zkSync Era excels at delivering fast, single-confirmation finality by leveraging its zkEVM architecture and the security of Ethereum's L1. A proof is generated and verified on Ethereum for every L2 block, providing validity proofs that guarantee state correctness. This results in a finality time of approximately 10-15 minutes, directly tied to Ethereum block times. For users and protocols like Uniswap or MakerDAO, this means a predictable, albeit not instantaneous, security guarantee.
LABS
Comparisons
zkSync vs Starknet: Finality
A technical comparison of finality mechanisms between zkSync and Starknet, analyzing speed, security guarantees, and trade-offs for high-stakes blockchain deployments.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Finality Race in ZK-Rollups
A technical breakdown of how zkSync and Starknet achieve finality, the critical metric for transaction irreversibility and user experience.
Starknet takes a different approach with its STARK-based proofs and Cairo VM, which enables higher computational throughput per proof. Its SHARP prover aggregates multiple transactions into massive batches, achieving significant economies of scale. This batching, however, introduces a trade-off: while individual transaction latency is low, the finality for a specific transaction is only achieved when its batch proof is posted to Ethereum, which can take several hours under the current model, though the Starknet Alpha 0.13.1 upgrade has significantly improved this timeline.
The key trade-off: If your priority is predictable, Ethereum-aligned finality for applications like DeFi where users expect clear settlement times, choose zkSync. If you prioritize maximum scalability and cost-efficiency per transaction for high-throughput use cases like gaming or social apps, and can tolerate longer finality cycles for the sake of lower fees, choose Starknet.
tldr-summary
Finality & Throughput Trade-offs
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A direct comparison of finality characteristics and their impact on user experience and developer design.
01
zkSync: Faster Soft Finality
Sub-second soft finality: Transactions are considered final for users and dApps within ~1 second after being included in a block. This is enabled by its zkRollup architecture with frequent validity proofs submitted to Ethereum. This matters for high-frequency DeFi trading, gaming, and payment applications where user experience depends on immediate feedback.
< 1 sec
Soft Finality
02
zkSync: Ethereum Finality Dependency
Ultimate finality is tied to Ethereum: While soft finality is fast, the absolute, irreversible finality of a zkSync block is only achieved after the SNARK proof is verified on Ethereum L1 (currently ~30-60 minutes). This matters for bridges and protocols requiring maximum security guarantees, as they must wait for L1 confirmation for large withdrawals or state updates.
03
Starknet: CairoVM & STARK Proofs
Optimized for computational scaling: Starknet's CairoVM and STARK proofs are designed for complex, batched computations. While proof generation is computationally intensive, it enables high theoretical TPS. This matters for complex on-chain logic, AI/ML inference, and large-scale simulations where the cost of proving is amortized over many transactions.
04
Starknet: Longer Soft Finality
Minutes to soft finality: Users and dApps typically wait longer (several minutes) for a transaction to be considered final on L2, as the sequencer waits to batch more transactions before generating a proof. This matters for applications where instant UX is less critical than batch efficiency, such as NFT minting, periodic settlements, or back-office operations.
~5-10 min
Typical Soft Finality
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Finality Feature Matrix: zkSync vs Starknet
Direct comparison of finality, security, and cost metrics for two leading ZK-Rollups.
| Metric | zkSync Era | Starknet |
|---|---|---|
Time to Finality (L1) | ~15 minutes | ~12 hours |
Proving System | zk-SNARKs (PLONK) | zk-STARKs |
Avg. Transaction Cost (ETH Transfer) | $0.10 - $0.30 | $0.20 - $0.60 |
Native Account Abstraction | ||
EVM Bytecode Compatibility | ||
Recursive Proof Support | ||
Data Availability Mode | zkRollup (on-chain) | Validium / Volition (optional) |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
zkSync vs Starknet: Finality
A technical comparison of finality guarantees, trade-offs, and ideal use cases for zkSync Era and Starknet.
01
zkSync: Fast, Single-Proof Finality
Single-Proof Validation: zkSync Era posts validity proofs to Ethereum L1 in ~1 hour intervals, providing near-instant finality for users after proof verification. This is ideal for high-frequency DeFi where users need strong, timely guarantees.
Key Metric: L1 finality is achieved after the single proof is verified, not after a multi-round challenge period.
02
zkSync: Ethereum-Aligned Security
Inherited L1 Finality: Final state root is anchored to Ethereum, inheriting its ~15 minute probabilistic finality. This matters for protocols like MakerDAO or Aave that require the highest security guarantees and view Ethereum as the canonical settlement layer.
Trade-off: Users must wait for L1 confirmation for absolute, cryptographically guaranteed finality.
03
Starknet: Sub-Second Validity Proofs
Sequencer-Level Finality: Starknet's sequencer provides sub-second finality for users. A validity proof is generated and submitted to Ethereum (StarkEx) or the L1 (Starknet) periodically, but user experience is not gated by L1 confirmation.
This matters for gaming and social apps where instant feedback is critical. Protocols like dYdX leverage this for perpetual trading.
04
Starknet: Cairo VM & Proof Batching
STARK Proof Efficiency: Starknet's Cairo VM and proof batching allow massive transaction aggregation, making L1 settlement highly gas-efficient. Finality is cost-effective at scale.
Key for high-throughput applications like Sorare (NFTs) or complex DeFi (zkLend). The trade-off is a more specialized developer environment versus EVM compatibility.
pros-cons-b
zkSync vs Starknet
Starknet Finality: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs in finality guarantees for Starknet and zkSync Era, two leading ZK-Rollups.
01
Starknet: Validity-Proof Finality
Proven State Transitions: Finality is achieved via STARK proofs posted to Ethereum L1. Once a proof is verified (~12-24 hours), the state is irreversible. This provides cryptographic security derived from Ethereum, ideal for high-value DeFi protocols like zkLend and Nostra.
~12-24h
To L1 Finality
02
Starknet: Soft Finality Speed
Fast L2 Confirmation: While waiting for L1 proof finality, Starknet offers soft finality in seconds after block creation. For most user interactions (e.g., NFT minting on Mint Square, swaps on Ekubo), this is sufficient. The Cairo VM ensures execution is deterministic and cannot be rolled back by sequencers.
< 15 sec
Soft Finality
03
zkSync Era: Faster L1 Finality
Shorter Finality Window: zkSync Era's zkEVM architecture and proof batching often result in faster L1 proof finality, typically within a few hours. This reduces the window of uncertainty for bridges and protocols like SyncSwap and Maverick Protocol that rely on L1 settlement.
~1-4h
To L1 Finality
04
zkSync Era: Immediate UX Finality
Optimistic-Like Experience: zkSync provides instant confirmations to users, similar to optimistic rollups, while backed by ZKPs. This creates a superior UX for high-frequency applications like gaming (Tevaera) and payments. The system's Boojum prover upgrade further accelerates this pipeline.
< 1 sec
User Confirmation
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
zkSync for DeFi
Verdict: The pragmatic choice for established protocols and liquidity. Strengths:
- Higher TVL & Adoption: Dominant market share with major protocols like Uniswap, Maverick, and SyncSwap.
- Proven Composability: EVM compatibility (zkEVM) simplifies deployment of existing Solidity contracts.
- Faster Time-to-Finality (L1): ~1 hour for full L1 finality, crucial for cross-chain bridges and risk management. Considerations: Slightly higher average transaction fees than Starknet.
Starknet for DeFi
Verdict: The innovator's choice for novel, high-throughput applications. Strengths:
- Lower Fees: Cairo VM enables more efficient proof generation, leading to consistently lower gas costs for users.
- State-of-the-Art Tech: STARK proofs and Cairo language offer long-term scalability advantages for complex logic.
- Strong Ecosystem Momentum: Native projects like Ekubo (AMM) and Nostra (money market) showcase its potential. Considerations: Longer learning curve with Cairo, and ~3-12 hour L1 finality can delay cross-chain asset recovery.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between zkSync and Starknet for finality is a strategic decision between predictable speed and maximal security.
zkSync Era excels at delivering consistent, predictable finality for mainstream applications. Its use of a centralized sequencer and a zkRollup architecture with Ethereum (L1) as the data availability layer enables single-digit minute finality for most transactions. This provides a user experience comparable to high-performance L1s, crucial for consumer-facing dApps like decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and gaming platforms where users expect quick, reliable confirmations.
Starknet takes a different approach by prioritizing cryptographic security and decentralization over speed. Its STARK proofs are posted to Ethereum for verification, but the network employs a decentralized sequencer model. This design, while enhancing censorship resistance, introduces more variability in block production and proof generation times, leading to longer and less predictable finality periods, often cited in the range of several hours under normal conditions.
The key trade-off: If your priority is user experience and predictable finality for high-frequency applications—think a high-volume NFT marketplace or a payments app—choose zkSync Era. Its architecture is optimized for speed and consistency. If you prioritize maximal security, censorship resistance, and are building a protocol where finality latency is secondary (e.g., a sophisticated DeFi vault or an institutional settlement layer), choose Starknet. Its decentralized proving and sequencing offer stronger long-term guarantees aligned with Ethereum's core values.
ENQUIRY
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall