Dune Analytics excels at custom, community-driven analysis because of its open, SQL-based platform. For governance, this means you can build bespoke dashboards tracking specific DAO proposals, delegate voting power, or treasury flows for any EVM chain. For example, a team can fork and modify a popular Compound Governance Dashboard to track a new fork's metrics, leveraging a vast repository of over 1 million community-created queries. Its strength is flexibility and cost-effectiveness for teams with in-house analytics skills.
LABS
Comparisons
Dune Analytics vs Nansen: On-Chain Governance Data Analysis
A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating tools to analyze DAO governance. We contrast Dune's customizable SQL queries against Nansen's wallet labeling and pre-built dashboards.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Governance Intelligence
Dune Analytics and Nansen represent two dominant, philosophically opposed approaches to on-chain data analysis, forcing a critical choice for teams building governance dashboards or monitoring protocol health.
Nansen takes a different approach by providing curated, labeled intelligence through its proprietary wallet and entity tagging system (Smart Money, Whale). This results in a trade-off: less customizability for immediate, high-signal insights. You can instantly see how major token holders or VC funds are voting across Uniswap, Aave, and Lido proposals without writing a line of code. Nansen's value is in its pre-processed data and network context, saving hundreds of analyst hours.
The key trade-off: If your priority is deep, customizable analysis on a budget and you have SQL expertise, choose Dune. If you prioritize speed-to-insight and understanding the 'who' behind wallet activity with a managed service, choose Nansen. The decision hinges on whether you need a scalpel (Dune) or a curated intelligence feed (Nansen) for your governance strategy.
tldr-summary
Dune Analytics vs Nansen
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for on-chain governance data analysis.
01
Dune: Unmatched Customization & Community
Open SQL platform with 1M+ community-created queries and dashboards. This matters for protocol teams who need to build custom, real-time governance dashboards (e.g., tracking proposal sentiment via delegate voting patterns) or researchers conducting novel analysis not covered by standard reports.
02
Dune: Cost-Effective for Deep Dives
Transparent, usage-based pricing starting with a generous free tier. This matters for bootstrapped DAOs or analysts who need to perform deep, exploratory queries on historical governance data (e.g., full voting history of a delegate across Aave, Compound, and Uniswap) without high fixed costs.
03
Nansen: Wallet Intelligence & Entity Labels
Proprietary wallet labeling (Smart Money, Funds, DAOs) across 200M+ addresses. This matters for investors and strategists needing to decode voter blocs, identify whale influence in Snapshot votes, or track the governance activity of known institutional entities like a16z or Paradigm.
04
Nansen: Curated Governance Dashboards
Pre-built, productized dashboards for top protocols (e.g., Uniswap, Aave, Lido). This matters for CTOs and VPs who need a quick time-to-insight on governance health metrics like voter turnout, proposal success rates, and delegate concentration without writing a single line of SQL.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Dune Analytics vs Nansen: On-Chain Governance Data Analysis
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for analyzing DAO proposals, voter behavior, and treasury activity.
| Metric | Dune Analytics | Nansen |
|---|---|---|
Primary Data Model | SQL Queries (User-Defined) | Pre-Built Dashboards & Wallets |
Governance Dashboard Templates | ||
Real-Time Wallet Labeling (Smart Money) | ||
Query & Dashboard Customization | Unlimited | Limited to Templates |
Supported Chains (Governance Focus) | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, 10+ | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, 5+ |
Cost for Full Access (Monthly) | $390 (Teams Plan) | $1,500+ (Alpha Plan) |
API Access for Custom Apps |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Dune Analytics vs Nansen: On-Chain Governance Data Analysis
Key strengths and trade-offs for analyzing DAO proposals, voter behavior, and treasury management.
02
Dune Analytics: Cost-Effective Exploration
Free Public Tier: Unlimited access to a vast repository of community-created queries and dashboards for platforms like Compound, Uniswap, and Arbitrum DAOs. This matters for VPs of Engineering conducting initial due diligence or benchmarking without upfront cost.
04
Nansen: Real-Time Alerting & Workflows
Proactive Monitoring: Set alerts for specific governance events (e.g., new proposals in MakerDAO, large delegate vote swings). This enables operational readiness for treasury teams needing to execute votes or respond to critical proposals.
05
Dune Analytics: Steep Learning Curve
SQL Proficiency Required: Building meaningful governance analysis demands significant technical skill and time investment. There is no pre-built "smart" layer for governance-specific metrics, unlike Nansen's dashboards.
06
Nansen: Higher Cost & Opacity
Enterprise Pricing Model: Access to advanced features and full data requires a significant budget ($10K+/year). The proprietary data models are a black box, limiting deep customization for unique governance logic.
pros-cons-b
Dune Analytics vs Nansen
Nansen: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for on-chain governance data analysis at a glance.
01
Nansen's Strength: Wallet Intelligence
Labeled entity tracking: Proprietary wallet labeling (Smart Money, Funds, VCs) provides immediate context for governance votes and proposal support. This matters for protocol architects needing to understand the influence of key stakeholders like a16z or Paradigm in DAO decisions without manual sleuthing.
02
Nansen's Strength: Curated Dashboards
Pre-built, analyst-vetted insights: Offers ready-to-use dashboards for top protocols (e.g., Uniswap, Aave) tracking proposal history, voter turnout, and delegate concentration. This matters for CTOs who need a rapid, reliable view of governance health without investing engineering hours in query development.
03
Dune's Strength: Custom Query Flexibility
SQL-based raw data access: Enables complex, custom analysis of any governance event on supported chains (Ethereum, OP Stack, etc.). This matters for VPs of Engineering building internal reports or monitoring bespoke metrics, like the voting power migration post-merger of two DAOs.
04
Dune's Strength: Cost & Ecosystem
Freemium model & forked queries: A generous free tier and a community where 10,000+ analysts share and fork queries (e.g., OpenZeppelin's governance templates). This matters for teams with budget constraints or those who value auditing and building upon public, verifiable SQL logic.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Which Tool: A Persona-Based Guide
Dune Analytics for DeFi
Verdict: The definitive tool for custom, granular analysis of DeFi protocols. Strengths: Unmatched flexibility for querying raw on-chain data (e.g., Uniswap v3 LP positions, Aave debt positions, Curve gauge votes). Analysts can build reusable dashboards to track specific metrics like protocol revenue, impermanent loss, or MEV bot activity. The open-source community model means thousands of pre-built queries exist for protocols like MakerDAO, Compound, and Lido. Limitations: Requires SQL knowledge; data freshness can have a 5-15 minute lag.
Nansen for DeFi
Verdict: Superior for tracking smart money flows and wallet behavior. Strengths: Proprietary wallet labeling ("Smart Money," "Whale") provides immediate context. Features like Token God Mode show real-time inflows/outflows from CEXs and top holders. Perfect for due diligence on new yield farms or identifying early capital rotation into protocols like Frax Finance or Pendle. Limitations: Less flexible for bespoke metric creation; focuses on interpreted data over raw SQL.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide your platform selection for on-chain governance intelligence.
Dune Analytics excels at deep, customizable analysis and community-driven insights because of its open SQL environment and public dashboard model. For example, a protocol architect can fork a dashboard tracking Uniswap DAO proposal sentiment and voting power distribution, then customize it with sub-queries for their specific token. This flexibility is powered by Dune's raw, decoded on-chain data, allowing for bespoke analysis of governance parameters like quorum thresholds or delegate concentration.
Nansen takes a different approach by providing pre-built, wallet-labeled intelligence and real-time alerts. This results in a trade-off: you gain immediate, actionable insights (e.g., spotting that "Smart Money" wallets are accumulating a governance token pre-proposal) but sacrifice the ability to create novel, complex queries from scratch. Nansen's strength is its proprietary entity labeling, which tags over 250 million wallets with categories like "Fund," "CEX," or "Active Trader," providing instant context to voting behavior.
The key trade-off: If your priority is custom research, protocol-specific metric creation, or cost-effective transparency, choose Dune. Its SQL-based platform is ideal for teams needing to build unique governance dashboards, audit delegate activity over time, or integrate data into internal tools via its API. If you prioritize speed-to-insight, wallet-level behavioral context, and monitoring for strategic moves, choose Nansen. It is the superior tool for DAO treasurers tracking competitor voting blocs, investors analyzing governance token flows, or projects needing real-time alerts on whale activity.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall