The Merge created a structural sink for ETH, permanently removing the asset from circulation via staking rewards and transaction fees burned by EIP-1559. This transforms ETH from an inflationary asset into a potentially deflationary one, contingent on network usage.
the-ethereum-roadmap-merge-surge-verge
Blog
Ethereum Staking and Long-Term ETH Supply
A data-driven analysis of how Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake has structurally altered its monetary policy, creating a path to net-negative supply growth as staking adoption accelerates.
introduction
THE NEW SCARCITY
Introduction
Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake has fundamentally altered ETH's monetary mechanics, creating a structural supply sink with profound long-term implications.
Long-term supply is now a function of validator growth, not a fixed issuance schedule. The staking ratio, currently ~25%, is the primary variable; a higher ratio increases issuance but also enhances network security and decentralization.
Liquid staking protocols like Lido and Rocket Pool abstract the technical complexity of staking, but concentrate validator power. Their dominance presents a centralization trade-off that the Ethereum community actively monitors through tools like Rated.Network.
Evidence: Since The Merge, over 1.5 million ETH has been net burned, and the total staked supply has grown to over 32 million ETH, locking ~$120B in economic security.
key-trends
ETH'S STRUCTURAL DEFICIT
Executive Summary: The Three-Pronged Squeeze
Ethereum's post-merge monetary policy is being reshaped by three powerful, compounding forces that are structurally reducing liquid ETH supply.
01
The Burn: EIP-1559's Permanent Deflation
Base fee burning creates a deflationary counter-pressure to issuance. High network activity turns ETH into a net yield-bearing commodity.\n- ~4.5M ETH burned since London hard fork.\n- Burn rate often exceeds issuance during bull market congestion.
4.5M+
ETH Burned
Net Deflation
When Gas > 15 Gwei
02
The Lock: The Rise of Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs)
Platforms like Lido, Rocket Pool, and EigenLayer lock ETH in staking contracts, creating a liquidity sink. LSTs like stETH satisfy DeFi yield demand without freeing the underlying asset.\n- >30% of supply now staked.\n- $40B+ TVL in LSTs and restaking protocols.
30%+
Supply Staked
$40B+
LST/Re-staking TVL
03
The Siphon: Institutional & ETF Demand
Spot ETH ETFs create a non-cyclical buy-side vacuum, removing ETH from circulating supply into custodial vaults. This mirrors Bitcoin's post-ETF trajectory but with a staking yield kicker.\n- BlackRock, Fidelity as permanent holders.\n- Staking yield provides institutional-grade cash flow.
Institutional
Demand Vector
Yield+Growth
Dual Asset Thesis
market-context
THE SUPPLY SHOCK
The New Monetary Base: From Miner Dumps to Staker Locks
Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake fundamentally altered its monetary policy by creating a permanent sink for ETH and reducing net issuance to near-zero.
Proof-of-Work was inflationary. Miners sold block rewards to cover hardware and energy costs, creating constant sell pressure on ETH. This dynamic suppressed price and diluted holders.
Proof-of-Stake is deflationary. Validators lock 32 ETH in the Beacon Chain, removing it from liquid circulation. This creates a permanent sink that grows with staking participation.
The Merge activated the triple halving. Post-merge, ETH issuance dropped ~90%. With EIP-1559's fee burn, net issuance is often negative, making ETH a net-deflationary asset.
Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) like Lido and Rocket Pool abstract staking complexity but concentrate systemic risk. They create a synthetic, yield-bearing asset (stETH, rETH) that becomes the new collateral base for DeFi.
The staking ratio is the new key metric. At ~25% today, it dictates monetary tightness. Higher ratios mean less liquid ETH, increasing its scarcity premium and volatility in DeFi lending markets like Aave.
ETH SUPPLY DYNAMICS
The Numbers Don't Lie: Issuance vs. Destruction
A quantitative breakdown of the primary forces influencing Ethereum's net supply: new issuance from staking rewards versus destruction from EIP-1559 burns.
| Metric / Scenario | Pre-Merge Ethereum (PoW) | Current Ethereum (PoS, No Burn) | Current Ethereum (PoS + EIP-1559) | Post-Dencun Ethereum (PoS + EIP-1559) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual Issuance Rate (ETH) | ~4.5% (Block + Uncle Rewards) | ~0.4% (Staking Rewards, 14M ETH Staked) | ~0.4% (Staking Rewards, 14M ETH Staked) | ~0.4% (Staking Rewards, 14M ETH Staked) |
Annual Burn Rate (ETH) | 0 | 0 | Variable (Network Activity) | Variable (Network Activity) |
Net Annual Supply Change (at 15 Gwei Base Fee) | +4.5% (Inflationary) | +0.4% (Mildly Inflationary) | -0.2% to -0.8% (Deflationary) | -0.4% to -1.5% (Deflationary) |
Break-Even Base Fee for Net Zero Issuance | N/A (Always Inflationary) | N/A (Always Inflationary) | ~15 Gwei | ~7 Gwei |
ETH Staked (Approx.) | 0 | 14,000,000 ETH | 14,000,000 ETH | 14,000,000 ETH |
Validator Annual Reward (Est.) | N/A | 3.2% APR | 3.2% APR | 3.2% APR |
Key Driver of Supply Change | Fixed Block Reward | Staking Rewards | Staking Rewards vs. EIP-1559 Burns | Staking Rewards vs. EIP-1559 Burns (Lower L2 Costs) |
Long-Term Supply Trajectory | Uncapped Inflation | Capped, Low Inflation | Deflationary Under Typical Use | Structurally More Deflationary |
deep-dive
THE SUPPLY SHOCK
The Staking Flywheel: Why 40% is the Tipping Point
Ethereum's transition to a yield-bearing asset creates a self-reinforcing scarcity loop that accelerates above a 40% staking ratio.
The staking flywheel is self-sustaining. Higher staking ratios directly reduce liquid ETH supply, increasing scarcity pressure. This scarcity, combined with the real yield from transaction fees, makes ETH a compelling capital asset. The flywheel accelerates as reduced sell pressure from stakers and new demand for yield compound.
40% is the network security tipping point. Below this, security is subsidized by inflation. Above it, fee revenue alone secures the chain, making ETH a pure productive asset. This transition mirrors a company moving from funding via equity dilution to generating operational profit.
Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) like Lido and Rocket Pool are the catalyst. They solve staking liquidity lock-up, enabling the flywheel to spin without sacrificing capital flexibility. The growth of LSTfi markets on EigenLayer and Pendle further monetizes staked positions, increasing yield attractiveness.
Evidence: Post-Merge ETH supply is deflationary during average demand. The net issuance curve turns negative when base fee burn outpaces new staking rewards, a state achieved more frequently as the staking ratio climbs. This structural shift permanently alters ETH's monetary properties.
risk-analysis
ETH STAKING & SUPPLY DYNAMICS
Counterpoints & Risks: Steelmanning the Bear Case
A critical examination of the structural risks and economic trade-offs embedded in Ethereum's post-Merge staking model.
01
The Security-Supply Inflation Dilemma
High staking yields require perpetual new ETH issuance, creating a long-term inflation tax. The protocol must balance attacker cost with holder dilution.\n- Key Risk 1: Sustainable yield >3-4% implies >0.5% annual supply growth, competing with mature asset classes.\n- Key Risk 2: If staking participation plateaus, the security budget (issuance * ETH price) becomes a function of volatile market cap.
>0.5%
Annual Inflation
$30B+
Annual Issuance Value
02
Liquid Staking Centralization (The Lido Problem)
Lido commands ~30% of all staked ETH, creating a systemic consensus-layer risk. The 'market decides' governance has failed to decentralize.\n- Key Risk 1: A dominant LST like stETH becomes a de facto settlement asset, replicating the very centralization Ethereum avoids.\n- Key Risk 2: Protocol-level mitigations (e.g., EigenLayer's operator set) may simply shift, not solve, the trust bottleneck.
~30%
Lido Share
1-of-3
Blocks Censored
03
The Illiquidity & Slashing Trap
The 32 ETH minimum and unbonding period create capital inefficiency and asymmetric risk for solo stakers, favoring large pools.\n- Key Risk 1: A correlated slashing event (e.g., client bug) could wipe out >$1B in value simultaneously, triggering a deflationary spiral.\n- Key Risk 2: Staked ETH is not a productive loan collateral, locking ~25% of supply in a low-velocity asset.
~$11k
Min. Stake Cost
~25%
Supply Locked
04
Validator Queue as a Macro Shock Absorber
The entry/exit queue (currently ~0.1% churn limit) prevents rapid stake flight but also traps capital during a crisis. It's a circuit breaker, not a solution.\n- Key Risk 1: In a 'run on the beacon chain' scenario, the queue stretches to months, preventing liquidity and exacerbating panic.\n- Key Risk 2: It creates a perverse incentive to pre-emptively exit during uncertainty, guaranteeing a spot in line.
~45 days
Max Exit Time
0.1%
Daily Churn
05
Yield Compression & The Alt-L1 Drain
As staking APR falls towards ~2-3%, Ethereum competes directly with Treasury yields. High-gas L2s may siphon economic activity.\n- Key Risk 1: Real yield turns negative if network usage (fee burn) declines, making ETH a purely speculative security asset.\n- Key Risk 2: Viable staking alternatives (Rocket Pool's rETH, Coinbase's cbETH) fragment liquidity and governance influence.
~3%
Base APR
>5
Major LSTs
06
The Regulatory Attack Surface
Staking-as-a-Service providers (Coinbase, Kraken, Lido DAO) are clear targets for SEC enforcement. A crackdown could force massive, disorderly unstaking.\n- Key Risk 1: The Howey Test may apply to pooled staking rewards, threatening the $50B+ LST market.\n- Key Risk 2: Geographic fragmentation of validators (e.g., US sanctions) could balkanize network consensus.
$50B+
LST Market Risk
>40%
US-Based Validators
future-outlook
THE SUPPLY SHOCK
The 2025 Outlook: Scarcity as a Network Feature
Ethereum's transition to a yield-bearing asset with a capped issuance rate fundamentally redefines its monetary policy and network security.
Net-negative ETH issuance is the new baseline. Post-Merge, Ethereum's annual issuance dropped ~90%. With over 32 million ETH staked, the burn from EIP-1559 consistently exceeds new issuance, creating a deflationary pressure that hard-caps the total supply.
Staking is not selling pressure. Unlike traditional Proof-of-Work mining, staking rewards are non-dilutive for non-stakers and do not create mandatory sell pressure. This transforms ETH from a commodity for block production into a capital asset generating yield.
The Lido dominance problem creates systemic risk. Lido controls ~30% of staked ETH, approaching levels that could challenge network decentralization. This centralization risk is the primary argument for native restaking protocols like EigenLayer to distribute trust.
Evidence: The current staking ratio is ~26%. At 40-50%, annual net deflation could reach 1-2%, making ETH a structurally scarcer asset than Bitcoin post-2040.
takeaways
ETH SUPPLY DYNAMICS
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake fundamentally altered its monetary policy and security model. Architects must design for a new reality of yield-bearing, deflationary collateral.
01
The Triple Halving: EIP-1559 & The Merge
Ethereum's net issuance flipped from ~4% annual inflation to potential deflation. The burn mechanism from EIP-1559, combined with ~0.4% validator issuance, creates a dynamic monetary policy.
- Net Issuance: Can range from -1% to +0.5% annually, depending on network activity.
- Security Budget: Staking yield now funds security, replacing miner extractable value (MEV).
- Design Implication: Protocols must model fee volatility and treat ETH as a yield-generating, deflationary base asset.
-1% to +0.5%
Net Issuance
~3.5M
ETH Burned
02
The LST Hydra: Centralization vs. Composability
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) like Lido's stETH, Rocket Pool's rETH, and Coinbase's cbETH have created a $40B+ derivative market. They solve capital efficiency but introduce systemic risk.
- Centralization Risk: Top 3 LSTs control >70% of staked ETH.
- Composability Benefit: LSTs are the bedrock for DeFi collateral, money markets (Aave, Maker), and restaking primitives.
- Architect's Choice: Integrate multiple LSTs for resilience or build on decentralized alternatives like Rocket Pool.
$40B+
LST TVL
>70%
Top 3 Share
03
Restaking: The New Security Primitive
EigenLayer enables staked ETH to be re-staked to secure other protocols (AVSs), creating a marketplace for pooled security. This unlocks new yield but creates slashing cascade risk.
- Capital Efficiency: ETH collateral earns base staking yield + AVS rewards.
- Risk Stacking: Validators face slashing conditions from multiple sources (Ethereum + AVSs).
- Design Mandate: Protocols using restaked security must have crisp, auditable slashing conditions to avoid systemic failure.
$15B+
Restaked TVL
2x+
Yield Potential
04
Validator Queue: The Scaling Bottleneck
The churn limit caps new validators at ~1,800 per day (~57.6k ETH). This creates a ~30-day queue during high inflow, delaying stake activation and exit.
- Throughput Limit: ~0.5% max weekly growth in staked ETH.
- Liquidity Impact: Exiting validators face the same queue, hindering rapid unstaking during crises.
- System Design: Protocols requiring large, rapid ETH deposits/withdrawals (e.g., LST mints, redemptions) must build asynchronous liquidity layers.
~30 days
Queue Delay
0.5%
Weekly Growth Cap
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall