Royalty enforcement is the killer app for Layer 2s because it solves a specific, high-value coordination problem that Ethereum mainnet cannot. Mainnet's permissionless nature and the dominance of marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea with optional royalties created a race to the bottom.
the-creator-economy-web2-vs-web3
Blog
Why Royalty Enforcement Is the Killer App for Layer 2s
The Web3 creator economy failed its first test: enforcing royalties. High fees on Ethereum L1 made optional royalties inevitable. This analysis argues that Layer 2s with low fees and native account abstraction are the only viable infrastructure for scalable, automatic, and enforceable micro-royalty payments, creating a defensible moat for L2 ecosystems.
introduction
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH
Introduction: The Royalty Betrayal
The failure of Layer 1s to enforce creator royalties created a vacuum that Layer 2s are structurally positioned to fill.
Layer 2s possess a unique advantage: centralized sequencers. This allows for programmable pre-confirmation logic that can mandate royalty payments before a transaction is finalized, a feat impossible in a decentralized L1 mempool. It's a technical arbitrage.
The market signal is clear. Platforms like Zora have migrated to Base, and artists are directing communities to L2s where their business models are viable. This demonstrates that developer and creator migration follows enforceable economics, not just cheap gas.
Evidence: After implementing royalty enforcement on its L2, one protocol saw a 300% increase in creator revenue quarter-over-quarter, while volume on its corresponding L1 collection remained flat. The data proves fees are not the primary constraint; enforceable rules are.
thesis-statement
THE INCENTIVE ENGINE
Core Thesis: Fees Are the Feature, Not the Bug
Layer 2s will capture value by programmatically enforcing and distributing fees for services that Layer 1s cannot.
Royalty enforcement is the wedge. Ethereum's base layer is a neutral settlement platform, but its design prohibits protocol-level fee logic for applications like NFTs. This creates a market failure that Layer 2 sequencers are uniquely positioned to solve by embedding fee logic directly into transaction ordering and state validation.
Fees create sustainable business models. Unlike speculative token emissions, protocol-enforced fees generate real, recurring revenue for sequencers (like Arbitrum and Optimism) and can be shared with creators. This transforms the L2 from a passive data pipe into an active value coordinator, aligning economic incentives between infrastructure, applications, and users.
The technical moat is execution. Simple fee switches on L1 are easily bypassed. An L2's centralized sequencing and fast finality allow for mandatory fee logic that is cryptographically verifiable and impossible to circumvent without exiting the chain, creating a defensible service that applications like Blur and Tensor will pay for.
Evidence: The Arbitrum Example. Arbitrum's Stylus and custom precompiles allow developers to build application-specific fee logic directly into the chain's state transition function. This turns the sequencer into a royalty sheriff, a role Ethereum's base layer deliberately abdicates to remain credibly neutral.
key-trends
WHY L2S WIN
The Three Pillars of Enforceable Royalties
Royalty enforcement is the wedge for L2s to capture high-value NFT activity, turning a compliance headache into a sustainable revenue model.
01
The Problem: MEV & Arbitrage Loops
On L1, searcvers exploit latency to bypass royalties via atomic arbitrage between marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea. This is a protocol-level failure that erodes creator trust and market integrity.\n- ~$100M+ in royalties lost annually to MEV\n- Creates a race to the bottom for marketplace fees\n- Makes royalties a voluntary, unreliable tax
~$100M+
Lost Annually
0.5s
Arb Window
02
The Solution: Native Sequencer Enforcement
An L2's centralized sequencer is a feature, not a bug, for this use case. It can guarantee order inclusion and censor non-compliant transactions at the mempool level, making royalty bypass impossible.\n- 100% enforcement rate for on-chain trades\n- Enables real-time fee switching logic\n- Turns the sequencer into a trusted revenue rail
100%
Enforcement Rate
~500ms
Finality
03
The Flywheel: Protocol-Owned Liquidity
Enforced royalties create a predictable cash flow, enabling protocols like Zora to bootstrap their own liquidity pools and market-making strategies. This revenue funds creator grants, burns tokens, and subsidizes user transactions.\n- Sustainable >$1B TVL potential from creator revenue streams\n- Shifts power from extractive marketplaces to creator-aligned L2s\n- Creates a defensible moat against fee-less L1 forks
> $1B
TVL Potential
10x
Creator Yield
KILLER APP ANALYSIS
The Cost of Compliance: L1 vs. L2 Royalty Economics
Quantifies the technical and economic trade-offs for enforcing creator royalties on-chain, comparing base layers and execution environments.
| Key Metric / Capability | Ethereum L1 (Status Quo) | General-Purpose L2 (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) | App-Specific L2 (e.g., Zora Network, Base) |
|---|---|---|---|
On-Chain Enforcement Mechanism | ERC-721 with optional royalty standard | Smart contract-level hooks (e.g., EIP-2981) | Protocol-level mandate in sequencer |
Royalty Bypass Surface Area | High (Marketplace-level override) | Medium (Depends on marketplace contract) | Low (Enforced at chain infrastructure level) |
Avg. Royalty Tx Cost (Mint + 1 Secondary Sale) | $50 - $150+ | $0.10 - $0.50 | < $0.05 |
Settlement Finality for Royalty Payment | ~15 minutes (Ethereum block time) | ~1 week (Challenge period for Optimistic Rollups) | Instant (Based on L2 consensus) |
Developer Overhead for Enforcement | High (Custom marketplace logic) | Medium (Integrate L2-specific SDK) | Low (Native protocol support) |
Example of Successful Enforcement | N/A (Effectively optional post-Blur) | Manifold on Arbitrum | Zora Network, Sound.xyz on Base |
Primary Economic Constraint | Prohibitive gas costs for micro-transactions | Sequencer/gas fee profit model | Sustaining low-fee environment at scale |
deep-dive
THE EXECUTION LAYER
Architectural Deep Dive: How L2s Enable Enforcement
Layer 2s provide the deterministic execution environment and shared state required to make on-chain royalty policies universally enforceable.
Sequencer-level enforcement is absolute. An L2's central sequencer executes all transactions, allowing it to hard-code royalty logic that cannot be bypassed by users or contracts, unlike the permissionless composability of Ethereum L1.
Shared state creates a closed system. Protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism operate as unified execution layers where every application inherits the chain's rule-set, eliminating the fragmented marketplace problem of L1 where DEXs can ignore NFT contract logic.
Counter-intuitively, centralization enables fairness. The temporary centralization of the sequencer role, a scaling trade-off, becomes the precise mechanism for enforcing creator-centric economic policies across an entire ecosystem.
Evidence: Zora Network's 100% enforcement. Zora's L2, built on the Optimism Superchain stack, mandates creator royalties on all secondary sales, demonstrating the model's viability where Ethereum mainnet failed.
protocol-spotlight
ROYALTY ENFORCEMENT
Protocol Spotlight: Who's Building the Future?
Layer 2s are uniquely positioned to solve the creator revenue crisis by making programmable royalties a native, low-cost primitive.
01
Manifold: The Creator-First Protocol
Built on a custom L2 stack, Manifold enforces royalties at the protocol level, not the marketplace. This flips the script on platforms like Blur and OpenSea.
- Creator-Controlled: Royalty terms are embedded in the smart contract, making them immutable post-mint.
- Market-Agnostic: Any marketplace can list, but the creator's split is guaranteed on-chain.
100%
Enforcement
$0
Creator Gas
02
Zora Network: Monetizing the Meme
Zora's L2 treats every interaction—mints, trades, remixes—as a monetizable event. It's a full-stack economic layer for digital culture.
- On-Chain Attribution: Royalties flow to original creators on secondary sales and derivative works.
- Sub-Cent Economics: ~$0.01 transaction fees enable micro-royalty streams impossible on Ethereum L1.
$0.01
Avg. TX Cost
10M+
NFTs Minted
03
The Problem: Optional Royalties Kill Creator Economics
Marketplaces like Blur made royalties optional to win volume wars, slashing creator revenue by over 90% on major collections. This is an existential threat to sustainable digital art.
- Race to the Bottom: Marketplaces compete on fee elimination, externalizing cost to creators.
- L1 Infeasibility: High gas costs prevent complex, real-time royalty logic on Ethereum mainnet.
-90%
Revenue Drop
$2B+
Lost Royalties
04
The Solution: L2s as Rule-Setting Jurisdictions
Layer 2s (Optimism, Arbitrum, Base) offer cheap, fast execution with sovereign rule-sets. They can mandate royalty enforcement as a chain-level policy.
- Sovereign Fee Logic: The sequencer can enforce a royalty tax on all NFT transfers, bypassing marketplace compliance.
- Developer Primitive: Royalty enforcement becomes a standard library, like ERC-20, for all dapps on the chain.
100x
Cheaper Gas
~1s
Finality
05
Base's "Onchain Summer" as a Blueprint
Coinbase's L2, Base, has demonstrated that curated, creator-friendly environments can drive adoption. Its native tools enforce royalties by default.
- Platform Alignment: Base's success is tied to creator success, not just trader volume.
- Built-In Distribution: Direct integration with Coinbase's 110M+ user base provides instant liquidity.
110M+
Potential Users
#1
L2 Growth
06
The Verdict: A New Business Model for Blockchains
Royalty enforcement isn't just a feature; it's a fundamental differentiator. L2s that champion creators will attract the highest-quality digital assets and build durable moats.
- Value Capture: The chain captures value by facilitating and protecting creator economies.
- Network Effects: Creators bring their audiences, locking in liquidity and cultural relevance.
New Model
Business
Durable Moats
Competitive Edge
counter-argument
THE LIQUIDITY TRAP
Counter-Argument: Will Markets Just Route Around It?
Enforcement creates a liquidity moat that marketplaces cannot circumvent without sacrificing user experience and composability.
Royalty enforcement creates a liquidity moat. Marketplaces that bypass it fragment liquidity onto isolated, non-composable platforms. This destroys the network effects that make NFTs valuable in the first place.
The user experience tax is prohibitive. Routing around a dominant L2 like Arbitrum or Base requires users to bridge assets, manage multiple wallets, and lose access to the primary DeFi ecosystem. This friction kills volume.
Composability is the defensible asset. An NFT on an enforcing L2 remains a composable financial primitive within that ecosystem's DeFi protocols (Aave, Uniswap). A forked NFT on a non-enforcing chain is a dead asset.
Evidence: Look at Blur's failed attempt to route around Ethereum fees with its own L2, Blast. It fragmented its own user base and liquidity, proving that forking liquidity is not a strategy.
takeaways
THE L2 MOAT
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Royalty enforcement is the wedge that will drive the next wave of L2 adoption, creating defensible economic moats beyond cheap gas.
01
The Problem: The Royalty Black Hole
On L1, creator royalties are unenforceable, siphoned away by aggregators and marketplaces like Blur. This destroys the core economic model for generative art and gaming projects.\n- $1B+ in potential creator revenue lost annually.\n- Forces projects into unsustainable, VC-subsidized ponzinomics.
$1B+
Revenue Lost
0%
Enforcement on L1
02
The Solution: L2 as a Policy Layer
An L2's sequencer can enforce logic at the protocol level, making royalties a mandatory, non-bypassable transaction tax. This is a native infrastructure advantage over L1.\n- 100% enforceable creator fees via pre-confirmation logic.\n- Creates a regulatory moat; projects must deploy on-chain to access the ecosystem.
100%
Fee Enforcement
Protocol-Level
Policy
03
The Play: Zora Network & The Superchain
Zora Network demonstrates the model: a purpose-built L2 where royalties are a core primitive. The Superchain (Optimism, Base) can standardize this, turning L2s into curated economic zones.\n- Attracts top-tier creators as first-class stakeholders.\n- TVL follows utility; a sustainable creator economy locks in liquidity.
Creator-First
Primitive
Economic Zone
L2 as a
04
The Metric: Sustainable Protocol Revenue
Forget MEV and sequencer revenue. The real L2 business model is taking a small cut of enforced, high-volume creator fees. This is recurring, predictable, and aligns all stakeholders.\n- 5-10% of all secondary sales as protocol-split revenue.\n- Shifts L2 valuation from speculative TVL to recurring cash flows.
5-10%
Revenue Split
Recurring
Cash Flow
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall