Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
the-stablecoin-economy-regulation-and-adoption
Blog

Why CBDCs Will Co-opt, Not Kill, Private Stablecoin Networks

A technical analysis arguing that central banks will leverage existing private stablecoin infrastructure for CBDC distribution, transforming issuers into regulated, high-compliance utilities rather than eliminating them.

introduction
THE REALPOLITIK

Introduction: The Inevitable Co-option

Central banks will not compete with private stablecoin networks; they will absorb their infrastructure and liquidity.

CBDCs require existing liquidity. A central bank digital currency launched in a vacuum is a ghost chain. Private stablecoins like USDC and USDT provide the critical on-chain user base, developer tooling, and exchange pairs that a CBDC needs to function.

Regulation is the primary weapon. Jurisdictions will not ban stablecoins; they will mandate interoperability standards and reserve attestations. This forces private networks to become compliant plumbing for the state's monetary layer.

The model is already proven. The Federal Reserve's FedNow service co-opted private payment rails. The EU's Digital Euro proposal explicitly plans for supervised private intermediaries to handle distribution and user onboarding.

Evidence: The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Project Agorá uses tokenized commercial bank deposits on a unified ledger, a clear blueprint for integrating private monetary liabilities into a public framework.

thesis-statement
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH

Core Thesis: The Path of Least Resistance

Central banks will adopt private stablecoin rails because building superior, compliant, and liquid on-chain infrastructure is a losing battle.

CBDCs are compliance products, not infrastructure. Central banks prioritize monetary policy control and regulatory oversight over technical superiority. The private sector's innovation velocity in areas like cross-chain bridging (LayerZero, Circle's CCTP) and on-chain liquidity (Uniswap, Aave) is insurmountable for bureaucratic institutions.

The co-option is already happening. Regulated entities like PayPal and Visa are building on existing chains (Ethereum, Solana), not waiting for central bank permissioned ledgers. The path of least resistance for a digital Euro or Dollar is to issue a compliant token standard (ERC-20) and leverage the established liquidity and user base of private networks.

Evidence: The UK's Project Rosalind tested a CBDC prototype using a private, permissioned version of the public Ethereum Virtual Machine. This proves the technical blueprint is public infrastructure, not a novel central bank ledger.

WHY CBDCS WILL CO-OPT, NOT KILL, PRIVATE STABLECOIN NETWORKS

Infrastructure Asymmetry: Public vs. Private

A feature and incentive comparison showing why central banks will leverage, not replace, existing private stablecoin infrastructure for CBDC distribution and settlement.

Infrastructure Feature / IncentivePublic CBDC (Direct Liability)Private Stablecoin (e.g., USDC, USDT)Hybrid Model (CBDC on Private Rail)

Settlement Finality

Instant, on central bank ledger

Depends on underlying chain (e.g., Ethereum 12-14 sec)

Instant, via central bank wholesale ledger

Programmability & Composability

Limited, state-controlled smart contracts

Full, via DeFi protocols (Uniswap, Aave, Compound)

Controlled, via whitelisted smart contract modules

Global Distribution & Liquidity

Geofenced, jurisdiction-locked

24/7 global, $160B+ existing liquidity pools

Geofenced wholesale, private global retail

Privacy Model

Fully transparent to state

Pseudonymous on-chain

KYC/AML layers with selective auditability

Primary Incentive for Central Bank

Monetary policy control, financial surveillance

N/A (Private entity profit)

Offload retail distribution, leverage innovation, maintain control

Primary Incentive for Private Sector

N/A (Regulated utility)

Network fees, seigniorage, ecosystem capture

Fee revenue, regulatory compliance, first-mover advantage

Cross-border Efficiency

Slow, via correspondent banking (2-3 days)

Fast, via crypto rails (<5 min, e.g., Stellar, Solana)

Fast wholesale settlement, private retail bridges

Infrastructure Cost for State

High (build & maintain novel retail system)

Zero (leverages existing capital investment)

Low (integrates with existing APIs from Circle, Tether)

deep-dive
THE CO-OPTION PLAYBOOK

Deep Dive: The Technical & Regulatory Stack

CBDCs will leverage private stablecoin infrastructure for distribution and compliance, creating a hybrid financial system.

CBDCs require distribution rails. Central banks lack the user-facing infrastructure and developer ecosystems to deploy digital currency at scale. They will integrate with existing private stablecoin networks like Circle's USDC or Tether's USDT for last-mile delivery and wallet integration.

Regulation becomes the on-ramp. Jurisdictions like the EU with MiCA will mandate that all stablecoin issuers become licensed entities. This creates a regulated gateway layer that CBDCs can plug into, using private firms for KYC/AML while maintaining sovereign control over the core ledger.

Technical stack convergence is inevitable. The interoperability protocols (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole) and cross-chain messaging standards that power private DeFi will be co-opted. A CBDC on one chain will use these bridges to settle with a private stablecoin on Ethereum or Solana.

Evidence: The US Federal Reserve's Project Agatha explicitly tests using regulated liability networks (RLNs) where commercial banks and potentially licensed stablecoin issuers settle tokenized claims on a shared ledger. This is the blueprint for co-option.

counter-argument
THE NETWORK EFFECT

Counter-Argument: The 'Kill Switch' Fallacy

CBDCs will integrate with and leverage existing private stablecoin infrastructure rather than replace it.

CBDCs need existing rails. A central bank digital currency launched in isolation is a ghost chain. It requires liquidity, wallets, and developer tooling that private networks like Ethereum and Solana have spent a decade building. The path of least resistance is integration, not destruction.

The co-opt strategy wins. Regulators will mandate compliance, not obsolescence. They will enforce programmable policy layers on top of established stablecoins like USDC and USDT, using them as compliant on/off-ramps. This creates a hybrid system where private networks handle distribution.

Evidence from TradFi. The SWIFT network and correspondent banking were never replaced by new state systems; they were regulated and co-opted. The same regulatory capture dynamic applies. The infrastructure is too valuable to kill.

case-study
WHY CBDCS WILL CO-OPT, NOT KILL

Case Studies: Early Signals of Co-option

Central banks are not building new rails; they are commandeering the most efficient private infrastructure for settlement.

01

The BIS Project mBridge: The Blueprint

The Bank for International Settlements' live pilot uses a permissioned blockchain to settle CBDC transactions between central banks. It's a direct co-option of the interoperability stack pioneered by private networks like LayerZero and Axelar.

  • Key Signal: Uses a modified Ethereum client (Hyperledger Besu) for its core ledger.
  • Key Benefit: Achieves ~2-3 second finality for cross-border payments, vs. days in traditional correspondent banking.
~3s
Settlement
20+
Central Banks
02

The Problem: Legacy RTGS is Obsolete

Real-Time Gross Settlement systems like Fedwire operate in batch windows with limited hours, creating settlement risk and inefficiency. They cannot natively interact with DeFi pools or on-chain treasuries.

  • Key Constraint: $10B+ in daily liquidity is trapped in inefficient settlement layers.
  • Key Signal: The ECB's exploratory work explicitly studies wholesale CBDC settlement on DLT to replace RTGS.
24/7/365
CBDC Advantage
$10B+
Trapped Liquidity
03

The Solution: CBDCs as the Ultimate Settlement Asset

CBDCs will become the risk-free settlement layer for private stablecoin networks like USDC and USDT. This mirrors how commercial banks today settle net positions on central bank balance sheets.

  • Key Mechanism: Private mints issue stablecoins 1:1 against wCBDC held in regulated, programmable smart contracts.
  • Key Benefit: Unlocks institutional DeFi with zero counterparty risk on the final settlement asset, boosting TVL in protocols like Aave and Compound.
0%
Counterparty Risk
1:1
Backing Ratio
04

The Singapore Ubin+ Model: Regulated DeFi

Project Ubin+ demonstrated tokenized assets and DeFi-like lending pools using a wholesale CBDC. This is not a replacement for MakerDAO or Uniswap; it's their regulated, institutional-grade counterpart.

  • Key Signal: The network used a permissioned Quorum blockchain with zk-proofs for privacy—adopting crypto-native tech stacks.
  • Key Benefit: Enables atomic delivery-vs-payment for capital markets, reducing systemic risk.
Atomic DvP
Settlement Type
zk-Proofs
Privacy Tech
05

The Private Sector Pivot: Circle's Strategy

Circle is explicitly positioning USDC to become a digital dollar wrapper. Their architecture is designed for direct integration with a future Fed CBDC, turning a competitor into their primary reserve asset.

  • Key Signal: Circle's Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) standardizes mint/burn across chains, creating the perfect liquidity layer for a wCBDC.
  • Key Benefit: Provides the user-facing liquidity and developer ecosystem that a bare CBDC lacks.
10+
Chains Supported
~$30B
USDC TVL
06

The Endgame: A Hybrid Two-Tiered System

The future is a two-tiered monetary architecture: a wholesale CBDC for interbank settlement and a retail layer of regulated private stablecoins and tokenized deposits. This co-opts the innovation of Ethereum and Solana while maintaining central bank control.

  • Key Mechanism: Central banks provide the settlement finality; private networks provide the UX, distribution, and composability.
  • Key Benefit: Preserves monetary policy transmission while unlocking $1T+ in programmable finance.
Tier 1 + Tier 2
Architecture
$1T+
Programmable Market
risk-analysis
WHY CBDCS WILL CO-OPT, NOT KILL, PRIVATE STABLECOIN NETWORKS

Risk Analysis: What Could Derail This?

Central Bank Digital Currencies will not compete with private stablecoins; they will absorb their infrastructure and user bases.

01

The Regulatory Capture Playbook

CBDCs will not ban Tether or USDC; they will mandate them as the exclusive on/off-ramps. The Bank Secrecy Act and OFAC compliance will be enforced at the protocol layer, turning stablecoin issuers into de facto KYC/AML agents for the state. This neutralizes the permissionless threat while leveraging private sector distribution.

  • Key Risk: Private networks become regulated financial utilities.
  • Key Benefit: State gains total transaction visibility without building new rails.
100%
Compliance
$140B+
TVL at Stake
02

The Interoperability Trap

Initiatives like Project mBridge and the EU's digital euro will standardize a CBDC-to-stablecoin bridge protocol. This creates a "walled garden" of compliance, where only approved private stablecoins can interact with the sovereign ledger. Networks like Circle's CCTP become mandatory plumbing, eroding the competitive moat of truly decentralized alternatives.

  • Key Risk: Protocol-level censorship becomes a technical standard.
  • Key Benefit: CBDCs gain instant liquidity and global reach via existing networks.
24/7
Settlement
<2s
Finality
03

The Programmable Policy Wedge

CBDCs will use smart contract functionality not for user features, but for monetary policy and surveillance. Private stablecoins will be forced to integrate these functions—like transaction limits or expiring stimulus—to maintain parity. This makes them functionally identical to CBDCs for end-users, collapsing the innovation argument.

  • Key Risk: Innovation shifts from user sovereignty to state control tools.
  • Key Benefit: Central banks achieve granular, real-time economic policy levers.
0%
Privacy
100%
Traceability
04

The Liquidity Black Hole

When a major economy like the US or EU launches a CBDC, institutional liquidity will flood to the zero-counterparty-risk asset. Protocols like Aave and Compound will list CBDC pools with superior risk weights, starving private stablecoins of the yield generation that drives their adoption. The private network becomes a high-risk niche.

  • Key Risk: DeFi yield economy reorients around sovereign digital debt.
  • Key Benefit: Risk-free collateral for trillion-dollar institutional DeFi.
$1T+
Potential TVL
~0 bps
Credit Risk
future-outlook
THE CO-OPTION

Future Outlook: The Regulated Utility

Central Bank Digital Currencies will integrate with and leverage private stablecoin networks for distribution and compliance, not replace them.

CBDCs need distribution rails. Central banks lack the infrastructure to reach end-users directly. They will license their digital currency to regulated entities like Circle (USDC) or Paxos (USDP), which already operate compliant on/off-ramps and wallet integrations.

Private networks become regulated utilities. Stablecoin issuers evolve into programmable compliance layers, embedding KYC/AML logic directly into the token using standards like ERC-20 or ERC-1404. This turns networks like Ethereum and Solana into the settlement backbones for sovereign money.

The model is wholesale, not retail. The ECB's digital euro and the Fed's FedNow service demonstrate a preference for intermediated architecture. Banks and fintechs handle customer-facing services, while the CBDC provides a risk-free settlement asset on-chain.

Evidence: Project Guardian by the Monetary Authority of Singapore already tests this, using permissioned DeFi pools for foreign exchange and bond trading with tokenized assets and regulated stablecoins.

takeaways
CBDC-ECOSYSTEM STRATEGY

TL;DR: Key Takeaways for Builders & Investors

Central Bank Digital Currencies will not replace private stablecoins; they will become the foundational settlement layer that supercharges the entire on-chain economy.

01

The Problem: Regulatory Capture vs. Permissionless Innovation

CBDCs will be the regulated, permissioned rails for wholesale and large-value transactions. Private networks like Circle (USDC) and MakerDAO (DAI) will dominate retail and DeFi composability.

  • Key Benefit 1: Builders can leverage CBDC's legal certainty for institutional on/off-ramps.
  • Key Benefit 2: Investors should back protocols that abstract away CBDC complexity for end-users.
$130B+
Stablecoin TVL
24/7
DeFi Uptime
02

The Solution: CBDCs as the Ultimate Settlement Asset

Think of a CBDC not as a competitor, but as the high-quality liquid asset (HQLA) backing a new generation of hybrid stablecoins and money markets. This mirrors the evolution from gold to fiat.

  • Key Benefit 1: Protocols can create over-collateralized synthetic CBDC derivatives for DeFi.
  • Key Benefit 2: Enables instant finality for cross-border trade finance, leapfrogging SWIFT.
~0 bps
Counterparty Risk
<1s
Settlement
03

The Infrastructure Play: Programmable Ledgers & Bridges

The real value accrual is in the middleware. CBDCs will require interoperability layers (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole) and programmable policy engines (e.g., Reserve Rights, Aave GHO hooks).

  • Key Benefit 1: Build the compliance and identity layer that connects CBDC pools to DeFi.
  • Key Benefit 2: Invest in intent-based solvers that route liquidity across public and private ledgers.
100x
More Liquidity Pairs
-90%
FX Cost
04

The Privacy Paradox: Auditable, Not Anonymous

CBDCs will enforce transaction monitoring, creating demand for privacy-preserving techniques like zero-knowledge proofs. This bifurcates the market: transparent CBDC for institutions, private layers for consumer apps.

  • Key Benefit 1: ZK-rollup teams can offer regulatory-compliant privacy for CBDC transactions.
  • Key Benefit 2: Investors must differentiate between privacy-for-compliance and privacy-for-censorship-resistance.
Auditable
For Regulators
Private
For Users
05

The Endgame: Hybrid Monetary Networks

The future is a multi-currency, multi-layer system. A Digital Dollar settles between banks, while USDC facilitates a Uniswap trade, and a DAI vault earns yield via Aave—all interoperable.

  • Key Benefit 1: Build for currency agnosticism; let users choose their settlement asset.
  • Key Benefit 2: The winning stablecoin protocol will be the one that integrates CBDC liquidity most seamlessly.
Multi-Chain
Architecture
Hybrid
Liquidity
06

The Asymmetric Bet: On-Chain Sovereign Debt

CBDCs will force sovereign bonds onto programmable ledgers. This creates the world's largest, most liquid yield market accessible 24/7. Ondo Finance and similar protocols are early signals.

  • Key Benefit 1: Build the primary dealership and repo market infrastructure for on-chain bonds.
  • Key Benefit 2: The real-world asset (RWA) narrative graduates from mortgages to treasuries, attracting trillions in institutional capital.
$100T+
Addressable Market
On-Chain
Yield Curve
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Why CBDCs Will Co-opt Private Stablecoin Networks | ChainScore Blog