The L1 narrative is exhausted. The market no longer rewards new consensus mechanisms or virtual machines without a defensible economic moat. The winner-take-most dynamics of liquidity and developers are entrenched.
venture-capital-trends-in-web3
Blog
Why VCs Are Pivoting from L1s to MEV Middleware
The highest leverage investment is no longer in new execution layers, but in the neutral infrastructure that governs, extracts, and redistributes value across all of them. This is the MEV middleware thesis.
introduction
THE SHIFT
Introduction: The End of the L1 Gold Rush
VC capital is abandoning speculative L1 bets for the concrete, revenue-generating infrastructure of MEV.
MEV is the new infrastructure layer. It extracts value directly from transaction flow, creating a fee-generating business model that is agnostic to which chain wins. This is a pivot from speculative asset appreciation to software-like SaaS margins.
Compare EigenLayer to a new L1. EigenLayer's restaking thesis monetizes Ethereum's security, a proven asset. A new L1 must bootstrap security from zero, a capital-intensive gamble with diminishing returns.
Evidence: In 2023, over $675M flowed into MEV-related startups (Flashbots, bloXroute, Jito Labs), while L1 funding outside of Ethereum's core ecosystem stagnated.
thesis-statement
THE CAPITAL FLOW
The Core Thesis: Infrastructure Eats Application
VC capital is shifting from speculative L1 bets to the fundamental, revenue-generating plumbing of blockchains.
L1 competition is commoditized. The EVM standard and shared security models like EigenLayer create fungible execution layers. Building a new chain no longer commands a premium.
MEV is the native yield. Every transaction creates extractable value. Infrastructure like Flashbots' SUAVE, CoWSwap, and Jito Labs directly captures this revenue, creating predictable business models.
Applications depend on the stack. The performance of Uniswap or Aave is dictated by the underlying MEV supply chain. VCs now fund the rails, not the trains.
Evidence: Jito's airdrop valued its MEV infrastructure at over $1B, while new L1s struggle to achieve a fraction of that market cap post-launch.
key-trends
WHY VCS ARE SHIFTING CAPITAL
The Data-Backed Pivot: Three Unignorable Trends
The L1 narrative has matured, revealing a more lucrative and defensible battleground in the execution layer's plumbing.
01
The Problem: L1s Are Commoditized, MEV Is Not
New Layer 1s compete on marginal throughput gains while inheriting the same MEV extraction problems. The real value accrual has shifted from consensus to execution.\n- Market Reality: Solana and Ethereum capture >70% of all developer activity and TVL.\n- VC Calculus: Funding the 50th EVM chain offers diminishing returns versus funding the infrastructure that services all of them.
>70%
Top 2 L1 Dominance
~$1.5B
Annual MEV (Ethereum)
02
The Solution: MEV Supply Chain as a Protocol
Projects like Flashbots SUAVE, Astria, and Espresso are abstracting the MEV supply chain into a modular, auction-based protocol layer. This creates a new investable asset class.\n- Modular Capture: Separating block building from proposing creates a multi-billion dollar market for specialized searchers and builders.\n- VC Upside: Middleware protocols can extract fees across all connected chains, unlike a single L1's capped fee market.
100+
Chains Served
10-20%
Extractable Value
03
The Trend: Intents and Solving for User Experience
The endgame isn't faster blocks, it's abstracting complexity. Intent-based architectures (UniswapX, CowSwap, Across) and private mempools (BloXroute, Titan) are the new UX frontier that VCs are funding.\n- Product-Led Growth: Solving MEV for users drives adoption faster than theoretical TPS.\n- Defensible Moats: Network effects in solver networks and exclusive order flow are harder to replicate than a new VM.
$10B+
Intent Volume (2024)
~500ms
Latency Advantage
VC INVESTMENT THESIS
L1 Saturation vs. MEV Growth: A Stark Contrast
Quantitative comparison of the saturated Layer 1 landscape versus the high-growth MEV middleware sector, highlighting the shift in venture capital allocation.
| Metric / Feature | Established L1s (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) | Emerging L1s (e.g., Monad, Berachain) | MEV Middleware (e.g., Flashbots, bloXroute, Jito) |
|---|---|---|---|
Annualized Revenue (2024) | $4.2B (Ethereum) | ~$50M (Solana 2023) | Projected $1.8B+ (Extractable Value) |
YoY Revenue Growth (Est.) | < 20% | 100-300% (pre-launch hype) |
|
Developer Mindshare Saturation | High (Declining new entrants) | Medium (Niche focus) | Low (Rapid innovation) |
Time to 10x User/TVL |
| 12-24 months (speculative) | < 12 months (via integration) |
Gross Margin Potential | 30-50% (Validator ops) | 20-40% (Unproven at scale) | 70-90% (Software margin) |
Regulatory Surface Area | High (Securities scrutiny) | High (Same as L1) | Low/Medium (Infrastructure) |
Competitive MoAT | Ecosystem Lock-in | Technical Novelty | Relayer/Validator Integration |
VC Deal Flow (2023-24) | Down ~60% | Flat (Seed heavy) | Up ~400% |
deep-dive
THE VALUE CAPTURE SHIFT
Deep Dive: The MEV Middleware Stack and Its Moats
VC capital is migrating from L1s to MEV middleware because it offers superior, defensible value capture in a modular ecosystem.
L1s are commoditizing. The proliferation of modular execution layers like Arbitrum and Optimism has shifted the core value proposition from monolithic chains to specialized components. This commoditization pressures L1 margins and redirects investor focus to infrastructure that services all chains.
MEV is the ultimate rent. In a world of cheap blockspace, the extractable value within transactions becomes the primary profit center. Middleware like Flashbots' SUAVE, bloXroute, and Jito Labs captures this value by controlling transaction ordering and flow.
Middleware builds deeper moats. While L1s compete on throughput, MEV infrastructure creates network effects in data and liquidity. A searcher network on a builder like Jito or a shared order flow auction like SUAVE becomes more valuable as more participants join, creating high-switching costs.
Evidence: Jito's Solana validator client commands ~40% of the network's stake, demonstrating that MEV tools can achieve protocol-level dominance. This stake share directly translates to sustained fee revenue from MEV, a more predictable model than speculative L1 tokenomics.
counter-argument
THE REAL SHIFT
Steelman: Is This Just the Next Overhyped Narrative?
VC capital is shifting from L1s to MEV middleware because the former is a saturated, winner-take-most market, while the latter offers a new, defensible layer of value extraction.
L1 competition is saturated. The market for new general-purpose blockchains is a zero-sum game dominated by Ethereum, Solana, and a few rollups. Building a new L1 requires billions in security and liquidity to compete, a bet with diminishing returns for VCs.
MEV is a persistent, growing tax. Every transaction on every chain generates extractable value, creating a perpetual revenue stream for infrastructure that can capture it. This is a fundamental economic layer, not a transient application.
Middleware creates defensible moats. Unlike applications, infrastructure like Flashbots' SUAVE, bloXroute, or Jito Labs builds network effects in data and order flow. These are protocol-level positions that are harder to dislodge than an app.
Evidence: Jito's airdrop valued its MEV infrastructure at over $400M. Flashbots' SUAVE has attracted nine-figure funding rounds to build a decentralized block builder, signaling institutional conviction in the middleware thesis.
protocol-spotlight
THE MEV INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT
Protocol Spotlight: The New VC Darlings
VCs are abandoning the saturated L1 wars to fund the critical, high-margin infrastructure that extracts value from the transactions themselves.
01
The Problem: L1s Are Commoditized
New L1s offer marginal improvements at best, competing on sub-second differences in finality. The real value accrual has shifted to the transaction supply chain.\n- Market Reality: Over 50+ L1/L2s have fragmented liquidity and user attention.\n- VC Calculus: Building a new chain requires $500M+ in token incentives for a shrinking chance of a top-10 spot.
50+
Chains
$500M+
Sunk Cost
02
The Solution: MEV as a Protocol
Protocols like Flashbots' SUAVE and Jito monetize the transaction lifecycle itself, creating fee markets on top of fee markets.\n- Business Model: Capture a slice of the $1B+ annual MEV extracted across chains.\n- Defensibility: Network effects in searcher/builder ecosystems and exclusive order flow are harder to replicate than a new VM.
$1B+
Annual MEV
>90%
Solana Stakes
03
The Arbiter: Intent-Based Architectures
Solving for user intent (e.g., "swap X for Y at best price") instead of transaction execution abstracts away MEV complexity. This is the next middleware layer.\n- Key Players: UniswapX, CowSwap, Across.\n- Value Prop: Users get better prices via competition among solvers, who internalize MEV. The protocol captures fees from the winning solution.
~20%
Better Prices
0 Gas
For Users
04
The Enforcer: Shared Sequencers
Rollups outsourcing block production to a neutral, shared sequencer set (e.g., Astria, Espresso) creates a new critical trust layer and revenue stream.\n- Economic Moats: Control over transaction ordering and cross-rollup atomic composability.\n- Market Size: Every L2 ($50B+ TVL) is a potential customer, paying for security and interoperability.
$50B+
Addressable TVL
~100ms
Cross-Rollup Latency
05
The Unifier: Cross-Chain MEV
The final frontier is extracting value from atomic transactions across multiple chains, turning fragmentation into an opportunity.\n- Infrastructure Need: Secure bridging and sequencing across heterogeneous environments.\n- Players Building: Across with its solver network, LayerZero's omnichain futures, and specialized cross-chain arbitrage bots.
10x
Arb Opportunity
5+
Chains per Tx
06
The Reality Check: Regulatory Attack Surface
MEV middleware sits in a regulatory gray zone. Centralized sequencing and explicit profit extraction could attract SEC scrutiny as securities or unregistered broker-dealers.\n- Existential Risk: The most profitable, centralized builders (e.g., Jito) are the biggest targets.\n- VC Hedge: Investments are spread across the stack to mitigate this single point of failure.
High
Regulatory Risk
Low
Legal Precedent
risk-analysis
MIDDLEWARE IS NOT A PANACEA
The Bear Case: Where This Thesis Breaks
The pivot to MEV middleware is a rational response to L1 saturation, but its success is not guaranteed. These are the critical failure modes.
01
The Regulatory Blowtorch
MEV extraction and order flow auctions are a regulatory minefield. The SEC could classify searcher bundles as securities or deem intent-based systems as unregistered broker-dealers.
- Legal Precedent: The Howey Test could be applied to the profit-sharing from block building.
- Global Fragmentation: A US crackdown would Balkanize liquidity, crippling cross-chain systems like LayerZero and Across.
High
Regulatory Risk
Fragmented
Market Access
02
The Integration Trap
Middleware's value is a function of integration surface area. If major dApps like Uniswap or Aave build proprietary solvers or bypass public mempools, the addressable market shrinks.
- Protocol Capture: Dominant L1s (e.g., Solana) may internalize MEV logic, making external middleware redundant.
- Complexity Cost: The overhead for dApp developers to integrate multiple, competing middleware layers (SUAVE, Flashbots) may outweigh the benefits.
Low
Switching Cost
High
Integration Friction
03
Economic Sustainability
Middleware revenue is a tax on L1 transaction value. In a bear market with low fees, the absolute value extractable by searchers and builders collapses.
- Revenue Correlation: MEV middleware cash flows are directly tied to volatile on-chain activity and gas prices.
- Winner-Take-Most Dynamics: The space will consolidate around 2-3 players, destroying returns for the long tail of VC-funded startups.
Cyclical
Revenue Model
~3
Surviving Entities
04
The Centralization Inversion
Solving MEV often requires trusted components (e.g., relayers, sequencers). This recreates the exact validator/miner centralization that L1s like Ethereum fought to solve with Proof-of-Stake.
- Trust Assumptions: Systems like CowSwap and UniswapX rely on a small set of solvers with the right to censor.
- Re-staking Concentration: Projects like EigenLayer could amplify systemic risk by concentrating economic security in a few middleware protocols.
High
Trust Assumptions
Concentrated
Power
future-outlook
THE VC PIVOT
Future Outlook: The Consolidation and Commoditization Phases
Investment capital is shifting from speculative L1 bets to the essential, revenue-generating middleware that will extract value from the next billion users.
L1s are commoditizing. The technical differentiation between new chains is marginal, and the market is consolidating around a few dominant networks like Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum. VCs now see L1s as low-margin infrastructure, not high-margin investments.
MEV is the new moat. The real value accrual in a mature, multi-chain ecosystem happens in the extraction layer. Firms like Flashbots, bloXroute, and Jito Labs are building the order flow auctions and block building markets that capture transaction surplus.
Middleware generates predictable yield. Unlike L1 token speculation, MEV supply chains produce recurring, fee-based revenue. This mirrors the profitable shift from building the internet (ISPs) to monetizing it (Google, Cloudflare).
Evidence: Jito's $10M+ monthly MEV revenue on Solana and Flashbots' dominance in Ethereum block production demonstrate the scalable business model that attracts institutional capital away from layer-1 token grants.
takeaways
THE MEV MIDDLEWARE SHIFT
TL;DR: Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
The L1 narrative is saturated. The next wave of alpha is in extracting and redistributing value from the transaction supply chain itself.
01
The Problem: L1s Are Commoditized, MEV Is Not
New Layer 1s compete on throughput and cost, but these are becoming commoditized features. The real, persistent value accrual is in the information asymmetry and ordering rights of the block space itself. MEV is a $500M+ annual market that scales with chain activity, not chain launches.
- Key Benefit 1: Recurring, protocol-agnostic revenue stream.
- Key Benefit 2: Defensible via specialized hardware and exclusive order flow.
$500M+
Annual Market
0
New L1s Needed
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Architectures (UniswapX, CowSwap)
Instead of fighting MEV, new middleware protocols internalize and redistribute it. By having users submit intents (desired outcome) instead of transactions (specific path), solvers compete to fulfill them, capturing MEV as profit and sharing it back via better prices.
- Key Benefit 1: Better UX: gasless, failed-transaction-proof swaps.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates a liquid market for block space beyond simple auctions.
100%
Fill Rate
~0
User Gas Cost
03
The Infrastructure: Cross-Chain MEV & Shared Sequencers (Espresso, Astria)
MEV and sequencing are becoming vertically integrated services. Projects like Espresso Systems and Astria are building shared sequencer networks that rollups can outsource to, enabling cross-rollup atomic arbitrage and capturing inter-domain MEV. This is the modular stack's killer app.
- Key Benefit 1: Unlocks cross-domain liquidity and composability.
- Key Benefit 2: Provides rollups with decentralized sequencing and instant pre-confirmations.
~500ms
Pre-confirm
10x+
Arb Opportunity
04
The Hedge: MEV is Anti-Fragile to L1 Failure
Investing in an L1 is a bet on its singular success. Investing in MEV infrastructure is a bet on the entire multi-chain ecosystem's activity. If Solana grows, MEV capture grows. If Arbitrum grows, MEV capture grows. If a new chain emerges, it needs MEV tools. This is a meta-layer investment.
- Key Benefit 1: Diversified exposure to blockchain utility growth.
- Key Benefit 2: Zero existential risk from any single L1's failure.
All
Chains
1
Thesis
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall