The MEV supply chain is now a competitive marketplace. Searchers run algorithms to find profitable opportunities, while specialized actors like Flashbots builders construct optimized blocks. Validators in PoS or sequencers in rollups simply accept the most profitable bundle, auctioned via protocols like MEV-Boost or SUAVE.
Why MEV Extraction Shifts from Miners to Bundlers
The rise of EIP-4337 and smart accounts fundamentally re-architects the MEV supply chain. The entity that bundles and orders UserOperations becomes the new extractor of arbitrage and front-running value, shifting power from miners/validators to a new class of infrastructure.
Introduction
The transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake and rollups has fundamentally relocated MEV extraction from miners to a new class of actors: searchers and bundlers.
Miners were passive extractors; they captured value from the public mempool. Bundlers are active optimizers, competing on execution quality in private channels. This shift creates a professionalized MEV industry, separating block production from transaction ordering.
The evidence is in the revenue. Post-Merge, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built via MEV-Boost. On Arbitrum and Optimism, centralized sequencers currently capture all MEV, a dynamic that protocols like Espresso and Astria aim to decentralize.
The Core Argument: Bundlers Are the New Miners
The economic and operational center of gravity for transaction ordering and MEV extraction is migrating from base-layer miners/validators to application-layer bundlers.
Bundlers control execution order. In an account abstraction (ERC-4337) world, user operations are submitted to a public mempool. The bundler is the entity that packages these operations into a single on-chain transaction, deciding the final sequence. This grants them the same ordering power that Proof-of-Work miners historically held.
MEV extraction is now a service. Miners captured value via priority gas auctions and dark pools. Bundlers, like those operated by Pimlico or Stackup, monetize by offering MEV-optimized bundling as a subsidized service, abstracting complexity from users. The revenue model shifts from seigniorage to a fee-for-service marketplace.
Decentralization is the new frontier. Miner decentralization was solved by Nakamoto Consensus. Bundler decentralization is the unsolved problem, with current implementations like Ethereum's p2p mempool and SUAVE aiming to prevent a single entity from monopolizing the right to order transactions. The censorship resistance battle has moved up the stack.
The Current Battleground: Wallet Wars & Intent
MEV extraction is migrating from miners to bundlers, forcing wallets to become the new gatekeepers of user intent.
The MEV supply chain is reorganizing. Proof-of-Stake and specialized block builders like Flashbots Auction have centralized block production, but the real value capture moved upstream to the transaction ordering layer.
Bundlers are the new miners. Private mempools and order-flow auctions, pioneered by entities like Flashbots and CoW Swap, allow searchers to pay bundlers for priority. This creates a fee market for ordering separate from the base gas fee.
Wallets control the spigot. The wallet signature is the atomic unit of user intent. Whoever aggregates and routes this intent—be it a smart wallet like Safe, a service like UniswapX, or a standard like ERC-4337—controls the most valuable transaction flow.
Evidence: Over 90% of Ethereum blocks are now built via MEV-Boost, and intent-based aggregators like Across Protocol and UniswapX now route billions in volume, proving the economic logic of intent abstraction.
Key Trends Driving the Shift
The fundamental architecture of block production is changing, moving MEV capture from a hardware-based oligopoly to a competitive, software-driven market.
The Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) Mandate
Ethereum's transition to PoS enshrined PBS, legally separating block proposal from construction. This creates a pure market for block space where specialized builders compete to sell maximal-value blocks to validators. Miners, now just proposers, are price-takers.
The Rise of the SUAVE Chain
Flashbots' SUAVE is a dedicated intent-centric mempool and decentralized block builder. It aims to become the preferred execution environment for user transactions, capturing MEV at the source (the user's intent) before it ever hits a public mempool.
- Decouples MEV from any single chain
- Standardizes preference expression via intents
- Democratizes access to block building
Intent-Based Architectures (UniswapX, CowSwap)
Applications are abstracting execution away from users. Instead of submitting a signed transaction, users submit a signed intent (e.g., "I want 1 ETH for max 2000 DAI"). Solvers (bundlers) compete to fulfill it optimally, internalizing MEV as part of the solving game. This bypasses public mempools entirely.
- Better prices for users via competition
- Gasless experiences
- MEV becomes a solver cost, not an extractive tax
Cross-Chain MEV & Universal Liquidity
MEV is no longer chain-specific. Arbitrage and liquidation opportunities exist across Ethereum L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism), alt-L1s (Solana), and via bridges (LayerZero, Across). Only sophisticated bundlers with multi-chain liquidity and execution can capture this value, a scale impossible for individual miners.
- Requires cross-chain messaging & settlement
- Demands sophisticated routing logic
- Creates a winner-take-most market for global builders
MEV Supply Chain: Then vs. Now
A comparison of the key actors, mechanisms, and economic incentives in the MEV supply chain before and after Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake and the rise of PBS.
| Feature | Then: Miner Extraction (Pre-Merge) | Now: Builder Extraction (Post-Merge) | Future: SUAVE & Intents |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Extractor | Miner / Mining Pool | Proposer-Builder-Separation (PBS) Builder | Decentralized Auction Network |
Extraction Method | Local mempool & private channels | Private mempools (e.g., Flashbots Protect, bloXroute) | Encrypted orderflow via SUAVE chain |
Auction Venue | Off-chain (centralized relay) | Off-chain (decentralized relay network) | On-chain (SUAVE as a shared mempool & solver) |
Revenue Capture | ~100% to miner (searcher tips optional) | Builder: ~90%, Proposer: ~10% (via MEV-Boost) | Solver/Executor: Auction-determined, User: potential rebates |
User Protection | None (frontrunning endemic) | Basic (via Flashbots RPC, ~30% of flow) | Programmable (intent-based, privacy via TEEs) |
Extraction Latency | < 1 sec (next block) | < 12 sec (next slot) | Multi-chain, cross-domain (variable) |
Key Infrastructure | Flashbots Auction (v0), private RPCs | MEV-Boost, Relays (e.g., Ultra, Agnostic), Block Builders | SUAVE chain, intent solvers (e.g., UniswapX, Across) |
Centralization Risk | High (miner cartels) | Very High (top 3 builders > 80% market share) | Theoretical Low (decentralized validator set for SUAVE) |
Anatomy of a Bundler's MEV Opportunity
Account abstraction moves MEV extraction from miners/validators to a new class of network actors: the bundlers.
Bundlers control transaction ordering within a UserOperation batch before submission to a public mempool. This creates a direct analog to block-building MEV on L1, but for the ERC-4337 ecosystem.
The MEV surface is protocol-specific. Bundlers on Arbitrum or Optimism arbitrage sequencer inclusion latency, while Polygon or Scroll bundlers compete in a public mempool akin to Ethereum.
Private orderflow is the ultimate prize. Bundlers integrated with wallets like Safe{Wallet} or Coinbase Smart Wallet capture exclusive, pre-public transaction flow, mirroring Flashbots' role on Ethereum.
Evidence: On testnets, over 60% of UserOperations are bundled by just three entities, demonstrating rapid centralization of this new extractive role.
Counterpoint: Will PBS and SUAVE Prevent This?
Proposer-Builder Separation and SUAVE refactor the MEV supply chain but do not eliminate extraction; they shift it to a new, more specialized layer.
PBS formalizes the role of the builder, creating a professionalized market for MEV extraction. This moves the economic activity from the proposer (the validator) to a new entity whose sole purpose is maximizing transaction value. The builder's profit is the extracted MEV, not block rewards.
SUAVE is a specialized chain designed for optimal transaction ordering. It centralizes the intelligence of MEV, creating a dominant mempool where searchers and builders compete. This does not prevent MEV; it creates a more efficient, transparent, and potentially centralized marketplace for it.
The shift is from miners to bundlers. In a PBS/SUAVE world, the power resides with the entities controlling the most sophisticated transaction ordering algorithms and access to liquidity. This is the domain of firms like Flashbots, bloXroute, and specialized searcher collectives.
Evidence: Ethereum's transition to PoS and the adoption of MEV-Boost demonstrates this shift in practice. Over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by a handful of professional builders, not the validators who propose them. The extraction persists; the actors change.
Risks & Centralization Vectors
The transition to Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and rollups has not eliminated MEV; it has professionalized and relocated it, creating new systemic risks.
The Builder Cartel Problem
Post-merge Ethereum's PBS creates a new centralization layer. A handful of sophisticated builders like Flashbots, bloXroute, and Titan dominate block production, controlling transaction ordering and censorship.\n- Top 3 builders often produce >80% of blocks.\n- Central point for regulatory pressure and OFAC compliance.
Rollup Sequencer Monopolies
Most rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) use a single, permissioned sequencer. This grants the operator exclusive, rent-extracting rights over the chain's order flow.\n- 100% of MEV is captured by the sequencer.\n- Creates a single point of failure and censorship.
Searcher-Bundler Symbiosis
In intent-based and SUAVE-like architectures, the line between searcher and bundler blurs. Entities that win the most order flow can run proprietary bundlers, creating a feedback loop of dominance.\n- Vertical integration of flow and execution.\n- Risks mirroring CEX internalization practices.
The Relayer Centralization Trap
Cross-chain intents and bridges (e.g., Across, LayerZero) rely on relayers for execution. The most capital-efficient relayer pools become natural monopolies, controlling interchain value flow.\n- Capital efficiency begets centralization.\n- Creates systemic risk across multiple chains.
Data: The New MEV MoAT
Superior private mempools (Flashbots Protect), exclusive order flow agreements, and proprietary data feeds create an insurmountable advantage for incumbent bundlers and builders.\n- Information asymmetry is the new barrier to entry.\n- Decentralized searcher networks are at a permanent disadvantage.
Solution Vectors: PBS & DVT
Mitigation requires protocol-level fixes. Enshrined PBS with decentralized builder circuits and Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) can disaggregate power.\n- Enshrined PBS removes builder trust.\n- DVT (e.g., Obol, SSV) decentralizes block proposal.
Future Outlook: The Bundler Stack Matures
The maturation of the bundler stack formalizes MEV extraction, shifting it from miners to specialized actors and creating new market structures.
Bundlers become the new miners. In a post-PBS world, block builders on Ethereum consolidate MEV, but account abstraction moves this function to the application layer. Bundlers in ERC-4337 and SUAVE-like shared sequencers execute user intents, becoming the primary extractors of cross-domain MEV.
Intent-based architectures redistribute value. Unlike transaction-based systems, intent-centric protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap outsource execution to solvers. This creates a competitive solver market where value accrues to the best executors, not the highest fee payer, fundamentally changing the MEV supply chain.
The stack professionalizes into verticals. Specialized firms like Flashbots and bloXroute will dominate different layers: searchers find opportunities, builders construct bundles, and relays ensure censorship resistance. This professional MEV supply chain increases efficiency but risks centralization in a few sophisticated players.
Evidence: Flashbots' MEV-Share and MEV-Boost already capture over 90% of Ethereum blocks, demonstrating the inevitability of specialized extraction. The next phase extends this model to intent settlement across rollups via protocols like Across and LayerZero.
Key Takeaways for Builders & Investors
The transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake and the rise of rollups have fundamentally re-architected the MEV supply chain, moving extraction from miners to a new class of actors.
The Problem: Opaque Miner Extractable Value
In PoW, miners had unilateral, non-accountable control over block ordering, leading to front-running and sandwich attacks that directly harmed users. The value flow was opaque and centralized among a few mining pools.
- Value Capture: Billions in user value extracted annually.
- Centralization Risk: MEV rewards incentivized pool dominance.
- User Experience: Unpredictable slippage and failed transactions.
The Solution: Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)
Ethereum's PBS (via MEV-Boost) formally separates block building from proposing. This creates a competitive market for block space, moving extraction from validators to specialized block builders.
- Market Efficiency: Builders compete to pay validators for the right to propose their block.
- Validator Simplicity: Validators outsource complex optimization, securing ~90% of Ethereum blocks via MEV-Boost.
- Transparency: MEV flows become more visible and quantifiable on the relay level.
The New Frontier: Rollup Bundlers & Searchers
In the rollup-centric future, the sequencer (or bundler in account abstraction) becomes the critical MEV choke point. Projects like EigenLayer (shared sequencers), Astria, and Espresso are competing to decentralize this role.
- Architectural Control: Whoever controls sequencing controls L2 MEV.
- Searcher Networks: Entities like Flashbots SUAVE aim to create a neutral, cross-chain marketplace for block building.
- Builder Opportunity: The stack fragments, creating openings for specialized L2/L3 builders.
The Investment Thesis: Vertical Integration
The most valuable infrastructure will vertically integrate the MEV supply chain. Look for entities that combine searching, building, and sequencing.
- Full-Stack Capture: Control from user intent (via intent-based protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap) to cross-chain settlement (via Across, LayerZero).
- Data Advantage: Proprietary order flow and cross-chain arbitrage data become moats.
- Regulatory Shield: Neutral, decentralized infrastructure is more defensible than opaque extractors.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.