Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
the-modular-blockchain-thesis-explained
Blog

Why Modular RPC Services Are the Unsung Heroes of Web3

The modular blockchain thesis creates a critical RPC bottleneck. Generalized endpoints fail under multi-chain load, forcing a new wave of specialized infrastructure from providers like Alchemy and Infura. This is the hidden battle for Web3's nervous system.

introduction
THE INFRASTRUCTURE LAYER

Introduction

Modular RPC services are the critical abstraction enabling scalable, reliable, and specialized blockchain access.

Modular RPC services abstract complexity from developers by managing node infrastructure, load balancing, and data indexing, allowing teams to focus on application logic instead of DevOps.

This specialization creates a performance arbitrage where services like Alchemy (Supernode) and QuickNode optimize for raw speed, while Blockdaemon and Ankr prioritize institutional-grade reliability and compliance.

The shift mirrors the API economy of Web2; just as AWS abstracted servers, modular RPCs abstract blockchain nodes, becoming the default entry point for 90% of new dApp traffic.

market-context
THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT

The Modular Load: From Monolith to Mosaic

Modular RPC services are the critical abstraction layer enabling scalable, reliable, and specialized blockchain access.

Monolithic RPCs are a systemic bottleneck. Early providers like Infura and Alchemy offered a single, generalized endpoint, creating a centralized point of failure and performance degradation for all applications.

Modular RPCs disaggregate the stack. Services like Chainstack, QuickNode, and NOWNodes separate data indexing, transaction simulation, and archival queries, allowing each layer to scale independently and optimize for specific use cases.

This creates a performance mosaic. A DeFi app uses a low-latency endpoint from QuickNode for swaps while a wallet uses a specialized indexer from The Graph for historical balances, distributing load across specialized providers.

Evidence: The 2022 Infura outage that crippled MetaMask and major dApps demonstrated the fragility of monolithic architecture, accelerating adoption of multi-provider, modular RPC strategies.

MODULAR RPC PROVIDERS

The RPC Bottleneck: A Performance Matrix

A quantitative comparison of RPC service architectures, highlighting why modular providers outperform legacy monoliths on critical performance and reliability metrics.

Performance Metric / FeatureLegacy Monolithic RPC (e.g., Infura, Alchemy)Modular RPC Service (e.g., Chainscore, BlastAPI, Gateway.fm)Self-Hosted Node

Global Latency (p95)

500ms

< 200ms

Varies (Depends on infra)

Request Success Rate

99.5%

99.95%

99.9% (if maintained)

Request Failover Time

30 sec

< 2 sec

Manual intervention

Cost per 1M Requests (ETH Mainnet)

$150-300

$50-120

$1,500+ (infra + devops)

Multi-Chain Support (10+ chains)

Real-time Metrics & Alerting

Custom Endpoint Routing

Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)

Hours

Minutes

Days

deep-dive
THE BOTTLENECK

Why Generalized RPCs Fail: The Technical Debt of Success

Monolithic RPC providers, the foundational layer for all dApp queries, are buckling under the weight of their own success, creating systemic risk.

Generalized RPCs are single points of failure. Providers like Alchemy and Infura operate massive, centralized endpoints that must handle every request type for every chain. This creates a performance ceiling where a single popular NFT mint can degrade service for all other applications on the network.

Technical debt manifests as latency and unreliability. The monolithic architecture forces a one-size-fits-all approach, making it impossible to optimize for specific use cases like real-time trading on Uniswap or high-frequency gaming on Immutable. The query complexity for a wallet balance is not the same as for historical logs, yet they compete for the same resources.

The cost of success is systemic fragility. As adoption grows, the load on these endpoints increases non-linearly. This creates a perverse incentive where the most critical infrastructure becomes the most likely to fail during peak demand, as seen in past outages during major DeFi events or NFT drops.

Evidence: During the peak of the 2021 bull run, generalized RPC latency often spiked above 2 seconds, causing failed transactions and arbitrage losses. This performance tax is a direct result of architectural limitations, not temporary congestion.

protocol-spotlight
MODULAR RPC SERVICES

The New Architects: Who's Building the Modular Stack

RPC endpoints are the silent, critical plumbing of Web3. The shift to modular blockchains has turned them from simple relays into complex, performance-critical infrastructure.

01

The Problem: Monolithic RPCs Can't Scale Modular Chains

A single RPC endpoint trying to serve data from an execution layer, a DA layer, and a settlement layer is a recipe for timeouts and missed transactions. This bottleneck directly impacts user experience and protocol reliability.

  • Latency Spikes: Querying multiple layers sequentially creates unpredictable delays, often exceeding 2-5 seconds.
  • State Inconsistency: Catching up with a fast-moving DA layer like Celestia or EigenDA requires constant, low-latency syncing that legacy providers can't guarantee.
2-5s
Query Latency
>10%
Error Rate
02

The Solution: Chainscore's Multi-Layer Orchestration

Chainscore treats each modular component as a first-class citizen, building a unified query engine that abstracts away the underlying complexity. This is the RPC equivalent of a high-performance API gateway for Web3.

  • Parallel Query Execution: Fetches data from execution, DA, and settlement layers concurrently, slashing latency to ~200-500ms.
  • Intelligent Caching: Proactively caches state from fast-moving DA layers to serve the most frequent queries instantly, reducing load and cost.
~200ms
P95 Latency
5x
Throughput
03

The Problem: RPC Downtime is Protocol Downtime

When your RPC provider goes down, your entire application goes down. For DeFi protocols like Uniswap or Aave, this means frozen liquidity and lost revenue. The reliability of your RPC is the reliability of your business.

  • Single Point of Failure: Traditional providers operate centralized clusters; a regional AWS outage can take your dApp offline.
  • No Performance SLAs: Free tiers offer no guarantees, forcing teams to over-provision expensive dedicated nodes for basic reliability.
99.9%
Typical SLA
$100K+/hr
Potential Loss
04

The Solution: Decentralized RPC Networks (e.g., Lava Network)

Projects like Lava Network are applying crypto-economic principles to RPC provisioning, creating a marketplace of node operators. This shifts the risk model from trust in a corporation to cryptoeconomic security.

  • Fault Tolerance: Requests are routed across a global network of independent providers; the failure of one has negligible impact.
  • Incentivized Performance: Providers are paid based on uptime and latency, aligning economic incentives with service quality.
>99.99%
Target Uptime
1000+
Global Nodes
05

The Problem: The Cost of Data Intensiveness

Modular chains, especially those with separate DA layers, generate exponentially more data to query. Paying for RPC calls that filter this massive data stream becomes a major and unpredictable OpEx for applications.

  • Opaque Pricing: Pay-per-request models create bill shock when user activity or data indexing needs spike.
  • Inefficient Queries: Applications pay to sift through bloated blockchain data they don't need due to a lack of query optimization.
$50K+/mo
Cost for Scale
10-100x
More Data
06

The Solution: Specialized Data Indexing & Subgraphs

The answer isn't just faster RPCs, but smarter data access layers. Services like The Graph and custom indexers pre-process on-chain data into efficient APIs, turning expensive raw calls into cheap, precise queries.

  • Predictable Pricing: Fixed-cost indexing eliminates variable RPC bill shock.
  • Application-Specific Schemas: DApps query exactly the data they need (e.g., "all Uniswap V3 swaps for pool X") without processing entire blocks.
-90%
Query Cost
<100ms
Response Time
risk-analysis
THE INFRASTRUCTURE BOTTLENECK

The Bear Case: Centralization, Cost, and Complexity

While L2s and appchains multiply, the foundational RPC layer remains a centralized, expensive, and fragile single point of failure.

01

The Problem: The RPC Monopoly

~70% of all Ethereum traffic flows through a handful of centralized RPC providers, creating systemic risk. This centralization is a direct result of the immense cost and operational complexity of running a global, high-performance node fleet.

  • Single Point of Censorship: A provider can blacklist addresses or transactions.
  • Cascading Failure Risk: An outage at a major provider can cripple dApps across chains.
  • Data Sovereignty Loss: User activity is funneled through corporate-controlled gateways.
~70%
Traffic Centralized
1-2
Major Outages/Year
02

The Solution: Decentralized RPC Networks (POKT, Lava)

Protocols like POKT Network and Lava Network unbundle RPC provisioning, creating a decentralized marketplace of node operators. This shifts the economic model from corporate SaaS to permissionless, incentivized infrastructure.

  • Censorship Resistance: Requests are distributed across a global, permissionless network of nodes.
  • Cost Efficiency: Competition drives prices toward marginal cost, reducing fees by ~50-80% for high-volume dApps.
  • Redundancy & Uptime: No single operator failure can take down the service, targeting >99.9% SLA.
>10k
Node Operators
-80%
Potential Cost
03

The Problem: The Multi-Chain RPC Sprawl

Every new L2 (Arbitrum, Optimism) and appchain (dYdX, Polygon CDK) forces developers to integrate and manage a new RPC endpoint. This creates exponential operational overhead and fragments user experience.

  • DevOps Nightmare: Managing uptime, load balancing, and failover for dozens of endpoints.
  • Latency Inconsistency: Users face variable performance depending on the chain and provider.
  • Wallet Integration Bloat: Wallets must maintain and update a growing list of RPC URLs.
50+
Active L2s/Appchains
100ms-2s
Latency Variance
04

The Solution: Universal RPC APIs (Gateway.fm, BlastAPI)

Services like Gateway.fm and BlastAPI provide a unified, high-performance API layer that abstracts away chain-specific endpoints. They act as intelligent routers, automatically directing requests to the optimal node.

  • Single Endpoint Simplicity: Developers integrate one API to access 50+ chains.
  • Intelligent Routing: Automatic failover and geo-optimized routing cut p95 latency by ~40%.
  • Enhanced Tooling: Bundled with analytics, webhooks, and dedicated infrastructure for enterprise-scale dApps.
1 API
For All Chains
-40%
P95 Latency
05

The Problem: The Data Access Premium

Advanced data queries (historical logs, trace calls, block receipts) are computationally expensive. Centralized providers either charge exorbitant premiums, severely rate-limit them, or don't offer them at all, stifling innovation in analytics and indexing.

  • Innovation Tax: Building a sophisticated on-chain dashboard or indexer becomes cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance Ceiling: Rate limits prevent real-time data processing for high-frequency dApps.
  • Vendor Lock-in: Proprietary APIs create dependency and hinder migration.
100x
Premium for Traces
10 req/s
Typical Rate Limit
06

The Solution: Specialized Data Layers (Goldsky, Nodies)

Infrastructure firms like Goldsky and Nodies are building vertically integrated data stacks that sit atop RPC layers. They provide real-time streams, enriched data, and high-performance historical queries as a service.

  • Real-Time Streams: Webhook and SSE feeds for instant event-driven logic, with sub-500ms latency.
  • Cost-Predictable Pricing: Move from unpredictable compute costs to fixed-fee data products.
  • Indexer-Grade Performance: Unlock capabilities previously reserved for teams running their own archive nodes.
<500ms
Event Latency
Fixed Fee
Pricing Model
future-outlook
THE INFRASTRUCTURE LAYER

The Invisible Standard: Predictions for the Next Stack

Modular RPC services are becoming the critical, hidden abstraction layer that determines application performance and user experience.

RPCs are the new CDN. Just as content delivery networks abstracted away server location for the web, modular RPC providers like Alchemy, Infura, and QuickNode abstract blockchain access. They manage node infrastructure, request routing, and data indexing, letting developers focus on application logic instead of devops.

Performance is the silent KPI. The battle for users is won on latency and reliability, not features. A 100ms RPC delay kills a wallet transaction. Services like Chainstack and BlastAPI compete on global edge networks and specialized endpoints, making them the unseen performance arbiters for dApps.

The bundling trend is inevitable. Standalone RPC is a commodity. The winning providers will bundle data indexing (The Graph), transaction simulation (Tenderly), and account abstraction (Biconomy) into a single API. This creates a unified developer surface that locks in ecosystems.

Evidence: Alchemy's Supernode handles over 430 billion compute units per day. This scale is impossible for individual teams to replicate, cementing RPCs as the non-negotiable infrastructure layer for scalable Web3.

takeaways
MODULAR RPC INFRASTRUCTURE

TL;DR: The CTO's Checklist

Your monolithic RPC endpoint is a single point of failure. Here's how to architect for performance, cost, and reliability.

01

The Monolith is a Liability

A single RPC provider creates a critical dependency and performance bottleneck. Downtime for them is downtime for you, and you're locked into their global latency and rate limits.\n- Single Point of Failure: Outages at providers like Infura/Alchemy have historically taken down major dApps.\n- Inflexible Performance: You can't optimize for specific chains or geographic regions.\n- Vendor Lock-in: Switching providers requires re-architecting your entire data layer.

100%
Dependency Risk
~2s
Worst-Case P99
02

Architect with Specialized Layers

Modular RPC stacks (e.g., Gateway.fm, Nodies, BlockPI) separate the data plane from the routing logic. Treat RPCs as a commodity and route requests based on chain, method, and latency.\n- Performance Tiering: Route eth_getLogs to a high-memory node and eth_call to a standard one.\n- Geographic Routing: Use nodes in-region for wallet interactions to slash latency to ~50ms.\n- Cost Optimization: Send archive data queries to the cheapest compliant provider.

-70%
Latency
-40%
Data Cost
03

Implement Intelligent Fallback & Load Balancing

Use a service mesh (e.g., Enclave, custom orchestration) to dynamically route traffic. Monitor node health and performance in real-time to avoid degraded endpoints.\n- Automatic Failover: If a primary node lags, traffic instantly shifts to a backup.\n- Load Distribution: Prevent rate limiting by spreading identical requests across multiple providers.\n- MEV-Aware Routing: For transactions, use RPCs with direct builder relationships to maximize inclusion.

99.99%
Uptime SLA
0ms
Failover Time
04

The Privacy & Compliance Layer

Monolithic providers see all your user traffic. Modular setups let you run private nodes for sensitive operations and comply with data sovereignty laws (e.g., GDPR).\n- Traffic Obfuscation: Mix requests across many endpoints to obscure user activity graphs.\n- Regulatory Compliance: Route EU user traffic through nodes physically located in the EU.\n- Enhanced Security: Isolate wallet-related RPC calls to a dedicated, hardened cluster.

0 Shared
User Graphs
GDPR
Ready
05

Cost Structure is Now Variable, Not Fixed

Shift from a flat, usage-agnostic monthly bill to a granular, pay-for-what-you-use model across multiple providers. This is the cloud cost optimization playbook applied to RPCs.\n- Spot Instances for RPC: Use cheaper, ephemeral nodes for bursty, non-critical traffic.\n- Negotiate Leverage: Pit providers against each other for specific chains or methods.\n- Predictable Scaling: Costs scale linearly with usage, not in expensive tier jumps.

-50%
OpEx
Per-Request
Billing
06

Future-Proof for Multi-Chain & Appchains

Your app will need to support new L2s, L3s, and app-specific rollups. A modular RPC layer abstracts chain complexity, letting you integrate new networks in hours, not weeks.\n- Unified API: Present a single endpoint to your devs; the router handles chain-specific quirks.\n- Rapid Integration: Add support for a new zkSync or Arbitrum Orbit chain by configuring a new node in the mesh.\n- Consistent Metrics: Get uniform performance and error logging across all supported chains.

1 Day
New Chain Onboarding
1 API
For All Chains
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Modular RPC Services: The Web3 Bottleneck & Solution | ChainScore Blog