Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module vs Tally Safe Module: Multisig Execution

A technical analysis for CTOs and protocol architects comparing two leading modules that connect off-chain Snapshot votes to on-chain execution via a Gnosis Safe, focusing on setup complexity, automation, and security trade-offs.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: Bridging Off-Chain Signals to On-Chain Execution

Comparing the two leading solutions for executing Snapshot proposals on-chain via Gnosis Safe.

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module excels at providing a secure, minimal, and audited execution path for on-chain governance. As a native module built and maintained by the core Safe team, it benefits from direct integration and a security-first design, having processed thousands of transactions across major DAOs like Uniswap and Aave. Its primary strength is trust minimization, as it enforces a strict 1:1 mapping between an off-chain Snapshot vote and a single on-chain transaction, eliminating execution ambiguity.

Tally's Safe Module takes a different approach by offering a more flexible and feature-rich execution layer. It supports advanced governance patterns like multi-transaction bundles, gasless execution via meta-transactions, and integration with Tally's broader governance dashboard. This results in a trade-off: increased functionality and user experience come with a more complex, opinionated architecture that relies on Tally's relayer infrastructure for certain features, introducing a mild trust assumption.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing security and simplicity with a battle-tested, minimal module, choose the Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module. If you prioritize advanced execution features, gasless voting, and a unified governance dashboard, choose Tally's Safe Module. For DAOs with high-value treasuries, the native module's audit pedigree and direct Safe integration often tip the scales.

tldr-summary
Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module vs Tally Safe Module

TL;DR: Core Differentiators

Key strengths and trade-offs for on-chain multisig execution based on off-chain governance votes.

02

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module: Protocol Agnostic

Works with any Safe: Functions with any Safe {1.3.0+} on any EVM chain. This matters for multi-chain DAOs (e.g., Arbitrum, Polygon, Base) that need consistent governance execution across their entire treasury deployment.

15+
Supported Chains
04

Tally Safe Module: Tally Ecosystem Lock-in

Tightly coupled with Tally's platform: The module is optimized for proposals created within Tally. This matters for DAOs already fully committed to Tally's governance stack, but can be a limitation if you want to use Snapshot + another front-end or execution tool.

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module vs Tally Safe Module

Direct comparison of key execution and governance features for multisig transaction management.

Metric / FeatureGnosis Safe Snapshot ModuleTally Safe Module

Native Integration with Safe{Wallet}

Gasless Proposal Creation & Voting

On-Chain Execution Gas Cost

Paid by proposer

Paid by proposer

Off-Chain Voting Layer

Snapshot.org

Tally's proprietary backend

Required Safe Threshold for Execution

1 signer (the proposer)

1 signer (the proposer)

Custom Voting Strategies Support

Open-Source Codebase

pros-cons-a
MULTISIG EXECUTION COMPARISON

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module vs Tally's Safe Module

Key strengths and trade-offs for on-chain execution of off-chain governance votes.

01

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module: Native Integration

Direct protocol integration: Developed and maintained by the core Gnosis Safe team. This ensures first-class compatibility with the Safe{Core} SDK and the official Safe UI, reducing integration risk for DAOs and protocols like Lido or Aave.

02

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module: Simplicity & Security

Minimal, audited contract: A single, focused module that has undergone formal verification. This reduces attack surface and gas costs for execution, which is critical for high-value DAO treasuries managing $10M+ in assets.

03

Tally's Safe Module: Enhanced UX & Flexibility

Governance-as-a-Service features: Bundles execution with Tally's full-stack platform, offering proposal creation, delegation tools, and real-time voting dashboards. Ideal for DAOs like Uniswap or Compound that want an all-in-one governance suite.

04

Tally's Safe Module: Cross-Chain & Multi-Protocol

Unified execution layer: Supports executing Snapshot votes across multiple chains (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum) and can integrate with other governance systems beyond Snapshot. This matters for DAOs with complex, multi-chain treasury deployments.

pros-cons-b
Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module vs Tally Safe Module

Tally Safe Module: Pros and Cons

A technical breakdown of execution strategies for on-chain multisig governance. Choose based on your protocol's security model and operational tempo.

02

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module: Security Trade-off

Introduces execution latency and a second transaction. A successful Snapshot vote creates a proposal that must be manually executed by a multisig signer, adding a delay and a potential point of failure. This matters for time-sensitive operations (e.g., treasury management during volatility) or protocols that prioritize atomic execution of governance decisions.

04

Tally Safe Module: On-Chain Cost & Finality

Requires all voting to occur on-chain, incurring gas fees for every vote and making decisions subject to blockchain finality. This matters for budget-conscious communities or those with high voter turnout, as costs scale with participation. It enforces sybil-resistance via gas payment but can reduce broad voter participation compared to off-chain models.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: Which Module For Your Use Case?

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module for Treasuries

Verdict: The Standard for High-Value, Deliberate Governance. Strengths: Deep integration with Snapshot's off-chain voting (used by Uniswap, Aave, Compound) creates a formal, auditable proposal-to-execution pipeline. The time-locked execution provides a critical security buffer for multi-million dollar operations. Its modularity allows integration with custom Zodiac modules for complex conditional logic (e.g., multi-step budget approvals). Considerations: The multi-step process (Snapshot vote → on-chain proposal → execution) is slower, making it less suitable for rapid treasury responses.

Tally's Safe Module for Treasuries

Verdict: Streamlined for Agile, On-Chain Governance. Strengths: Direct integration with Tally's on-chain governance explorer and OpenZeppelin Governor contracts unifies the workflow. It's ideal for DAOs like Fei Protocol that prioritize transparency and atomic execution where votes directly trigger actions. Reduces tooling fragmentation. Considerations: Lacks the off-chain signaling flexibility of Snapshot, which can be a cost-prohibitive model for large, casual voter bases.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Recommendation

Choosing between the native Snapshot Module and Tally's Safe Module depends on your team's operational philosophy and technical constraints.

Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module excels at decentralized, permissionless governance because it directly integrates with the Snapshot protocol, a neutral, off-chain standard used by over 5,000 DAOs. This allows any token holder to create and vote on proposals without incurring gas fees, making it ideal for large, permissionless communities. Its architecture ensures the multisig is a pure executor, separating the voting and execution layers cleanly.

Tally's Safe Module takes a different approach by providing a managed, opinionated platform that bundles proposal creation, voting, and execution into a unified interface. This results in a streamlined user experience and reduced operational overhead for the Safe owners, but introduces a dependency on Tally's infrastructure and design choices. It's a turnkey solution that prioritizes convenience and speed of setup over protocol neutrality.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing decentralization, adhering to the most widely adopted off-chain standard (Snapshot), and maintaining infrastructure independence, choose the Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module. If you prioritize rapid deployment, a polished all-in-one dashboard, and are comfortable with a managed service layer, choose Tally's Safe Module.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Gnosis Safe Snapshot Module vs Tally Safe Module: Multisig Execution | ChainScore Comparisons