Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
wallet-wars-smart-accounts-vs-embedded-wallets
Blog

Why MEV Extraction Shifts from Miners to Bundlers

The rise of EIP-4337 and smart accounts fundamentally re-architects the MEV supply chain. The entity that bundles and orders UserOperations becomes the new extractor of arbitrage and front-running value, shifting power from miners/validators to a new class of infrastructure.

introduction
THE POWER SHIFT

Introduction

The transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake and rollups has fundamentally relocated MEV extraction from miners to a new class of actors: searchers and bundlers.

The MEV supply chain is now a competitive marketplace. Searchers run algorithms to find profitable opportunities, while specialized actors like Flashbots builders construct optimized blocks. Validators in PoS or sequencers in rollups simply accept the most profitable bundle, auctioned via protocols like MEV-Boost or SUAVE.

Miners were passive extractors; they captured value from the public mempool. Bundlers are active optimizers, competing on execution quality in private channels. This shift creates a professionalized MEV industry, separating block production from transaction ordering.

The evidence is in the revenue. Post-Merge, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built via MEV-Boost. On Arbitrum and Optimism, centralized sequencers currently capture all MEV, a dynamic that protocols like Espresso and Astria aim to decentralize.

thesis-statement
THE POWER SHIFT

The Core Argument: Bundlers Are the New Miners

The economic and operational center of gravity for transaction ordering and MEV extraction is migrating from base-layer miners/validators to application-layer bundlers.

Bundlers control execution order. In an account abstraction (ERC-4337) world, user operations are submitted to a public mempool. The bundler is the entity that packages these operations into a single on-chain transaction, deciding the final sequence. This grants them the same ordering power that Proof-of-Work miners historically held.

MEV extraction is now a service. Miners captured value via priority gas auctions and dark pools. Bundlers, like those operated by Pimlico or Stackup, monetize by offering MEV-optimized bundling as a subsidized service, abstracting complexity from users. The revenue model shifts from seigniorage to a fee-for-service marketplace.

Decentralization is the new frontier. Miner decentralization was solved by Nakamoto Consensus. Bundler decentralization is the unsolved problem, with current implementations like Ethereum's p2p mempool and SUAVE aiming to prevent a single entity from monopolizing the right to order transactions. The censorship resistance battle has moved up the stack.

market-context
THE POWER SHIFT

The Current Battleground: Wallet Wars & Intent

MEV extraction is migrating from miners to bundlers, forcing wallets to become the new gatekeepers of user intent.

The MEV supply chain is reorganizing. Proof-of-Stake and specialized block builders like Flashbots Auction have centralized block production, but the real value capture moved upstream to the transaction ordering layer.

Bundlers are the new miners. Private mempools and order-flow auctions, pioneered by entities like Flashbots and CoW Swap, allow searchers to pay bundlers for priority. This creates a fee market for ordering separate from the base gas fee.

Wallets control the spigot. The wallet signature is the atomic unit of user intent. Whoever aggregates and routes this intent—be it a smart wallet like Safe, a service like UniswapX, or a standard like ERC-4337—controls the most valuable transaction flow.

Evidence: Over 90% of Ethereum blocks are now built via MEV-Boost, and intent-based aggregators like Across Protocol and UniswapX now route billions in volume, proving the economic logic of intent abstraction.

THE POWER SHIFT

MEV Supply Chain: Then vs. Now

A comparison of the key actors, mechanisms, and economic incentives in the MEV supply chain before and after Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake and the rise of PBS.

FeatureThen: Miner Extraction (Pre-Merge)Now: Builder Extraction (Post-Merge)Future: SUAVE & Intents

Primary Extractor

Miner / Mining Pool

Proposer-Builder-Separation (PBS) Builder

Decentralized Auction Network

Extraction Method

Local mempool & private channels

Private mempools (e.g., Flashbots Protect, bloXroute)

Encrypted orderflow via SUAVE chain

Auction Venue

Off-chain (centralized relay)

Off-chain (decentralized relay network)

On-chain (SUAVE as a shared mempool & solver)

Revenue Capture

~100% to miner (searcher tips optional)

Builder: ~90%, Proposer: ~10% (via MEV-Boost)

Solver/Executor: Auction-determined, User: potential rebates

User Protection

None (frontrunning endemic)

Basic (via Flashbots RPC, ~30% of flow)

Programmable (intent-based, privacy via TEEs)

Extraction Latency

< 1 sec (next block)

< 12 sec (next slot)

Multi-chain, cross-domain (variable)

Key Infrastructure

Flashbots Auction (v0), private RPCs

MEV-Boost, Relays (e.g., Ultra, Agnostic), Block Builders

SUAVE chain, intent solvers (e.g., UniswapX, Across)

Centralization Risk

High (miner cartels)

Very High (top 3 builders > 80% market share)

Theoretical Low (decentralized validator set for SUAVE)

deep-dive
THE POWER SHIFT

Anatomy of a Bundler's MEV Opportunity

Account abstraction moves MEV extraction from miners/validators to a new class of network actors: the bundlers.

Bundlers control transaction ordering within a UserOperation batch before submission to a public mempool. This creates a direct analog to block-building MEV on L1, but for the ERC-4337 ecosystem.

The MEV surface is protocol-specific. Bundlers on Arbitrum or Optimism arbitrage sequencer inclusion latency, while Polygon or Scroll bundlers compete in a public mempool akin to Ethereum.

Private orderflow is the ultimate prize. Bundlers integrated with wallets like Safe{Wallet} or Coinbase Smart Wallet capture exclusive, pre-public transaction flow, mirroring Flashbots' role on Ethereum.

Evidence: On testnets, over 60% of UserOperations are bundled by just three entities, demonstrating rapid centralization of this new extractive role.

counter-argument
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT

Counterpoint: Will PBS and SUAVE Prevent This?

Proposer-Builder Separation and SUAVE refactor the MEV supply chain but do not eliminate extraction; they shift it to a new, more specialized layer.

PBS formalizes the role of the builder, creating a professionalized market for MEV extraction. This moves the economic activity from the proposer (the validator) to a new entity whose sole purpose is maximizing transaction value. The builder's profit is the extracted MEV, not block rewards.

SUAVE is a specialized chain designed for optimal transaction ordering. It centralizes the intelligence of MEV, creating a dominant mempool where searchers and builders compete. This does not prevent MEV; it creates a more efficient, transparent, and potentially centralized marketplace for it.

The shift is from miners to bundlers. In a PBS/SUAVE world, the power resides with the entities controlling the most sophisticated transaction ordering algorithms and access to liquidity. This is the domain of firms like Flashbots, bloXroute, and specialized searcher collectives.

Evidence: Ethereum's transition to PoS and the adoption of MEV-Boost demonstrates this shift in practice. Over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by a handful of professional builders, not the validators who propose them. The extraction persists; the actors change.

risk-analysis
THE MEV POWER SHIFT

Risks & Centralization Vectors

The transition to Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and rollups has not eliminated MEV; it has professionalized and relocated it, creating new systemic risks.

01

The Builder Cartel Problem

Post-merge Ethereum's PBS creates a new centralization layer. A handful of sophisticated builders like Flashbots, bloXroute, and Titan dominate block production, controlling transaction ordering and censorship.\n- Top 3 builders often produce >80% of blocks.\n- Central point for regulatory pressure and OFAC compliance.

>80%
Block Share
~5
Dominant Entities
02

Rollup Sequencer Monopolies

Most rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) use a single, permissioned sequencer. This grants the operator exclusive, rent-extracting rights over the chain's order flow.\n- 100% of MEV is captured by the sequencer.\n- Creates a single point of failure and censorship.

100%
MEV Capture
1
Active Sequencer
03

Searcher-Bundler Symbiosis

In intent-based and SUAVE-like architectures, the line between searcher and bundler blurs. Entities that win the most order flow can run proprietary bundlers, creating a feedback loop of dominance.\n- Vertical integration of flow and execution.\n- Risks mirroring CEX internalization practices.

Feedback Loop
Centralization Risk
04

The Relayer Centralization Trap

Cross-chain intents and bridges (e.g., Across, LayerZero) rely on relayers for execution. The most capital-efficient relayer pools become natural monopolies, controlling interchain value flow.\n- Capital efficiency begets centralization.\n- Creates systemic risk across multiple chains.

Multi-Chain
Risk Surface
05

Data: The New MEV MoAT

Superior private mempools (Flashbots Protect), exclusive order flow agreements, and proprietary data feeds create an insurmountable advantage for incumbent bundlers and builders.\n- Information asymmetry is the new barrier to entry.\n- Decentralized searcher networks are at a permanent disadvantage.

Asymmetric
Advantage
06

Solution Vectors: PBS & DVT

Mitigation requires protocol-level fixes. Enshrined PBS with decentralized builder circuits and Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) can disaggregate power.\n- Enshrined PBS removes builder trust.\n- DVT (e.g., Obol, SSV) decentralizes block proposal.

Protocol-Level
Fix Required
future-outlook
THE MEV SHIFT

Future Outlook: The Bundler Stack Matures

The maturation of the bundler stack formalizes MEV extraction, shifting it from miners to specialized actors and creating new market structures.

Bundlers become the new miners. In a post-PBS world, block builders on Ethereum consolidate MEV, but account abstraction moves this function to the application layer. Bundlers in ERC-4337 and SUAVE-like shared sequencers execute user intents, becoming the primary extractors of cross-domain MEV.

Intent-based architectures redistribute value. Unlike transaction-based systems, intent-centric protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap outsource execution to solvers. This creates a competitive solver market where value accrues to the best executors, not the highest fee payer, fundamentally changing the MEV supply chain.

The stack professionalizes into verticals. Specialized firms like Flashbots and bloXroute will dominate different layers: searchers find opportunities, builders construct bundles, and relays ensure censorship resistance. This professional MEV supply chain increases efficiency but risks centralization in a few sophisticated players.

Evidence: Flashbots' MEV-Share and MEV-Boost already capture over 90% of Ethereum blocks, demonstrating the inevitability of specialized extraction. The next phase extends this model to intent settlement across rollups via protocols like Across and LayerZero.

takeaways
THE MEV POWER SHIFT

Key Takeaways for Builders & Investors

The transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake and the rise of rollups have fundamentally re-architected the MEV supply chain, moving extraction from miners to a new class of actors.

01

The Problem: Opaque Miner Extractable Value

In PoW, miners had unilateral, non-accountable control over block ordering, leading to front-running and sandwich attacks that directly harmed users. The value flow was opaque and centralized among a few mining pools.

  • Value Capture: Billions in user value extracted annually.
  • Centralization Risk: MEV rewards incentivized pool dominance.
  • User Experience: Unpredictable slippage and failed transactions.
$1B+
Annual Extractable Value
>60%
Top 3 Pool Share
02

The Solution: Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)

Ethereum's PBS (via MEV-Boost) formally separates block building from proposing. This creates a competitive market for block space, moving extraction from validators to specialized block builders.

  • Market Efficiency: Builders compete to pay validators for the right to propose their block.
  • Validator Simplicity: Validators outsource complex optimization, securing ~90% of Ethereum blocks via MEV-Boost.
  • Transparency: MEV flows become more visible and quantifiable on the relay level.
90%
Blocks via MEV-Boost
~0.3 ETH
Avg. Block Payment
03

The New Frontier: Rollup Bundlers & Searchers

In the rollup-centric future, the sequencer (or bundler in account abstraction) becomes the critical MEV choke point. Projects like EigenLayer (shared sequencers), Astria, and Espresso are competing to decentralize this role.

  • Architectural Control: Whoever controls sequencing controls L2 MEV.
  • Searcher Networks: Entities like Flashbots SUAVE aim to create a neutral, cross-chain marketplace for block building.
  • Builder Opportunity: The stack fragments, creating openings for specialized L2/L3 builders.
$100M+
L2 MEV Opportunity
5+
Major Sequencer Projects
04

The Investment Thesis: Vertical Integration

The most valuable infrastructure will vertically integrate the MEV supply chain. Look for entities that combine searching, building, and sequencing.

  • Full-Stack Capture: Control from user intent (via intent-based protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap) to cross-chain settlement (via Across, LayerZero).
  • Data Advantage: Proprietary order flow and cross-chain arbitrage data become moats.
  • Regulatory Shield: Neutral, decentralized infrastructure is more defensible than opaque extractors.
10x
Valuation Multiplier
Vertical
Integration MoAT
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
MEV Extraction Shifts from Miners to Bundlers in 2024 | ChainScore Blog