Interoperability as a Service (IaaS) will be the dominant business model for the next wave of blockchain infrastructure. The current paradigm of isolated, application-specific bridges like Across or Stargate is unsustainable for mass adoption, creating a market for generalized, protocol-agnostic routing.
the-modular-blockchain-thesis-explained
Blog
Why Interoperability as a Service Will Be the Next Major Business Model
The modular blockchain thesis creates a trillion-dollar B2B market for secure message passing. This analysis explains why hubs like Polymer will monetize connectivity, not just bridging, becoming the next major infrastructure business model.
introduction
THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT
Introduction
Interoperability is evolving from a feature into a core, monetizable infrastructure layer.
The value accrual shifts from the application to the network layer. Protocols like LayerZero and Axelar are already proving this, monetizing the secure passage of messages and assets, not the end-user transaction. This mirrors the evolution from on-premise servers to AWS.
This model unlocks intent-based architectures. Projects like UniswapX and CowSwap abstract complexity by outsourcing cross-chain routing to specialized IaaS providers, turning interoperability from a user problem into a backend service. The network with the best liquidity and security wins.
Evidence: The Total Value Secured (TVS) by cross-chain messaging protocols exceeds $60B, with LayerZero facilitating over $50B in transaction volume. This capital flow creates a direct, scalable revenue stream for the infrastructure provider, not the dApp.
key-trends
WHY INTEROPERABILITY AS A SERVICE WINS
Executive Summary: The Three-Part Thesis
The current multi-chain reality is a tax on innovation. IaaS abstracts the complexity, turning a cost center into a profit engine.
01
The Problem: The Integration Tax
Every new chain forces protocols to rebuild liquidity, security, and UX from scratch. This ~6-12 month integration cycle is a massive capital and engineering drain.
- Cost: $500K+ in dev resources per chain.
- Friction: Fragmented liquidity across 50+ L1/L2s.
- Risk: Unique vulnerabilities per bridge and chain.
12 mo.
Integration Cycle
$500K+
Dev Cost
02
The Solution: The Abstraction Layer
IaaS providers like LayerZero, Axelar, and Wormhole act as a universal messaging standard. They commoditize cross-chain logic, letting protocols deploy once and access all chains.
- Speed: Go-to-market reduced from months to ~1 week.
- Security: Centralized risk audit on the interoperability layer.
- Composability: Unlocks native cross-chain applications (e.g., UniswapX).
1 week
Deployment Time
50+
Chain Access
03
The Business Model: The Interoperability Fee
IaaS monetizes every cross-chain message, creating a recurring revenue stream scaling with total value flow. This is more defensible than one-time infrastructure sales.
- Revenue: Fee-per-message (e.g., $0.10-$5.00 per tx).
- Scale: TAM tied to $10B+ daily cross-chain volume.
- Stickiness: High switching costs once integrated.
$0.10-$5.00
Fee Per Tx
$10B+
Daily Volume
market-context
THE BUSINESS MODEL
The Modular Endgame: A Cambrian Explosion of Chains
Interoperability as a Service will become the dominant business model by monetizing the connectivity between specialized, modular blockchains.
Interoperability as a Service (IaaS) monetizes connectivity. The modular thesis fragments execution, data availability, and settlement. This creates a combinatorial explosion of chains, each requiring secure communication. Protocols like LayerZero and Axelar are already selling this connectivity, not just as a feature but as their core product.
The value accrual shifts from L1s to IaaS. An L1's moat was its ecosystem. In a modular world, users and assets fluidly move between rollups and app-chains via Across or Stargate. The IaaS layer captures fees on every cross-chain transaction, becoming the indispensable plumbing.
The service abstracts complexity into a commodity. Developers will not build their own bridges. They will call an API from Wormhole or Hyperlane to route intents. This mirrors how AWS abstracted server management, creating a massive, recurring revenue business from infrastructure.
Evidence: LayerZero's valuation. Its $3B+ valuation as a messaging protocol demonstrates the market's bet on IaaS. Daily message volume across these networks already exceeds hundreds of thousands, a direct proxy for the economic activity they facilitate.
INTEROPERABILITY AS A SERVICE
The Business Model Shift: From Bridge to Hub
Comparing the economic and technical models of isolated bridges versus unified interoperability hubs.
| Core Metric | Isolated Bridge (e.g., Stargate, Multichain) | Generalized Messaging (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar) | Intent-Based Hub (e.g., UniswapX, Across) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Revenue Source | Transaction fee + native token inflation | Message fee (gas abstraction) | Solver competition for MEV + fee |
Capital Efficiency | Locked liquidity in pools | Light validators/guardians | Optimistic or zero-liquidity models |
User Experience | Manual chain selection, multiple hops | Programmable cross-chain calls | Single signature, abstracted routing |
Protocol Take Rate | 0.1% - 0.5% of swap volume | $0.01 - $0.50 per message |
|
Composability | |||
Risk Model | Liquidity fragmentation + bridge hacks | Validator set security | Optimistic fraud proofs + bonded solvers |
Example Entity | Stargate Finance | LayerZero Labs | UniswapX, CowSwap, Across |
deep-dive
THE BUSINESS MODEL
The IaaS Stack: How Hubs Monetize Trust
Interoperability as a Service (IaaS) transforms blockchain hubs from passive infrastructure into active, fee-generating marketplaces for cross-chain trust.
Hubs become trust markets. A hub like Cosmos or Polkadot does not just relay data; it sells verifiable security. Validator sets and light client protocols become a commodity that rollups and appchains purchase to inherit finality.
The fee switch is verification. The business model shifts from inflationary token rewards to fees for state attestations. This creates a predictable revenue stream tied directly to cross-chain activity volume, not speculation.
Contrast with L2 sequencers. An L2 monetizes block space. An IaaS hub monetizes the trusted communication layer between those blockspaces. This is a higher-level, protocol-level service with wider economic moats.
Evidence: Cosmos' Interchain Security (ICS) demonstrates this model. Consumer chains pay fees in ATOM to rent the Cosmos Hub's validator set, creating a direct value accrual mechanism for the hub token.
protocol-spotlight
THE INFRASTRUCTURE WAR
Protocol Spotlight: The IaaS Contenders
The next major business model isn't another app—it's the secure, programmable plumbing connecting them all.
01
The Problem: The Cross-Chain Trilemma
Every bridge today forces a trade-off between security, capital efficiency, and connectivity. You can't have all three. This creates systemic risk and fragmented liquidity.
- Security: Native validation vs. external committees.
- Capital: Locked assets vs. minted wrappers.
- Connectivity: Hub-and-spoke vs. universal mesh.
~$3B
Bridge Hacks (2022-24)
3/3
Pick Two
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Routing
Instead of forcing users through a specific liquidity pool, let a solver network compete to fulfill their abstract intent (e.g., 'Swap 1 ETH for SOL on mainnet'). This is UniswapX for cross-chain.
- Key Benefit: Optimal route discovery across all chains and DEXs.
- Key Benefit: Gasless user experience with solver competition.
- Key Benefit: Naturally aggregates liquidity from Across, LayerZero, and others.
~500ms
Quote Latency
-20%
Avg. Price Impact
03
The Contender: LayerZero's Omnichain Future
LayerZero isn't a bridge; it's a generic message-passing layer. Its business model is selling security (the Oracle/Relayer set) and connectivity as a service to any app.
- Key Benefit: Universal Composability. Any contract on any chain can talk to any other.
- Key Benefit: Application-Layer Security. Stargate (its first app) failing doesn't break the protocol.
- Key Benefit: Viral Distribution via airdrops to early integrating apps.
70+
Chains Supported
$10B+
TVL in Ecosystem
04
The Contender: Axelar's Interchain Amplifier
Axelar provides sovereign VM connectivity. It doesn't just pass messages; it enables chains to call each other's smart contracts natively, powered by a Proof-of-Stake validator set.
- Key Benefit: General Message Passing (GMP) allows contract-to-contract calls.
- Key Benefit: Built-in Security from a decentralized validator set, akin to Cosmos.
- Key Benefit: Developer Familiarity with EVM-equivalent tooling (Satellite).
50+
Connected Chains
2-3s
Finality Time
05
The Contender: Wormhole's Multi-VM Agnosticism
Wormhole's core innovation is the Guardian network and its generic VAA (Signed Action Approval) format. It's chain-agnostic, making it the go-to for non-EVM chains like Solana, Aptos, and Sui.
- Key Benefit: Maximum Chain Diversity. First-mover on major non-EVM ecosystems.
- Key Benefit: Modular Security. The Guardian network is being decentralized, with plans for ZK light clients.
- Key Benefit: Enterprise Grade backing from Jump Crypto.
30+
Blockchains
$35B+
Messages Sent
06
The Business Model: Taxing the Data Layer
IaaS winners won't profit from transaction fees alone. The real revenue is in selling security assurances and monetizing cross-chain data flow.
- Revenue Stream 1: Relayer/Oracle Service Fees (LayerZero).
- Revenue Stream 2: Staking/Slashed Security Deposits (Axelar).
- Revenue Stream 3: Enterprise SDK Licensing & Priority Access (Wormhole).
- The Endgame: Becoming the TCP/IP of Web3, a utility so fundamental it's embedded everywhere.
1000x
Msg Volume (2025E)
$1B+
Annualized Fees
counter-argument
THE EXISTENTIAL RISKS
The Bear Case: Why This Might Not Work
The abstraction of interoperability creates systemic fragility and centralization vectors that could undermine its own premise.
Aggregation creates systemic risk. An IaaS layer like Socket or LI.FI becomes a single point of failure; a critical bug in their router logic compromises every integrated chain and dApp, replicating the contagion risk of major CEX failures.
Economic sustainability is unproven. The model relies on extracting fees from inherently commoditized message-passing, a race to the bottom where only the largest aggregators like LayerZero with proprietary validation can survive, recreating the oligopoly it aimed to dismantle.
Intent architectures shift, not eliminate, trust. Systems like UniswapX and CowSwap delegate routing to third-party solvers, creating new centralized cartels of searchers and validators that users must trust for optimal execution, a regression in decentralization.
Evidence: The 2022 Wormhole and Nomad bridge hacks, which lost over $1 billion, demonstrate that complex interoperability middleware is a fat target; adding another abstraction layer (IaaS) expands the attack surface without solving the underlying oracle/validator security problem.
FREQUENTLY ASKLEARNED QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about why Interoperability as a Service (IaaS) will be the next major business model in blockchain.
Interoperability as a Service (IaaS) is a business model where protocols like LayerZero, Axelar, and Wormhole sell secure cross-chain communication as a commodity. It abstracts the complexity of building bridges, allowing developers to integrate multi-chain functionality with a few lines of code, similar to how AWS provides cloud infrastructure.
takeaways
INTEROPERABILITY AS A SERVICE
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
The next major business model won't be a protocol, but a foundational utility that abstracts away the complexity of cross-chain interaction.
01
The Problem: The Integration Tax
Every new chain requires a new integration, costing ~6-12 months of engineering time and creating fragmented liquidity and user experience. This is the primary bottleneck for multi-chain dApp scaling.
- Cost: $500K+ in dev resources per major integration
- Risk: Security surface expands with each custom bridge
- Result: Teams are chain-locked, missing out on $10B+ TVL across other ecosystems
6-12 mo
Dev Time
$500K+
Cost
02
The Solution: Universal Messaging Primitive
IaaS platforms like LayerZero, Axelar, and Wormhole provide a single integration point for generalized message passing. This turns interoperability from a product feature into a pay-per-use utility.
- Abstraction: Developers interact with one API, not N bridges
- Monetization: Revenue scales with cross-chain message volume, not token speculation
- Network Effect: The protocol with the most connected chains becomes the default standard
50+
Chains
~500ms
Latency
03
The Killer App: Intents and Solvers
IaaS enables the intent-based architecture pioneered by UniswapX and CowSwap. Users declare what they want, not how to do it. Solvers (like Across) compete across chains to fulfill it optimally.
- Efficiency: Solvers route to best liquidity, saving ~15-30% on slippage
- User Experience: Gasless, non-custodial, and chain-abstracted
- Market: Turns MEV into a service for users, creating a new solver network economy
15-30%
Slippage Saved
Gasless
UX
04
The Investment Thesis: Owning the Pipe
IaaS is a toll bridge business for the multi-chain future. Value accrues to the protocol that secures the most high-value transactions, not the smartest contract logic.
- Revenue Model: Fees on $100B+ annual cross-chain volume
- Moat: Security (audits, bug bounties) and chain coverage are defensible
- Valuation Driver: Recurring SaaS-like revenue from dApps, not speculative token flows
$100B+
Annual Volume
SaaS
Model
05
The Security Dilemma
Generalized messaging is a massive attack surface. IaaS providers must secure a system where a breach on one chain compromises all connected chains. This creates a winner-take-most security market.
- Risk: A single bug can lead to $1B+ cross-chain exploits
- Solution: Economic security via staking (Ethereum model) vs. light client/zk proofs (Cosmos IBC model)
- Outcome: Only 2-3 maximally secure IaaS providers will survive
$1B+
Risk Surface
2-3
Survivors
06
The Builders' Playbook
Forget building another bridge. The opportunity is in specialized applications atop IaaS primitives.
- Niche: Build cross-chain lending, derivatives, or identity that leverages existing IaaS security
- Strategy: Use LayerZero's OFT or CCIP for token transfers; build custom logic on top
- Outcome: Faster time-to-market, inheriting billions in economic security from the base layer
0
New Bridges
$B
Inherited Security
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall