LSTs are superior collateral. They accrue yield while maintaining liquidity, making idle native tokens a legacy concept. This creates a persistent yield pressure that redefines capital efficiency.
wallet-wars-smart-accounts-vs-embedded-wallets
Blog
Why Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) Will Become the Primary Wallet Balance
An analysis of how yield-seeking behavior will make LSTs the default on-chain asset, forcing a fundamental shift in wallet infrastructure and user experience.
introduction
THE NEW PRIMITIVE
Introduction
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) are evolving from a yield product into the fundamental unit of account for on-chain capital.
The wallet balance is the yield source. Protocols like Lido (stETH) and Rocket Pool (rETH) transform static ETH into a productive asset by default, forcing a comparison against the risk-free staking rate for every DeFi action.
Infrastructure is the enabler. Standardization via ERC-20 and integrations across Aave, Uniswap, and EigenLayer make LSTs the most composable and utility-rich asset class, destined to become the default wallet denomination.
thesis-statement
THE DEFAULT STATE
The Core Thesis: Yield as a Non-Optional Feature
The opportunity cost of idle capital will drive Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) to become the base layer for all on-chain balances.
Idle capital is a bug. A wallet holding native ETH or SOL is a system failure, leaking value to inflation and forgoing yield. Protocols like Lido and Jito have proven users will migrate en masse to capture staking rewards without sacrificing liquidity.
LSTs are superior collateral. Compared to raw ETH, an LST like stETH or mSOL is a yield-bearing asset with deeper DeFi integration. This creates a compounding advantage in lending markets on Aave and Compound, where LSTs offer higher borrowing power.
The network effect is irreversible. As LST adoption grows, their liquidity and utility outpace the native asset. This creates a flywheel effect: more DeFi integrations attract more holders, which deepens liquidity, making LSTs the de facto standard.
Evidence: Lido's stETH commands a 32% market share of all staked ETH, and its Curve pool is a foundational DeFi primitive. Solana's JitoSOL surpassed 50% of the validator stake weight in under a year.
key-trends
WHY LSTs WIN
Key Trends Driving the LST Default
The convergence of yield, utility, and network effects is making Liquid Staking Tokens the inevitable base layer for on-chain capital.
01
The Opportunity Cost of Idle ETH
Holding native ETH in a wallet is a -4%+ annual drag versus staking. LSTs like Lido's stETH and Rocket Pool's rETH turn a dormant asset into productive capital, creating an inescapable financial incentive for adoption.
- Yield as a Baseline: Staking yield becomes the new risk-free rate for Ethereum.
- Capital Efficiency: Unlocks ~$70B+ in otherwise idle TVL for DeFi composability.
4%+ APY
vs. 0%
$70B+
Idle Capital
02
DeFi's LST-First Design
Major protocols now optimize for LST collateral, creating a powerful feedback loop. Aave, MakerDAO, and EigenLayer treat stETH as prime collateral, offering higher LTVs and better rates than native ETH.
- Collateral Superiority: Better risk parameters and deeper liquidity pools.
- Composability Stack: LSTs are the foundational asset for restaking and LSDfi, as seen with Pendle and Kelp DAO.
Higher LTV
Better Terms
LSDfi
New Primitive
03
The End of the Solo Staking Mandate
The technical and capital barriers to solo staking (32 ETH, hardware, slashing risk) confine it to a niche. LST providers abstract this complexity, offering one-click exposure to consensus rewards.
- Democratized Access: Lowers minimum stake to <0.1 ETH.
- Risk Mitigation: Professional node operators and decentralized networks like Rocket Pool distribute slashing risk.
32 ETH -> 0.1 ETH
Barrier Removed
Professional Ops
Risk Managed
04
The Cross-Chain Settlement Asset
LSTs are becoming the preferred bridge asset, not native ETH. Their inherent yield makes them superior for cross-chain liquidity and collateral, as leveraged by LayerZero and Axelar for omnichain applications.
- Yield-Bearing Bridge: Transfers value and accrues yield in transit.
- Omnichain Standard: Projects like Stargate build liquidity pools around stETH, not ETH.
Yield in Transit
Key Advantage
Omnichain
New Standard
05
Veblen Good Network Effects
LST liquidity begets more liquidity in a winner-take-most market. The deepest pool (Lido) attracts the most DeFi integrations, which attracts more stakers, creating an unassailable moat. This is evident in Curve's stETH-ETH pool dominance.
- Liquidity Flywheel: More TVL → Better peg stability → More utility.
- Protocol Capture: DeFi becomes structurally dependent on the largest LST's liquidity.
Winner-Take-Most
Market Dynamic
Peg Stability
Critical Mass
06
The Regulatory Arbitrage
LSTs may face clearer regulatory pathways than the underlying staking service. A token representing a yield-bearing claim could be classified differently than the act of validation, offering a potential compliance advantage in adversarial jurisdictions.
- Security vs. Utility: Token form factor may avoid certain securities classifications.
- Institutional On-Ramp: TradFi entities prefer regulated custodial solutions for tokenized yield.
Clearer Pathway
Regulatory
Tokenized Yield
TradFi Bridge
OPPORTUNITY COST ANALYSIS
The Yield Gap: Idle ETH vs. LST Opportunity Cost
Quantifying the financial and operational trade-offs between holding native ETH and using Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) like Lido's stETH, Rocket Pool's rETH, or Coinbase's cbETH.
| Metric / Feature | Native ETH (Idle) | Liquid Staking Token (LST) | Re-staking Token (LRT) |
|---|---|---|---|
Base Yield (APY) | 0.0% | 3.2% - 3.8% | 3.2% + 10-20% (e.g., EigenLayer) |
Capital Efficiency | |||
Liquidity Access | On-chain transfer only | Instant DeFi composability (Aave, Compound, Uniswap) | DeFi + AVS restaking pools |
Slashing Risk Exposure | Direct (Validator) | Indirect (Pool Diversified) | Layered (Validator + AVS) |
Unstaking Delay | ~2-7 days |
| Protocol withdrawal + AVS unbonding period |
Protocol Centralization Risk | N/A (Solo) | High (Lido: ~32% network share) | High (EigenLayer dominance) |
Smart Contract Risk | None | High (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool codebase) | Very High (LST + AVS + EigenLayer contracts) |
DeFi Integration Multiplier | 1x (Collateral Value) | ~5x (Collateral + Yield + Liquidity) | ~8x (Collateral + Yield + Liquidity + Restaking Points) |
deep-dive
THE NEW PRIMITIVE
Deep Dive: How LSTs Reshape the Wallet Stack
Liquid Staking Tokens are evolving from a yield-bearing asset into the foundational unit of account for on-chain capital.
LSTs are superior money. They combine the security of staked ETH with the liquidity of a tradable asset, creating a higher-utility base layer than native tokens. This makes them the logical default for wallet balances and transaction settlement.
Yield becomes a public good. Protocols like EigenLayer and Symbiotic transform idle LST yield into cryptoeconomic security for new networks. This utility subsidy makes holding LSTs more rational than holding inert ETH.
The wallet stack inverts. Wallets like Rainbow and Zerion will prioritize LST balances, with native ETH treated as 'gas currency' held in a separate reserve. Smart accounts from Safe and Biconomy will auto-compound this yield.
Evidence: Over 40% of all staked ETH is now liquid, with Lido's stETH and Rocket Pool's rETH acting as de facto stablecoins in DeFi lending markets like Aave and Compound.
counter-argument
THE REALITY CHECK
Counter-Argument: Centralization and Slashing Risks
The systemic risks of LSTs are real but are being mitigated by market forces and technical innovation.
LST dominance creates centralization vectors that threaten network security. A single LST like Lido controlling >30% of Ethereum stake creates a systemic risk, but this triggers protocol-level defenses like the inactivity leak penalty and market-driven diversification to competitors like Rocket Pool.
Slashing risk is priced and insured. The market treats slashing as a quantifiable operational risk, not an existential one. Protocols like EigenLayer abstract this risk further, while insurance pools and validator client diversity (e.g., Prysm vs Teku) reduce its probability.
The counter-force is economic. Validator centralization invites regulatory scrutiny and reduces staking rewards through proposer boost dilution. This creates a natural economic pressure for stake to distribute across Rocket Pool, Frax Ether, and Stader.
Evidence: Lido's dominance has plateaued below 33% for over a year, while Rocket Pool's share grows. The Ethereum protocol's consensus-layer design inherently penalizes excessive centralization, making a single-point failure scenario economically irrational.
protocol-spotlight
THE NEW MONEY LAYER
Protocol Spotlight: The LST Stack Winners
Liquid Staking Tokens are evolving from a yield product into the foundational asset for all on-chain activity, redefining wallet balances.
01
The Problem: Idle Capital Silos
Native staking locks capital, creating a massive opportunity cost. Users must choose between securing the network and participating in DeFi, fragmenting liquidity and utility.
- $100B+ in locked, unproductive ETH
- 7-30 day unbonding periods create illiquidity risk
- Zero composability with the broader DeFi stack
$100B+
Locked Capital
30 days
Unbonding
02
The Solution: Programmable Yield-Bearing Money
LSTs like Lido's stETH, Rocket Pool's rETH, and Frax's sfrxETH transform staked assets into fungible, yield-accruing tokens. They become the default balance for wallets and smart contracts.
- ~3-5% native yield automatically compounds in the token
- Instant liquidity via DEXs and money markets like Aave
- Native integration as collateral across DeFi (MakerDAO, Aave, Compound)
3-5%
Base Yield
$30B+ TVL
Lido stETH
03
The Meta: LSTs as the Universal Collateral Layer
The next phase isn't just yield—it's leverage. LSTs enable recursive financial strategies, becoming the primary collateral for stablecoins and lending.
- EigenLayer enables LST restaking for additional yield and security
- Lybra & Prisma mint stablecoins (eUSD, mkUSD) directly against LST collateral
- Pendle & Eigenpie fragment yield and principal for structured products
2x+
Yield Stacking
$5B+
Restaked TVL
04
The Winner: Infrastructure, Not Tokens
The real value accrues to the infrastructure layer that secures, distributes, and integrates LSTs. Winners are oracle providers, cross-chain bridges, and risk managers.
- Chainlink Proof of Reserve secures the LST > asset peg
- LayerZero & Axelar enable omnichain LSTs (stETH on Arbitrum)
- Gauntlet & Chaos Labs model collateral risk for LST-backed loans
100%
Oracle Reliance
5+ chains
Avg. LST Deployment
05
The Risk: Centralization & Depeg
LST dominance introduces systemic risks. A failure in a major provider like Lido or a cascading depeg could destabilize the entire DeFi ecosystem.
- Lido commands >30% of staked ETH, a protocol-level risk
- Oracle manipulation or slashing events threaten the collateral base
- Regulatory scrutiny targets staking-as-a-service models
>30%
Lido Dominance
High
Systemic Risk
06
The Endgame: Native Yield in Every Transaction
The wallet of the future won't hold 'ETH'—it will hold a yield-generating LST. This shifts the base layer from inert digital gold to productive internet bonds.
- Wallets & DEXs default to LST balances for all swaps and payments
- Stablecoins are predominantly backed by LST collateral, sharing yield
- The 'Risk-Free Rate' for crypto is now an on-chain, composable asset
Primary
Wallet Balance
RFR
On-Chain Yield
risk-analysis
LST ADOPTION THREATS
Risk Analysis: What Could Derail This Future?
The path to LSTs as the default wallet balance is paved with systemic risks that could collapse the thesis.
01
The Slashing Black Swan
A correlated slashing event across major validators (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool) would vaporize the 'risk-free' yield narrative and trigger a mass exodus.\n- Correlated Failure: A consensus-layer bug or coordinated attack could slash thousands of validators simultaneously.\n- Insurance Gaps: Current coverage pools (e.g., EigenLayer, Nexus Mutual**) are untested at scale for a >1% TVL loss event.
>1%
TVL At Risk
$32 ETH
Max Slash
02
Regulatory Capture of Staking
Aggressive SEC action could classify certain LSTs as securities, crippling DeFi composability and on-ramps.\n- KYC-Enforced Pools: Mandatory identification for staking (e.g., Coinbase's cbETH model) becomes the norm, killing permissionless innovation.\n- Liquidity Fragmentation: Compliant and non-compliant LST pools cannot interact, breaking the unified money market.
US Only
Jurisdiction Risk
Major CEXs
Attack Vector
03
Yield Compression & MEV Centralization
Staking yields normalize near risk-free rates, while MEV extraction becomes dominated by a few entities, killing the economic moat.\n- APR Convergence: As staking saturates, yields fall to 3-4%, eliminating the premium over traditional savings.\n- Validator Cartels: Entities like Flashbots and Jito Labs capture >80% of MEV, redistributing value away from ordinary stakers.
3-4%
Long-Term APR
>80%
MEV Capture
04
Smart Contract & Oracle Failure
A critical bug in a dominant LST's token contract or its price oracle would cascade through the entire DeFi ecosystem.\n- Systemic Contagion: LSTs like stETH are used as $20B+ in collateral; a depeg would trigger mass liquidations.\n- Oracle Lag: A delay in reporting a slashing event could allow billions in bad debt to accumulate before positions are liquidated.
$20B+
Collateral At Risk
Minutes
Oracle Lag
05
The Restaking Rehypothecation Spiral
LSTs deposited into restaking protocols (e.g., EigenLayer) create a dangerous chain of leverage, where a failure in one AVS collapses the stack.\n- Nested Liquidity: The same underlying ETH is used to secure multiple services, multiplying systemic risk.\n- Uncorrelated Correlations: A failure in an unrelated AVS (e.g., a data availability layer) could trigger slashing that propagates back to the base LST.
10x+
Leverage Factor
AVS Slash
Cascade Trigger
06
L1 Consensus Change & Fork Risk
A contentious Ethereum hard fork or a fundamental change to proof-of-stake mechanics could render existing LSTs obsolete or worthless.\n- Social Consensus Failure: A fork could create two competing stETH tokens, destroying liquidity and trust.\n- Validator Set Overhaul: A move to a single-slot finality or new punishment scheme could break existing LST delegation mechanics.
Two stETHs
Fork Outcome
Protocol Overhaul
Existential Risk
future-outlook
THE LST STANDARD
Future Outlook: The 24-Month Horizon
Liquid Staking Tokens will become the default on-chain asset, displacing native tokens in wallets and DeFi.
LSTs become base money. Native ETH or SOL in a wallet is idle capital. LSTs like stETH or jitoSOL provide yield while maintaining liquidity, making them strictly superior. Wallets will default to displaying and transacting in these yield-bearing assets.
DeFi composability demands LSTs. Protocols like Aave and Uniswap optimize for LST collateral and liquidity pools. Using native ETH creates friction and opportunity cost. The network effect will make LSTs the mandatory input for efficient DeFi participation.
The yield standard emerges. Just as USDC became the stablecoin standard, a dominant LST (e.g., Lido's stETH) will become the canonical yield-bearing asset. Its deep liquidity on DEXs and bridges like LayerZero and Wormhole will create a self-reinforcing flywheel.
Evidence: Ethereum's Shanghai upgrade unlocked withdrawals, removing the final structural risk. stETH now represents over 30% of all staked ETH, and its use as collateral across MakerDAO, Aave, and Compound exceeds $10B, proving the demand for yield-bearing base layers.
takeaways
THE LST PRIMACY THESIS
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Liquid Staking Tokens are evolving from a yield-bearing asset into the foundational unit of account for on-chain capital, fundamentally reshaping wallet economics and protocol design.
01
The Problem: Idle Capital is a Protocol Killer
Native staking locks up $100B+ in unproductive capital, creating massive opportunity cost and liquidity fragmentation. This is the single largest inefficiency in Proof-of-Stake economics.\n- Opportunity Cost: Capital cannot be deployed in DeFi, NFTs, or new primitives.\n- Liquidity Fragmentation: Creates separate, illiquid pools for staked vs. unstaked assets.\n- User Friction: Forces a binary choice between security (staking) and utility (spending).
$100B+
Locked Capital
0%
Yield Elsewhere
02
The Solution: LSTs as the Native Unit of Account
LSTs like Lido's stETH, Rocket Pool's rETH, and EigenLayer's restaked LSTs transform locked equity into productive, composable capital. They become the default wallet balance because they are money that earns money.\n- Composability: Use LSTs as collateral in Aave, Maker, and Compound while earning staking yield.\n- Network Effects: Protocols will quote prices and denominate fees in LSTs to capture this sticky, yield-bearing liquidity.\n- Yield Aggregation: LSTs are the base layer for EigenLayer restaking and Babylon Bitcoin staking, creating layered yield.
2x+
Yield Stack
100%
Capital Efficiency
03
The New Primitive: Programmable Yield-Bearing Money
LSTs are not just tokens; they are programmable balance sheets. This enables novel financial primitives impossible with static native tokens.\n- Automated Vaults: Protocols like EigenLayer and Kelp DAO auto-restake yield into AVSs or LRTs.\n- Intent-Based Systems: Users express goals (e.g., 'maximize yield'), and solvers route through LST/DeFi pools automatically (see UniswapX, CowSwap).\n- Cross-Chain Native Asset: LSTs are becoming the preferred bridging asset (e.g., stETH on LayerZero, Axelar) as they carry intrinsic yield across chains.
New Primitives
Enabled
Auto-Compounding
Default State
04
The Inevitable Endgame: LSTs as Reserve Currency
The highest utility form of an asset wins. LSTs will become the benchmark for risk-free rate (RFR) on their native chain, displacing the native token in wallets and treasuries.\n- Protocol Treasuries: DAOs like Aave and Uniswap will hold LSTs, not native ETH/AVAX/SOL, for yield-accretive treasury management.\n- Stablecoin Backing: LSTs will be the primary collateral for over-collateralized stablecoins (e.g., Maker's potential sDAI model).\n- Venture Implication: The next wave of 'killer apps' will be built assuming LSTs are the default balance, not volatile native tokens.
Benchmark RFR
On-Chain
Treasury Standard
For DAOs
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall