Sequencing is the moat. Execution and settlement are commoditizing; the strategic value lies in controlling transaction ordering and the resulting MEV revenue streams. This is the new profit center.
the-modular-blockchain-thesis-explained
Blog
Why L2 Competition Will Shift to the Sequencing Layer
As execution layers become commoditized via shared EVMs like OP Stack and Arbitrum Orbit, the true competitive moat for L2s will be the sequencing layer. This analysis explains why, who's building it, and what it means for the modular stack.
introduction
THE REAL BATTLEGROUND
Introduction
The next phase of L2 competition will be defined by control over the sequencing layer, not just raw throughput.
Shared sequencers are inevitable. The economic and security costs of running a solo sequencer are unsustainable for most chains, creating a vacuum for shared sequencing networks like Espresso, Astria, and Radius.
Decentralization is a feature, not a goal. Protocols will adopt shared sequencers for liveness guarantees and interoperability, not ideology. This creates a direct competition with centralized sequencer models.
Evidence: The $600M+ in MEV extracted on Ethereum L2s in 2023 proves the economic stakes. Shared sequencer testnets from Espresso and Astria already process transactions for multiple rollup stacks.
thesis-statement
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT
The Core Thesis: Sequencing is the New Frontier
The competitive moat for L2s is moving from execution to the control of transaction ordering and value capture.
Sequencer revenue dominates L2 economics. The primary value capture for an L2 like Arbitrum or Optimism is not gas fees, but the MEV and fee revenue extracted by its centralized sequencer. This creates a multi-billion dollar incentive to own the ordering layer.
Shared sequencing unbundles the stack. Projects like Espresso Systems and Astria are building shared sequencer networks that separate sequencing from execution. This commoditizes execution environments and forces L2s to compete on other dimensions.
Intent-based architectures bypass sequencers. Protocols like UniswapX and Across use solvers that find optimal execution paths, rendering the L2 sequencer's ordering power irrelevant for those transactions. The sequencer becomes a dumb pipe.
Evidence: Arbitrum's sequencer generates an estimated $30M+ annual profit from MEV and fees, a figure that will attract direct competition and regulatory scrutiny, accelerating the shift to decentralized or shared models.
key-trends
WHY SEQUENCING IS THE NEW BATTLEGROUND
The Three Forces Driving the Shift
The L2 stack is commoditizing. The next phase of competition will be won at the sequencing layer, where value capture and user experience are directly controlled.
01
The MEV Problem: A $500M+ Annual Subsidy
Sequencers capture proposer and builder MEV from user transactions. This revenue, currently centralized, is a massive subsidy that funds L2 operations and user incentives.\n- Arbitrum and Optimism currently capture this value for their foundations.\n- Decentralized sequencing protocols like Astria and Espresso aim to redistribute it.
$500M+
Annual MEV
>90%
Centralized
02
The Interoperability Problem: Fragmented Liquidity Silos
Native cross-rollup composability is impossible with isolated sequencers. Users and apps are trapped in silos, forcing reliance on slow, expensive bridges.\n- Shared sequencing layers (e.g., Espresso, Astria) enable atomic cross-rollup transactions.\n- This unlocks new primitives like shared liquidity and seamless app-chain communication.
~$30B
Bridged Assets
~5-20 min
Bridge Latency
03
The Credible Neutrality Problem: Censorship & Extractable Value
A single entity controlling the sequencer is a central point of failure. It can censor transactions, extract maximal value, and create systemic risk.\n- Decentralized sequencing is a prerequisite for credible neutrality, akin to Ethereum's validator set.\n- Projects like EigenLayer and Near DA are building the staking and data availability layers to secure it.
0
Fault Tolerance
100%
Uptime Required
WHY L2 COMPETITION IS SHIFTING TO THE SEQUENCER
The Shared Sequencing Landscape: A Protocol Comparison
Comparison of key architectural and economic trade-offs for leading shared sequencer protocols.
| Feature / Metric | Espresso Systems | Astria | Radius | Metis (Hybrid) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Core Architecture | Decentralized PoS Validator Set | Centralized Operator + Decentralized Prover | Encrypted Mempool + Timelock Encryption | Hybrid (Centralized Sequencer + Decentralized DAC) |
Throughput (Sequences/sec) |
|
| ~ 5,000 (Encryption Overhead) | ~ 8,000 |
Time-to-Finality (L1 Inclusion) | < 12 min (Ethereum) | < 4 min (via Celestia) | < 20 min (Timelock Window) | < 10 min |
Censorship Resistance Guarantee | ||||
MEV Redistribution | Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) | To Rollup (via Auction) | Full MEV Suppression | To Treasury & Stakers |
Native Cross-Rollup Atomic Comps | ||||
Current Live Mainnet Users | Testnet Only | Devnet (Celestia) | Testnet Only | Live (Andromeda) |
Economic Security Model | Staked $ESPRESSO (PoS) | Bonded Operators + Slashing | Staked $RADIUS (PoS) | Staked $METIS (PoS) |
deep-dive
THE SEQUENCER IS THE BUSINESS
The Economic and Technical Imperative
The sequencing layer will become the primary competitive battleground for L2s, as it directly controls revenue, user experience, and protocol sovereignty.
Sequencer revenue is terminal value. L2s currently monetize by capturing MEV and transaction fees via their centralized sequencer. This revenue stream funds development and security subsidies, creating a direct link between sequencer profitability and L2 valuation.
User experience is a sequencing problem. Finality speed, transaction ordering, and cost predictability are sequencer outputs. Protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism compete on these metrics, but the underlying sequencer design dictates the ceiling.
Shared sequencers threaten sovereignty. Projects like Espresso Systems and Astria offer decentralized sequencing as a service. Adoption creates a commodity execution layer, forcing L2s to differentiate elsewhere or cede control.
Evidence: The $30M+ in sequencer profits captured by Arbitrum in 2023 demonstrates the economic scale. The migration of dApps like Uniswap to multiple L2s shows they will route liquidity to the chain with the best (sequencer-driven) UX.
risk-analysis
WHY SEQUENCING IS THE REAL BATTLEGROUND
The Inevitable Counter-Arguments & Risks
The L2 narrative is pivoting from raw throughput to who controls the economic and security core of the stack.
01
The 'Commoditized Execution' Problem
EVM equivalence and open-source tooling have made execution environments a solved problem. The real moat is the sequencing rights that determine transaction ordering, MEV extraction, and cross-chain atomicity.\n- Decentralized Sequencers like Espresso and Astria are unbundling this layer.\n- Protocols like dYdX and Fuel already run custom sequencer sets, proving the model.
~80%
of L2 Value
0
Switching Cost
02
Shared Sequencer Networks (The Solution)
Networks like Espresso, Astria, and Radius are creating a neutral sequencing layer that multiple L2s can plug into. This enables cross-rollup atomic composability and democratizes MEV revenue.\n- Enables trust-minimized bridging and shared liquidity.\n- Turns sequencing from a cost center into a profit-sharing marketplace for validators.
Sub-Second
Finality
Shared
Security Budget
03
The Centralization & MEV Cartel Risk
If a single entity (e.g., a dominant L2 or a VC-backed sequencer) captures the sequencing layer, it recreates the miner extractable value (MEV) problems of Ethereum L1 but with fewer participants.\n- Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) models must be enforced at the sequencing layer.\n- Failure leads to censorship risks and value leakage from L2 ecosystems to sequencer operators.
>60%
Stake Threshold
$B+
MEV at Stake
04
Ethereum's Enshrined Future
The endgame is enshrined sequencing via Ethereum's consensus layer (e.g., EigenLayer restaking, PBS). This would make L2s true "verification layers" and eliminate the trusted sequencer debate.\n- EigenDA is the first major test of this thesis.\n- Long-term, this could render most third-party sequencer networks obsolete, recentralizing power around Ethereum core devs.
L1 Security
Guarantee
Existential
Risk to L2s
05
The Interoperability Tax
Shared sequencers promise atomic cross-rollup swaps, but they introduce a new liveness dependency. If the shared sequencer fails, all connected L2s halt.\n- This creates systemic risk akin to the cross-chain bridge hacks of 2022.\n- Solutions like Across and LayerZero with optimistic verification may remain more robust for high-value transfers.
Single
Point of Failure
Seconds → Days
Failure Impact
06
Economic Sustainability
Sequencer revenue today is mostly MEV and transaction fees. In a low-fee environment or with widespread PBS, this revenue shrinks. Who pays for sequencer decentralization?\n- Protocols may need to subsidize their sequencer sets, creating a new cost.\n- The business model relies on capturing value from cross-chain intents and orderflow auctions.
$0.01
Avg. Fee Target
Unproven
Revenue Model
future-outlook
THE SEQUENCER SHIFT
The Endgame: A Commoditized Execution Layer
L2 competition will migrate from execution to sequencing as the core economic and strategic battleground.
Execution becomes a commodity. The EVM bytecode standard and open-source rollup clients like OP Stack and Arbitrum Nitro create interchangeable execution environments. The marginal cost of launching a new L2 trends to zero, destroying execution as a defensible moat.
Sequencing captures the value. The entity that orders transactions controls MEV extraction, fee markets, and user experience. This is the new profit center and control point, analogous to the validator role in L1s like Ethereum.
Shared sequencers fragment liquidity. Projects like Espresso, Astria, and Shared Sequencer create a market for decentralized sequencing. This fractures the atomic composability that single-sequencer L2s like Arbitrum One currently monopolize.
Evidence: The modular stack. The rise of Celestia for data availability, EigenLayer for shared security, and AltLayer for rollup-as-a-service proves the stack is unbundling. Execution is the layer with the least inherent lock-in.
takeaways
THE SEQUENCER FRONTIER
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
The L2 race is moving from raw throughput to the economic and security guarantees of the sequencing layer, where value capture and user experience are decided.
01
The Problem: Centralized Sequencers Are a $10B+ Liability
Today's dominant L2s use a single, permissioned sequencer. This creates a massive, unaddressed risk for the $40B+ in TVL they secure.\n- Censorship Risk: A single entity can front-run or block transactions.\n- Extractable Value: MEV is captured by the sequencer, not returned to users or the protocol.\n- Single Point of Failure: Downtime of one actor halts the chain.
$40B+
TVL at Risk
1
Active Sequencer
02
The Solution: Decentralized Sequencing as a Revenue Engine
Decentralizing the sequencer (e.g., Espresso, Astria, Shared Sequencers) transforms it from a cost center into a protocol's primary revenue and security layer.\n- Value Redistribution: MEV can be captured and redistributed via mechanisms like burn-and-mint or direct staker rewards.\n- Enhanced Security: A validator set with staked economic capital replaces a trusted operator.\n- Atomic Composability: Enables seamless cross-rollup transactions, a key unlock for modular stacks.
100%+
Revenue Upside
Trustless
Security Model
03
The Battleground: Shared Sequencer Networks Will Win
Isolated rollup sequencers are inefficient. The future belongs to shared sequencer networks that provide sequencing-as-a-service, creating powerful network effects.\n- Liquidity Unification: Provides atomic cross-rollup liquidity, challenging monolithic L1s and fragmented L2s.\n- Developer Capture: Builders choose chains based on the sequencer network's ecosystem and tooling, not just VM.\n- Interoperability Primitive: Becomes the foundational layer for intent-based systems (UniswapX, CowSwap) and cross-chain messaging (LayerZero, Axelar).
Network Effect
Key MoAT
~500ms
Cross-Rollup Latency
04
The Investment Thesis: Owning the Sequencing Layer
Value accrual in modular blockchains will shift decisively to the sequencing tier, analogous to how ISPs profit from internet traffic.\n- Fee Market Control: The sequencer network sets and captures base sequencing fees.\n- Staking Token Utility: Native tokens are required for sequencer node operation and slashing, creating sustainable demand.\n- Strategic Moat: Early networks like Espresso or Astria that secure major rollups will be extremely difficult to dislodge.
Infrastructure
Value Layer
Staking
Core Utility
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall