Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
the-ethereum-roadmap-merge-surge-verge
Blog

PBS Changes Who Controls Ethereum Blocks

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is not just a technical upgrade; it's a political and economic re-architecting of Ethereum. It decouples block proposal from construction, shifting power, risks, and rewards to a new class of specialized actors. This analysis breaks down the winners, losers, and the new attack vectors in a post-PBS world.

introduction
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT

Introduction: The Quiet Coup in Block Production

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) fundamentally re-architects the block production supply chain, decoupling block proposal from block building.

PBS is a supply chain split that separates the role of the block proposer (validator) from the block builder (specialized searcher). This creates a competitive market for block space, moving control from individual validators to a network of builders like Flashbots SUAVE and Titan Builder.

The validator's role is simplified to selecting the most profitable block header. This eliminates their need for complex MEV extraction tooling, reducing centralization pressure and validator operational risk compared to the pre-PBS era.

Builders now control block content, assembling transactions from users and searchers to maximize fees. This professionalizes MEV capture, shifting the competitive edge from staking scale to computational and algorithmic sophistication.

Evidence: Post-merge, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by a handful of professional builders. This concentration demonstrates the efficiency gains but introduces new centralization vectors in the builder layer.

deep-dive
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT

The Builder's Dilemma: Centralization vs. Efficiency

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block proposal from construction, fundamentally altering who controls Ethereum's transaction ordering and value flow.

PBS is a power transfer from validators to specialized block builders. Validators propose empty slots, while builders compete to fill them with the most profitable transaction bundles. This creates a new market for block space where builders like Flashbots, bloXroute, and Titan act as centralized, high-frequency trading desks for MEV.

Centralization is the explicit trade-off for efficiency. PBS optimizes for maximal extractable value (MEV) capture, which requires sophisticated algorithms and private mempools. This concentrates power in a few professional builders, a necessary evil to prevent a worse outcome: validator-level centralization from DIY MEV extraction.

The control point shifts from who proposes to who builds. Builders decide transaction inclusion and ordering, controlling the censorship resistance and fee markets. Without PBS-enforcing protocols like mev-boost, validators would capture this power directly, creating stronger incentives for centralization.

Evidence: Post-Merge, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by just five entities via mev-boost. This builder oligopoly is the direct, measurable result of PBS optimizing for economic efficiency at the expense of decentralization in the short term.

BLOCK PRODUCER SOVEREIGNTY

Pre-PBS vs. Post-PBS: A Control Matrix

A comparison of control over block content and value capture before and after Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS), highlighting the shift from monolithic validators to specialized roles.

Control DimensionPre-PBS (Monolithic Validator)Post-PBS (PBS with MEV-Boost)Post-PBS (Enshrined PBS)

Block Content Selection

Validator chooses all txs & order

Builder chooses all txs & order

Builder proposes, Proposer commits

MEV Revenue Capture

Validator captures 100%

Builder captures >90%, Proposer gets bid

Builder & Proposer split per protocol rules

Censorship Resistance Locus

Validator (can be OFAC compliant)

Builder (can be OFAC compliant)

Proposer (via commit-reveal or inclusion lists)

Required Stake

32 ETH

0 ETH (Builder)

32 ETH (Proposer)

Hardware/Infra Cost

~$10k+ for competitive setup

$100k for data/arbitrage bots

~$10k+ (Proposer), > $100k (Builder)

Time to Finalize Order

~12 seconds (block proposal slot)

< 1 second (builder auction)

< 1 second (builder auction)

Trust Assumption

None (solo validator)

Relay honesty (currently 3-5 major relays)

Protocol-enforced (cryptoeconomic)

counter-argument
THE POWER SHIFT

The Refutation: Why Enshrined PBS Isn't a Panacea

Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) changes the locus of control over block production, creating new systemic risks.

Enshrined PBS centralizes builder power. The protocol enforces a separation between the block proposer and the entity that constructs the block. This formalizes a role currently filled by sophisticated MEV searchers and builders like Flashbots SUAVE and Jito Labs, granting them protocol-level influence.

Validators become passive order-takers. The validator's role reduces to selecting the highest-value block header from a builder marketplace. This creates a principal-agent problem where the validator's economic interest (maximizing bid) diverges from the network's interest (optimal block composition).

Builder cartels are a protocol risk. A dominant builder or cartel can censor transactions or manipulate the base fee. This is a more severe threat than today's validator cartels, as builders control the actual transaction ordering and content. MEV-Boost relays currently face this scrutiny; enshrined PBS bakes it in.

Evidence: The relay cartel concern is real. Today, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by just three entities via MEV-Boost. Enshrined PBS must architect against this concentration from day one, or it will cement, not prevent, centralized control.

risk-analysis
BLOCK-BUILDER DOMINANCE

The New Attack Vectors: Post-PBS Threat Model

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) fundamentally shifts power from validators to builders, creating a new MEV-centric threat landscape.

01

The Problem: Builder Censorship & OFAC Compliance

Block builders, not validators, now control transaction ordering. Centralized builders like Flashbots and bloXroute can censor transactions to comply with OFAC sanctions, threatening Ethereum's neutrality.

  • Risk: >50% of blocks built by compliant entities.
  • Impact: Creates a two-tier system where sanctioned addresses are excluded from the canonical chain.
>50%
OFAC Blocks
1 Entity
Control Point
02

The Solution: Enshrined PBS & CrLists

Pushing PBS into the protocol (ePBS) with crLists (censorship resistance lists) forces builders to include transactions from the public mempool.

  • Mechanism: Proposer provides a mandatory transaction list.
  • Goal: Decouple block building from transaction inclusion, neutralizing censorship at the builder layer.
L1 Enforced
Guarantee
0 Censored
Target
03

The Problem: Builder Collusion & MEV Cartels

Builders can form cartels to monopolize MEV extraction, manipulating prices and extracting maximum value from users on Uniswap and Aave.

  • Risk: >80% builder market share controlled by a few entities.
  • Impact: Reduces validator profits, centralizes chain control, and increases user costs.
>80%
Market Share
Cartel Risk
High
04

The Solution: SUAVE & Decentralized Builders

Decentralized builder networks like Flashbots' SUAVE aim to democratize block building by separating the roles of searcher, builder, and proposer.

  • Architecture: Shared mempool and compute network.
  • Goal: Break cartels, increase competition, and return MEV profits to a broader set of participants.
Multi-Chain
Scope
Open Access
Design
05

The Problem: Time-Bandit Attacks & Reorgs

Builders with superior MEV extraction capabilities can profitably reorg recent blocks to capture missed value, undermining chain finality.

  • Attack Vector: Private mempool transactions create information asymmetry.
  • Impact: Threatens ~12s time-to-finality, creating uncertainty for DeFi and bridges like LayerZero.
~12s
Finality At Risk
High Profit
Attack Incentive
06

The Solution: Single-Slot Finality & MEV Smoothing

Ethereum's roadmap towards single-slot finality (SSF) and protocols like MEV smoothing make reorgs economically irrational.

  • Mechanism: Finalize blocks immediately, or redistribute MEV rewards across all validators.
  • Goal: Eliminate the profitability of chain reorganizations, securing the head of the chain.
Instant
Finality Target
0 Profit
Reorg Incentive
future-outlook
THE POWER SHIFT

The Verge Horizon: How PBS Enables the Endgame

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block production from block validation, fundamentally altering the network's political economy.

PBS separates economic power from consensus power. Validators propose slots, but specialized builders like Flashbots and bloXroute compete to construct the most profitable blocks. This prevents validator cartels from extracting maximal value.

The builder market becomes the battleground. Builders must outbid each other for user transactions and MEV bundles. This competition funnels value back to users via MEV-boost auctions and order flow auctions.

Validators are reduced to commodity hardware. Their role shifts to pure attestation, lowering staking requirements and centralization pressure. The real influence migrates to the builder layer and its capital requirements.

Evidence: Post-merge, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built via MEV-Boost. This proves the market demand for specialization and the inevitability of PBS's formal protocol integration.

takeaways
PBS: THE NEW BLOCK POWER DYNAMIC

TL;DR for Protocol Architects

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block building from block proposing, fundamentally shifting MEV capture and censorship resistance.

01

The Problem: Validators as Monopolistic Rent-Seekers

Without PBS, the block proposer (validator) has a monopoly on block construction, leading to inefficient MEV extraction and opaque, centralized value capture.\n- Centralization Risk: Solo validators can't compete with sophisticated MEV bots.\n- Inefficient Markets: MEV profits are not maximized for the network or users.

>90%
MEV to Proposer
Opaque
Value Flow
02

The Solution: A Competitive Builder Market

PBS introduces a specialized builder role that competes in an open auction to create the most valuable block for the winning proposer.\n- Efficiency: MEV is extracted by specialists, maximizing value.\n- Revenue Redistribution: Proposer revenue becomes more predictable and fair via the winning bid.

~100%
Bid to Proposer
Competitive
Auction
03

The New Threat: Builder-Level Censorship

Control shifts from 1000s of proposers to a handful of dominant builders (e.g., Flashbots, bloXroute). A malicious or compliant builder can systematically exclude transactions.\n- Regulatory Attack Vector: A single entity can be forced to censor.\n- Solution Path: Requires crLists (censorship resistance lists) and MEV-Boost++ to enforce inclusion.

~80%
Builder Market Share
Critical
crList Need
04

The Architecture: Enshrined vs. Protocol-Attached PBS

Current PBS via MEV-Boost is a middleware patch. The endgame is enshrined PBS in the core protocol.\n- MEV-Boost (Now): Trusted relay, extra complexity, but operational.\n- Enshrined PBS (Future): Native auction, eliminates trust in relays, simplifies consensus.

~2/3
Blocks via MEV-Boost
L1 Upgrade
End State
05

The MEV Supply Chain: Searchers, Builders, Proposers

PBS formalizes a three-tier MEV supply chain. Searchers (e.g., arbitrage bots) find opportunities, Builders aggregate them into blocks, Proposers simply accept the highest bid.\n- Specialization: Each layer optimizes for a specific function.\n- Liquidity: Creates a liquid market for block space.

3-Layer
Supply Chain
Billions
Annual MEV
06

The Builder's Toolkit: SUAVE as the Endgame

The ultimate evolution is a decentralized block builder. SUAVE (Single Unifying Auction for Value Expression) aims to be a neutral, chain-agnostic marketplace for preference expression and execution.\n- Decentralizes Building: Removes the trusted builder oligopoly.\n- Cross-Chain: Unifies MEV markets across Ethereum, layerzero, avalanche.

Chain-Agnostic
Scope
Neutral
Platform Goal
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected direct pipeline