Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
wallet-wars-smart-accounts-vs-embedded-wallets
Blog

Why ERC-4337's UserOps Will Revolutionize dApp Interactions

UserOperations are not just a new transaction format; they are the atomic unit of intent that decouples user desire from on-chain execution. This architectural shift enables meta-transactions, gas sponsorship, and complex bundled interactions, making smart accounts the inevitable victor in the wallet wars.

introduction
THE SHIFT

Introduction

ERC-4337's UserOperations decouple transaction execution from signature validation, enabling a new paradigm of user-centric smart accounts.

UserOperations are not transactions. They are standardized intents that separate a user's signature from the gas payment and execution logic, enabling account abstraction without a consensus-layer change. This allows wallets like Safe and Biconomy to implement social recovery and batch transactions.

The revolution is programmable validation. A Paymaster contract can sponsor gas fees in any token, enabling Visa-like UX where users approve actions, not gas calculations. This shifts the mental model from paying for computation to paying for outcomes.

This kills the EOA hegemony. Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) enforce a rigid 1-signature, 1-action model. ERC-4337 smart accounts enable session keys for gaming, atomic multi-op bundles for DeFi, and delegated security models that protocols like Ether.fi and Pimlico are already building on.

Evidence: Since its March 2023 launch, over 4.5 million UserOperations have been processed on networks like Polygon and Optimism, with Alchemy's data showing a 40% month-over-month growth in smart account creation, proving developer adoption precedes user adoption.

thesis-statement
THE ABSTRACTION

The Core Argument: Intent as a First-Class Citizen

ERC-4337's UserOperations shift the blockchain's computational burden from the user to the network, making user intent the primary transaction primitive.

UserOps decouple declaration from execution. A user signs a UserOp declaring a desired outcome, while a network of bundlers and paymasters handles gas, fee logic, and transaction assembly. This inverts the standard model where the user's wallet must manage these complexities.

This enables intent-centric design patterns. Applications like UniswapX and CowSwap already abstract execution paths for better prices. ERC-4337 generalizes this, allowing any dApp to become a solver for user-specified intents, not just a fixed-function contract caller.

The bundler market creates execution competition. Bundlers, akin to searchers in Flashbots' MEV-Boost, compete to fulfill UserOps profitably. This drives efficiency in gas optimization and opens new fee markets separate from simple gas bidding.

Evidence: Since launch, over 4.5 million UserOps have been processed, with smart accounts from Safe and Biconomy driving adoption. This volume proves the demand for abstracted transaction logic.

ACCOUNT ABSTRACTION

Execution Model: EOA Transaction vs. ERC-4337 UserOperation

A first-principles comparison of the legacy transaction model versus the new intent-based UserOperation, which decouples transaction logic from the user's account.

Feature / MetricEOA Transaction (Legacy)ERC-4337 UserOperation (AA)Implication

Transaction Signer

EOA Private Key

Smart Contract Wallet

Enables social recovery, multi-sig, and key rotation.

Gas Payment Asset

Native Chain Token (ETH, MATIC)

Any ERC-20 Token (via Paymasters)

Users can pay fees in USDC, eliminating ETH requirements.

Transaction Bundling

Multiple actions (swap, lend, bridge) in one atomic operation.

Sponsored Gas

Projects like Base's Onchain Summer can pay user gas, enabling gasless onboarding.

Pre & Post-Execution Hooks

Enables session keys for gaming, subscription payments, and MEV protection.

Signature Scheme

ECDSA (secp256k1)

Any (BLS, EdDSA, MPC)

Enables quantum resistance and seamless cross-chain signing via projects like ZeroDev.

Average Onchain Footprint

~110 bytes

~200+ bytes

Higher calldata cost offset by batching efficiency and L2 scaling.

Primary Infrastructure

RPC Nodes (Alchemy, Infura)

Bundlers (Stackup, Pimlico, Alchemy) & Paymasters

Creates a new middleware market for intent execution and subsidy.

deep-dive
THE STANDARDIZATION EVENT

Why This Kills the Embedded Wallet Model

ERC-4337's UserOperations commoditize wallet logic, making proprietary embedded solutions obsolete.

UserOperations commoditize wallet logic. The ERC-4337 standard defines a universal transaction object that any bundler or paymaster can process. This eliminates the need for dApps to integrate and maintain custom, closed-source wallet SDKs from providers like Magic or Web3Auth.

Paymasters unlock superior UX. Native gas sponsorship and fee abstraction are now protocol-level features, not vendor lock-in. A dApp can use Biconomy's paymaster network for session keys or Stackup's platform for ERC-20 gas payments without changing user accounts.

Account abstraction is permissionless. Developers build on a shared, composable infrastructure layer. A smart account from Safe{Core} or ZeroDev works with any bundler, enabling competition that drives down costs and improves reliability versus walled gardens.

Evidence: The Ethereum Foundation's 2023 grants and Vitalik's explicit endorsement signal that ERC-4337 is the canonical path, not a proprietary alternative. Bundler services like Alchemy's Rundler and Pimlico already handle millions of UserOps.

protocol-spotlight
THE INTENT-CENTRIC PIPELINE

The New Infrastructure Stack

ERC-4337's UserOperations are not just smart accounts; they are the foundational transaction primitive for a new, user-centric execution layer.

01

The Problem: The Gas Abstraction Wall

Mass adoption is blocked by the need for users to hold native tokens for gas. This creates a fragmented, hostile UX.\n- ~40% of potential users are blocked by this single friction point.\n- DApps must build custom, insecure relayers or subsidize fees.

0 ETH
User Gas Balance
40%
User Drop-off
02

The Solution: Paymaster-Powered Sponsorship

UserOps decouple payment logic from execution, enabling sponsored transactions and gasless onboarding.\n- DApps can pay for user gas in any token (ERC-20, stablecoins).\n- Enables session keys for seamless gaming and trading experiences.

1-Click
Onboarding
Any Token
Pay Gas
03

The Problem: Atomic Composability Limits

Traditional transactions are isolated. Complex cross-protocol actions require multiple signings, exposing users to MEV and failed partial executions.\n- Uniswap -> Aave collateralization requires two separate, risky transactions.\n- Users lose value to sandwich attacks in between steps.

2+ TXs
Per Action
High MEV
Risk
04

The Solution: Bundler as a Universal Scheduler

Bundlers aggregate UserOps into a single on-chain transaction, enabling atomic multi-protocol intents.\n- Enables UniswapX-like intent fulfillment across any dApp.\n- Flashbots SUAVE and CowSwap solvers become native execution layers.

Atomic
Execution
1 Bundle
Many Actions
05

The Problem: Key Management is a Single Point of Failure

Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) with seed phrases are a UX and security nightmare. Loss, theft, and inflexibility prevent advanced features.\n- $3.8B+ lost to private key theft in 2023.\n- No native recovery, social logins, or multi-factor security.

$3.8B
Annual Theft
No Recovery
For EOAs
06

The Solution: Smart Account as a Programmable Identity

ERC-4337 accounts are smart contracts, enabling native account abstraction.\n- Social recovery via guardians (e.g., Safe{Wallet}).\n- Transaction simulations and security modules (e.g., OpenZeppelin).\n- Permissioned sessions for dApp-specific keys.

Social
Recovery
Modular
Security
counter-argument
THE ARCHITECTURAL TRADE-OFF

The Bear Case: Centralization and Complexity

ERC-4337's reliance on centralized Bundlers and Paymasters introduces new trust vectors and operational overhead.

Bundlers are centralized bottlenecks. The protocol's design delegates transaction ordering and submission to a single actor, creating a single point of failure and censorship. This mirrors the miner extractable value (MEV) centralization seen in block builders like Flashbots.

Paymasters create vendor lock-in. Sponsoring gas fees requires users to trust a centralized service's solvency and policy, shifting dependency from wallets to entities like Biconomy or Stackup. This reintroduces the custodial risk account abstraction aims to eliminate.

Smart contract wallets increase complexity. Managing social recovery, session keys, and upgrade logic introduces attack surfaces absent in EOAs. Auditing a custom Account is more complex than verifying a single private key.

Evidence: The top three Bundlers on networks like Polygon process over 80% of UserOperations, demonstrating rapid centralization. This concentration risks creating a Bundler cartel similar to today's relay network.

takeaways
THE INTENT-CENTRIC FUTURE

TL;DR for Builders and Investors

ERC-4337's UserOperations are not just a new transaction type; they are the atomic unit for a new paradigm of intent-based, gas-abstracted applications.

01

The End of the Gas Token Tax

UserOperations decouple payment from execution, enabling sponsorship and paymasters. This kills the UX friction of needing the native token for every chain.\n- New Business Models: Apps can sponsor gas, pay in any ERC-20, or use subscriptions.\n- Real User Acquisition: Onboarding is now as simple as signing a message, not funding a wallet.

0 ETH
User Balance Needed
100%
Payment Flexibility
02

Bundlers: The New Infrastructure Layer

Bundlers are the validators of the intent economy. They compete to aggregate, order, and submit UserOps, creating a permissionless mempool and a new MEV surface.\n- Infra Opportunity: A new race for reliable, high-performance bundler services akin to RPC providers.\n- Execution Markets: Bundlers can optimize for fee profit, speed, or censorship resistance, creating a competitive landscape.

~500ms
Target Latency
$B+
Market Potential
03

From Transactions to Declarative Intents

UserOps are a primitive for expressing what a user wants, not how to do it. This unlocks complex, cross-chain interactions settled in a single signature.\n- Composability Leap: Think UniswapX or CowSwap logic, but native to the protocol layer for any dApp.\n- Solver Networks: Specialized actors (like Across or Socket) can compete to fulfill the most efficient path, driving down costs.

1-Click
Complex Actions
-30%
Avg. Cost
04

Account Abstraction is a Security Upgrade

Smart Accounts enabled by ERC-4337 move security logic on-chain. This replaces the brittle EOA model with programmable recovery, sessions, and multi-sig.\n- Enterprise-Grade Controls: Define spending limits, time-locks, and social recovery without custodians.\n- Reduced Liability: Phishing and key loss, the two largest sources of crypto theft, are mitigated at the protocol level.

>90%
Theft Reduction
On-Chain
Policy Enforcement
05

The Aggregator Wars, Round Two

Just as Uniswap aggregated liquidity, ERC-4337 enables intent aggregators. The winning dApp front-end will be the one that finds the best solver for your UserOp.\n- Winner-Take-Most Dynamics: UX and fulfillment efficiency will be the key battlegrounds.\n- Vertical Integration: Expect bundlers, solvers, and front-ends to merge into full-stack intent networks.

10x
UX Consolidation
New Giants
To Be Born
06

The Cross-Chain Primitive LayerZero Missed

While LayerZero and CCIP focus on generic messaging, UserOps are application-layer intents that natively require cross-chain fulfillment. This creates a higher-value abstraction for interoperability.\n- DApp Native: Builders design flows that are cross-chain by default, without managing bridges.\n- Solver-Driven: The market for cross-chain solvers will eclipse simple bridge validators in value capture.

Native
Cross-Chain UX
$$$
Solver Fees
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
ERC-4337 UserOps: The End of the Native Wallet | ChainScore Blog