Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
the-ethereum-roadmap-merge-surge-verge
Blog

EIP-4844’s Impact on Ethereum Block Composition

EIP-4844 introduces blob-carrying transactions, creating a parallel data market. This analysis breaks down the new block structure, its economic incentives for L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism, and the long-term implications for Ethereum's block space.

introduction
THE DATA

The Blob is the New Block

EIP-4844 re-architects Ethereum's block composition by introducing a dedicated data channel for L2s, separating execution from data availability.

Blobs decouple execution from data. EIP-4844 introduces a new transaction type that carries large, ephemeral data packets called blobs. These are stored separately from the main execution payload for ~18 days, creating a dedicated lane for L2 data availability that avoids competing with regular transactions for block space.

The blob market is a fee market. Blobs have a separate gas fee (blob gas) that targets 3 blobs per block. This creates a distinct pricing mechanism for rollup data, insulating L1 users from L2 posting costs and allowing protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism to manage expenses predictably.

Blobs are ephemeral, not permanent. Unlike calldata, nodes prune blob data after ~18 days. This is the core efficiency gain, reducing long-term storage burden while providing a sufficient data availability window for fraud proofs and data sampling, a model adopted by Celestia and EigenDA.

Evidence: Post-Dencun, average transaction fees on major L2s like Arbitrum and Base fell by over 90%, demonstrating the immediate impact of cheaper data availability on end-user costs.

market-context
THE BLOCK SPACE ECONOMY

The Pre-Blob Bottleneck: L2s as Execution Tenants

Before EIP-4844, L2s competed directly with L1 users for scarce and expensive call data, creating a structural bottleneck for scaling.

L2s were data tenants. They paid rent by posting compressed transaction data to Ethereum's call data. This was their only method to prove state validity and enable secure withdrawals.

Call data was scarce real estate. Every L2 transaction bid against Uniswap swaps and NFT mints for the same 80KB per block. This created volatile, often prohibitive, costs for Arbitrum and Optimism.

The bottleneck was economic, not technical. L2s could process thousands of TPS internally, but their data publication rate was throttled by L1 gas auctions. This limited finality and user cost predictability.

Evidence: In 2023, L2 call data costs frequently spiked above 90% of their total operating expenses, making scaling a direct function of Ethereum's volatile gas market.

DATA AVAILABILITY LAYER EVOLUTION

Block Anatomy: Pre vs. Post EIP-4844

A quantitative comparison of Ethereum block structure before and after the Dencun upgrade, focusing on the introduction of blob-carrying transactions for rollup data.

Block ComponentPre-EIP-4844 (Calldata Era)Post-EIP-4844 (Blob Era)Key Implication

Primary Data Carrier for L2s

Execution Layer Calldata

Blob-Carrying Transactions

Decouples L2 data from execution gas market

Data Storage Duration

Permanent (on-chain forever)

~18 Days (pruned after EIP-4444)

Reduces historical node storage burden

Target Data Per Block

~90 KB (gas-limited, variable)

~375 KB (3 blobs * 125 KB each)

~4.2x increase in dedicated L2 data bandwidth

Cost Unit & Market

Gas (Competes with EVM ops)

Blob Gas (Separate EIP-1559-style fee market)

Predictable, stable pricing for rollups

Base Fee Adjustment Speed

Every Block (rapid)

Every Block (rapid, independent curve)

Prevents sustained blob fee spikes

Inclusion List Priority

Gas Priority Fee (tip)

Blob Fee + Priority Fee

Validators earn from two independent fee markets

Client Data Handling

Full execution & historical storage

Temporary blob storage, then pruning

Enables statelessness & lighter nodes

Key Supporting Infrastructure

EVM, Core Devs

Beacon Node, Consensus Layer, Blob Sidecars

Architectural shift towards modular design

deep-dive
THE DATA LAYER

Mechanics & Incentives: The Blob Lifecycle

EIP-4844 introduces a dedicated data channel for rollups, fundamentally restructuring block composition and economic incentives.

Blobs are sidecars, not payloads. EIP-4844 separates data from execution by attaching 128KB data blobs to blocks. This design creates a separate fee market for data, preventing L2 transaction spikes from congesting Ethereum's core execution layer.

Data availability is the new bottleneck. Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism compete for blob space, not gas. Their cost is now a function of blob supply and demand, decoupled from the volatile base fee for EVM computation.

Blob gas is ephemeral. Nodes prune blob data after ~18 days, a pruning mechanism that enforces the protocol's intent: blobs are for short-term data availability proofs, not permanent storage. This is enforced by clients like Geth and Erigon.

Evidence: Post-EIP-4844, L2 transaction costs dropped by over 90% for protocols like Base and zkSync, as they shifted from calldata to this cheaper, dedicated data lane.

risk-analysis
EIP-4844 BLOCK COMPOSITION

The New Attack Surfaces & Bear Cases

Blobs shift the economic and security model of block building, creating new MEV vectors and centralization pressures.

01

The Blob Fee Market: A New MEV Battleground

Blob space is a separate, volatile resource. Builders must now optimize for two fee markets (gas + blobs), creating complex arbitrage. This favors sophisticated, vertically-integrated players like Flashbots and Jito Labs who can extract value from both layers simultaneously.\n- New Auction: Blob inclusion becomes a priority gas auction (PGA) target.\n- Builder Edge: Algorithms that predict blob demand gain a significant advantage.\n- User Impact: L2 posting costs become unpredictable, breaking the 'cheap data' promise during congestion.

2x
Markets to Game
Volatile
L2 Cost Basis
02

Builder Centralization via Data Censorship

Blobs are only guaranteed for ~18 days. A malicious or compliant builder could selectively exclude or delay specific L2's blobs, effectively performing a time-delay censorship attack. Entities like OFAC-compliant builders or a dominant player like Blocknative could stifle specific applications.\n- Attack Vector: Target an L2 like Base or Arbitrum by ignoring its blobs.\n- PBS Weakness: Proposer-Builder Separation fails if all major builders collude or are coerced.\n- Long-Term Risk: Undermines credible neutrality for rollups.

18 Days
Censorship Window
Single Point
Builder Failure
03

The Data Layer Re-Centralization

EIP-4844 assumes a robust, decentralized peer-to-peer blob data network. In practice, initial implementations rely on a few centralized blob relayers and block builders. This recreates the infra centralization seen in Flashbots' relay, creating a bottleneck. If EigenLayer operators become the primary blob storers, it compounds systemic risk.\n- Relay Risk: Blob data availability depends on a handful of nodes.\n- EigenLayer Tie-In: Restaking collateral could be slashed for data withholding, creating new attack vectors.\n- Contradiction: A design for decentralization may initially increase it.

Handful
Critical Relayers
New Slashing
AVS Risk
04

L2 Economic Model Fragility

Rollups like Optimism and zkSync budget for blob costs. A sustained spike in blob prices—driven by a meme coin frenzy on a competing L2 or a spam attack—can bankrupt their sequencers or force unsustainable fee increases onto users. This creates cross-chain economic attacks.\n- Budget Breakage: Fixed revenue models can't absorb volatile data costs.\n- Spam Vector: Attack one L2 by spamming blobs to inflate costs for all.\n- Solution?: Requires complex hedging or over-collateralization, hurting capital efficiency.

Spike Risk
Cost Attack
Chain-to-Chain
Attack Surface
future-outlook
THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT

The Path to Full Danksharding: Blobs as a Trojan Horse

EIP-4844's blob-carrying transactions are a production-hardened testnet for the core data structures of full Danksharding.

Blobs are a production testnet. They introduce the binary large object (blob) format and KZG polynomial commitments that full Danksharding requires, but with a temporary, limited capacity. This allows core clients like Geth and Erigon to validate the new data path in a live environment.

The fee market is the real innovation. Blobs create a separate fee market from standard gas, decoupling execution from data availability costs. This directly tests the proposer-builder separation (PBS) economics that will govern data availability under full Danksharding.

Rollups are the immediate beneficiaries. Layer-2s like Arbitrum and Optimism now post data as cheap blobs instead of expensive calldata, slashing fees by ~90%. This validates the data availability sampling (DAS) demand model for future shards.

Evidence: Post-EIP-4844, Base's average transaction fee dropped from $0.31 to $0.003. This proves the data cost decoupling works and provides a live dataset for future shard bandwidth planning.

takeaways
EIP-4844 BLOCK IMPACT

TL;DR for Builders

Proto-Danksharding fundamentally changes block space economics by introducing a new, low-cost data channel.

01

The Problem: L2s Are Drowning in Data Costs

Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism spend >90% of operational costs on calldata, a massive bottleneck for scaling and fee reduction.

  • Cost Ceiling: L2 fees are anchored to expensive L1 gas prices.
  • Throughput Limit: Data availability is the primary constraint for L2 TPS.
>90%
L2 Cost
~$1M/day
Historical Spend
02

The Solution: Blobs as a Separate Auction

EIP-4844 introduces blob-carrying transactions with a dedicated fee market, decoupling L2 data costs from mainnet execution congestion.

  • Independent Pricing: Blob gas is priced via a target-per-block mechanism, separate from EIP-1559 for gas.
  • Ephemeral Storage: Blobs are pruned after ~18 days, aligning with rollup fraud/validity proof windows.
~0.1-0.3 ETH
Target per Block
~18 days
Data Retention
03

The Result: 10-100x Cheaper L2 Data

Blobs create a massive, predictable discount for data availability, enabling new L2 economic models and application categories.

  • Fee Predictability: L2s can offer stable, ultra-low fees.
  • New Primitives: Enables cost-effective on-chain video, gaming states, and large-scale data attestations.
10-100x
Cost Reduction
$0.001-0.01
Target Tx Cost
04

The Caveat: Blob Supply is Limited & Volatile

Initial blob capacity is ~0.375 MB per block (~3 blobs). Demand spikes from protocols like EigenLayer and high-volume L2s will create a new volatile market.

  • Early Scarcity: Initial throughput is a fraction of eventual Danksharding vision.
  • New Fee Market: Builders must monitor and bid for blob space, not just gas.
~3
Blobs/Block (v1)
0.375 MB
Target Capacity
05

The Infrastructure Shift: New Client & Node Requirements

Full nodes must now handle blob sidecars via the Deneb consensus upgrade. This requires updated execution/consensus client pairs (e.g., Geth/Lighthouse).

  • Bandwidth Spike: ~2.5 MB/min extra data bandwidth.
  • Storage Churn: Nodes manage temporary blob data, not permanent history.
~2.5 MB/min
Extra Bandwidth
Prysm/Lodestar
Client Updates
06

The Next Frontier: Full Danksharding & Data Availability Sampling

EIP-4844 is a proto-shard. Full Danksharding will scale to ~1.3 MB per slot using data availability sampling (DAS) and KZG commitments.

  • Path to Scaling: Enables 64 blobs/block, unlocking ~100k TPS across L2s.
  • Trustless Light Clients: DAS allows phones to verify data availability.
64
Future Blobs/Block
~1.3 MB/slot
Target Throughput
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected direct pipeline
EIP-4844: How Blobs Reshape Ethereum Block Composition | ChainScore Blog