Boardroom API excels at providing a unified, multi-chain governance interface because of its protocol-agnostic aggregation layer. For example, it supports governance data from over 100 protocols across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Solana, allowing developers to build a single dashboard for users with assets across different chains. Its strength lies in normalizing disparate governance mechanics—from Compound's token-weighted voting to Optimism's Citizen House—into a consistent data model.
LABS
Comparisons
Boardroom API vs Tally API: Governance Data & Integration APIs
A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating programmatic access to governance data. Analyzes Boardroom's multi-protocol aggregation against Tally's deep on-chain ecosystem integration.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Governance Data Infrastructure
A data-driven comparison of Boardroom API and Tally API for on-chain governance integration.
Tally API takes a different, depth-first approach by focusing intensely on the Ethereum ecosystem and deep contract-level data. This results in superior granularity for complex proposals on major DAOs like Uniswap, Aave, and Lido, including real-time vote power delegation graphs and historical voting sentiment analysis. The trade-off is a narrower chain coverage compared to Boardroom's broad, multi-chain strategy.
The key trade-off: If your priority is building a cross-chain governance aggregator or wallet that needs a single API for diverse protocols, choose Boardroom. If you prioritize deep, analytical insights and tooling for Ethereum-native DAOs where proposal detail and delegate intelligence are critical, choose Tally.
tldr-summary
BOARDROOM API PROS
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.
01
Unified Multi-Chain Governance
Aggregates 100+ protocols across 20+ chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, etc.). This matters for dApps and analytics platforms needing a single integration to track governance across a fragmented ecosystem.
02
Rich, Standardized Data Schema
Provides deep, normalized data for proposals, votes, and delegates (e.g., vote power, voting history, delegate statements). This matters for building detailed governance dashboards (like Tally or Snapshot) that require consistent, relational data models.
03
Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Focuses on uptime and data integrity with dedicated infrastructure. This matters for mission-critical applications where governance data feeds cannot fail, such as on-chain execution triggers or real-time voting UIs for DAOs like Uniswap or Aave.
04
Comprehensive Delegate & Voter Profiles
Tracks delegate platforms, voting history, and voter sentiment over time. This matters for voter education tools and delegate discovery platforms aiming to increase governance participation and transparency.
05
Real-Time Proposal & Vote Streaming
Offers WebSocket and SSE endpoints for instant updates on new proposals and vote casts. This matters for notification systems and live governance feeds that require sub-second latency, such as Discord bots or governance alert services.
06
Flexible, Granular Querying
APIs allow filtering by chain, protocol, status, and voter with pagination and sorting. This matters for developers building complex queries into their applications without over-fetching data, optimizing performance and cost.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Boardroom API vs Tally API: Governance Data & Integration APIs
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for on-chain governance data providers.
| Metric / Feature | Boardroom API | Tally API |
|---|---|---|
Supported Chains | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, 15+ others | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, 10+ others |
Governance Standard Coverage | Compound Governor, OpenZeppelin, Tally, Aave | Tally Governor, Compound Governor, OpenZeppelin |
Real-time Proposal & Vote Data | ||
Historical Data Depth | Full history from contract deployment | Full history from contract deployment |
Webhook Notifications | ||
Free Tier API Rate Limit | 10 requests/sec | 5 requests/sec |
Pricing Model (Pro) | Custom enterprise | Usage-based tiers |
pros-cons-a
GOVERNANCE DATA & INTEGRATION APIS
Boardroom API vs Tally API
A data-driven comparison for teams building on-chain governance dashboards, voting portals, or protocol analytics. Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.
02
Boardroom API: Cons
Abstraction Overhead: The unified data model can obscure chain-specific governance nuances (e.g., Compound's timelock vs. Optimism's multi-step process). A risk for protocols requiring granular, low-level control.
Centralized Aggregation Point: Relies on Boardroom's indexed data pipeline. Potential single point of failure vs. querying contracts directly. A consideration for maximally decentralized or censorship-resistant applications.
Cost Structure: Premium analytics and high-volume access move to paid tiers. Can become a significant line item for high-traffic public dashboards or internal tools with heavy usage.
04
Tally API: Cons
EVM-Only Focus: Primarily supports Ethereum, L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism), and sidechains. Not suitable for Solana, Cosmos, or other non-EVM ecosystems. A non-starter for cross-chain governance aggregators.
Limited Derived Analytics: Focuses on raw proposal, vote, and delegate data. Lacks the sentiment scoring, historical trend analysis, and forecasting of specialized data platforms. Less ideal for pure analytics dashboards.
Brand Association: Perceived as part of the Tally product suite (UI, delegate services). May be a consideration for projects competing directly with Tally or wanting a neutral data provider.
pros-cons-b
BOARDROOM API VS TALLY API
Tally API: Pros and Cons
A data-driven comparison of two leading governance data providers. Choose based on your protocol's stack and integration priorities.
01
Boardroom API: Multi-Chain Breadth
Aggregates 100+ protocols across Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, and L2s. This matters for dApps or funds tracking governance across a fragmented ecosystem. Offers a unified interface for Compound, Uniswap, Aave, and newer DAOs like dYdX and Lido.
02
Boardroom API: Advanced Data & SDK
Deep delegate analytics and proposal simulation. Provides vote delegation graphs, delegate scoring, and historical trend analysis. The TypeScript SDK simplifies building complex governance dashboards for Snapshot, Tally, and custom voting platforms.
03
Boardroom API: Integration Overhead
Requires stitching data from multiple sources. While powerful, integrating full delegate profiles and cross-DAO analytics can demand more front-end logic. This matters for teams needing rapid MVP deployment over deep customization.
04
Tally API: Native Ethereum Focus
Deep, native integration with on-chain governance. Optimized for Compound Governor-based DAOs (Uniswap, Gitcoin, ENS). Provides direct, real-time access to proposal states, vote casts, and quorum metrics without abstraction layers.
05
Tally API: Developer Experience
Simplified, opinionated endpoints for common use cases (e.g., getProposals, getVotes). Lower latency for Ethereum Mainnet and L2 (Optimism, Arbitrum) queries. Ideal for teams building dedicated interfaces for a single, major DAO.
06
Tally API: Ecosystem Scope
Primarily serves the Ethereum Governor ecosystem. Less coverage for off-chain voting (Snapshot), Cosmos chains, or Solana DAOs. This matters for protocols planning multi-chain expansion or needing to analyze sentiment across voting platforms.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which API
Boardroom API for Protocol Teams
Verdict: The default for on-chain governance dashboards and deep DAO analytics. Strengths: Unmatched depth for Compound, Uniswap, Aave, and MakerDAO governance. Provides real-time proposal status, delegate power tracking, and historical voting analysis. Native integration with Snapshot for off-chain signaling. Essential for teams needing to surface governance participation metrics directly to their community or build custom voting interfaces. Limitations: Primarily focused on major EVM DAOs; less support for newer or non-EVM chains.
Tally API for Protocol Teams
Verdict: Superior for teams building custom, gas-optimized voting mechanisms and managing the full proposal lifecycle. Strengths: Deep integration with Governor Bravo/Compatible contracts. Offers tools for proposal creation, simulation, and execution, not just data. The Tally SDK is built for developers to embed voting directly into dApps. Better for protocols that have forked a standard Governor contract and need programmatic control. Considerations: More developer-centric; less turnkey for a simple community dashboard.
BOARDROOM API VS TALLY API
Technical Deep Dive: Data Models and Integration Patterns
A technical comparison of Boardroom and Tally's governance data APIs, focusing on their underlying data models, query capabilities, and integration patterns for developers building on-chain governance tools.
Boardroom provides a more comprehensive, multi-chain dataset. It aggregates governance data across 100+ protocols (e.g., Compound, Uniswap, Aave) and multiple chains (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum). Tally focuses primarily on deep, real-time data for protocols using its Governor framework (like Uniswap and Gitcoin) on Ethereum. For a broad, cross-protocol dashboard, Boardroom is superior. For deep integration with a specific Tally-managed DAO, Tally's API offers more granular proposal and voting state data.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown of when to choose Boardroom's unified governance portal versus Tally's deep protocol integration.
Boardroom API excels at providing a unified, multi-chain governance dashboard for end-users and developers. Its core strength is aggregating proposals, votes, and delegate data across 100+ protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave into a single, consistent interface. This results in a superior developer experience for building cross-protocol governance explorers or voter dashboards, as evidenced by its use in platforms like Snapshot and major DAO frontends. The trade-off is a less granular, protocol-specific feature set.
Tally API takes a different approach by offering deep, native integration for individual protocols, particularly those built with OpenZeppelin Governor. This strategy provides unparalleled access to low-level governance mechanics, real-time proposal state, and custom voting strategies. For example, a protocol like Nouns or Fei Protocol can leverage Tally for bespoke delegation analytics and on-chain execution tracking. The trade-off is a more complex integration process focused on depth over breadth.
The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid deployment of a user-facing governance portal across multiple chains and DAOs with a standardized data model, choose Boardroom. Its aggregated API reduces integration time from weeks to days. If you prioritize building or managing a single, complex on-chain governance system (like a Governor-based DAO) and need deep, real-time control over its lifecycle, choose Tally. Its native integration ensures no governance action or state is abstracted away.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall