Isolated fee markets create systemic inefficiency. Each rollup (Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync) operates a separate auction for block space, blind to demand on other chains.
zk-rollups-the-endgame-for-scaling
Blog
The Future of Fee Markets: Dynamic Pricing in a Multi-Rollup World
Current rollup fee models are myopic. True pricing must account for cross-rollup liquidity flows and underlying data availability layer congestion, not just local block space.
introduction
THE STATUS QUO
Introduction: The Myopic Fee Market
Current fee markets are isolated, creating arbitrage opportunities and user friction in a multi-chain ecosystem.
Arbitrageurs profit from latency, not value. Users pay for slow, manual bridging while MEV bots capture the spread between fragmented L1 and L2 gas prices.
Dynamic pricing solves this myopia. A unified fee market across chains, akin to UniswapX's intents or Across's optimistic bridging, prices cross-domain execution atomically.
Evidence: Over $20M in MEV was extracted from L2-to-L1 bridges in 2023, a direct tax from the lack of a coordinated fee mechanism.
key-trends
THE FUTURE OF FEE MARKETS
The Three Forces Reshaping Fee Economics
Static gas auctions are dead. The future is dynamic, cross-chain pricing driven by competition, modularity, and user intent.
01
The Problem: The Rollup Gas Auction Trap
Each rollup runs its own isolated fee market, creating a fragmented and inefficient auction. Users overpay during congestion, while blockspace goes unsold during low activity.
- Inefficient Pricing: No cross-rollup competition for user fees.
- Wasted Capacity: Idle blockspace on one chain while another is congested.
- Poor UX: Users must manually hunt for the cheapest chain.
100x
Fee Variance
~40%
Idle Capacity
02
The Solution: Shared Sequencing & MEV Auctions
A shared sequencer network (e.g., Espresso, Astria) creates a unified, cross-rollup marketplace for blockspace. Transaction ordering is auctioned to the highest bidder across multiple chains simultaneously.
- Dynamic Pricing: Fees reflect true, aggregated demand across the ecosystem.
- Revenue Capture: Rollups capture MEV value directly via auction proceeds.
- Atomic Cross-Rollup Bundles: Enables new composability primitives.
50-70%
Higher Yield
~1s
Finality
03
The Enabler: Intent-Based Routing Protocols
Protocols like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across abstract gas complexity. Users submit desired outcomes (intents); a solver network finds the optimal route across L2s, paying fees on their behalf.
- Gasless UX: Users sign intents, not gas-heavy transactions.
- Optimal Execution: Solvers compete to fulfill intent at lowest net cost across all liquidity venues and chains.
- Fee Abstraction: Gas becomes a backend cost, not a user-facing concern.
90%+
Success Rate
-20%
Net Cost
04
The Outcome: The L2 as a Commodity
With shared sequencing and intent routing, rollup blockspace becomes a fungible commodity. The competitive differentiator shifts from cheap gas to superior execution, security, and app-specific features.
- Fee Convergence: Gas prices stabilize across chains with similar security profiles.
- Vertical Integration: Rollups compete on app performance, not just cost.
- New Business Models: Subscription fees, freemium models, and intent-based subsidies emerge.
$10B+
Market Size
0
Gas Knowledge Needed
deep-dive
THE MULTI-LAYER FEE MARKET
The Anatomy of a Dynamic Fee: Beyond Gwei
Dynamic fees are evolving from simple gas auctions into multi-dimensional pricing systems that account for cross-domain execution and opportunity cost.
Dynamic fees are multi-dimensional vectors. A fee on a rollup is no longer just a gas bid. It is a bundle of costs for L1 settlement, L2 execution, and data availability, each with its own volatile market. Protocols like EigenLayer and Espresso introduce opportunity cost pricing for shared sequencers, where a slot's value depends on cross-chain MEV potential.
The user's fee is a solved optimization problem. Systems like UniswapX and Across Protocol treat fee payment as an intent. Solvers compete to source liquidity across chains, internalizing bridging costs and MEV into a single, optimized quote. The fee reflects the solver's cost to orchestrate the entire cross-domain transaction, not just compute.
Fee abstraction kills the wallet prompt. Account abstraction standards (ERC-4337) and paymasters enable fee payment in any token or via sponsored transactions. The fee market shifts from end-users to dApps and sequencers, who batch and subsidize transactions to improve UX and capture volume, as seen with Polygon's AggLayer ambitions.
Evidence: Arbitrum's L1 submission costs can constitute over 60% of its total fee burden, demonstrating that L1 data availability is the dominant variable. Rollups like Taiko experiment with multi-proof systems (based, optimistic) to let users choose their own security-fee trade-off in real time.
THE FUTURE OF FEE MARKETS
Fee Market Architectures: A Comparative Analysis
Comparing dynamic fee mechanisms for rollup sequencers and cross-domain transaction ordering.
| Key Mechanism | Priority Gas Auctions (Ethereum L1) | Time-Based Auction (Arbitrum) | MEV-Aware Ordering (Espresso / SUAVE) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Pricing Model | First-price sealed-bid auction | Uniform clearing price auction | Proposer-Builder-Separation (PBS) model |
MEV Extraction Locus | Public mempool → searchers | Sequencer → centralized capture | Designated builders → revenue sharing |
User Fee Predictability | Volatile; spikes >1000 gwei | Stable; fees set by sequencer | Competitive; set by builder bids |
Cross-Domain Bundle Support | |||
Typical Latency to Finality | 12 seconds (1 Ethereum block) | ~0.5 seconds (sequencer inclusion) | < 1 second (with fast lane) |
Resistance to Censorship | Low (public mempool) | High (centralized sequencer) | Medium (decentralized builder set) |
Key Implementations / Research | Ethereum base layer | Arbitrum Nitro, Optimism Bedrock | Espresso Systems, Flashbots SUAVE, Astria |
counter-argument
THE USER EXPERIENCE
Counterpoint: Simplicity is a Feature
Complex fee markets create user friction that can outweigh their theoretical efficiency gains.
Complexity creates user friction. A user sending ETH from Arbitrum to Base should not need a degree in mechanism design. The cognitive load of evaluating gas auctions, MEV rebates, and priority fee tiers is a direct tax on adoption.
Static fees are predictable. The primary value of a fee is its predictability, not its perfect market efficiency. Users and developers build on Ethereum L1 because its gas model, while imperfect, is a known quantity. Dynamic systems like EIP-1559 already introduce volatility.
The market will standardize. In a multi-rollup world, the winning fee abstraction layer will be the simplest. Protocols like Across and Circle's CCTP succeed by offering a single, predictable quote, abstracting away the underlying auction mechanics. Complexity will be pushed to the infrastructure layer, invisible to the end-user.
protocol-spotlight
FROM STATIC GAS TO DYNAMIC SURGES
Early Experiments in Dynamic Pricing
The monolithic block space auction is fracturing. Rollups and app-chains are forcing a new paradigm where fees must be priced across fragmented, interdependent execution layers.
01
The Problem: Static Gas Markets are Blind to Rollup Congestion
Ethereum's base fee only reflects L1 demand. An L2 sequencer facing a sudden NFT mint or DeFi exploit sees no price signal, leading to non-deterministic inclusion and failed arbitrage. Users pay for L1 security but get L2 chaos.
- Result: Arbitrage bots lose ~$1M+ monthly to inclusion failures.
- Blind Spot: L2's internal mempool is a black box for the fee market.
$1M+
Monthly Bot Losses
0%
L1 Fee Signal
02
The Solution: EigenLayer's Shared Sequencer as a Price Oracle
A decentralized sequencer network (like Espresso, Astria) can function as a canonical liquidity-time oracle. By observing pending transactions across hundreds of rollups, it establishes a real-time price for execution priority on any connected chain.
- Mechanism: Cross-rollup auction for sequencer attention.
- Outcome: Predictable inclusion with ~500ms finality across the stack.
500ms
Cross-Rollup Finality
100+
Rollup Visibility
03
The Problem: MEV is Now a Cross-Chain Game
The most valuable arbitrage and liquidations exist between rollups (e.g., Arbitrum to Optimism). Today's fee markets are isolated, forcing searchers to bid blindly in two separate auctions, doubling cost and risk.
- Inefficiency: ~30-40% of cross-rollup MEV is unextractable due to coordination failure.
- Fragmentation: No atomic price for a cross-domain transaction bundle.
40%
MEV Left Unextracted
2x
Auction Overhead
04
The Solution: SUAVE as a Universal Preference Chain
Flashbots' SUAVE centralizes intent expression and block building into a dedicated chain. It becomes the liquidity venue for all cross-domain MEV, allowing searchers to bid once for atomic execution across Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base.
- Unification: Single auction for multi-rollup transaction bundles.
- Privacy: Encrypted mempool prevents frontrunning on destination chains.
1
Unified Auction
100%
Bundle Atomicity
05
The Problem: Users Don't Want to Manage 10 Gas Wallets
The multi-rollup future means holding native gas tokens for dozens of chains. This kills UX and fragments liquidity. Gas abstraction is currently a patchwork of bridged ETH and sponsor meta-transactions with limited reach.
- Friction: Users abandon transactions when facing unknown gas tokens.
- Risk: Bridged assets introduce new trust assumptions and delays.
10+
Gas Tokens Needed
High
UX Friction
06
The Solution: ERC-4337 Paymasters as Dynamic Price Aggregators
Smart accounts with Paymasters can abstract gas payment. Advanced Paymasters will dynamically route transactions via the cheapest available rollup, paying fees in any token, and hedging price risk. They become intelligent fee market routers.
- Function: Route user ops to L2s with ~15% lower real-time fees.
- Innovation: Pay gas in USDC while the Paymaster optimizes for ETH/rollup-native token cost.
15%
Avg. Fee Savings
Any Token
Pay Gas With
takeaways
THE FUTURE OF FEE MARKETS
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Static gas markets are obsolete. The future is dynamic, cross-chain pricing that treats blockspace as a multi-dimensional commodity.
01
The Problem: Rollup Fragmentation Kills Predictability
Builders face inconsistent, unpredictable costs across dozens of rollup sequencers. A user's journey from Arbitrum to Base to zkSync involves three separate, opaque auctions.\n- Result: UX is broken; cross-chain dApps cannot guarantee execution costs.\n- Metric: Cost variance between L2s can exceed 300% during congestion.
300%+
Cost Variance
10+
Opaque Markets
02
The Solution: Intent-Based, Cross-Chain Auctions
Shift from transaction submission to outcome declaration. Protocols like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across abstract away chain-specific gas. A solver network competes to fulfill the intent at the best rate across all available liquidity venues.\n- Key Benefit: Users get price-of-execution guarantees.\n- Key Benefit: Solvers internalize cross-chain complexity, optimizing for MEV and latency.
~500ms
Solver Latency
$10B+
Protected Volume
03
The Infrastructure: Universal Order Flow Auctions
The endgame is a shared auction layer for blockspace demand. Think Flashbots SUAVE or Astria's shared sequencer. Rollups become execution layers; the auction layer becomes the canonical market for ordering.\n- Key Benefit: Enables cross-rollup MEV arbitrage as a native primitive.\n- Key Benefit: Creates a liquid, unified fee market for all L2s, driving efficiency.
1
Unified Market
0
Chain Abstraction
04
The Investment Thesis: Own the Auction, Not the Chain
The greatest value accrual shifts from L1/L2 token emissions to the protocols that aggregate and route demand. This is the "Priceline for blockspace" model.\n- Target: Infrastructure that standardizes pricing (e.g., OP Stack's Plasma mode, EigenLayer AVS for sequencing).\n- Avoid: Rollups with proprietary, closed sequencers that cannot participate in a shared fee market.
100x
Order Flow Value
L1
Value Shift
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall