Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Tally's Delegate System vs Boardroom's Delegate Dashboard: Delegate Engagement

A technical comparison of delegate-centric governance platforms, analyzing profile tools, voting analytics, and communication features for DAO decision-makers.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Delegate Engagement Imperative

A data-driven comparison of how Tally and Boardroom architect delegate engagement, a critical lever for DAO health and voter participation.

Tally's Delegate System excels at deep, on-chain integration and protocol-level tooling, making it the default choice for governance-native ecosystems. Its strength lies in seamless embedding within applications like Uniswap and Compound, where delegate profiles and voting history are surfaced directly in the interface. This native approach drives higher delegate visibility and participation, as evidenced by its role in facilitating over $30B in governance votes across major DeFi protocols.

Boardroom's Delegate Dashboard takes a different approach by prioritizing a unified, cross-protocol management layer. Its strategy aggregates governance activity from diverse DAOs like Optimism and Arbitrum into a single dashboard, offering delegates a consolidated view of their influence. This results in a trade-off: while it provides superior portfolio management for professional delegates, it operates more as an overlay rather than a deeply integrated protocol component, which can limit its direct reach within individual community hubs.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing in-protocol engagement and voter turnout within a specific ecosystem, choose Tally. If you prioritize empowering professional delegates who manage positions across multiple DAOs with a unified tool, choose Boardroom.

tldr-summary
Tally vs. Boardroom

TL;DR: Core Differentiators

Key strengths and trade-offs for delegate engagement platforms at a glance.

03

Tally's Delegate Directory & Discovery

Structured reputation system: Features verified delegate profiles with voting history, statements, and delegated voting power (e.g., 2.5M UNI for top delegates). This matters for token holders seeking alignment who want to research and delegate to experts based on transparent track records.

04

Boardroom's Advanced Delegation Tools

Flexible voting power management: Supports partial delegation (split voting power) and topic-based delegation (delegate by category like Treasury or Security). This matters for sophisticated institutions requiring granular control over how their governance influence is applied.

05

Tally's Proposal Lifecycle Engine

End-to-end proposal workflow: Guides users from temperature check → governance proposal → on-chain execution. Integrated with Snapshot for signaling and Safe for execution. This matters for DAO contributors and project founders actively steering protocol upgrades and treasury management.

06

Boardroom's Analytics & Notifications

Proactive governance intelligence: Custom alerts for new proposals, voting deadlines, and delegate activity changes across all connected protocols. This matters for active participants who cannot manually monitor dozens of DAO forums and Snapshot spaces, preventing missed votes.

DELEGATE ENGAGEMENT & GOVERNANCE DASHBOARDS

Feature Comparison: Tally vs Boardroom

Direct comparison of delegate systems for on-chain governance management.

Metric / FeatureTallyBoardroom

Primary Governance Focus

Delegate Discovery & Voting

Multi-DAO Portfolio Management

Supported Networks

Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism

Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, 25+ others

Real-Time Proposal Notifications

In-App Delegation

Delegate Performance Analytics

Voting history, proposal alignment

Voting power, participation rate

Integrated Treasury Management

Free to Use

pros-cons-a
Tally vs Boardroom: Delegate Engagement

Tally's Delegate System: Pros and Cons

Key strengths and trade-offs for protocol governance at a glance.

01

Tally Pro: Deep On-Chain Integration

Direct smart contract interaction: Tally's system is built directly on top of governance contracts (e.g., Compound Governor Bravo, Uniswap). This enables real-time vote delegation and execution without intermediary layers. This matters for protocols requiring maximum security and transparency, as delegate actions are verifiable on-chain.

02

Tally Pro: Unified Delegate Directory

Centralized reputation hub: Tally aggregates delegate profiles, voting history, and statements across multiple protocols (Compound, Uniswap, Gitcoin) into a single interface. This provides cross-protocol reputation visibility, helping token holders identify and delegate to consistent, high-quality delegates. This matters for large token holders (DAOs, VCs) managing governance across their portfolio.

03

Boardroom Pro: Multi-Chain Dashboard

Aggregated cross-chain view: Boardroom supports governance across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and 10+ other chains in one dashboard. This provides a unified management console for delegates and voters active in multi-chain ecosystems (e.g., Aave, Balancer, Lido). This matters for delegates operating across Layer 2s and sidechains who need to track proposals without switching interfaces.

04

Boardroom Pro: Advanced Delegation Tools

Flexible delegation controls: Offers features like partial delegation splits (e.g., 60% to Delegate A, 40% to Delegate B) and proposal-type-specific delegation. This enables sophisticated voting strategies beyond all-or-nothing delegation. This matters for institutional delegators and DAO treasuries seeking to mitigate concentration risk and align delegates with specific expertise areas.

05

Tally Con: Ethereum-Centric Focus

Limited multi-chain support: Tally's primary strength is deep integration with major Ethereum Mainnet governance systems. Support for Layer 2 and alternative chain governance (e.g., Polygon, Avalanche) is less mature or requires custom integration. This matters for protocols native to other chains or deploying governance on L2s for cost savings.

06

Boardroom Con: Abstraction Layer Risk

Additional trust assumption: Boardroom acts as an aggregation and indexing layer, which can introduce data latency or centralization points compared to direct on-chain interaction. While secure, it adds a dependency on Boardroom's indexers for proposal and vote state. This matters for maximalist protocols where every component must be trust-minimized and verifiable.

pros-cons-b
Tally vs Boardroom

Boardroom's Delegate Dashboard: Pros and Cons

Key strengths and trade-offs for delegate engagement at a glance. Data-driven analysis for DAOs choosing a governance front-end.

01

Tally Pro: Deep Protocol Integration

Native multi-chain support for Compound, Uniswap, and ENS governance contracts. This matters for DAOs that require direct, low-latency interaction with their core protocol's on-chain voting mechanisms, minimizing abstraction layers.

02

Tally Pro: Delegate-First Analytics

Granular delegate profiles with historical voting power, proposal alignment scores, and delegation trends. This matters for token holders performing due diligence, as it provides transparent, on-chain reputation metrics beyond simple vote counts.

03

Tally Con: Limited Customization Scope

Primarily a front-end for existing contracts (e.g., Governor Bravo). This matters for DAOs needing bespoke governance modules, custom delegation logic, or deep brand integration, as Tally's framework is less flexible than a full-stack solution.

04

Boardroom Pro: Unified Multi-Protocol Hub

Aggregated dashboard for tracking delegations and proposals across 30+ protocols like Aave, Compound, and Lido from a single interface. This matters for professional delegates or funds managing voting power across a diversified portfolio, saving significant operational overhead.

05

Boardroom Pro: Advanced Delegation Tools

Features like delegation statements, sub-delegation, and gasless voting via EIP-712 signatures. This matters for increasing voter participation and enabling sophisticated delegation strategies without requiring constant wallet interaction from token holders.

06

Boardroom Con: Abstraction Layer Complexity

Additional dependency on Boardroom's indexing and aggregation services. This matters for DAOs prioritizing maximum decentralization and direct contract interaction, as it introduces a trusted intermediary layer for data presentation and vote bundling.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

When to Choose Tally vs Boardroom

Tally for DAO Architects

Verdict: The definitive choice for on-chain governance with deep delegate tooling. Strengths:

  • On-Chain Primitive: Tally is built as a front-end for the Compound Governor Bravo standard, making it the native interface for protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Gitcoin. Governance is executed directly via smart contract interactions.
  • Advanced Delegate System: Features a comprehensive delegate directory with detailed profiles, voting history, and delegate statements. This fosters a transparent and competitive delegate ecosystem.
  • Full Proposal Lifecycle: Supports the entire process from temperature check to on-chain execution, including multi-sig proposal creation and real-time voting analytics. Best For: Protocols that require rigorous, transparent, and fully on-chain governance, where delegate identity and track record are critical.

Boardroom for DAO Architects

Verdict: A powerful aggregator and dashboard for multi-DAO participation, less focused on being a governance primitive. Strengths:

  • Multi-Protocol Dashboard: Provides a unified interface to view and vote across dozens of DAOs (e.g., Compound, Maker, ENS) from a single dashboard, reducing management overhead.
  • Enhanced Voter Experience: Focuses on simplifying the voting process for token holders with clear summaries, notification systems, and batch voting capabilities.
  • Off-Chain Coordination: Integrates with Snapshot for gasless voting on proposals before they move on-chain, facilitating broader community sentiment gathering. Best For: Architects managing participation in multiple DAOs or those who prioritize voter accessibility and off-chain signaling before final on-chain execution.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Verdict and Final Recommendation

Choosing between Tally and Boardroom hinges on whether you prioritize deep, protocol-specific delegate intelligence or a broad, multi-chain governance portfolio dashboard.

Tally's Delegate System excels at providing deep, on-chain governance intelligence for specific protocols. Its strength lies in its integration with protocol-specific data, offering detailed delegate profiles with voting history, proposal alignment scores, and delegation-weighted voting power. For example, a DAO like Uniswap or Compound can use Tally to surface delegates with proven expertise in their specific treasury management or parameter adjustment proposals. This creates a high-fidelity environment for engaged, informed delegation.

Boardroom's Delegate Dashboard takes a different approach by aggregating governance activity across a multi-chain portfolio. This strategy results in a trade-off: breadth over depth. A delegate or voter managing positions in Compound on Ethereum, Aave on Polygon, and Uniswap on Arbitrum can track all their delegations and voting requirements from a single interface. However, the analysis for each protocol is necessarily less granular than Tally's dedicated views, focusing on cross-chain participation rates rather than deep proposal analysis.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing informed, high-stakes delegation within a single, major protocol ecosystem (e.g., Ethereum mainnet DeFi), choose Tally for its unparalleled depth and protocol-native tooling. If you prioritize managing delegation and voting across a fragmented, multi-chain portfolio, choose Boardroom for its aggregation and workflow efficiency, accepting less granular insight per protocol.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team