Tokenomics-driven growth is unsustainable. The 'play-to-earn' model created a closed-loop economy where new player capital subsidized early adopters, a classic Ponzi structure. Projects like Axie Infinity demonstrated this flaw when their SLP token collapsed by over 99% from its peak.
the-state-of-web3-education-and-onboarding
Blog
The Future of Web3 Gaming: When the Earning Stops
A technical autopsy of the Play-to-Earn model and a blueprint for building games that survive the inevitable depreciation of speculative token incentives.
introduction
THE PIVOT
Introduction: The Ponzi Phase is Over
Web3 gaming's initial play-to-earn model has collapsed, forcing a necessary evolution towards sustainable, player-first economics.
The market demands fun, not financialization. Successful games like Fortnite and Counter-Strike monetize engagement, not speculative token mechanics. The future of Web3 gaming requires inverting the priority: gameplay first, with optional, seamless asset ownership via standards like ERC-6551 for composable NFTs.
Evidence: Daily active wallets for top Web3 games fell over 60% in 2023 despite increased overall blockchain activity, proving that financial incentives alone fail to retain users. The surviving projects are those building actual games.
key-trends
THE FUTURE OF WEB3 GAMING
The Post-Earn Reality: Three Inevitable Trends
When speculative tokenomics collapse, the underlying infrastructure must evolve to serve players, not just yield farmers.
01
The Problem: The Ponzi Game Loop
Token emissions as the primary gameplay loop is a zero-sum economic model. It attracts mercenary capital, not players, leading to inevitable death spirals like Axie Infinity's SLP collapse.\n- Ponzi Dynamics: New player deposits fund old player withdrawals.\n- Unsustainable: Inflationary token models require perpetual user growth.\n- Result: ~90% of "play-to-earn" games fail within 12 months of token launch.
-99%
Token Value
~90%
Failure Rate
02
The Solution: Asset Composability as Core Gameplay
True value emerges from interoperable digital objects with utility across experiences, not from farming a governance token. This mirrors the success of NFT marketplaces like Blur and Tensor.\n- True Ownership: Skins, items, and characters as portable assets.\n- Cross-Game Economies: An item earned in one game provides utility in another.\n- Developer Incentive: Royalties on secondary sales fund sustainable development.
10x+
Asset Utility
5-10%
Sustainable Royalty
03
The Infrastructure: Seamless Onboarding via Account Abstraction
Mass adoption requires killing the seed phrase. ERC-4337 Account Abstraction and embedded wallet providers like Privy or Dynamic enable familiar Web2 logins with Web3 ownership.\n- Gasless Transactions: Sponsors or games pay fees, removing friction.\n- Social Recovery: Use Google/Facebook to recover access, not a 12-word phrase.\n- Batch Operations: One signature for multiple in-game actions, enabling complex mechanics.
-80%
Drop-off Rate
<30s
Onboarding Time
THE FUTURE OF WEB3 GAMING: WHEN THE EARNING STOPS
The Great Unwinding: A Post-Mortem of P2E Economics
A comparative analysis of post-P2E game design models, measuring their resilience to token inflation and player retention.
| Core Economic Metric | Traditional P2E (Axie Infinity) | Play-and-Own (Illuvium) | Fully On-Chain (Dark Forest) | Web2 Premium (Traditional AAA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Revenue Sink | NFT Breeding Fees | Asset Staking & Crafting | On-chain ZK Proof Generation | One-time Purchase / DLC |
In-game Token Inflation (Annualized) |
| Target <5% via veTokenomics | 0% (No native token) | 0% (Fiat-only) |
Player Retention Driver | ROI / Earning Potential | Gameplay & Speculative Asset Value | Community & Emergent Strategy | Content Quality & Social Features |
Protocol-Owned Liquidity (TVL) | $1.2B (Nov 2021) | $120M (Ecosystem Fund) | N/A | N/A |
Average Session Time (hrs) | 4.2 (Grinding) | 1.8 (Varied gameplay) | 6.5 (Strategic play) | 2.1 (Casual engagement) |
Requires Initial Capital to Play | ||||
Sustainable Without New Players? | ||||
Developer Revenue Share from Secondary Sales | 4.25% | 5% (ILV stakers govern rate) | 0% | 0% |
deep-dive
THE POST-SPECULATIVE CORE
The Survival Blueprint: Designing for Zero-Earn
Sustainable Web3 gaming requires a fundamental shift from financial speculation to player-centric design.
Player retention is the new KPI. Games must prioritize engagement loops and progression systems that are intrinsically rewarding, not extrinsically funded by token emissions. The play-to-earn model created a mercenary player base that exits when yields drop.
On-chain assets require off-ramp utility. NFTs must unlock exclusive gameplay, governance, or content, not just serve as speculative tickets. Projects like TreasureDAO and Immutable are building ecosystems where assets have utility across multiple games, creating a composable asset standard.
The economic engine shifts to primary sales. Sustainable revenue comes from initial NFT/asset sales and secondary market royalties, not from inflationary token rewards. This aligns developer incentives with long-term asset value and community health.
Evidence: The collapse of Axie Infinity's SLP token, which fell 99% from its peak, demonstrates the unsustainable tokenomics of yield-first design. In contrast, games focusing on core loops, like Parallel and Shrapnel, are attracting players with gameplay-first promises.
protocol-spotlight
BEYOND PLAY-TO-EARN
Case Studies: Who's Building for the Long Game?
The next wave of Web3 gaming isn't about speculative asset farming; it's about building sustainable economies where fun, not financialization, is the core loop.
01
Parallel: The AAA Quality Moonshot
The Problem: Web3 games are synonymous with poor graphics and shallow gameplay.\nThe Solution: A sci-fi card game with Unreal Engine 5 visuals and a $500M+ valuation from a16z, betting that mainstream adoption requires zero visual compromise.\n- Key Benefit: Proves high-fidelity, collectible-driven economies can attract traditional gamers.\n- Key Benefit: Separates asset ownership from core gameplay progression, reducing pay-to-win pressure.
$500M+
Valuation
UE5
Visual Fidelity
02
Pixels: The Slow-Burn Social Sandbox
The Problem: Hyper-financialized games create extractive, transient communities.\nThe Solution: A browser-based MMO that migrated from Polygon to Ronin, focusing on social collaboration and land ownership over token rewards.\n- Key Benefit: ~1M+ daily active users driven by gameplay, not airdrop farming.\n- Key Benefit: Demonstrates that a player-owned economy can be built on social capital and creativity, not just token emissions.
1M+
Daily Users
Ronin
Ecosystem
03
The Abyss World Thesis: Fully On-Chain Autonomy
The Problem: Most 'Web3' games are just NFTs tacked onto centralized servers, offering no real ownership.\nThe Solution: A fully on-chain, Autonomous World built with MUD engine on a rollup, where game state and logic are immutable and composable.\n- Key Benefit: Enables permissionless modding, persistent worlds, and emergent gameplay unconstrained by developer roadmaps.\n- Key Benefit: Aligns with the Starknet, Lattice, Argus ecosystem pushing the frontier of on-chain gaming infra.
FOC
Fully On-Chain
MUD
Engine
04
The Arbitrum & Immutable ZK-Rollup Play
The Problem: High gas fees and poor UX on L1s strangle game economies.\nThe Solution: Dedicated gaming rollups like Immutable zkEVM and Arbitrum Orbit chains offer ~$0.001 transactions and custom throughput for studios.\n- Key Benefit: Provides the scalability and cost profile necessary for true mass-market free-to-play models.\n- Key Benefit: Creates walled-garden ecosystems where assets are portable, but the economic flywheel is contained and optimized.
$0.001
Avg. Tx Cost
zkEVM
Tech Stack
counter-argument
THE PONZI PROBLEM
Counterpoint: Can't We Just Fix the Tokenomics?
Tokenomics alone cannot solve the fundamental misalignment between player-as-investor and player-as-user.
Tokenomics is a distraction. It treats the symptom—capital flight—not the disease: a game that fails to retain players on its own merits. Projects like Star Atlas and Illuvium have sophisticated models, but their primary economic loop still requires new capital to sustain old players.
The core conflict is identity. A player-as-investor's optimal strategy is to extract value and exit, which directly opposes a player-as-user's need for a stable, balanced ecosystem. This creates a permanent adversarial relationship between the protocol and its user base.
Evidence from DeFi. Even in pure finance, protocols like OlympusDAO and Tomb Fork proved that unsustainable token emissions cannot be 'fixed' with new math. The only sustainable model is one where the token's utility—like Uniswap's UNI for governance—is secondary to the core product's value.
takeaways
POST-EXTRACTIVE DESIGN
TL;DR: The Builder's Checklist for Sustainable Web3 Games
The 'Play-to-Earn' model is a Ponzi; sustainable games must shift from financial extraction to engagement-driven value.
01
The Problem: The Ponzi of Extractive Tokenomics
Games like Axie Infinity and StepN collapsed when new player inflows couldn't subsidize inflation. The core loop was earning, not playing.\n- Symptom: In-game token inflation rates of >100% APY\n- Result: >95% token value collapse post-hype, killing the economy
>95%
Value Collapse
>100% APY
Inflation Rate
02
The Solution: Sink-First, Non-Transferable Economies
Value must be destroyed before it's created. Follow Dark Forest's lead: make core progression assets soulbound (non-transferable).\n- Mechanic: Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) for skills/achievements\n- Goal: Align player incentives with long-term engagement, not short-term flipping
SBTs
Core Asset
0%
Extractable
03
The Problem: On-Chain Everything Kills Fun
Forcing every mouse click onto a blockchain like Ethereum or even an L2 creates latency (~2-15s) and cost (>$0.01/action) that murders gameplay.\n- Reality: ~500ms is the max tolerable latency for core gameplay\n- Consequence: Clunky UX drives away mainstream gamers
~500ms
Max Latency
>$0.01
Cost/Action
04
The Solution: Hybrid State Architecture (e.g., MUD, Argus)
Use a framework like MUD or Argus to separate game state. Keep fast, mutable state off-chain; settle final, valuable outcomes on-chain.\n- Tech: Rollups for finality, L2s for cheap settlement\n- Result: Sub-100ms gameplay with <$0.001 settlement cost
Sub-100ms
Gameplay
<$0.001
Settle Cost
05
The Problem: NFTs as Overpriced JPGs
Static NFTs (ERC-721) are digital beanie babies. Their value is purely speculative, offering zero ongoing utility or composability within a game world.\n- Evidence: >90% of gaming NFTs have no utility post-mint\n- Outcome: Collections become dead weight on the balance sheet
>90%
No Utility
ERC-721
Static Standard
06
The Solution: Dynamic, Composable Assets (ERC-6551, ERC-404)
Adopt standards like ERC-6551 (Token Bound Accounts) or ERC-404 to make NFTs living entities. Let them hold items, earn yield, and evolve.\n- Capability: NFTs as wallet addresses that can interact\n- Vision: Player assets become persistent characters across game universes
ERC-6551
TBA Standard
ERC-404
Semi-Fungible
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall