Bundlers are the new miners. They are the competitive, permissionless actors who execute UserOperations, paying gas and earning fees. This creates a fee market for execution, separate from Ethereum's block-building market.
Why ERC-4337's Bundler Market Will Create New Economies
Account abstraction's decentralized bundler network isn't just infrastructure—it's a competitive marketplace for UserOps that will spawn new MEV strategies, validator-like revenue streams, and reshape wallet economics.
Introduction
ERC-4337's bundler market is not just a technical component; it is a foundational economic layer for user-centric blockchain interaction.
The market will fragment by specialization. Generalist bundlers like Pimlico and Stackup will compete with vertical-specific services. A gaming dapp's bundler will optimize for speed, while a DeFi aggregator's will prioritize MEV capture.
This specialization creates new economies. A bundler servicing UniswapX intent flows will develop expertise in cross-chain liquidity, while one for Safe{Wallet} accounts will master batched social recovery transactions. Each vertical has unique fee and latency demands.
Evidence: The existing PBS (Proposer-Builder Separation) market for block building is a $500M+ annual industry. The bundler market, which executes user intent, will be larger because it sits closer to the application layer.
The Core Thesis: Bundlers as the New Validators
ERC-4337's bundler role will create a competitive market that mirrors and eventually surpasses the economic significance of today's L1 validators.
Bundlers execute user intents. They are the active, permissionless actors in ERC-4337 that collect UserOperations, simulate them, and submit them to the blockchain, replacing the wallet as the transaction's initiator.
This creates a new fee market. Bundlers compete on inclusion, ordering, and fee extraction from UserOperations, generating a dynamic auction layer separate from the base chain's gas auction, similar to MEV searchers on Ethereum.
Bundler revenue is multi-faceted. It includes direct user tips, cross-chain MEV opportunities via intents that span networks like Arbitrum and Polygon, and potential subsidies from paymasters like Circle or protocol treasuries.
The market will consolidate. Just as block building on Ethereum consolidated with Flashbots and builders like bloXroute, specialized bundlers (e.g., Stackup, Biconomy, Alchemy) will dominate through superior simulation, latency, and capital efficiency.
Evidence: The existing searcher/MEV economy on Ethereum is a $500M+ annual market; bundlers will capture a similar, if not larger, share from the entire smart account ecosystem across all EVM chains.
The Emerging Bundler Economy: Three Key Trends
ERC-4337 unbundles the wallet, creating a competitive market for user operation execution. This is the new battleground for wallet and infra providers.
The Problem: Bundlers as Commoditized Gas Relays
A naive view sees bundlers as simple transaction packers, competing only on mempool latency and gas optimization. This race to the bottom ignores the real value layer.
- Zero differentiation beyond speed and price.
- Minimal revenue from pure base fee capture.
- High client risk from centralized RPC reliance.
The Solution: Intent-Based Order Flow as the Moat
Winning bundlers will aggregate and fulfill user intents, not just transactions. This mirrors the evolution of UniswapX and CowSwap on Ethereum.
- Capture MEV value via backrunning, arbitrage, and efficient settlement.
- Guarantee execution through private mempools and Flashbots SUAVE.
- Monetize flow via order flow auctions (OFAs) and cross-chain intents with Across and LayerZero.
The Vertical: Bundler-As-A-Service (BaaS) Stacks
Protocols like Pimlico, Stackup, and Alchemy are building full-stack BaaS to abstract complexity. This creates a B2B2C economy where wallets outsource bundler ops.
- Paymaster integration for sponsored transactions and gas abstraction.
- Account abstraction SDKs for seamless wallet developer onboarding.
- Unified APIs that handle EIP-4337, EIP-7702, and native AA on zkSync and Starknet.
Anatomy of a Bundler Market: MEV, Subsidies, and Vertical Integration
ERC-4337's permissionless bundler role will spawn a competitive market driven by MEV extraction and cross-chain arbitrage.
Bundlers are MEV extractors first. Their primary revenue is not user fees but cross-domain MEV from reordering and arbitraging UserOperations across chains like Arbitrum and Polygon. This mirrors searcher-builder dynamics in Ethereum's PBS.
Subsidies will bootstrap adoption. To attract users, bundlers will subsidize gas fees using their MEV profits, creating negative-cost transactions. This is a direct subsidy model, not a meta-transaction relay.
Vertical integration is inevitable. Successful bundlers will operate their own private mempools and block builders, akin to Flashbots' SUAVE, to capture maximum value and ensure execution guarantees for intents.
Evidence: On testnets, bundlers like Stackup and Alchemy's Rundler already compete on inclusion speed and fee quotes, proving the market's nascence.
Bundler Market Landscape: Protocol Strategies
Comparison of core strategies and economic models for ERC-4337 bundlers, which will define new markets for user operation (UserOp) execution.
| Key Strategic Dimension | Generalist Bundler (e.g., Stackup, Alchemy) | Application-Specific Bundler (e.g., Uniswap, Aave) | MEV-Aware Bundler (e.g., Flashbots SUAVE, bloXroute) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Revenue Model | Fee Premium on Gas + Potential Subsidy | Protocol Fee Integration + User Retention | MEV Extraction + Order Flow Auctions |
Target Latency for UserOps | < 500 ms | < 2 sec (batch-optimized) | < 200 ms (priority) |
Key Cost Center | Public Mempool Monitoring | Custom Smart Wallet Logic | Bid Execution & Searcher Relations |
Relies on Public Mempool | |||
Native Cross-Chain Capability | |||
Typical Fee Premium over Base Gas | 5-15% | 0% (bundled in app fee) | Variable (-5% to +50%) |
Strategic Dependency | UserOp Volume | Application TVL & Activity | Exclusive Order Flow |
Risk of Censorship | Medium (public mempool) | Low (private queue) | High (controlled by searchers) |
Counterpoint: Won't This Just Centralize?
ERC-4337's bundler design will not centralize; it will create a competitive market for transaction ordering and subsidization.
Bundlers are permissionless validators. Any entity can run a bundler to aggregate UserOperations, creating a competitive market for block space. This is analogous to the searcher-builder-proposer separation in PBS, not a single centralized gateway.
Economic specialization will fragment the market. High-volume DEXs like UniswapX will run bundlers for their own intents, while infrastructure firms like Pimlico and Stackup will offer generalized services. This creates distinct economies for execution and subsidization.
The mempool is the decentralization anchor. The public UserOperation mempool prevents bundlers from censoring transactions. Users and alternative bundlers always see pending intents, ensuring no single entity controls flow.
Evidence: The existing searcher market for MEV, which involves thousands of independent actors, demonstrates that complex, permissionless coordination at the network layer is viable and anti-fragile.
Risk Analysis: What Could Derail the Bundler Economy?
ERC-4337's bundler market is not a foregone conclusion; these critical failure modes could stall or collapse the nascent economy.
The Centralizing Crunch: MEV & Staking Cartels
Permissionless bundling is a myth if economic forces drive centralization. The same entities dominating Ethereum validator sets (e.g., Lido, Coinbase) and MEV supply chains (e.g., Flashbots) will vertically integrate bundling.
- Risk: A few actors control >66% of bundle inclusion, enabling censorship and rent extraction.
- Outcome: Recreates the miner-extractable value (MEV) problem at the application layer, negating user sovereignty.
- Precedent: See the centralization pressures in EigenLayer restaking and Flashbots SUAVE.
The Subsidy Cliff: When Paymasters Go Bankrupt
Initial user adoption is fueled by sponsored transactions from Paymasters (e.g., dApps, wallets). This creates a fragile, subsidized economy.
- Risk: When marketing budgets dry up, users face real gas costs, causing a cliff in daily active accounts.
- Domino Effect: Lower volume reduces bundler revenue, increasing fees in a death spiral.
- Evidence: Parallels exist in Layer 2 sequencer subsidies and EIP-4844 blob fee volatility.
The Protocol Sidelining: L2 Native Account Abstraction
Why outsource to Ethereum bundlers when you can bake AA into the chain? zkSync, Starknet, and Polygon zkEVM are implementing native AA with protocol-level bundling.
- Risk: ERC-4337 becomes an Ethereum L1-only standard, ceding the high-volume L2 market to proprietary implementations.
- Consequence: Fragments liquidity and developer mindshare, starving the cross-chain bundler market.
- Analogy: Similar to how Cosmos IBC and LayerZero created competing cross-chain standards.
The Atomicity Trap: Failed UserOperations Kill Batch Profit
Bundlers aggregate UserOperations into a single on-chain transaction. One failing op (e.g., insufficient funds, signature error) can revert the entire batch.
- Risk: Forces bundlers to run full simulation (like Ethereum validators), increasing overhead and requiring sophisticated DoS protection.
- Result: High failure rates make small, permissionless bundlers unprofitable, again favoring centralized, resource-rich players.
- Mitigation: Requires complex mempool rules, akin to UniswapX's fill-or-kill logic.
Future Outlook: The Bundler-Centric Stack
ERC-4337's bundler market will evolve into a competitive landscape of specialized services, creating new business models and revenue streams.
Bundlers become specialized service providers. The generic bundler role will fragment into verticals like high-frequency arbitrage, privacy-focused execution, and cross-chain intent settlement. This mirrors the evolution of Ethereum's block builders.
The real value is in the mempool. Bundlers with proprietary access to user intent flow, like those integrated with major wallets (e.g., Safe, Rabby), will command premium fees. This creates a data marketplace for transaction ordering.
Cross-chain intents are the killer app. A bundler will source liquidity from UniswapX on Ethereum and settle on Arbitrum, abstracting the bridge. This turns bundlers into the execution layer for a unified cross-chain user experience.
Evidence: Pimlico's bundler service already processes over 1.5 million UserOperations monthly, demonstrating the demand for reliable, performant infrastructure ahead of mass adoption.
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
ERC-4337's bundler market is not just a technical component; it's a new primitive for structuring and monetizing user operations.
The Problem: Centralized Relayer Risk
Current smart account systems like Safe rely on centralized relayers, creating a single point of failure and censorship. ERC-4337 unbundles this role.
- Decentralized Execution: A competitive market of bundlers prevents any single entity from blocking transactions.
- Censorship Resistance: Users can broadcast user operations (UserOps) to a public mempool, akin to Ethereum's tx pool.
The Solution: MEV-Aware Bundling
Bundlers are sophisticated searchers that will compete to aggregate and order UserOps for maximal extractable value (MEV).
- New Revenue Streams: Bundlers earn fees from ordering, cross-domain arbitrage, and intent fulfillment (see: UniswapX, CowSwap).
- Infrastructure Play: Expect specialized bundlers for gaming (fast finality), DeFi (MEV optimization), and institutional (privacy).
The Vertical: Paymaster as a Service
ERC-4337's paymaster enables sponsored transactions and gas abstraction, creating a B2B SaaS model for dApps.
- User Acquisition Tool: Protocols can subsidize gas to onboard users, paid for by the bundler market.
- Stablecoin Payments: Users can pay fees in ERC-20 tokens (e.g., USDC), with paymasters handling ETH conversion.
The Architecture: Modular Stack Specialization
The bundler stack will fragment into specialized layers, mirroring the L2 rollup ecosystem.
- Execution Layer: Core bundler clients (e.g., Stackup, Alchemy, Pimlico).
- Aggregation Layer: Services that route UserOps to optimal bundlers (similar to Across, Socket).
- Settlement Layer: Cross-chain intent solvers leveraging infra like LayerZero and CCIP.
The Investment Thesis: Capture the Gas Market
Bundlers and paymasters will capture a portion of the total gas spent by smart accounts, a market scaling with adoption.
- Recurring Revenue: Fees are a direct percentage of transaction volume, not speculative tokenomics.
- Network Effects: The most reliable and efficient bundlers will attract more UserOps, creating defensible moats.
The Risk: Bundler Cartels and Centralization
Economic incentives could lead to bundler centralization, recreating the miner/extractor problems of L1.
- Staking Requirements: High-performance bundlers may require significant ETH stake, favoring large players.
- Regulatory Target: Entities controlling user transaction flow become obvious regulatory targets for compliance.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.