Tenderly excels at real-time, developer-centric observability because it integrates directly with your development workflow. It provides instant alerts, gas profiling, and transaction simulation for contracts you own or depend on. For example, its debug and simulate features allow teams to replay failed transactions with a full state trace, a critical tool for diagnosing mainnet incidents that can save hours of manual investigation during an outage or exploit.
LABS
Comparisons
Tenderly Dashboards vs Dune Analytics: Contract Health & Metrics
A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating operational dashboards for real-time contract health, user activity, and on-chain analytics. We analyze data sources, customization, cost, and integration to determine the best tool for your use case.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Two Philosophies of On-Chain Observability
Tenderly and Dune Analytics represent two distinct paradigms for monitoring contract health and blockchain metrics, each optimized for different stages of the development lifecycle.
Dune Analytics takes a different approach by prioritizing open, community-driven data exploration and historical analysis. This results in a trade-off: while its SQL-based Spellbook abstractions and public dashboards (like those tracking Uniswap v3 fees or Lido staking ratios) offer unparalleled transparency and trend analysis, they are less suited for real-time monitoring of private contract states or programmatic alerting within a CI/CD pipeline.
The key trade-off: If your priority is operational reliability and rapid incident response for your specific contracts, choose Tenderly. If you prioritize public data storytelling, benchmarking against ecosystem standards, and leveraging community-built dashboards, choose Dune Analytics.
tldr-summary
Tenderly vs Dune: Contract Health & Metrics
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
A data-driven breakdown of strengths and ideal use cases for two leading blockchain analytics platforms.
01
Choose Tenderly for Real-Time Debugging
Live transaction simulation & debugging: Step-by-step execution traces for any transaction, including pending mempool tx. This matters for protocol developers monitoring live contracts, debugging failed tx, or simulating governance proposals before execution.
02
Choose Dune for Community & Historical Analysis
Crowdsourced SQL dashboards: Access 1M+ queries and dashboards from 100K+ analysts. This matters for researchers and investors analyzing long-term protocol trends (e.g., Uniswap DEX volume), token flows, or competitor benchmarking using on-chain history.
03
Choose Tenderly for Proactive Alerting
Custom, code-based alerting: Set up alerts for specific contract functions, event emissions, or wallet activities. This matters for DevOps/SRE teams needing instant Slack/Discord/PagerDuty notifications for security events, liquidity changes, or user behavior anomalies.
04
Choose Dune for Open Data & Composability
Open, queryable raw data: All decoded contract data is publicly queryable via SQL (SparkSQL). This matters for data analysts and DAOs building custom reports, embedding analytics into apps, or forking and modifying existing community dashboards for specific needs.
CONTRACT HEALTH & METRICS DASHBOARDS
Head-to-Head Feature Matrix: Tenderly vs Dune
Direct comparison of key features for monitoring smart contract performance and on-chain analytics.
| Metric / Feature | Tenderly | Dune Analytics |
|---|---|---|
Primary Data Source | Full Node RPC & Indexed Data | Indexed On-Chain Data Only |
Real-Time Alerting & Monitoring | ||
Gas Profiling & Simulation | ||
Custom Dashboard Creation | ||
SQL Query Interface | ||
Free Tier Query Execution Limit | 1M compute units/month | No query limits |
Supported Chains | EVM chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, etc.) | Multi-chain (EVM, Solana, Bitcoin) |
Smart Contract Debugger |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Tenderly Dashboards vs Dune Analytics: Contract Health & Metrics
A data-driven comparison for teams choosing a monitoring and analytics platform. Tenderly excels in real-time debugging, while Dune dominates in historical, community-driven analysis.
03
Tenderly Con: Limited Historical Analysis
Focus on recent data: Primarily designed for monitoring live contracts and recent transactions. Struggles with deep historical trend analysis (e.g., 6-month user cohort behavior) or creating benchmark reports against legacy protocol versions. Forces teams to export data to other BI tools for longitudinal studies.
04
Dune Con: No Private Testing Environment
Public-first, read-only paradigm: Cannot simulate transactions, debug private smart contracts, or create dashboards for unreleased protocols. A significant blocker for CTOs managing pre-launch security and teams requiring confidential KPI tracking. You must use Tenderly or a local Hardhat fork for this.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Tenderly vs Dune: Contract Health & Metrics
Key strengths and trade-offs for monitoring smart contract performance and on-chain metrics.
01
Tenderly: Deep Debugging & Simulation
Specific advantage: Full-stack debugging with transaction simulation and gas profiling. This matters for protocol developers needing to replay failed transactions, test forks, and optimize contract logic before deployment. Direct integration with Hardhat and Foundry.
02
Tenderly: Real-Time Alerting
Specific advantage: Custom, webhook-driven alerts for specific contract events or state changes. This matters for DevOps and security teams requiring instant notifications for anomalies, large withdrawals, or failed function calls to maintain uptime and security.
03
Tenderly: Limited Public Data Exploration
Specific trade-off: Primarily focused on your deployed contracts. This is a limitation for researchers and analysts who need to query and visualize broad, cross-protocol datasets or historical trends without deploying first.
04
Dune Analytics: Community & Composability
Specific advantage: Open, forkable dashboards with 200,000+ queries. This matters for data analysts and PMs benchmarking protocol performance against competitors (e.g., Uniswap vs. Curve TVL) or building on top of community-vetted data models.
05
Dune Analytics: SQL-Based Flexibility
Specific advantage: Write raw SQL (Dune SQL) on decoded blockchain data. This matters for data engineers creating complex, custom metrics that aren't possible with pre-built dashboards, like calculating custom fee accruals or user cohort retention.
06
Dune Analytics: Lag in Real-Time Data
Specific trade-off: Data ingestion can have a 5-15 minute delay. This is a limitation for trading desks or live monitoring that require sub-minute latency to track mempool activity or immediate post-deployment contract health.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which Tool
Tenderly for Developers
Verdict: The essential tool for building, debugging, and monitoring. Strengths:
- Real-time Debugging: Step-through transaction execution with full state inspection. Essential for debugging complex DeFi interactions (e.g., Uniswap swaps, Aave liquidations).
- Simulation & Forking: Test contract changes against a forked mainnet state. Validate upgrades for protocols like Compound or MakerDAO before deployment.
- Alerting & Monitoring: Set up custom alerts for failed transactions, specific function calls, or gas threshold breaches on your live contracts.
- Integration: Directly integrates with Hardhat and Foundry for a seamless devops workflow.
Dune Analytics for Developers
Verdict: Powerful for retrospective analysis and creating public dashboards for your community. Strengths:
- SQL-Based Queries: Write complex queries to analyze historical on-chain events, user cohorts, and protocol metrics.
- Dashboard Publishing: Create and share immutable, verifiable dashboards to showcase protocol growth (TVL, unique users, fee revenue).
- Data Composability: Build on top of existing abstractions (Spells) created by others for protocols like Lido or Arbitrum.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Tenderly and Dune is a strategic decision between deep, real-time contract introspection and broad, community-driven ecosystem analytics.
Tenderly excels at real-time contract health monitoring and debugging because it operates directly on transaction-level data from its node infrastructure. For example, its Gas Profiler and Simulator allow teams to pre-emptively test upgrades and identify gas inefficiencies before mainnet deployment, a critical capability for protocols like Aave or Uniswap managing billions in TVL. Its alerting on custom events and failed transactions provides a direct line to production issues.
Dune Analytics takes a different approach by leveraging a massive, open dataset queried via SQL. This results in unparalleled strength for tracking macro protocol metrics—like daily active users, fee revenue, or cross-protocol TVL flows—but trades off real-time granularity for batch-processed data updated hourly. Its power lies in community dashboards, such as those tracking L2 adoption or NFT marketplace volumes, which provide context no single team could build alone.
The key trade-off is between operational control and ecosystem context. If your priority is developer velocity and production reliability—needing to debug reverts, simulate forks, and monitor smart contract vitals in real-time—choose Tenderly. If you prioritize competitive intelligence, user growth analytics, and transparent, shareable reporting for stakeholders, choose Dune. For comprehensive coverage, leading protocols often use both: Tenderly for the engine room and Dune for the navigation bridge.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall