The execution layer is commoditized. Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism now handle transaction processing, forcing backend logic to migrate to smart contracts and specialized co-processors like Risc Zero.
the-ethereum-roadmap-merge-surge-verge
Blog
What Ethereum Upgrades Mean for Backend Systems
A technical analysis of how Ethereum's post-Merge roadmap (Surge, Verge) forces a fundamental re-architecture of indexing, RPC services, and node infrastructure. This is an ops team's guide to the coming complexity.
introduction
THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT
Introduction
Ethereum's core upgrades are redefining the role and architecture of backend systems.
Data availability is the new bottleneck. Systems must now design for blob storage on Celestia or EigenDA, not just database writes, fundamentally changing data pipeline architecture.
State growth dictates system cost. The verkle tree transition enables stateless clients, shifting the validation burden from your servers to the protocol's proving layer.
thesis-statement
THE DATA
The Core Argument: Data Architectures Must Fracture
Ethereum's scaling upgrades will force monolithic backend systems to decompose into specialized, modular data pipelines.
Monolithic backends will fail under the data load from Ethereum's scaling roadmap. The monolithic model of a single database processing all on-chain data cannot scale to handle the throughput from rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism, which already process millions of transactions daily.
Data access patterns are diverging between execution and consensus. The needs of a high-frequency DEX bot querying recent blocks via Alchemy differ fundamentally from an analytics dashboard performing historical analysis via The Graph or Dune. A single architecture cannot serve both optimally.
Specialized data pipelines will emerge for each use case. Expect dedicated systems for real-time mempool streaming (e.g., Blocknative), low-latency finality proofs (e.g., Succinct), and compressed historical archives (e.g., Google's BigQuery datasets). This is the fracturing of the data layer.
Evidence: The cost of indexing the entire Ethereum chain on a single node has grown exponentially, while applications like Uniswap only require access to a fraction of that data. This inefficiency is the core driver for modular data architectures.
key-trends
WHAT ETHEREUM UPGRADES MEAN FOR BACKEND SYSTEMS
The Three Backend Pressure Points
Ethereum's core upgrades are shifting the fundamental constraints for application developers, forcing a re-architecture of backend logic, data pipelines, and security models.
01
The Problem: State Growth is a DoS Vector
The Ethereum state (account balances, contract storage) grows by ~50 GB/year. Synchronizing this for a new node takes weeks. For backends, this makes running a full node for real-time data prohibitively expensive and slow, pushing reliance on centralized RPC providers like Infura and Alchemy, which creates a single point of failure and censorship risk.
~50 GB/year
State Growth
Weeks
Sync Time
02
The Solution: Verifiable Light Clients & The Portal Network
Post-Dencun, light clients can verify data using cryptographic proofs instead of trusting a server. The Portal Network (e.g., Erigon, Trinand) aims to distribute state access. Backends can now query specific data with ~1 MB proofs instead of storing terabytes, enabling decentralized, trust-minimized data feeds and reducing infrastructure costs by ~70%.
~1 MB
Proof Size
-70%
Infra Cost
03
The Problem: MEV is a Backend Tax
Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is a $500M+ annual tax on users, arbitraged by sophisticated bots. For backend systems managing user transactions, this manifests as unpredictable fees, failed transactions, and front-running. It breaks the assumption of a simple, predictable mempool, forcing backends to become MEV-aware.
$500M+
Annual Extract
~15%
Failed TXs
04
The Solution: SUAVE & Intent-Based Architectures
Protocols like SUAVE aim to decentralize block building. For backends, the shift is to intent-based systems (e.g., UniswapX, CowSwap, Across) where users submit desired outcomes, not transactions. This moves MEV competition off-chain, returning predictable execution and better prices to users, while backends integrate with solvers and order flow auctions.
Predictable
Execution
Better Prices
For Users
05
The Problem: Monolithic Execution is a Bottleneck
All Ethereum transactions compete for the same ~12-15 million gas/block. This creates volatile, spiking fees and limits throughput to ~15-30 TPS. Backends for high-frequency applications (gaming, DeFi) cannot guarantee low-latency, low-cost interactions, forcing them onto centralized sidechains or L2s with fragmented liquidity and security.
~15-30
TPS Limit
Volatile
Fee Market
06
The Solution: Rollups as Your Dedicated Backend
Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync) provide dedicated, scalable execution layers. For backend architects, this means deploying application-specific chains or settling in high-throughput environments. With EIP-4844 blob storage, data availability costs are ~100x cheaper, making L2s the new default backend for any serious application, offering ~2s finality and <$0.01 fees.
<$0.01
Avg. Fee
~2s
Finality
ETHEREUM'S EXECUTION LAYER EVOLUTION
The Backend Upgrade Matrix: From Merge to Verge
A technical comparison of core backend system requirements and capabilities across Ethereum's major protocol upgrades.
| Backend System Impact | Post-Merge (Proof-of-Stake) | Post-Danksharding (Proto-Danksharding) | Post-Verge (Verkle Trees) |
|---|---|---|---|
Consensus Finality Time | 6.4 minutes (32 slots) | 6.4 minutes (32 slots) | 6.4 minutes (32 slots) |
State Growth Management | Historical EIPs (EIP-4444 planned) | Blob Storage (EIP-4844) for L2s | Stateless Clients via Verkle Proofs |
Client Sync Time (Full Archive) | ~2 weeks | ~2 weeks | < 1 hour (stateless verification) |
RPC Node Hardware (RAM) |
|
| ~2 GB (stateless) |
Data Availability Layer | Execution Layer calldata | Separate Blob Sidecar (125 KB/slot) | Separate Blob Sidecar + Potential DAS |
Witness Proof Size (for State) | ~1-10 MB (Merkle-Patricia) | ~1-10 MB (Merkle-Patricia) | < 1 KB (Verkle) |
Backward Compatibility Break | |||
Primary Scaling Vector | L2 Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism) | L2 Rollups w/ Cheap Blobs | Massive Node Decentralization |
deep-dive
THE BACKEND REBUILD
The New Stack: Surviving the Surge and Verge
Ethereum's scaling roadmap forces a fundamental re-architecture of backend systems, moving from simple RPC calls to complex, multi-chain state management.
The RPC endpoint dies. The Surge's multi-client, multi-layer future fragments state across L2s like Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync. Backends must now query a portfolio of chains, not a single source, requiring new infrastructure like Chainstack's multi-RPC or Alchemy's Supernode to manage latency and reliability.
State expiry changes everything. The Verge's statelessness and history expiry via EIP-4444 shift the data availability burden. Systems relying on historical queries must integrate with The Graph for indexing or EigenLayer AVSs for archival services, as full nodes no longer store the entire chain.
Execution becomes asynchronous. Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV finality delays mean transaction outcomes are probabilistic for longer. Backends must adopt Flashbots Protect RPC or build with SUAVE to manage this uncertainty and avoid front-running.
Evidence: Post-Dencun, L2 transaction costs dropped 90%, but the median time for a cross-L2 state proof via Across or LayerZero increased by 40ms, highlighting the new latency-for-cost trade-off architects must optimize.
risk-analysis
ETHEREUM UPGRADES
The Bear Case: What Breaks in Production
The transition to a modular, rollup-centric roadmap introduces new failure modes for backend systems built for a monolithic chain.
01
The MEV-Agnostic Indexer
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV-Boost fragment the canonical transaction lifecycle. Your indexer's mempool watcher is now blind to ~90% of final block content, which arrives via private channels. Real-time state tracking breaks.
- Problem: Missed critical txs from Flashbots, bloXroute, etc.
- Solution: Multi-source ingestion from PBS relays and a post-block reconciliation layer.
~90%
Blind Spot
12s
New Latency Floor
02
The State Growth Time Bomb
Verkle Trees and Stateless Clients shift the burden of state proof generation. Your archive node's 10TB+ storage is now a liability, not an asset. The new bottleneck is witness generation speed for light clients, breaking current RPC provider models.
- Problem: RPC endpoints fail under witness generation load.
- Solution: Re-architect for stateless verification and specialized witness servers, akin to Erigon's new path.
10TB+
Legacy Bloat
1000x
Proof Throughput Needed
03
Cross-Rollup Finality Chaos
With EIP-4844 blobs and dozens of L2s, "Ethereum finality" is no longer a single event. Your settlement layer assumption is shattered. A zkRollup proves in 10 minutes, an Optimistic Rollup challenges for 7 days. Atomic cross-rollup logic fails.
- Problem: Inconsistent finality across Arbitrum, zkSync, Base breaks atomic composability.
- Solution: Implement a finality gradient dashboard and use shared sequencing layers like Espresso or Astria for coordinated execution.
10min vs 7d
Finality Range
50+
Settlement States
04
Gas Estimation Goes Non-Linear
Multi-dimensional gas (EIP-4844 blob fee, execution fee, priority fee) and PBS create a chaotic pricing surface. Your simple eth_gasPrice call becomes useless, causing rampant transaction underpricing and stuck tx.
- Problem: ~30% of user tx fail or delay due to bad estimates post-upgrade.
- Solution: Integrate MEV-aware estimators (e.g., Blocknative's Adaptor) and model blob gas as a separate, volatile market.
3 Markets
Gas Dimensions
~30%
Estimate Failure Rate
future-outlook
THE POST-EIP-4844 REALITY
The 2025 Backend Stack: Predictions
Ethereum's core upgrades will shift backend architecture from monolithic L1 reliance to a modular, specialized data layer.
Ethereum becomes the settlement layer. The merge and EIP-4844 shift execution and data availability off-chain. Your backend's primary L1 interaction will be for finality proofs and high-value settlements, not daily transactions.
Rollups dictate your data stack. You will choose your backend's data availability (DA) layer: Celestia for sovereign chains, EigenDA for high-throughput, or Ethereum for maximum security. This choice determines your cost and scalability profile.
Provers are the new servers. Zero-knowledge proof systems like Risc Zero and zkSync's Boojum become critical infrastructure. Your backend must generate or verify validity proofs, making computational integrity a core service.
Evidence: After EIP-4844, Starknet's transaction costs dropped 99%, proving that dedicated data layers are non-negotiable for scaling. Your 2025 stack is a bundle of these specialized components.
takeaways
ETHEREUM'S INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT
TL;DR for the CTO
The Merge, Dencun, and the coming Verkle trees are not just consensus changes; they're a full-stack mandate for backend systems.
01
The Problem: Post-Merge MEV is a Backend Tax
Proof-of-Stake and PBS (Proposer-Builder Separation) turned MEV extraction into a formalized, high-frequency backend process. Your users' transactions are being reordered and sandwiched before they even hit a block.
- Key Impact: Unpredictable finalization and front-running directly degrade your app's UX.
- Key Action: Integrate with Flashbots Protect RPC, CowSwap's CoW Protocol, or private mempools to shield users.
$1B+
Annual MEV
~500ms
Arb Window
02
The Solution: Dencun's Blobs Kill L2 Data Costs
EIP-4844 (proto-danksharding) introduces data blobs, making L2 settlement data ~100x cheaper than calldata. This fundamentally changes your L2 and data availability calculus.
- Key Impact: Arbitrum, Optimism, Base transaction fees drop to < $0.01. Rollups become the default backend scaling layer.
- Key Action: Re-architect state management. Move high-throughput logic to an L2; use Ethereum L1 for final settlement only.
~100x
Cheaper Data
< $0.01
Target Tx Cost
03
The Future: Statelessness & Verkle Trees
The next major upgrade replaces Merkle Patricia Tries with Verkle Trees, enabling stateless clients. Validators no longer need the full state to verify blocks.
- Key Impact: Node hardware requirements plummet, enabling ~10x more participation. Light clients become first-class citizens.
- Key Action: Prepare for a new RPC landscape. Services like Infura, Alchemy will shift; plan for lightweight, verifiable state proofs in your backend services.
~10x
Node Scalability
TB->GB
State Burden
04
The New Stack: Modular Execution & Specialization
Ethereum is becoming a modular settlement and DA layer. Execution is shifting to rollups (OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, zkSync) and specialized chains (Monad, Fuel).
- Key Impact: Your backend is now multi-chain by default. Interoperability via EigenLayer, AltLayer, and intents via UniswapX, Across is critical.
- Key Action: Adopt a cross-chain messaging standard (CCIP, LayerZero, Wormhole) and abstract gas across chains with account abstraction (ERC-4337).
50+
Active L2/L3s
$30B+
L2 TVL
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall