User data is a liability in Web2. Platforms like Google and Meta monetize your behavior but you cannot audit, port, or derive value from your own digital footprint.
the-creator-economy-web2-vs-web3
Blog
The Future of First-Party Data is On-Chain
Web2's creator data is trapped in silos. On-chain activity logs and tokenized engagement create a verifiable, portable, and directly monetizable first-party data set that creators fully own. This is the atomic unit of the new creator economy.
introduction
THE DATA
Introduction: The Data Prison of Web2
Web2's centralized data silos create immense value but lock it away from users and developers.
First-party data is trapped in corporate databases. This creates a fundamental misalignment where the entity that captures value (the platform) is not the entity that created it (the user).
On-chain activity is public data. Every transaction on Ethereum or Solana is a verifiable, portable data point. Protocols like Aave and Uniswap generate rich, structured behavioral data as a byproduct of operation.
The future is sovereign data. Wallets like Rainbow and Zerion are the new data aggregators, giving users a unified, portable view of their on-chain identity and history across all applications.
thesis-statement
THE DATA
Thesis: On-Chain Logs Are the New First-Party Data
Blockchain event logs provide a verifiable, composable, and standardized data layer that will replace traditional first-party data collection.
On-chain logs are immutable first-party data. Every transaction emits structured event logs that are cryptographically signed and timestamped. This creates a verifiable audit trail that is impossible to forge or retroactively alter, unlike traditional server logs.
This data is natively composable. Standardized formats like ERC-20 Transfer events allow protocols like Uniswap and Aave to build atop each other's data without permission. This interoperability creates a network effect for data that siloed corporate databases cannot match.
The cost of data verification disappears. Traditional first-party data requires expensive audits for trust. On-chain, the consensus mechanism (e.g., Ethereum's L1) provides the verification for free. This shifts the competitive moat from data collection to data interpretation and execution.
Evidence: The entire DeFi ecosystem, from Chainlink oracles to Dune Analytics dashboards, is built by querying and aggregating these raw event logs. This data pipeline is open, eliminating the need for proprietary data warehousing.
THE DATA PARADIGM SHIFT
Web2 Data Silos vs. On-Chain Data Assets
A first-principles comparison of data ownership, composability, and economic models between traditional platforms and public blockchain-based assets.
| Core Feature / Metric | Web2 Data Silos (e.g., Meta, Google) | On-Chain Data Assets (e.g., ENS, POAP, NFT) |
|---|---|---|
Data Ownership & Portability | ||
Native Composability (DeFi, Social, Gaming) | ||
Auditability & Provenance | Opaque, internal logs | Fully transparent, immutable ledger |
Monetization Model | Platform extracts 100% of ad/data revenue | Creator/owner captures value via royalties, staking, or trading |
Developer Access | Gated API, rate-limited, revocable | Permissionless, global state access |
Data Freshness for Apps | Batch API calls, 5-60 min latency | Real-time via RPCs or indexers like The Graph |
Sybil Resistance / Identity Cost | Free, low-cost to fake | Gas-paid, cryptographically verifiable |
Primary Infrastructure Cost | Centralized servers, $M+ annual spend | Decentralized network, gas fees subsidized by users |
deep-dive
THE DATA
Deep Dive: The Anatomy of On-Chain Creator Data
On-chain activity transforms creator-fan relationships into a composable, programmable asset class.
First-party data is a public asset. On-chain activity—mints, trades, social interactions—creates a verifiable, permissionless dataset. This data is not locked in a platform's database; it is a composable primitive for new applications.
The graph is the new CRM. Protocols like The Graph and Goldsky index this data into subgraphs, enabling queries for user segmentation and engagement analytics that legacy Web2 tools cannot replicate.
Data drives protocol economics. Creator tokens and NFTs on platforms like Farcaster or Sound.xyz use on-chain activity to algorithmically adjust rewards, distribute fees, and govern communities without manual intervention.
Evidence: Farcaster's Frames protocol processes millions of interactions, creating a real-time engagement graph that any developer can permissionlessly query to build applications.
protocol-spotlight
THE FUTURE OF FIRST-PARTY DATA IS ON-CHAIN
Protocol Spotlight: Building the Data Infrastructure
Legacy data pipelines are broken. The next generation of applications will be built on verifiable, composable, and programmable on-chain data.
01
The Problem: Data Silos Kill Composable Finance
DeFi protocols operate in isolation, unable to natively share user state or reputation. This fragmentation creates redundant KYC, limits capital efficiency, and stifles innovation.
- Uniswap has no idea you're a MakerDAO power user.
- Your on-chain credit history is trapped in isolated subgraphs and proprietary APIs.
- Building cross-protocol logic requires fragile, centralized oracles and custom integrations.
$100B+
Inefficient Capital
10+
Redundant Integrations
02
The Solution: Programmable Attestations (EAS, Verax)
Turn any piece of data into a verifiable, portable on-chain credential. This creates a universal schema for trust and reputation that any smart contract can query.
- Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) enables Gitcoin Passport scores and Optimism's Citizen House.
- Verax on Linea provides a shared registry for attestations, reducing L2 fragmentation.
- Contracts can gate access or adjust rates based on proven on-chain history, not just token holdings.
10M+
Attestations Issued
-90%
Integration Cost
03
The Problem: Real-World Data is a Black Box
Bridging off-chain events (payments, KYC, IoT data) to smart contracts relies on a small cartel of oracle nodes. This reintroduces centralization and creates single points of failure.
- Chainlink dominates, creating protocol risk and high costs for niche data.
- Data provenance and computation are opaque; you must "trust the report."
- Custom data feeds are expensive and slow to deploy, limiting use cases.
<10
Dominant Node Operators
$1M+
Feed Setup Cost
04
The Solution: Decentralized Physical Infrastructure (Helium, peaq)
DePINs tokenize physical infrastructure and create transparent, cryptographically-verified data markets. Sensors and devices become first-party data publishers.
- Helium's 5G and IoT networks generate verifiable coverage proofs on-chain.
- peaq network enables machines to own themselves and sell their data via Fetch.ai-style agent economies.
- Smart contracts can pay for and consume sensor data directly, bypassing centralized aggregators.
1M+
Active Devices
-70%
Data Cost
05
The Problem: Indexing is a Centralized Bottleneck
Applications rely on The Graph's hosted service or centralized RPC providers for complex queries. This creates censorship risk, data latency, and limits real-time applications.
- The Graph's decentralized network is underutilized; most dapps use the centralized hosted service.
- Alchemy and Infura control the gateway for ~70% of all Ethereum RPC requests.
- Custom logic requires running your own indexer, a massive DevOps burden for teams.
~70%
Centralized RPC Share
500ms-2s
Query Latency
06
The Solution: Parallelized RPC & Indexing (Succinct, Lava)
A new stack decouples data availability from query execution, enabling specialized, performant networks for specific data needs.
- Succinct's SP1 enables zk-proofs of arbitrary computation, allowing trustless verification of off-chain indexer results.
- Lava Network creates a decentralized market for RPC and indexing, routing queries to the best provider.
- Goldsky and Subsquid offer specialized, real-time streaming data pipelines for high-frequency applications.
<100ms
P95 Latency
1000+
Specialized Providers
counter-argument
THE TRANSPARENCY TRAP
Counter-Argument: Privacy and the Public Ledger
The inherent transparency of public blockchains creates a fundamental tension with data privacy, but emerging cryptographic primitives provide a path forward.
The public ledger is a liability for sensitive first-party data, exposing user behavior and financial history to competitors and data scrapers. This creates a chilling effect on adoption for enterprises and high-value users.
Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) are the primary solution, enabling data verification without exposure. Protocols like Aztec Network and Aleo build entire private execution layers, while zk-SNARKs in Tornado Cash demonstrate selective privacy.
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) offers a more flexible alternative, allowing computation on encrypted data. Projects like Fhenix and Inco Network are building FHE-enabled L1s, though computational overhead remains high.
The trade-off is complexity versus utility. Private smart contracts on Aztec are more expensive than public ones, but the privacy premium is justified for sensitive business logic and personal data.
risk-analysis
THE ON-CHAIN DATA TRAP
Risk Analysis: What Could Go Wrong?
The promise of first-party data on-chain is immense, but systemic risks could undermine its entire value proposition.
01
The Privacy Paradox
Public ledgers create a transparency-privacy paradox. Immutable data can deanonymize users and expose sensitive behavioral patterns, creating honeypots for surveillance and targeted attacks.
- Permanent Leakage: Once revealed, pseudonymous identities can be linked across protocols via EigenLayer restaking or Uniswap LP positions.
- Regulatory Blowback: GDPR's 'right to be forgotten' is fundamentally incompatible with immutable storage, risking legal challenges for dApps.
- Data Poisoning: Users could intentionally submit false data to corrupt on-chain reputation systems like Ethereum Attestation Service.
100%
Permanent
GDPR
Conflict
02
The Oracle Centralization Endgame
The most valuable data (off-chain identity, credit scores, real-world assets) requires oracles. This recreates the trusted third-party problem crypto aimed to solve.
- Single Points of Failure: Projects like Chainlink and Pyth dominate, creating systemic risk if compromised.
- Data Monopolies: The entity controlling the oracle feed controls the application logic, a reversal of DeFi's permissionless ethos.
- Cost Proliferation: High-frequency, high-fidelity data feeds could make micro-transactions economically unviable, stifling innovation.
~$10B+
TVL at Risk
>50%
Market Share
03
The MEV & Data Extortion Market
Transparent data flows create perfect information for searchers, enabling new, more predatory forms of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV).
- Behavioral Front-Running: Searchers could analyze on-chain spending habits to front-run NFT mints or token purchases before the user even signs the next tx.
- Reputation Griefing: Attackers could artificially manipulate on-chain reputation scores to sabotage loan eligibility in protocols like Aave or Compound.
- Data Rollups as Cartels: Sequencers for data-specific rollups could become the ultimate data brokers, selling insights back to the highest bidder.
$1B+
Annual MEV
0-Latency
Attack Window
04
The Interoperability Fragmentation Trap
Data silos will form not between web2 companies, but between competing blockchain ecosystems, making a unified user profile impossible.
- Walled Data Gardens: Solana, Ethereum L2s, and Cosmos app-chains will host incompatible data schemas, fracturing identity.
- Bridge Trust Assumptions: Moving verifiable credentials across chains via LayerZero or Axelar introduces new trust vectors and delays.
- Protocol Incompatibility: A user's Galxe passport on Ethereum is meaningless on a Solana gaming dApp without costly attestation bridges.
50+
Data Silos
7 Days+
Attestation Delay
05
The Infrastructure Cost Spiral
Storing and processing vast datasets on-chain is prohibitively expensive. The quest for scalability may compromise data integrity or decentralization.
- Blob Storage Limits: Even with EIP-4844, storing large datasets (e.g., game state, user history) on Ethereum is economically impossible.
- Centralized Compression: Teams will be forced to use off-chain solutions like Arweave or Filecoin, reintroducing liveness assumptions.
- Node Requirements: Full nodes that must index and serve petabytes of historical data will become specialized, expensive services, harming permissionless verification.
1000x
Storage Cost
$10k+
Node Cost
06
The Regulatory Weaponization Vector
On-chain data provides a perfect, immutable audit trail for regulators to enforce compliance retroactively, chilling development and use.
- Programmable Compliance: Authorities could mandate blacklist oracles, forcing DeFi protocols like Uniswap to censor transactions at the smart contract level.
- Liability for Historical Data: dApp founders could be held liable for user-generated content stored permanently on-chain, even if the dApp is decentralized.
- KYC-Only Chains: The logical extreme is permissioned 'compliant' chains, destroying the censorship-resistant value proposition.
OFAC
Sanctions Tool
100%
Audit Trail
future-outlook
THE DATA
Future Outlook: The Data-Powered Creator DAO
On-chain first-party data transforms creator economics from opaque advertising to direct, programmable value capture.
Creator data becomes a sovereign asset. On-chain activity—from token-gated access to NFT purchases—creates a verifiable, portable data trail. This data is no longer locked in a centralized platform's black box like Instagram or YouTube, enabling direct monetization and composability.
DAOs automate value distribution via data. A Creator DAO uses on-chain attestations and smart contracts to programmatically reward contributors. This replaces the manual, trust-based splits of traditional collectives with transparent, automated revenue sharing based on provable engagement.
The infrastructure is already live. Protocols like Lens Protocol and Farcaster provide the social graph. Tools like Goldfinch and Superfluid enable programmable finance. The ERC-6551 token-bound account standard turns NFTs into wallets, creating persistent identity and data accumulation.
Evidence: Farcaster's Frames feature, which turns casts into interactive apps, demonstrates the monetization shift from ads to direct actions. A creator's Frame can mint an NFT or collect payment, with the entire economic event and user intent recorded on-chain.
takeaways
THE FUTURE OF FIRST-PARTY DATA IS ON-CHAIN
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
On-chain data shifts the power dynamic from centralized platforms to users and protocols, creating new primitives for trust and value.
01
The Problem: Data Silos and Platform Rent-Seeking
Web2 platforms like Google and Meta hoard user data, creating walled gardens and extracting disproportionate value. Builders face high CAC and opaque algorithms, while users have no portability or sovereignty.
- Key Benefit 1: On-chain data is public, verifiable, and composable by default.
- Key Benefit 2: Breaks platform monopolies, enabling direct user-to-protocol relationships and ~30-50% lower customer acquisition costs.
-50%
Potential CAC
100%
Data Portability
02
The Solution: Portable Reputation as a New Asset Class
On-chain activity—from DeFi positions to NFT holdings—creates a verifiable, portable reputation graph. Protocols like Galxe, Guild.xyz, and EigenLayer are building on this primitive.
- Key Benefit 1: Enables soulbound tokens (SBTs) and undercollateralized lending based on transaction history.
- Key Benefit 2: Drives hyper-targeted growth via on-chain quests and loyalty programs, moving beyond empty airdrop farming.
$1B+
Ecosystem TVL
0
Platform Fees
03
The Infrastructure: Verifiable Data Lakes & Compute
Raw on-chain data is useless without indexing and compute. The Graph, Goldsky, and Subsquid are building the decentralized data layer, while EigenDA and Celestia provide scalable data availability.
- Key Benefit 1: Sub-second query latency for real-time dApp state, rivaling centralized services.
- Key Benefit 2: Censorship-resistant data pipelines ensure applications cannot be deplatformed based on their data source.
~500ms
Query Latency
10kx
Cheaper Storage
04
The Application: Intent-Based Systems & Autonomous Agents
With rich, structured on-chain data, applications can shift from simple transaction execution to intent fulfillment. This is the thesis behind UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across Protocol.
- Key Benefit 1: Users specify what they want (e.g., "best price for 100 ETH"), not how to get it, improving UX and efficiency.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables long-lived autonomous agents that can act on behalf of users based on verifiable on-chain signals.
20%+
Better Execution
24/7
Agent Uptime
05
The Investment Thesis: Data as the New Moats
In Web3, competitive moats won't come from hoarding data, but from creating the most useful and accessible data graphs. The value accrues to the protocols that standardize, index, and facilitate its use.
- Key Benefit 1: Invest in infrastructure layers (The Graph, EigenLayer) that become essential plumbing.
- Key Benefit 2: Back applications that leverage on-chain data to create 10x better UX or novel business models (e.g., on-chain credit scoring).
Protocol
Value Accrual
10x
UX Advantage
06
The Risk: Privacy-Preserving Computation is Non-Negotiable
Total transparency is a double-edged sword. Widespread on-chain data enables front-running, reputation attacks, and financial doxxing. Aztec, ZK-proofs, and FHE are critical countermeasures.
- Key Benefit 1: Programmable privacy (e.g., show proof of credit score without revealing transactions) enables sensitive use cases.
- Key Benefit 2: Prevents the recreation of surveillance capitalism on-chain, protecting the core value proposition of user sovereignty.
Zero-Knowledge
Proof Standard
Essential
For Adoption
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall