Venture's equity-only model breaks in a world where protocol value accrues to token holders and liquidity providers, not shareholders. Funds like a16z and Paradigm already deploy capital via restaking on EigenLayer and LP positions on Uniswap V3.
venture-capital-trends-in-web3
Blog
Why Venture Funds Must Become Liquidity Providers
The passive, equity-only VC model is dead. On-chain liquidity provision through concentrated market making on platforms like Uniswap V3 is now a non-negotiable source of alpha and a critical tool for portfolio support. This is a first-principles breakdown of the strategic imperative.
introduction
THE ACTIVE MANDATE
The End of Passive Capital
Venture funds must transition from passive equity holders to active, on-chain liquidity providers to capture value in the modular stack.
Passive capital is a stranded asset. A fund's balance sheet, parked in stablecoins or native tokens, generates zero yield and misses the fee-generating mechanics of automated market makers and cross-chain messaging layers.
The new venture toolkit is on-chain. Funds must directly interact with sequencer auctions (like Espresso), provide liquidity for intent-based systems (like UniswapX), and secure shared sequencer sets. This is active portfolio management.
Evidence: EigenLayer's TVL exceeds $15B, demonstrating institutional demand for capital efficiency beyond simple staking. A fund's 5% equity stake is irrelevant if 95% of the protocol's economic activity bypasses it.
key-trends
FROM PASSIVE CAPITAL TO ACTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE
The Three Pillars of the LP Mandate
Venture funds can no longer afford to be passive spectators; providing liquidity is now a core competency for generating alpha and securing the networks they bet on.
01
The Problem: Illiquid Governance Power
Voting with locked tokens is useless if you can't influence protocol fees or direct liquidity. Passive staking yields are commoditized.
- Active LPing converts governance weight into real yield and protocol influence.
- Funds like Pantera Capital and Polychain already run proprietary market-making strategies on Uniswap v3 and Curve.
- Control over fee tiers and concentrated ranges dictates capital efficiency for entire DeFi ecosystems.
100-1000x
Capital Efficiency
>30%
Fee Capture
02
The Solution: Become a Private Mempool
Public mempools are toxic. MEV extraction turns your portfolio's trades into a public revenue stream for searchers.
- Running a private transaction relay (like Flashbots Protect) or a solver for CowSwap or UniswapX protects portfolio flow.
- This infrastructure allows for cross-chain intent execution, competing with Across and LayerZero.
- Capturing this ~$1B+ annual MEV flow is a strategic hedge and a new revenue line.
-99%
MEV Leakage
$1B+
Annual Market
03
The Mandate: Underwrite Network Security
A portfolio of L1/L2 tokens is a bet on network security. That bet fails if the chain lacks sustainable liquidity.
- Providing deep, stable liquidity for core assets (e.g., ETH, wBTC) on nascent rollups like Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync is a public good that directly increases chain valuation.
- This moves beyond Aave and Compound deposits to becoming the foundational Automated Market Maker (AMM) pool.
- It's a defensive moat: your liquidity becomes the protocol's critical infrastructure.
10-50x
TVL Multiplier
<5bps
Stable Spreads
deep-dive
THE PARADIGM SHIFT
From Bagholder to Market Maker: The Mechanics of VC LP
Venture capital must transition from passive equity holders to active liquidity providers to capture value in decentralized markets.
VCs are structurally misaligned. Traditional venture funds hold illiquid equity for 7-10 years, creating a bagholder problem where paper gains evaporate during volatile exits. In crypto, token liquidity is the primary value capture mechanism from day one.
Active LPing is the new board seat. Providing liquidity on Uniswap V3 or Curve creates real-time governance influence and fee revenue, replacing symbolic advisory roles. This turns idle treasury assets into productive capital.
The model requires new tooling. Manual LP management is untenable. Funds must adopt Gamma, Steer, or Aperture for automated concentrated liquidity strategies, optimizing capital efficiency and impermanent loss hedging.
Evidence: A 2023 Galaxy Digital report shows top-tier crypto-native funds now allocate 15-30% of AUM to DeFi strategies, generating yield that subsidizes portfolio runway and de-riskes the fund model.
WHY VENTURE FUNDS MUST BECOME LIQUIDITY PROVIDERS
The LP ROI Matrix: Passive Hold vs. Active Provision
Quantifies the capital efficiency and strategic advantages of active liquidity provision over passive token holding for venture portfolios.
| Key Metric / Capability | Passive Token Holding | Active LP (Concentrated) | Active LP (Delta-Neutral Vault) |
|---|---|---|---|
Annualized Yield (Baseline) | 0% | 12-45% APR | 8-20% APR |
Capital Efficiency (Utilization) | < 5% |
|
|
Impermanent Loss Hedge | |||
Protocol Governance Influence | |||
On-Chain Revenue Capture | |||
Gas Cost (Annual % of Position) | < 0.1% | 2-5% | 1-3% |
Operational Overhead | Minimal | High (Orbiter, Gamma) | Medium (Mellow, Steer) |
Alpha Generation (Data Access) | None | Flow & Price Data | Flow, Price, & Volatility Data |
risk-analysis
VC LPs ARE NOT TRADERS
The Inevitable Objections (And Why They're Wrong)
Venture funds often cite operational risk and mission drift as reasons to avoid providing liquidity. This is a strategic miscalculation.
01
The Problem: 'We're Investors, Not Market Makers'
This is a false dichotomy. Passive capital is becoming a commodity. The real alpha is in providing the infrastructure layer for the next wave of applications.\n- Strategic Positioning: Providing liquidity for your own portfolio's tokens creates a defensible moat and aligns incentives directly with protocol success.\n- Yield Capture: Earn 15-30%+ APY on idle capital that would otherwise sit in a multisig, turning a cost center into a revenue stream.
15-30%+
APY on Idle Capital
0
Strategic Moat Cost
02
The Problem: 'The Regulatory Risk Is Too High'
Regulatory uncertainty is a constant, not a variable. The key is structuring for compliance from day one, not avoiding the activity.\n- On-Chain Transparency: A properly structured LP entity provides an immutable, auditable record of all activity, simplifying compliance versus opaque offshore funds.\n- Active vs. Passive: Providing liquidity for specific, vetted portfolio projects is a strategic partnership, not anonymous market making, which is a stronger legal narrative.
100%
On-Chain Audit Trail
Key
Strategic Narrative
03
The Problem: 'Operational Overhead Will Sink Us'
This was valid in 2021. Today, infrastructure like Aevo, Hyperliquid, and dYdX v4 abstract away exchange operations, while GMX and Vertex offer simplified vaults.\n- Infrastructure Abstraction: Use dedicated liquidity management platforms or custom vaults with automated rebalancing, reducing active management to portfolio selection.\n- Scalable Ops: A single team can manage a $100M+ LP book across multiple chains using standardized tooling, making overhead a fixed, not variable, cost.
$100M+
Scalable Book Size
Fixed
Ops Cost
investment-thesis
THE STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE
The New Fund Playbook: Integrating LP at the DNA Level
Venture funds must evolve from passive capital allocators to active liquidity architects to capture value in the on-chain economy.
LP is the new due diligence. Providing liquidity to a portfolio protocol generates real-time, on-chain data on user adoption and tokenomics. This data is superior to quarterly reports from founders.
Passive capital is a stranded asset. Deploying capital solely at the equity round ignores the primary value accrual mechanism for users and protocols, which is the token. Funds like Variant and Electric Capital are already structuring for this.
The playbook is technical, not financial. Effective LP integration requires expertise in Automated Market Makers (AMMs) like Uniswap V3, yield strategies via Gamma or Arrakis, and MEV protection tools. This is an engineering function.
Evidence: A fund providing concentrated liquidity for a portfolio token can earn 20-100%+ APY on its position, turning a balance sheet line item into a productive, data-generating asset.
takeaways
THE ALIGNED CAPITAL THESIS
TL;DR: The Non-Negotiables
Passive token bags are dead. The new alpha is providing the critical infrastructure for the on-chain economy.
01
The Problem: The J-Curve Trap
Traditional VC funds face a 7-10 year lockup with zero liquidity, praying for a single exit event. In crypto, protocols launch with $100M+ treasuries on day one. Your capital is idle while the assets you own generate real yield for others.
- Capital Inefficiency: Locked equity vs. productive token assets.
- Missed Revenue: Protocol fees flow to LPs, not investors.
- Valuation Lag: Paper gains disconnected from on-chain cash flows.
0%
Yield on Locked Capital
7-10y
Traditional Lockup
02
The Solution: Become the Protocol's Central Bank
Deploy fund capital as strategic liquidity in core protocol pools (e.g., Uniswap v3, Aave, EigenLayer). This transforms you from a passive shareholder into the system's risk-bearing foundation.
- Yield Capture: Earn 5-20%+ APY on your own portfolio assets.
- Governance Leverage: Deep liquidity stakes increase voting power and deal flow.
- Real-Time P&L: Mark-to-market your position daily via on-chain reserves.
5-20%+
Strategic APY
24/7
P&L Visibility
03
The Mandate: Risk Engineering Over Picking
Alpha shifts from picking winners to engineering sustainable yield across volatility regimes. This requires building in-house quant teams focused on MEV capture, delta-neutral strategies, and cross-chain liquidity management.
- Systemic Role: Provide stability during black swan events (see MakerDAO's PSM).
- Tech Stack Mastery: Requires expertise in oracles (Chainlink), intent solvers (UniswapX, CowSwap), and cross-chain messaging (LayerZero, Axelar).
- New Fee Model: Management fees from active strategies, not just AUM.
Delta-Neutral
Core Strategy
MEV+
Yield Source
04
The Precedent: a16z's Can't Be Evil Fund
Andreessen Horowitz's $400M dedicated crypto fund structures investments as liquid tokens and actively participates in governance and staking. They don't just bet on the protocol; they become its economic backbone.
- Blueprint for Scale: Demonstrates LP acceptance of token-liquid strategies.
- Network Effects: Deep integration grants preferential access to top-tier projects pre-launch.
- Talent Magnet: Attracts crypto-native PMs and researchers who want to deploy, not just analyze.
$400M
Fund Size
Governance+
Active Role
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall