Axie's economic model was a textbook Ponzi scheme. New user deposits paid the yields for earlier players, with no external revenue source. The SLP token had a single, inflationary use case: breeding new Axies, which only increased sell pressure.
the-state-of-web3-education-and-onboarding
Blog
Why Axie Infinity's Model Was a Cautionary Tale, Not a Blueprint
A technical autopsy of how Axie's reliance on new player capital for rewards created a textbook hyperinflationary death spiral, and what sustainable Web3 game design must learn from it.
introduction
THE ECONOMIC FAILURE
The Ponzi in the Petting Zoo
Axie Infinity's tokenomics created a closed-loop economy that was mathematically guaranteed to collapse.
The fatal flaw was inelastic demand. The game required new capital to sustain old players, unlike sustainable models like StepN that burned tokens for utility. When user growth stalled, the death spiral was immediate and total.
Evidence: The SLP price collapsed from $0.35 to $0.002, a 99.4% drawdown. Concurrently, daily active users plummeted from 2.7 million to under 50,000, proving the model's unsustainability.
key-trends
WHY PLAY-TO-EARN'S FIRST KING FELL
The Core Flaws: A Three-Part Failure
Axie Infinity's collapse wasn't bad luck; it was a predictable failure of a model that confused financial speculation for sustainable game design.
01
The Hyperinflationary SLP Sink
The Smooth Love Potion (SLP) token was a flawed economic primitive with unchecked supply and collapsing demand. The core loop required burning SLP to breed new Axies, but the primary sink was speculative breeding, not gameplay utility.
- Supply: Daily emissions far outstripped burns, creating massive sell pressure.
- Demand: New player growth (the only real demand driver) plateaued, then reversed.
- Result: SLP price fell >99% from its peak, destroying the earnings model.
>99%
SLP Collapse
0
Utility Sinks
02
The Unsustainable Player Funnel
The model relied on a pyramid-like structure of recruiting new players to pay old ones. Earning potential was the sole acquisition channel, not fun.
- Scholarship System: Required capital upfront (Axies cost ~$1k+ at peak) to 'rent' to players, creating a high barrier.
- Ponzi Dynamics: Revenue for existing players depended entirely on newer players buying assets.
- Result: When new user growth stalled, the entire economic engine seized, proving it was a marketing scheme, not a game.
$1k+
Entry Cost (Peak)
Ponzi
Growth Model
03
Centralized Points of Failure
Despite being a blockchain game, critical components were highly centralized, creating single points of failure and undermining trust.
- Ronin Bridge Hack: $625M stolen due to compromised validator keys, freezing the economy.
- Sky Mavis Control: Central authority over game balances, breeding rules, and the marketplace.
- Result: Exposed the contradiction of a 'decentralized' game whose economy could be halted by a single company or hacker.
$625M
Bridge Hack
Sky Mavis
Single Point
AXIE INFINITY VS. SUSTAINABLE MODELS
The Death Spiral by the Numbers
A quantitative breakdown of Axie Infinity's flawed economic design versus the principles of sustainable play-to-earn and play-and-earn models.
| Economic Metric / Feature | Axie Infinity (2021-22) | Sustainable Play-to-Earn | Pure Play-and-Earn |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Token Sink | Breeding (AXS/SLP) | Cosmetic upgrades, limited editions | Season passes, cosmetic only |
New User Cost (Entry) | $300 - $1000 | $0 - $50 | $0 |
Earning Reliance |
| <30% new user inflow | 0% (Earnings are side-effect) |
Inflation Rate (Peak) | SLP: >100% APY | Controlled, <5% APY | 0% (No earn token) |
Token Velocity | High (Earn -> Sell) | Low (Earn -> Stake/Spend in-game) | N/A |
Developer Revenue Source | Breeding fees (4.25%) | Primary NFT sales, marketplace fees | Asset sales, battle passes |
Ponzi Coefficient |
| <0.3 | 0 |
Sustainable Loop Present |
deep-dive
THE PONZI MECHANICS
Anatomy of a Hyperinflationary Engine
Axie Infinity's economic model was a textbook case of a closed-loop, token-incentivized Ponzi that collapsed under its own inflationary weight.
The SLP Sink Illusion was the core failure. The game required Smooth Love Potion (SLP) to breed new Axies, creating a demand sink. However, the primary SLP emission source was daily gameplay rewards, directly linking new supply to player growth. This created a positive feedback loop where player acquisition directly fueled token inflation.
Inflation Outpaced Utility. The breeding sink's token burn rate was linear, while reward-based SLP emissions scaled with the player base. When user growth stalled, the supply/demand equilibrium shattered. The model lacked a deflationary mechanism independent of perpetual new user influx, unlike sustainable models with external revenue (e.g., Immutable's gas fee burns).
Evidence: The SLP price chart is the autopsy. It peaked near $0.40 in mid-2021 and collapsed to fractions of a cent, a >99% devaluation, as daily active users plateaued and then declined, proving the inherently extractive design.
counter-argument
THE PIVOT IS THE POINT
The Rebuttal: "But They're Pivoting!"
Axie Infinity's pivot from its original token model proves its initial design was unsustainable, not a template for success.
The pivot is evidence. Axie's shift to Origin and Appchain validates the failure of its inflationary SLP sink model. The original design required perpetual new player capital to subsidize earnings, a classic Ponzi structure.
Sustainable models diverge. Compare Axie's abandoned design to Illuvium's yield-redistribution or Parallel's asset-backed cards. These projects build value through gameplay and asset scarcity, not token emission faucets.
Metrics reveal the flaw. The 95% SLP price collapse from its peak preceded the pivot. This wasn't market volatility; it was the inevitable economic deflation of a model with no intrinsic demand drivers.
takeaways
AXIE INFINITY CASE STUDY
The Blueprint for What Not to Do
Axie Infinity's 2021 boom became the definitive playbook for unsustainable tokenomics and centralized game economies.
01
The Hyperinflationary SLP Sink
The game's core loop was a ponzinomic treadmill. Breeding required SLP tokens, creating constant sell pressure, while rewards were the only meaningful utility.\n- Inflationary Design: SLP supply increased by ~500M tokens/month at peak.\n- No Sink Mechanism: Utility was purely consumptive, with no value-accrual or burn.\n- Result: SLP price collapsed >99% from its ATH, destroying the in-game economy.
>99%
SLP Collapse
500M/mo
Peak Inflation
02
Centralized On-Ramp as a Single Point of Failure
User acquisition and cash flow depended entirely on Ronin Bridge and a single validator set. This created catastrophic systemic risk.\n- Bridge Hack: The $625M Ronin Bridge exploit in March 2022 halted all economic activity.\n- Validator Centralization: Sky Mavis controlled 4 of 9 validators, violating decentralization principles.\n- Lesson: Infrastructure centralization turns a protocol weakness into an existential threat.
$625M
Bridge Exploit
4/9
Validators Controlled
03
The Unsustainable "Play-to-Earn" Labor Model
Axie rebranded low-wage digital labor as gaming. The model required a perpetually expanding user base to pay earlier players, a classic pyramid structure.\n- Economic Reality: Scholarship managers in developing nations became essential middlemen, optimizing for yield, not fun.\n- Demand Collapse: When new user inflow stopped, the entire earnings model imploded.\n- Legacy: It poisoned the well for genuine blockchain gaming, conflating speculation with sustainable engagement.
~2M
Peak Daily Users
-98%
User Decline
04
The Governance Token (AXS) as a Vaporware Promise
AXS was sold as a governance token for a Land Metaverse that never materialized. Value was purely speculative, backed by future promises, not current utility.\n- Voting Cartel: Top 10 holders controlled ~40% of circulating supply, making decentralized governance a fiction.\n- Missing Utility: Staking rewards were just more inflation; there was no protocol revenue to share.\n- Blueprint Failure: This became the model for a thousand other projects: sell a dream, dump the token.
~40%
Supply Concentrated
-95%
AXS from ATH
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall