CBDCs require existing liquidity. A central bank digital currency launched in a vacuum is a ghost chain. Private stablecoins like USDC and USDT provide the critical on-chain user base, developer tooling, and exchange pairs that a CBDC needs to function.
Why CBDCs Will Co-opt, Not Kill, Private Stablecoin Networks
A technical analysis arguing that central banks will leverage existing private stablecoin infrastructure for CBDC distribution, transforming issuers into regulated, high-compliance utilities rather than eliminating them.
Introduction: The Inevitable Co-option
Central banks will not compete with private stablecoin networks; they will absorb their infrastructure and liquidity.
Regulation is the primary weapon. Jurisdictions will not ban stablecoins; they will mandate interoperability standards and reserve attestations. This forces private networks to become compliant plumbing for the state's monetary layer.
The model is already proven. The Federal Reserve's FedNow service co-opted private payment rails. The EU's Digital Euro proposal explicitly plans for supervised private intermediaries to handle distribution and user onboarding.
Evidence: The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Project Agorá uses tokenized commercial bank deposits on a unified ledger, a clear blueprint for integrating private monetary liabilities into a public framework.
Core Thesis: The Path of Least Resistance
Central banks will adopt private stablecoin rails because building superior, compliant, and liquid on-chain infrastructure is a losing battle.
CBDCs are compliance products, not infrastructure. Central banks prioritize monetary policy control and regulatory oversight over technical superiority. The private sector's innovation velocity in areas like cross-chain bridging (LayerZero, Circle's CCTP) and on-chain liquidity (Uniswap, Aave) is insurmountable for bureaucratic institutions.
The co-option is already happening. Regulated entities like PayPal and Visa are building on existing chains (Ethereum, Solana), not waiting for central bank permissioned ledgers. The path of least resistance for a digital Euro or Dollar is to issue a compliant token standard (ERC-20) and leverage the established liquidity and user base of private networks.
Evidence: The UK's Project Rosalind tested a CBDC prototype using a private, permissioned version of the public Ethereum Virtual Machine. This proves the technical blueprint is public infrastructure, not a novel central bank ledger.
Key Trends: The Co-option Playbook
Central banks will leverage the infrastructure and distribution of private stablecoins to achieve policy goals, creating a hybrid financial layer.
The Regulatory Capture of On/Off-Ramps
CBDCs will become the mandatory, KYC'd settlement layer for fiat conversions, making private stablecoins like USDC and USDT dependent on central bank rails for liquidity.\n- Control Point: Mandates for licensed exchanges to use CBDC rails for minting/redemption.\n- Network Effect: Private networks handle the $1T+ on-chain economy, but rely on state-controlled entry/exit.
Programmability as a Policy Tool
CBDCs will use the programmability pioneered by MakerDAO and Aave to enforce monetary policy directly on-chain.\n- Targeted Stimulus: Expiring, geo-fenced, or purpose-restricted digital vouchers.\n- Real-Time Data: Central banks gain visibility into ~$150B in stablecoin flows for macro adjustments.
The Interoperability Mandate
CBDCs will standardize on private sector bridge and messaging protocols like LayerZero and Wormhole for cross-border settlement, killing the SWIFT monopoly.\n- Infrastructure Leverage: Co-opt existing $20B+ in bridge security.\n- Private Speed, Public Backstop: Fast, private settlement with finality guaranteed by central bank reserves.
Wholesale CBDC as the Ultimate Collateral
Central banks will issue wholesale CBDC to regulated DeFi protocols, making it the risk-free benchmark for lending markets like Compound and Aave.\n- Collateral Upgrade: Replaces off-chain treasury bills with programmable, on-chain central bank liability.\n- Yield Curve Control: Directly sets the floor rate for the entire on-chain credit market.
Privacy as a Negotiable Feature
CBDCs will adopt privacy-preserving tech from zk-proof projects like Aztec or Tornado Cash successors, but with state-held master keys for auditability.\n- Citizen-Facing Privacy: Transaction details hidden from the public and commercial entities.\n- State Sovereignty: Central banks retain ultimate visibility, enforcing a new privacy paradigm.
The Liquidity Siphon
CBDC pools on automated market makers like Uniswap will become the deepest liquidity sources, dictating exchange rates and capturing fee revenue.\n- Monetary Sovereignty: Central banks can provide infinite liquidity to defend pegs or execute forex policy.\n- Revenue Capture: Diverts ~$1B/year in swap fees from private LPs to public balance sheets.
Infrastructure Asymmetry: Public vs. Private
A feature and incentive comparison showing why central banks will leverage, not replace, existing private stablecoin infrastructure for CBDC distribution and settlement.
| Infrastructure Feature / Incentive | Public CBDC (Direct Liability) | Private Stablecoin (e.g., USDC, USDT) | Hybrid Model (CBDC on Private Rail) |
|---|---|---|---|
Settlement Finality | Instant, on central bank ledger | Depends on underlying chain (e.g., Ethereum 12-14 sec) | Instant, via central bank wholesale ledger |
Programmability & Composability | Limited, state-controlled smart contracts | Full, via DeFi protocols (Uniswap, Aave, Compound) | Controlled, via whitelisted smart contract modules |
Global Distribution & Liquidity | Geofenced, jurisdiction-locked | 24/7 global, $160B+ existing liquidity pools | Geofenced wholesale, private global retail |
Privacy Model | Fully transparent to state | Pseudonymous on-chain | KYC/AML layers with selective auditability |
Primary Incentive for Central Bank | Monetary policy control, financial surveillance | N/A (Private entity profit) | Offload retail distribution, leverage innovation, maintain control |
Primary Incentive for Private Sector | N/A (Regulated utility) | Network fees, seigniorage, ecosystem capture | Fee revenue, regulatory compliance, first-mover advantage |
Cross-border Efficiency | Slow, via correspondent banking (2-3 days) | Fast, via crypto rails (<5 min, e.g., Stellar, Solana) | Fast wholesale settlement, private retail bridges |
Infrastructure Cost for State | High (build & maintain novel retail system) | Zero (leverages existing capital investment) | Low (integrates with existing APIs from Circle, Tether) |
Deep Dive: The Technical & Regulatory Stack
CBDCs will leverage private stablecoin infrastructure for distribution and compliance, creating a hybrid financial system.
CBDCs require distribution rails. Central banks lack the user-facing infrastructure and developer ecosystems to deploy digital currency at scale. They will integrate with existing private stablecoin networks like Circle's USDC or Tether's USDT for last-mile delivery and wallet integration.
Regulation becomes the on-ramp. Jurisdictions like the EU with MiCA will mandate that all stablecoin issuers become licensed entities. This creates a regulated gateway layer that CBDCs can plug into, using private firms for KYC/AML while maintaining sovereign control over the core ledger.
Technical stack convergence is inevitable. The interoperability protocols (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole) and cross-chain messaging standards that power private DeFi will be co-opted. A CBDC on one chain will use these bridges to settle with a private stablecoin on Ethereum or Solana.
Evidence: The US Federal Reserve's Project Agatha explicitly tests using regulated liability networks (RLNs) where commercial banks and potentially licensed stablecoin issuers settle tokenized claims on a shared ledger. This is the blueprint for co-option.
Counter-Argument: The 'Kill Switch' Fallacy
CBDCs will integrate with and leverage existing private stablecoin infrastructure rather than replace it.
CBDCs need existing rails. A central bank digital currency launched in isolation is a ghost chain. It requires liquidity, wallets, and developer tooling that private networks like Ethereum and Solana have spent a decade building. The path of least resistance is integration, not destruction.
The co-opt strategy wins. Regulators will mandate compliance, not obsolescence. They will enforce programmable policy layers on top of established stablecoins like USDC and USDT, using them as compliant on/off-ramps. This creates a hybrid system where private networks handle distribution.
Evidence from TradFi. The SWIFT network and correspondent banking were never replaced by new state systems; they were regulated and co-opted. The same regulatory capture dynamic applies. The infrastructure is too valuable to kill.
Case Studies: Early Signals of Co-option
Central banks are not building new rails; they are commandeering the most efficient private infrastructure for settlement.
The BIS Project mBridge: The Blueprint
The Bank for International Settlements' live pilot uses a permissioned blockchain to settle CBDC transactions between central banks. It's a direct co-option of the interoperability stack pioneered by private networks like LayerZero and Axelar.
- Key Signal: Uses a modified Ethereum client (Hyperledger Besu) for its core ledger.
- Key Benefit: Achieves ~2-3 second finality for cross-border payments, vs. days in traditional correspondent banking.
The Problem: Legacy RTGS is Obsolete
Real-Time Gross Settlement systems like Fedwire operate in batch windows with limited hours, creating settlement risk and inefficiency. They cannot natively interact with DeFi pools or on-chain treasuries.
- Key Constraint: $10B+ in daily liquidity is trapped in inefficient settlement layers.
- Key Signal: The ECB's exploratory work explicitly studies wholesale CBDC settlement on DLT to replace RTGS.
The Solution: CBDCs as the Ultimate Settlement Asset
CBDCs will become the risk-free settlement layer for private stablecoin networks like USDC and USDT. This mirrors how commercial banks today settle net positions on central bank balance sheets.
- Key Mechanism: Private mints issue stablecoins 1:1 against wCBDC held in regulated, programmable smart contracts.
- Key Benefit: Unlocks institutional DeFi with zero counterparty risk on the final settlement asset, boosting TVL in protocols like Aave and Compound.
The Singapore Ubin+ Model: Regulated DeFi
Project Ubin+ demonstrated tokenized assets and DeFi-like lending pools using a wholesale CBDC. This is not a replacement for MakerDAO or Uniswap; it's their regulated, institutional-grade counterpart.
- Key Signal: The network used a permissioned Quorum blockchain with zk-proofs for privacy—adopting crypto-native tech stacks.
- Key Benefit: Enables atomic delivery-vs-payment for capital markets, reducing systemic risk.
The Private Sector Pivot: Circle's Strategy
Circle is explicitly positioning USDC to become a digital dollar wrapper. Their architecture is designed for direct integration with a future Fed CBDC, turning a competitor into their primary reserve asset.
- Key Signal: Circle's Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) standardizes mint/burn across chains, creating the perfect liquidity layer for a wCBDC.
- Key Benefit: Provides the user-facing liquidity and developer ecosystem that a bare CBDC lacks.
The Endgame: A Hybrid Two-Tiered System
The future is a two-tiered monetary architecture: a wholesale CBDC for interbank settlement and a retail layer of regulated private stablecoins and tokenized deposits. This co-opts the innovation of Ethereum and Solana while maintaining central bank control.
- Key Mechanism: Central banks provide the settlement finality; private networks provide the UX, distribution, and composability.
- Key Benefit: Preserves monetary policy transmission while unlocking $1T+ in programmable finance.
Risk Analysis: What Could Derail This?
Central Bank Digital Currencies will not compete with private stablecoins; they will absorb their infrastructure and user bases.
The Regulatory Capture Playbook
CBDCs will not ban Tether or USDC; they will mandate them as the exclusive on/off-ramps. The Bank Secrecy Act and OFAC compliance will be enforced at the protocol layer, turning stablecoin issuers into de facto KYC/AML agents for the state. This neutralizes the permissionless threat while leveraging private sector distribution.
- Key Risk: Private networks become regulated financial utilities.
- Key Benefit: State gains total transaction visibility without building new rails.
The Interoperability Trap
Initiatives like Project mBridge and the EU's digital euro will standardize a CBDC-to-stablecoin bridge protocol. This creates a "walled garden" of compliance, where only approved private stablecoins can interact with the sovereign ledger. Networks like Circle's CCTP become mandatory plumbing, eroding the competitive moat of truly decentralized alternatives.
- Key Risk: Protocol-level censorship becomes a technical standard.
- Key Benefit: CBDCs gain instant liquidity and global reach via existing networks.
The Programmable Policy Wedge
CBDCs will use smart contract functionality not for user features, but for monetary policy and surveillance. Private stablecoins will be forced to integrate these functions—like transaction limits or expiring stimulus—to maintain parity. This makes them functionally identical to CBDCs for end-users, collapsing the innovation argument.
- Key Risk: Innovation shifts from user sovereignty to state control tools.
- Key Benefit: Central banks achieve granular, real-time economic policy levers.
The Liquidity Black Hole
When a major economy like the US or EU launches a CBDC, institutional liquidity will flood to the zero-counterparty-risk asset. Protocols like Aave and Compound will list CBDC pools with superior risk weights, starving private stablecoins of the yield generation that drives their adoption. The private network becomes a high-risk niche.
- Key Risk: DeFi yield economy reorients around sovereign digital debt.
- Key Benefit: Risk-free collateral for trillion-dollar institutional DeFi.
Future Outlook: The Regulated Utility
Central Bank Digital Currencies will integrate with and leverage private stablecoin networks for distribution and compliance, not replace them.
CBDCs need distribution rails. Central banks lack the infrastructure to reach end-users directly. They will license their digital currency to regulated entities like Circle (USDC) or Paxos (USDP), which already operate compliant on/off-ramps and wallet integrations.
Private networks become regulated utilities. Stablecoin issuers evolve into programmable compliance layers, embedding KYC/AML logic directly into the token using standards like ERC-20 or ERC-1404. This turns networks like Ethereum and Solana into the settlement backbones for sovereign money.
The model is wholesale, not retail. The ECB's digital euro and the Fed's FedNow service demonstrate a preference for intermediated architecture. Banks and fintechs handle customer-facing services, while the CBDC provides a risk-free settlement asset on-chain.
Evidence: Project Guardian by the Monetary Authority of Singapore already tests this, using permissioned DeFi pools for foreign exchange and bond trading with tokenized assets and regulated stablecoins.
TL;DR: Key Takeaways for Builders & Investors
Central Bank Digital Currencies will not replace private stablecoins; they will become the foundational settlement layer that supercharges the entire on-chain economy.
The Problem: Regulatory Capture vs. Permissionless Innovation
CBDCs will be the regulated, permissioned rails for wholesale and large-value transactions. Private networks like Circle (USDC) and MakerDAO (DAI) will dominate retail and DeFi composability.
- Key Benefit 1: Builders can leverage CBDC's legal certainty for institutional on/off-ramps.
- Key Benefit 2: Investors should back protocols that abstract away CBDC complexity for end-users.
The Solution: CBDCs as the Ultimate Settlement Asset
Think of a CBDC not as a competitor, but as the high-quality liquid asset (HQLA) backing a new generation of hybrid stablecoins and money markets. This mirrors the evolution from gold to fiat.
- Key Benefit 1: Protocols can create over-collateralized synthetic CBDC derivatives for DeFi.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables instant finality for cross-border trade finance, leapfrogging SWIFT.
The Infrastructure Play: Programmable Ledgers & Bridges
The real value accrual is in the middleware. CBDCs will require interoperability layers (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole) and programmable policy engines (e.g., Reserve Rights, Aave GHO hooks).
- Key Benefit 1: Build the compliance and identity layer that connects CBDC pools to DeFi.
- Key Benefit 2: Invest in intent-based solvers that route liquidity across public and private ledgers.
The Privacy Paradox: Auditable, Not Anonymous
CBDCs will enforce transaction monitoring, creating demand for privacy-preserving techniques like zero-knowledge proofs. This bifurcates the market: transparent CBDC for institutions, private layers for consumer apps.
- Key Benefit 1: ZK-rollup teams can offer regulatory-compliant privacy for CBDC transactions.
- Key Benefit 2: Investors must differentiate between privacy-for-compliance and privacy-for-censorship-resistance.
The Endgame: Hybrid Monetary Networks
The future is a multi-currency, multi-layer system. A Digital Dollar settles between banks, while USDC facilitates a Uniswap trade, and a DAI vault earns yield via Aave—all interoperable.
- Key Benefit 1: Build for currency agnosticism; let users choose their settlement asset.
- Key Benefit 2: The winning stablecoin protocol will be the one that integrates CBDC liquidity most seamlessly.
The Asymmetric Bet: On-Chain Sovereign Debt
CBDCs will force sovereign bonds onto programmable ledgers. This creates the world's largest, most liquid yield market accessible 24/7. Ondo Finance and similar protocols are early signals.
- Key Benefit 1: Build the primary dealership and repo market infrastructure for on-chain bonds.
- Key Benefit 2: The real-world asset (RWA) narrative graduates from mortgages to treasuries, attracting trillions in institutional capital.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.