MEV is thermodynamic entropy. In a decentralized network, block producers (like Lido, Coinbase) must order transactions. Any ordering creates arbitrage opportunities between states, which searchers (e.g., using Flashbots) will exploit. This value extraction is as unavoidable as friction.
security-post-mortems-hacks-and-exploits
Blog
Why MEV is the Unavoidable Tax on Every Ethereum Transaction
Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is not a bug or an exploit. It is a fundamental, structural cost of operating a transparent, unordered blockchain like Ethereum. This analysis explains why it's unavoidable, how it functions as a tax, and the implications for protocol design.
introduction
THE PHYSICS OF THE MEMPOOL
Introduction: The Inevitable Slippage
MEV is not a bug but a fundamental property of permissionless block production, extracting value from every transaction.
The tax is paid in slippage. Users don't see a direct fee, but MEV manifests as worse prices on DEX swaps, failed arbitrage on Uniswap, and front-run NFT mints. Protocols like CowSwap and UniswapX use intents to mitigate this by hiding transactions.
Evidence: Over $1.2B in MEV was extracted from Ethereum in 2023, primarily from DEX arbitrage and liquidations, representing a direct tax on user activity.
key-trends
THE UNAVOIDABLE TAX
Executive Summary: The MEV Reality
Maximal Extractable Value is not a bug but a fundamental property of permissionless block ordering. Every transaction pays it, whether you see it or not.
01
The Problem: The Invisible Slippage
Traditional DEX swaps show you slippage tolerance. MEV is the hidden slippage paid to the network's unseen arbitrage and liquidation engines. Your limit order is a free option for searchers.
- $1B+ extracted from users in 2023 alone.
- Front-running and sandwich attacks target ~90% of large swaps on public mempools.
- This 'tax' is embedded in every successful transaction's effective gas price.
$1B+
Annual Extract
~90%
Large Swap Target
02
The Solution: Intents & Private Order Flow
Protocols like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across shift the paradigm from transactions (do this) to intents (I want this outcome). Solvers compete off-chain, finding optimal routing without exposing user intent to public mempools.
- Eliminates front-running and reduces costs via batch auctions.
- Users get price improvement from solver competition.
- Represents the shift from 'execution' to 'result' guarantees.
>70%
Cost Reduction
0
Public Mempool Exp.
03
The Infrastructure: Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)
Ethereum's core scaling roadmap formalizes MEV capture via PBS. Specialized builders (e.g., Flashbots, bloXroute) create optimal blocks, while validators simply propose the highest-paying header. This commoditizes block production.
- Centralizes block building but decentralizes proposer selection.
- Enables cr lists for fair inclusion.
- Creates a transparent market for block space, making MEV revenue explicit.
>90%
Mainnet Blocks via PBS
~600ms
Bid Latency
04
The Consequence: Redefining Liveness
MEV has made simple transaction propagation insecure. The new security requirement is liveness under MEV: can your transaction be included without being exploited? This demands new RPC endpoints (Flashbots Protect), SUAVE, and private transaction pools.
- Relays and builders are now critical liveness infrastructure.
- The user's gateway to Ethereum is no longer a simple node; it's a MEV-aware stack.
- Failure to adapt means subsidizing sophisticated bots with every trade.
100%
Required Adaptation
New Stack
User Requirement
thesis-statement
THE UNAVOIDABLE COST
The Core Thesis: MEV as a Structural Tax
MEV is not a bug but a structural tax on every transaction, extracting value from users to validators and sophisticated searchers.
MEV is a tax because it is a mandatory cost extracted from the economic activity on-chain. Every swap on Uniswap or loan liquidation on Aave creates an arbitrage opportunity that searchers will capture, transferring value from the user to the network's capital providers.
The tax is structural because it is a direct consequence of blockchain's permissionless, transparent mempool. This design, which enables censorship resistance, also guarantees that profitable transaction ordering will be discovered and exploited by entities like Flashbots.
Unlike gas fees, which pay for computation, MEV extracts value from the transaction's economic outcome itself. A user pays gas to execute a trade, but the MEV tax is the slippage or price impact captured by a searcher's front-running or back-running bundle.
Evidence: Over $1.2B in MEV was extracted from Ethereum users in 2023, a figure that scales directly with DeFi activity and represents a persistent drain on user capital to validators and sophisticated bots.
deep-dive
THE EXTRACTION
The Mechanics of the Tax: From Sandwich Bots to Arbitrage
MEV is extracted through predictable transaction patterns that bots exploit for profit, imposing a direct cost on users.
Sandwich attacks are the most visible tax. A bot front-runs a user's DEX swap on Uniswap or Sushiswap, then sells the inflated asset back to them, pocketing the spread. The user receives worse execution.
Arbitrage is the most fundamental tax. It's the cost of keeping markets like Curve and Balancer synchronized. While it improves price efficiency, the profit is extracted from liquidity providers and traders as slippage.
Liquidations are a forced extraction. Protocols like Aave and Compound rely on bots to liquidate undercollateralized positions. The liquidator's discount is a direct, non-negotiable cost to the borrower.
The tax is quantifiable. Flashbots data shows over $1.2B in MEV was extracted from Ethereum in 2023, with sandwich attacks alone costing users hundreds of millions.
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The MEV Tax Ledger: Who Pays, Who Collects
A breakdown of the primary MEV extraction mechanisms, their economic impact, and the entities that bear the cost versus those that capture the value on Ethereum.
| Extraction Vector | Who Pays the Tax | Who Collects the Tax | Estimated Annualized Extractable Value | Mitigation Landscape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Arbitrage (DEX) | Liquidity Providers (via worse price) | Searchers & Proposer Builders | $1.2B+ | Private RPCs (Flashbots Protect), MEV-Sharing (MEV-Share) |
Liquidations (Lending) | Borrowers (via penalty + gas) | Searchers & Protocol Treasuries | $300M+ | Keeper Networks (Keep3r, Gelato), Suboptimal by design |
Sandwich Attacks | Retail Traders (via slippage) | Searchers | $250M+ | Frontrunning Protection (1inch, CowSwap), Private Mempools |
Time-Bandit Attacks | All Users (via chain reorgs) | Proposing Validators | Negligible post-PoS | Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS), Single-Slot Finality |
NFT Frontrunning | NFT Traders (via higher mint cost) | Searchers & Minters | $50M+ | Commit-Reveal Schemes, Fair Sequencing (SUAVE) |
counter-argument
THE PHYSICS OF BLOCK SPACE
Counterpoint: Can't We Just Build Our Way Out?
MEV is a fundamental property of permissionless blockchains, not a bug that can be engineered away.
MEV is a thermodynamic tax. It emerges from the physics of block space, where ordering rights are a scarce resource. Any system with a global ordering mechanism creates extractable value, making MEV a permanent feature of decentralized networks.
Protocols can only redistribute MEV. Solutions like Flashbots SUAVE, CowSwap, and UniswapX attempt to democratize extraction, but they shift value between searchers, users, and validators rather than eliminating it. The economic surplus from transaction ordering persists.
Privacy is a mirage. Even with full encryption, observable on-chain outcomes like price changes create inferable MEV. Protocols like Aztec or FHE chains change the attack surface but do not erase the underlying value of transaction ordering.
Evidence: Over $1.2B in MEV was extracted on Ethereum L1 in 2023 (Flashbots data). This demonstrates the persistent economic gravity of block space, which no protocol redesign has circumvented.
case-study
THE UNSTOPPABLE FORCE OF MEETING THE IMMOVABLE MARKET
Case Study: The Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) Redistribution
PBS is Ethereum's structural concession that MEV extraction is inevitable, so the goal shifts to managing its distribution and externalities.
01
The Pre-PBS Jungle: A Seeker's Nightmare
Before PBS, validators were monolithic. They searched for, built, and proposed blocks, creating massive centralization pressure and opaque, on-chain MEV wars.
- Centralization Risk: The need for sophisticated MEV tooling (like Flashbots MEV-Geth) created validator oligopolies.
- Inefficiency: Public mempool arbitrage created wasteful gas auctions, with value burned instead of captured.
- User Harm: Frontrunning and sandwich attacks were rampant, a direct tax on retail.
90%+
OF VALIDATORS
$1B+
ANNUAL MEV
02
PBS: The Institutionalization of MEV
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a market design that splits block production. Specialized builders (e.g., Flashbots, bloXroute) compete to create the most profitable blocks, which proposers (validators) simply select.
- Efficiency Engine: Creates a competitive market for block space, maximizing value extraction.
- Validator Simplification: Decouples ethical/technical complexity; proposers just choose the highest bid.
- Redistribution: MEV profits are now explicitly paid to validators/stakers via priority fees, making it a visible protocol subsidy.
~99%
BLOCKS BUILT
>80%
TO STAKERS
03
The Builder Monopoly & crLists
PBS creates a new centralization vector: builder dominance. The solution is crLists (censorship resistance lists), a protocol-level rule forcing builders to include certain transactions.
- Builder Power: A single builder (Flashbots) often wins the auction, controlling transaction inclusion.
- Regulatory Risk: Builders could be forced to censor transactions (e.g., OFAC sanctions).
- crList Mandate: Forces builders to include eligible, fee-paying transactions from the public mempool, preserving credibly neutral access.
1
DOMINANT BUILDER
100%
COMPLIANCE GOAL
04
The Endgame: Enshrined PBS & SUAVE
The current PBS is "in-protocol" via the builder's fee, but the full vision is Enshrined PBS (ePBS) in the core protocol. Parallel efforts like SUAVE aim to decentralize the builder role itself.
- Protocol Security: ePBS moves the auction on-chain, reducing trust assumptions in relays.
- Decentralized Building: SUAVE is a shared mempool and decentralized block builder network, breaking the builder monopoly.
- User Sovereignty: The ultimate goal is returning MEV value to users via mechanisms like order flow auctions.
2025+
E PBS ETA
Chain
SUAVE VISION
takeaways
THE UNTAXABLE TRANSACTION IS A MYTH
Architectural Takeaways: Building in a World with MEV
MEV is not a bug but a fundamental property of permissionless, transparent blockchains. Building on Ethereum means designing for its extraction.
01
The Problem: The Searcher-Builder-Proposer (SBP) Oligopoly
The post-merge PBS landscape has consolidated power. ~90% of blocks are built by a handful of professional builders, creating a new layer of rent-seeking infrastructure.\n- Centralization Risk: Relayers and builders become critical, trusted intermediaries.\n- Inefficiency: Value leaks to middlemen instead of users or validators.
~90%
Builder Market Share
3-5
Dominant Builders
02
The Solution: Commit-Reveal & Private Order Flows
Hide transaction content from the public mempool to prevent frontrunning. This shifts the MEV auction from public to private.\n- Flashbots Protect / RPC: The standard for private transaction submission.\n- Taichi Network / bloXroute: Specialized networks for order flow auction (OFA).\n- Result: Users get better execution, builders compete on private bids.
>50%
Txns via Private Channels
~0%
Sandwich Risk
03
The Problem: L2s Export, Don't Eliminate, MEV
Rollups batch transactions, but sequencing creates a new MEV market. Centralized sequencers are the single point of extraction.\n- Sequencer Censorship: They can reorder or exclude transactions.\n- Cross-Domain MEV: Arbitrage between L1 and L2 (e.g., Optimism, Arbitrum) is a major source.
1
Active Sequencer (often)
$100M+
Cross-Domain Arb Value
04
The Solution: SUAVE - A Universal MEV Market
Flashbots' vision: decouple block building from chain consensus. SUAVE is a specialized chain for preference expression and execution.\n- Unified Liquidity: Combines intent flow from all chains.\n- Competitive Execution: Solvers compete to fulfill user intents optimally.\n- Future-Proof: Aims to be the HTTP for MEV, making extraction transparent and fair.
All Chains
Target Scope
Intents
New Primitive
05
The Problem: Application-Level MEV is Inevitable
Any state change with slippage or time sensitivity creates extractable value. DEXs, lending liquidations, NFT mints are perpetual targets.\n- Design Flaw: If your app has a profitable edge, bots will find it.\n- User Experience: Failed txns, worse prices, and constant frontrunning.
100%
of Major DEXs
$1B+
Annual DEX MEV
06
The Solution: Intents & Auction-First Design (UniswapX, CowSwap)
Shift from transaction-based to outcome-based systems. Users submit signed intents; off-chain solvers compete to fulfill them.\n- Better Prices: Solvers find optimal routing across all liquidity sources.\n- Gasless & Safe: Users sign once, no failed txns. MEV is captured and shared (e.g., via CowSwap's surplus).\n- Architecture: This requires a trusted solver network and on-chain settlement.
20-50%
Price Improvement
0
Gas for User
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall