: Set up custom alerts for specific contract events or function calls (e.g.,
OwnershipTransferred). Use Case: You need a development and DevOps suite for building, testing, and monitoring smart contracts in production.
The Graph for Developers
Verdict: Choose for building performant front-ends and analytics that query historical, aggregated on-chain data. Strengths:
- Historical Indexing: Efficiently query months of event data (e.g., "all Uniswap V3 swaps for a pool") with a single GraphQL call.
- Decentralized Network: Subgraphs can be hosted on The Graph's decentralized network for censorship resistance.
- Data Transformation: Write mappings in AssemblyScript to shape raw event data into structured entities for your dApp. Use Case: You are building a dApp dashboard, analytics page, or any feature requiring complex historical queries.
TENDERLY VS THE GRAPH
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture & Data Flow
A technical comparison of how Tenderly and The Graph handle on-chain data, from event emission to queryable APIs. Understand their core architectures to choose the right tool for monitoring, indexing, and analytics.
Yes, Tenderly is significantly faster for real-time monitoring and alerts. Tenderly's architecture uses a proprietary node infrastructure and WebSocket streams to deliver event notifications and transaction simulations in under 2 seconds. The Graph, as an indexing protocol, operates on a pull-based model with subgraph syncing times ranging from minutes to hours, making it unsuitable for low-latency alerts. For use cases like fraud detection or instant user notifications, Tenderly is the superior choice.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide your choice between Tenderly's real-time observability and The Graph's decentralized data indexing.
Tenderly excels at real-time contract monitoring and debugging because it provides a centralized, developer-first platform with deep execution traces and instant alerts. For example, its Simulator allows you to test transactions against the latest state before broadcasting, and its Alerting system can notify your team of failed transactions or specific on-chain events within seconds, crucial for rapid incident response in high-value DeFi protocols like Aave or Uniswap.
The Graph takes a fundamentally different approach by providing decentralized, historical data indexing via its open network of Indexers. This results in a trade-off: while queries are highly reliable and censorship-resistant, the data is not real-time, with indexing typically lagging behind the chain head by several blocks. Its strength lies in serving complex historical queries for dApp frontends, as seen with major protocols like Livepeer and Decentraland, which rely on subgraphs for efficient data retrieval.
The key architectural trade-off is between centralized speed and decentralized resilience. Tenderly offers a managed service with ~99.9% uptime SLA, immediate data access, and advanced debugging tools, but you are dependent on a single provider. The Graph offers a permissionless network where data availability is guaranteed by cryptoeconomic incentives, but you manage subgraph development and accept indexing latency.
Consider Tenderly if you need: immediate observability for production monitoring, advanced debugging of failed transactions, or rapid prototyping with forked environments. It's the tool for engineering teams managing live contracts where every second of downtime or an uncaught bug can mean significant financial loss.
Choose The Graph when: your dApp requires robust, decentralized access to extensive historical data, you are building a censorship-resistant frontend, or your data schema is complex and requires custom indexing logic. It is the foundational data layer for applications where protocol neutrality and long-term data availability are non-negotiable.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall