Modularity multiplies MEV surfaces. Separating execution, settlement, and data availability creates new inter-layer arbitrage opportunities that monolithic chains like Solana or Ethereum L1 do not have. MEV migrates from block producers to cross-domain sequencers and bridge operators.
the-modular-blockchain-thesis-explained
Blog
Why Modular Blockchains Amplify MEV, Not Eliminate It
The modular thesis promises scalability through specialization. The unintended consequence is a geometric explosion in MEV surface area across rollups, bridges, and shared sequencers, creating a more complex and lucrative playground for searchers.
introduction
THE CORE CONTRADICTION
Introduction: The Modular Mirage
Modular blockchain design fragments execution but consolidates MEV extraction into new, systemic choke points.
Sequencers become centralized extractors. Rollup sequencers like those on Arbitrum and Optimism are the new MEV gatekeepers. They control transaction ordering across the entire L2, creating a single point of failure for maximal extractable value that is more concentrated than in Ethereum's permissionless mempool.
Cross-domain MEV is the new frontier. The latency between a transaction being finalized on a rollup and settled on Ethereum creates a predictable window for value extraction. Bridges like Across and Stargate are exploited for arbitrage between asset prices on different layers.
Evidence: Over 80% of Arbitrum and Optimism blocks are produced by a single sequencer, granting it unilateral MEV extraction rights across millions of user transactions, a centralization vector absent in Ethereum's base layer.
key-trends
WHY MODULARITY AMPLIFIES MEV
The Amplification Engine: Three Key Trends
Modular blockchains don't eliminate MEV; they restructure and amplify it across new layers, creating novel attack surfaces and extractive opportunities.
01
The Interchain Liquidity Problem
Sovereign rollups and app-chains fragment liquidity, creating a cross-domain arbitrage frontier. This amplifies MEV by turning every bridge and sequencer into a new extraction point.
- New Extractable Value: Opportunities between Celestia rollups, Arbitrum Orbit chains, and Cosmos app-chains.
- Latency Arms Race: Faster sequencer finality (~500ms) enables front-running across chains.
- Protocols at Risk: UniswapX, Across, and LayerZero users face complex, multi-domain sandwich attacks.
100+
New Domains
$10B+
At-Risk TVL
02
Sequencer as the New Miner
Centralized sequencers in rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) become single points of MEV extraction. Their exclusive right to order transactions is a privatized mempool.
- Opaque Ordering: No public mempool means no fair competition for block builders.
- Revenue Capture: Sequencers can internalize ~99% of cross-domain arbitrage value.
- Solution Trend: Shared sequencer networks like Espresso and Astria aim to commoditize this layer, but introduce new coordination MEV.
~99%
Value Capture
1
Central Point
03
Data Availability as an MEV Enabler
Cheap, external DA (Celestia, EigenDA) reduces costs for MEV extraction. Attackers can spam data-heavy transactions or exploit data withholding attacks to manipulate state.
- Cost Efficiency: ~100x cheaper blobspace lowers the capital barrier for complex MEV bots.
- Withholding Risk: Malicious sequencers can delay data publication to execute time-sensitive arbitrage.
- New Frontier: Proposer-Builder-Separation (PBS) for DA layers creates a secondary MEV market for data ordering rights.
~100x
Cheaper Blobs
New
PBS Frontier
deep-dive
THE MEV AMPLIFIER
Deep Dive: The Geometry of Fragmented Liquidity
Modular architectures fragment state and execution, creating new arbitrage surfaces that searchers exploit across domains.
Modularity creates arbitrage surfaces between execution layers like Arbitrum and Optimism. Searchers profit from price differences for the same asset across rollups, a problem monolithic chains like Solana do not have.
Cross-domain MEV is more complex and profitable than single-chain MEV. Transactions must be sequenced across multiple blocks and bridges like Across or LayerZero, creating a coordination game for searchers.
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) on Ethereum pushes complex MEV extraction to the builder level. This centralizes cross-chain MEV bundling, benefiting sophisticated actors like Flashbots who can coordinate across domains.
Intent-based architectures like UniswapX externalize routing complexity to solvers. This shifts, rather than eliminates, MEV; solvers now compete to capture the value of fragmented liquidity across all available venues.
ARCHITECTURAL RISK PROFILE
MEV Vector Analysis: Monolithic vs. Modular
Compares MEV attack surfaces and extractable value dynamics across blockchain execution models, highlighting how modular designs create new vectors.
| MEV Vector / Metric | Monolithic L1 (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) | Modular L2 (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) | Modular Rollup Stack (e.g., Celestia DA, EigenLayer AVS) |
|---|---|---|---|
Sequencer Centralization Risk | Low (Decentralized Validator Set) | High (Single Sequencer by default) | Extreme (Potential for Cartelization) |
Cross-Domain MEV Opportunity | Limited to single chain | High (L1->L2, L2->L2 via bridges) | Very High (Multi-rollup, Restaking cascades) |
Time-to-Finality for MEV | ~12-15 sec (Ethereum slot) | ~1-4 sec (to L1 inclusion) | Variable (DA layer latency + settlement delay) |
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) Viability | Proven (e.g., MEV-Boost) | Emerging (e.g., Espresso, Astria) | Fragmented (per-rollup PBS required) |
Liquidity Fragmentation for Arbitrage | Low (Unified liquidity pool) | High (Bridging delays create arb windows) | Extreme (Siloed liquidity across 1000s of rollups) |
Enshrined MEV Redistribution | Possible (e.g., EIP-1559 burn) | Rare (Sequencer captures most value) | None (Value leaks to external infra providers) |
Primary Attack Surface | Mempool & Consensus Layer | Sequencer & Bridge Contracts | DA Layer, Prover Network, Interop Layer |
counter-argument
THE NEW BOTTLENECK
Counter-Argument: But What About Shared Sequencers?
Shared sequencers like Espresso and Astria centralize MEV extraction at a new, system-critical layer.
Shared sequencers centralize MEV. They replace many rollup sequencers with a single, powerful auction house for transaction ordering, creating a new monopoly. This consolidates, rather than distributes, the economic power of block building.
The MEV supply chain elongates. Rollups outsource sequencing but must still post data. This inserts a new rent-seeking intermediary between users and finality, adding latency and cost layers for protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism.
Proposer-Builder-Separation (PBS) re-emerges. Shared sequencers become the canonical builders. Rollup validators, now just attestation committees, are forced to accept their blocks, replicating Ethereum's PBS dynamics with less decentralization.
Evidence: Espresso's partnership with Arbitrum and the $28M funding for Astria demonstrate capital is betting on this centralized bottleneck, not on its elimination.
takeaways
MODULAR MEV LANDSCAPE
Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Modularity doesn't erase MEV; it fragments and amplifies it across new layers, creating novel risks and opportunities.
01
The Sequencer Monopoly Problem
Rollups outsource block production to centralized sequencers, creating a single-point MEV extraction hub. This is the new miner extractable value.
- Key Risk: Centralized sequencers can front-run, censor, and reorder transactions for profit.
- Key Opportunity: Builders can compete for sequencer slots or develop shared sequencing layers like Astria and Espresso.
>90%
Sequencer Centralization
$100M+
Annual MEV Pool
02
Interchain MEV is the New Frontier
Sovereign rollups and app-chains fragment liquidity, turning cross-domain arbitrage into a primary MEV source. This is a multi-chain game.
- Key Risk: Latency races between Celestia-based rollups create toxic, unpredictable MEV.
- Key Opportunity: Build cross-chain MEV capture systems or intent-based solvers that route through UniswapX or Across.
~2s
Arb Window
50+
Active Rollups
03
Data Availability is a MEV Vector
Choosing a cheap, high-throughput DA layer like Celestia or EigenDA trades off censorship resistance for lower costs, enabling new MEV attacks.
- Key Risk: Sequencers can withhold transaction data, creating time-bandit attacks where old states are reorged for profit.
- Key Opportunity: Investors should back DA layers with strong economic security and builders must design for data withholding resistance.
100x
Cheaper DA
7 Days
Challenge Window
04
Build for the MEV-Aware Stack
The modular stack (Execution, Settlement, DA, Consensus) requires a new generation of MEV-aware infrastructure. Ignoring it is a critical vulnerability.
- Key Action: Builders must integrate MEV protection (e.g., SUAVE, encrypted mempools) natively into rollup clients.
- Key Action: Investors must evaluate teams on their MEV mitigation strategy, not just TPS and cost.
0
Native Protections
$1B+
Infra Market
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall