Your social graph is a financial asset currently locked in corporate silos like Meta and X. On-chain, it becomes a composable primitive for lending, reputation, and discovery, creating a permissionless reputation layer.
web3-social-decentralizing-the-feed
Blog
Why Your Social Graph Should Be a Financial Asset
An analysis of how portable, on-chain social graphs (Farcaster, Lens) enable direct monetization, turning network effects into personal equity and breaking platform captivity.
introduction
THE MISALLOCATED ASSET
Introduction
Social graphs are the most valuable but least monetized data layer on the internet.
Web2 platforms extract value; Web3 protocols distribute it. Facebook monetizes your connections via ads. Farcaster and Lens Protocol enable direct monetization through tipping, social tokens, and governance.
The network effect becomes a financial primitive. On-chain, your follower count and engagement history become verifiable collateral for undercollateralized loans, similar to how friend.tech monetized attention.
Evidence: The creator economy is a $250B market, yet creators capture less than 10% of the value. Protocols like RSS3 and CyberConnect are building the indexers and data layers to unlock this capital.
key-trends
WHY YOUR SOCIAL GRAPH SHOULD BE A FINANCIAL ASSET
The On-Chain Social Thesis: Three Core Trends
Your social capital is currently trapped in corporate silos. On-chain protocols are unlocking its value through composable identity, verifiable reputation, and direct monetization.
01
The Problem: Social Capital is a Non-Transferable Illiquid Asset
Your influence, reputation, and community are locked inside platforms like X or Discord. You can't collateralize it, sell it, or take it with you. This creates zero economic leverage for users and captive audiences for platforms.
- Value Extraction: Platforms monetize your graph; you get ads.
- Portability Lock-in: Switching platforms means abandoning your entire social history.
- No Financial Primitives: You cannot use your social proof for underwriting, staking, or access.
0%
User Ownership
$0
Liquidity Value
02
The Solution: Farcaster & On-Chain Social Graphs
Protocols like Farcaster (with Frames and Storage Credits) decouple social identity from applications. Your graph becomes a portable, verifiable asset on a public ledger.
- Sovereign Identity: Your social connections and posts are tied to your crypto wallet, not a server.
- Composable Reputation: Builders can permissionlessly read your graph to create new apps (e.g., lens, cyberconnect).
- Direct Monetization: Creators can embed commerce (Frames) or token-gate interactions directly in feeds.
350k+
Farcaster Users
100%
Data Portability
03
The Mechanism: Reputation as Collateral & Underwriting
On-chain activity—from Gitcoin Grants donations to POAP holdings—creates a verifiable reputation graph. This becomes a financial primitive for underwriting and access.
- Credit Scoring: Lending protocols like Goldfinch or Maple could underwrite based on your on-chain social proof.
- Sybil Resistance: Projects like Optimism's Attestations use social graph analysis to filter airdrop farmers.
- Access Markets: Your DeBank, Galxe, or Rabby Hole credential history can be tokenized for gated communities or job markets.
10x
Lower Fraud Risk
New Asset Class
Social Capital
deep-dive
THE GRAPH AS CAPITAL
The Mechanics of Social Equity
Your social graph is an under-collateralized asset that protocols like Farcaster and Lens are securitizing.
Social graphs are capital assets. A follower list is a pre-qualified distribution channel with proven attention. This graph functions as off-chain, non-transferable equity in your personal brand, which web3 protocols now convert into on-chain financial primitives.
Protocols securitize your influence. Farcaster Frames and Lens Open Actions let creators embed financial hooks—like minting or swapping—directly into posts. This turns a simple social interaction into a transaction, directly monetizing the trust and reach encoded in your follower graph.
The asset is under-collateralized. Unlike DeFi loans requiring over-collateralization, social capital is a reputation-based asset with zero upfront stake. This creates asymmetric upside for builders but introduces sybil and spam risks that protocols must gate.
Evidence: Lens Protocol's blockchain social graph has facilitated over 50 million interactions, demonstrating the latent economic activity within programmable social connections.
SOCIAL GRAPH AS A FINANCIAL ASSET
Protocol Showdown: Farcaster vs. Lens Protocol
Comparison of on-chain social primitives for building and monetizing a user's social graph.
| Feature / Metric | Farcaster | Lens Protocol |
|---|---|---|
Core Architecture | Hybrid (On-chain + Off-chain) | Fully On-Chain (Polygon) |
User Identity Cost (One-Time) | $5-7 (Storage Rent) | $0 (Mint Gas Only) |
Social Graph Ownership Model | User-Controlled Signer Key | User-Owned NFT (Profile NFT) |
Monetization Primitive | Direct Payments (Frames) | Collect Modules, Fee Follow Modules |
Developer Ecosystem | ~400 Clients (e.g., Warpcast) | ~100+ Apps (e.g., Orb, Phaver) |
Daily Active Users (Est.) |
| ~ 10,000 |
Protocol Revenue (30d, Est.) | $150K+ (Frame Tips) | Not Disclosed |
Portable Social Graph | ||
Native Token for Governance |
counter-argument
THE REALITY CHECK
The Skeptic's View: UX, Spam, and the Cold Start
Monetizing social graphs faces immediate, non-trivial hurdles in user experience, network integrity, and initial adoption.
The onboarding funnel breaks. Asking users to manage wallets and sign transactions for every social interaction introduces catastrophic friction. This kills the viral loops that built Web2 networks like Twitter and TikTok.
Spam becomes a financial attack. If social actions generate yield, the network attracts Sybil farms, not users. Proof-of-personhood systems like Worldcoin or Gitcoin Passport become mandatory gatekeepers, adding another layer of complexity.
The cold start problem is economic. An empty social-fi app offers zero utility. Protocols must bootstrap liquidity and engagement simultaneously, a challenge Friend.tech faced despite its initial hype-driven volume.
Evidence: The daily active user count for most on-chain social apps remains below 10k, while traditional social platforms measure users in billions. The UX and incentive gap is the primary bottleneck.
takeaways
SOCIAL FINANCE PRIMER
TL;DR: Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Social graphs are the next primitive for value creation, moving from data silos to composable financial networks.
01
The Problem: Social Capital is Illiquid
Your reputation, community standing, and influence are locked in centralized platforms like X or Discord. This social capital has real value but cannot be traded, borrowed against, or ported.
- Value Leak: Platforms capture all monetization via ads.
- No Portability: Reputation resets to zero on new platforms.
- Zero Composability: Cannot integrate social proof into DeFi or on-chain apps.
$0
Liquid Value
100%
Platform Capture
02
The Solution: On-Chain Attestation Frameworks
Protocols like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Verax turn social actions into verifiable, portable assets. Think of them as a decentralized credit bureau for your web3 identity.
- Sovereign Data: You own the attestations (follows, endorsements, credentials).
- Financial Primitives: Use attestations as collateral for undercollateralized loans via Goldfinch-style models.
- Sybil Resistance: Foundational layer for Gitcoin Passport, Optimism's AttestationStation.
10M+
Attestations (EAS)
L2 Native
Low-Cost
03
The Killer App: Social-First Lending & Underwriting
DeFi today requires overcollateralization. A verifiable social graph enables identity-based underwriting, unlocking credit markets.
- Lower Collateral: Borrow against reputation + some capital.
- DAO Tools: Gauge contributor reputation for grants or salaries via SourceCred-like mechanics.
- New Asset Class: Trade baskets of influencer attestations or community membership NFTs.
~60% LTV
Potential Loan-to-Value
New Market
Social Credit
04
The Infrastructure Play: Graph Indexing & Data Nets
Building this requires robust data layers. This is not about a new Lens Protocol fork, but the pipes that connect all graphs.
- Indexing: Services like The Graph or Goldsky for real-time social querying.
- Data Composability: Make Farcaster, Lens, and EAS data interoperable.
- Monetization: Earn fees by providing verified social data to underwriters (the Chainlink oracle model for identity).
$GRAPH
Existing Token Model
API Biz
Revenue Stream
05
The Regulatory Minefield: Privacy & Compliance
Financializing social data triggers KYC/AML, privacy laws (GDPR), and the risk of creating an on-chain social credit score. This is the hardest problem.
- Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Use zk-proofs (via Aztec, Polygon zkEVM) to prove reputation without exposing data.
- Compliance Layers: Integrate Veriff or Circle's Verite for regulated identity.
- Avoiding Dystopia: Design must be permissionless and avoid centralized scoring.
ZK-Proofs
Key Tech
High Stakes
Regulatory Risk
06
The Investment Thesis: Own the Primitive, Not the App
As with Uniswap (AMM primitive) vs. a specific swap UI, the value accrues to the base attestation and data layers.
- Fat Protocol Thesis: Infrastructure tokens capture more value than early applications.
- Acquisition Targets: Centralized social platforms (Reddit, X) will need to acquire on-chain graph tech.
- Metrics to Watch: Monthly Active Attesters, Total Value Underwritten (TVU), attestation volume.
Infrastructure
Value Layer
TVU > TVL
New Metric
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall