Monolithic VC is obsolete. Generalist funds betting on 'the next L1' lack the technical depth to evaluate specialized execution environments like FuelVM, Arbitrum Stylus, or Eclipse rollups. This creates a structural advantage for funds with protocol architects on staff.
venture-capital-trends-in-web3
Blog
Why Modular Execution Layers Are Fragmenting Application-Specific VC
The rise of app-chains and RaaS platforms like AltLayer and Caldera is forcing venture capital to hyper-specialize. We break down the technical drivers, investment implications, and the new winner-picking game for VCs.
introduction
THE FRAGMENTATION
Introduction
The rise of modular execution layers is forcing venture capital to specialize, moving from generalist bets to deep, application-specific infrastructure investments.
Capital follows composability. The modular stack (Celestia, EigenDA, AltLayer) decouples execution, enabling hyper-optimized app-chains. VCs now fund the infrastructure for a single vertical (e.g., Hyperliquid for perps, dYdX Chain for orderbooks) instead of a general-purpose chain.
The new moat is integration complexity. Winning funds don't just write checks; they provide go-to-market via shared sequencers (Espresso, Astria) and custom DA layers. This turns capital into a technical service, fragmenting the investment landscape by technical stack.
key-trends
WHY MODULAR EXECUTION IS DISRUPTING VENTURE CAPITAL
Executive Summary: The New VC Reality
The monolithic blockchain model created a winner-take-all market for general-purpose VCs. Modular execution layers are fragmenting this landscape, creating specialized investment theses around performance, sovereignty, and application logic.
01
The Problem: Monolithic Bottlenecks Create a Zero-Sum Game
Investing in a dApp on Ethereum or Solana means betting on the entire underlying chain's success and sharing its constraints. Your portfolio is capped by ~15-30 TPS and competes for the same block space and MEV revenue. This forces VCs into a generic, congested market.
~30 TPS
Shared Capacity
Zero-Sum
Fee Market
02
The Solution: Sovereign Rollups as Vertical Investment Vehicles
Projects like dYdX v4 and Aevo spin up dedicated execution layers (rollups) using stacks like Arbitrum Orbit or OP Stack. This creates a new asset class: application-specific chains where VCs can invest in the entire fee economy of a vertical (e.g., perps trading) without spillover to competitors.
100%
Fee Capture
Vertical
Sovereignty
03
The New Thesis: Performance Arbitrage & Specialized VMs
Modular execution unlocks investment in hyper-optimized virtual machines. A VC can now back:
- A gaming rollup using AltLayer with a custom WASM VM for sub-second finality.
- A DeFi rollup with a parallel EVM like Monad or Sei for 10,000+ TPS. This shifts focus from 'the next Ethereum' to 'the best execution environment for X'.
10,000+ TPS
Targeted Scale
~500ms
Finality
04
The Risk: Liquidity Fragmentation & Security Budgets
Fragmentation isn't free. Each new rollup must bootstrap its own liquidity, validator set, and security budget. This creates a new due diligence layer for VCs: evaluating the shared sequencer (e.g., Espresso, Astria), DA layer cost (Celestia vs. EigenDA), and cross-chain interoperability stack (LayerZero, Axelar).
$1M+/yr
DA Cost
High
Integration Risk
05
The Pivot: From Generalist Funds to Execution Layer Specialists
The smart money is building expertise in specific modular stacks. A fund might now have:
- An Arbitrum Orbit specialist for DeFi rollups.
- A zkSync Hyperchain expert for privacy apps.
- A Celestia + Rollkit analyst for quick-testing MVPs. This fragments the VC landscape itself, creating moats around technical implementation knowledge.
Stack-Specific
Expertise
New Moats
For VCs
06
The Endgame: Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) as the New Incubator
Platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and Gelato RaaS are becoming the Y Combinator for rollups. They lower the capital requirement to launch a chain to ~$50k, enabling micro-VCs and even large protocols to incubate their own application-specific ventures. This democratizes chain creation and further fragments investment opportunities.
~$50k
Launch Cost
Democratized
Access
market-context
THE FRAGMENTATION
The Commoditization of Sovereignty
The rise of modular execution layers is commoditizing blockchain sovereignty, fragmenting venture capital away from monolithic L1 bets and towards application-specific infrastructure.
Sovereignty is now a commodity. Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) providers like Conduit, Caldera, and AltLayer abstract the complexity of launching an appchain. This turns application-specific execution from a multi-year engineering feat into a configurable deployment, shifting venture focus from the chain to the application stack.
VCs are funding stacks, not chains. The investment thesis pivots from betting on a single L1's ecosystem to funding the modular primitives that enable all appchains. This fragments capital across data availability layers (Celestia, EigenDA), shared sequencers (Espresso, Astria), and interoperability hubs (LayerZero, Hyperlane).
Evidence: The total value locked (TVL) in app-specific rollups and L3s on networks like Arbitrum Orbit and OP Stack has grown 300% year-over-year, while new L1 fundraising has declined by 40%.
APPLICATION-SPECIFIC VC FRAGMENTATION
The Execution Layer Specialization Matrix
Comparison of execution layer architectures showing how specialization fragments venture capital investment theses and developer tooling requirements.
| Core Metric / Capability | Monolithic L1 (e.g., Solana) | General-Purpose Rollup (e.g., Arbitrum, OP Stack) | App-Specific Rollup / SVM (e.g., Eclipse, Injective) |
|---|---|---|---|
Execution Environment | Single, global state machine | EVM-compatible virtual machine | Custom VM (SVM, CosmWasm) or forked EVM |
Sovereignty Over Stack | Partial (Sequencer) | ||
Time-to-Finality (avg) | 400-800 ms | 12 sec - 1 hr (L1 dependent) | 12 sec - 1 hr (L1 dependent) |
Max Theoretical TPS | 65,000 | ~4,500 (on Ethereum) | Uncapped by shared environment |
Custom Fee Token / Model | |||
VC Investment Thesis | General-purpose scalability bet | EVM ecosystem liquidity bet | Vertical-specific moat & fee capture |
Primary Risk Vector | Network downtime | L1 consensus & data availability cost | Validator/Sequencer centralization |
Example Builders | All applications on Solana | GMX, Uniswap, Aave | dYdX, Injective, Eclipse (for SVM on Solana) |
deep-dive
THE FRAGMENTATION
From Generalist to Execution Layer Specialist
The rise of modular execution layers is forcing venture capital to abandon generalist bets and specialize in application-specific infrastructure.
Monolithic L1s created generalist VCs. Their singular, all-purpose execution environment meant capital chased the same broad narratives: DeFi, NFTs, gaming. Success was measured by total value locked (TVL) on a single chain like Ethereum or Solana.
Modularity fragments the investment thesis. Specialized execution layers like Eclipse, Movement, and Monad optimize for specific applications. A VC must now evaluate sovereign rollups, parallel EVMs, and appchains as distinct asset classes with unique risk profiles.
The new moat is execution specialization. Capital flows to teams building for specific verticals: a gaming chain using AltLayer, a DeFi chain on Arbitrum Orbit, or a social app on Farcaster's Frames. Generalist funds miss the technical nuances of Celestia's data availability versus EigenDA.
Evidence: The $1B+ deployed into modular stacks like Polygon CDK, Optimism's Superchain, and Cosmos appchains in 2023 proves capital is chasing infrastructure specialization, not general-purpose L1s.
risk-analysis
MODULAR EXECUTION FRAGMENTATION
The Fragmentation Trap: Risks for VCs and Builders
The proliferation of modular execution layers like Arbitrum Orbit, OP Stack, and Polygon CDK is fracturing liquidity, security, and developer mindshare, creating hidden costs for investors and teams.
01
The Liquidity Silos Problem
Every new rollup creates a new liquidity pool. VCs backing an app-chain must now fund its entire DeFi stack from scratch, competing with established L2s for $10B+ in fragmented TVL. This destroys capital efficiency and user experience.
- Capital Drain: Bootstrapping DEXs, lending, and stablecoins requires massive, non-core investment.
- User Friction: Native bridging and swaps add ~30 seconds and ~$5+ in costs per cross-chain action.
$10B+
Fragmented TVL
~30s
Bridge Latency
02
Security Is Not Composable
An app-chain's security is only as strong as its chosen settlement layer and sequencer. VCs inherit the technical and economic risks of a nascent stack, from potential sequencer failures to untested fraud-proof mechanisms.
- Concentrated Risk: A bug in the shared OP Stack or Arbitrum Nitro codebase can cascade across all chains built on it.
- Validator Fragmentation: Security budgets are split, weakening the economic security of each individual chain.
1 Bug
Cascades to 100s
Splintered
Security Budget
03
The Developer Tax
Building on a new execution layer means forgoing the established tooling, audits, and talent pool of Ethereum L1 or major L2s. Teams spend ~40% of dev time on infra plumbing instead of core product logic.
- Tooling Gap: Missing or immature equivalents of The Graph, Tenderly, or Hardhat stall development.
- Talent Scarcity: Finding devs proficient in a new, chain-specific stack is difficult and expensive.
~40%
Dev Time Lost
10x
Hiring Difficulty
04
Solution: The Shared Sequencer Thesis
Projects like Espresso Systems and Astria offer a path out: decouple execution from sequencing. This allows app-chains to retain sovereignty while sharing a neutral, high-performance sequencing layer for atomic cross-chain composability.
- Atomic Composability: Enables sub-second cross-rollup transactions without bridges.
- Escape Vendor Lock-in: Teams can choose execution (EVM, SVM, Move) without being forced into a specific ecosystem's sequencer.
Sub-Second
Cross-Chain Tx
Neutral
Sequencing Layer
05
Solution: Aggregated Liquidity Layers
Protocols like Chainlink CCIP, LayerZero, and Axelar are evolving from message-passing into liquidity networks. They abstract away fragmentation by providing a unified pool for cross-chain assets, reducing the bootstrap burden on individual chains.
- Unified Pools: A single integration taps into global, chain-agnostic liquidity.
- Intent-Based Flow: Users express a desired outcome (e.g., swap X for Y) and the network finds the optimal route across fragmented venues.
Unified
Liquidity Layer
Intent-Based
Execution
06
The VC Mandate: Bet on Abstraction
The winning investment thesis is no longer "which L2" but "what abstracts L2s away." VCs must prioritize infra that unifies the modular stack: shared sequencers, universal liquidity layers, and developer platforms that deploy to any VM.
- Invest in the Mesh: Back the protocols that connect and unify the fragments, not another fragment.
- Demand Portability: Fund teams whose tech stack is execution-layer agnostic, avoiding ecosystem lock-in.
Abstraction
Winning Thesis
Agnostic
Tech Stack
future-outlook
THE FRAGMENTATION
Consolidation Through Interoperability
Modular execution layers are fragmenting venture capital by enabling application-specific chains, which consolidates liquidity and user experience across ecosystems.
Application-specific chains fragment VC allocation. The rise of Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) providers like Caldera and Conduit allows any team to launch a sovereign execution layer. This creates a new investment thesis focused on the application's business logic, not its host chain's governance, scattering capital across hundreds of specialized environments.
Interoperability protocols consolidate the fragments. Fragmented liquidity is a terminal problem. Standards like IBC and messaging layers like LayerZero and Axelar create a unified liquidity plane. This allows a gaming chain built with the Polygon CDK to source assets directly from Arbitrum or Base, making the underlying execution layer a commodity.
The battleground shifts to shared sequencers. The true consolidation layer is sequencing. Shared sequencer networks like Espresso and Astria abstract away block production, allowing app-chains to inherit shared security and atomic cross-chain composability. This turns modular execution into a feature, not a silo.
Evidence: The Total Value Locked (TVL) in app-specific rollups and Layer 3s has grown 300% in 12 months, while cross-chain messaging volume via LayerZero and Wormhole exceeds $30B monthly. Capital follows composability, not chains.
takeaways
MODULAR EXECUTION FRAGMENTATION
TL;DR: The New VC Playbook
The rise of modular execution layers is shattering the 'one-size-fits-all' venture capital model, forcing funds to specialize or be left behind.
01
The Problem: Generic Smart Contract Platforms
Monolithic L1s and general-purpose L2s force all applications into the same execution environment, creating a winner-take-most market for VCs. Funds compete on the same deal flow for the next Uniswap clone on the same virtual machine, leading to diluted returns and homogeneous portfolios.
~90%
EVM Market Share
1x
Deal Saturation
02
The Solution: Execution Layer Specialization
Modular stacks like Celestia + EigenDA enable purpose-built execution layers (e.g., Fuel, Eclipse, Movement). VCs can now bet on vertical-specific infra instead of horizontal platforms. This creates new investment theses around parallelized VMs, privacy-preserving chains, and high-frequency trading app-chains.
10-100x
TPS Potential
-99%
State Bloat
03
The New Thesis: Sovereign App-Chain Funds
VCs are forming funds dedicated to financing and governing application-specific rollups. This mirrors the Pioneer Model of a16z crypto but at the execution layer. Funds provide capital for sequencer setup, shared security via restaking (EigenLayer), and cross-chain liquidity primitives.
$50M+
Fund Size
10-20
Chain Portfolio
04
The Data Moat: MEV & Fee Markets
Specialized execution layers create proprietary data streams. A fund backing a high-throughput gaming rollup or a dark pool AMM chain captures unique MEV flows and fee market intelligence. This data becomes a competitive edge for portfolio construction and outperforming generic index funds.
$1B+
Annual MEV
New Asset
Data As
05
The Risk: Liquidity Fragmentation
Sovereign execution layers fracture liquidity and composability. VCs must now also invest in the cross-chain stack: intents (UniswapX, CowSwap), interoperability (LayerZero, Axelar), and shared sequencers (Espresso, Astria). The playbook expands from picking winners to orchestrating ecosystems.
100+
Rollups by 2025
Critical Path
Interop Infra
06
The Endgame: Vertical Integration
Top-tier VCs will vertically integrate by incubating their own modular stack components—a custom data availability layer, a VM optimized for their thesis, and a bridge to their portfolio chains. This transforms them from capital providers into infrastructure architects, capturing value across the entire stack.
Full-Stack
Control
Platform Risk
Eliminated
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall