Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
public-goods-funding-and-quadratic-voting
Blog

Why Composability Is Non-Negotiable for Sustainable Funding

Isolated funding platforms are dead. This analysis argues that sustainable public goods funding requires a modular stack that integrates with identity (ENS), data oracles, and cross-chain bridges to survive the multi-chain future.

introduction
THE COMPOSABILITY IMPERATIVE

The Great Funding Fragmentation

Siloed funding mechanisms create unsustainable capital inefficiency, making cross-protocol composability a technical requirement for growth.

Fragmented liquidity kills efficiency. Isolated lending pools on Aave and Compound cannot share collateral, forcing users to over-collateralize identical assets across separate systems.

Composability is a capital multiplier. Protocols like Yearn and Balancer automate yield strategies across chains, but rely on fragile bridges like Axelar and LayerZero to move value.

The standard is ERC-4626. This vault standard creates a universal interface for yield-bearing tokens, enabling native composability between lending, DEXs, and derivative platforms.

Evidence: UniswapX's intent-based architecture outsources routing to solvers who atomically source liquidity from venues like Curve and 1inch, demonstrating composability as a service.

thesis-statement
THE COMPOSABILITY IMPERATIVE

The Core Argument: Modularity or Irrelevance

Sustainable protocol funding depends on modular architecture enabling permissionless integration, not on isolated, monolithic products.

Composability is a revenue multiplier. A protocol's value is its surface area for integration. Isolated dApps become cost centers; modular protocols like Uniswap V4 become infrastructure. Their hooks create a permissionless ecosystem where every new integration is a new revenue stream.

Monolithic design is technical debt. Protocols that bundle execution, settlement, and data availability (like early Solana DeFi) sacrifice long-term adaptability for short-term performance. This creates a vendor lock-in effect, stifling innovation and capping the total addressable market for fees.

The data proves modularity wins. Ethereum's rollup-centric roadmap and the success of Celestia's data availability layer demonstrate that sustainable value accrual shifts to the most composable base layers. Protocols building as monolithic L2s compete; protocols building as modular components get integrated.

market-context
THE COMPOSABILITY IMPERATIVE

The State of Play: A Multi-Chain Reality

Sustainable protocol funding depends on seamless asset and data flow across a fragmented ecosystem, making cross-chain composability a foundational requirement.

Protocols are multi-chain by default. A project's total value locked (TVL) and revenue are now distributed across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and Solana. A funding model that only captures value on a single chain misses the majority of its economic activity.

Funding depends on composable assets. Revenue-sharing tokens and fee switches are worthless if user assets are siloed. Protocols like Uniswap and Aave require bridges like Across and LayerZero to aggregate liquidity and user positions into a single, fundable token.

The standard is cross-chain intent. Users execute trades via UniswapX or CowSwap that route across multiple chains for best execution. A sustainable funding model must capture value from these intent-based flows, not just direct, on-chain interactions.

Evidence: Over 60% of DeFi's TVL resides outside Ethereum L1. Protocols ignoring this face irreversible revenue leakage to chains and bridges that enable seamless composability.

deep-dive
THE ARCHITECTURE

The Three Pillars of a Composable Funding Stack

Sustainable funding requires a modular architecture built on liquidity, execution, and settlement layers that interoperate seamlessly.

Liquidity must be programmatically accessible. A funding stack needs a unified liquidity layer, not isolated treasuries. This is why protocols like Superfluid and Sablier are foundational; they enable continuous, composable cash flows that other smart contracts can permissionlessly interact with and build upon.

Execution requires intent-based abstraction. Users and protocols must express desired outcomes, not manual steps. UniswapX and CowSwap demonstrate this principle by outsourcing routing, which allows funding mechanisms to tap into the best execution across all DEXs and bridges like Across without complex integration.

Settlement demands verifiable finality. The stack's trust layer must be a neutral, cryptographically secure settlement base. Ethereum L1, Celestia, or EigenLayer provide this, ensuring that funding commitments are immutable and verifiable across the entire composable system, preventing double-spends or censorship.

Evidence: The 80% TVL dominance of Ethereum L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism) proves that developers prioritize composability and security over isolated performance; they build where money and applications already exist in a shared state.

LIQUIDITY FRAGMENTATION ANALYSIS

The Composability Gap: Isolated vs. Modular Funding

A first-principles comparison of funding mechanisms based on their ability to create composable, reusable capital. Isolated pools fragment liquidity; modular protocols treat liquidity as a network primitive.

Core MetricIsolated Pools (Uniswap V2, Aave V2)Modular Hooks (Uniswap V4)Intent-Based (UniswapX, Across)

Liquidity Reusability

Capital Efficiency

~20-40% avg. utilization

80% target utilization

95% via shared solvers

Settlement Latency

1-2 blocks (12-24s)

1 block (12s)

Optimistic (1-3 min)

Protocol Fee Overhead

0.3-1.0% per hop

0.05% + hook logic

0.1-0.5% solver fee

MEV Resistance

Susceptible to sandwich

Hook-defined protection

Solver competition

Cross-Chain Native

Developer Surface

Fixed AMM logic

Turing-complete hooks

Declarative intents

protocol-spotlight
COMPOSABILITY AS A FUNDAMENTAL PRIMITIVE

Who's Building the Modular Future?

Sustainable funding requires protocols to be more than isolated islands; they must be composable components that create and capture value across the stack.

01

The Problem: Value Leakage in Monolithic Stacks

Monolithic L1s like Ethereum and Solana act as walled gardens where value accrues to the base layer token, not the applications. This starves dApps of sustainable revenue models, forcing reliance on inflationary token emissions.

  • Fee Capture: Apps pay ~10-100 Gwei in base fees to the L1, capturing zero value.
  • Business Model: Leads to unsustainable "farm and dump" tokenomics as the only viable funding mechanism.
0%
Fee Capture
100%
L1 Rent
02

The Solution: Shared Sequencers as Value Hubs

Projects like Astria and Espresso are building shared sequencers that enable rollups to outsource block production. This creates a new composable layer where value can be captured and shared.

  • MEV Redistribution: Sequencers can capture and redistribute MEV back to rollups and users.
  • Interoperability Premium: Enables atomic cross-rollup composability, a feature users and dApps will pay for, creating a new revenue stream.
Shared
MEV Pool
Atomic
Cross-Rollup
03

The Solution: Modular DA Layers as Composable Assets

Celestia, EigenDA, and Avail are not just data storage; they are platforms for trust-minimized light clients and validity proofs. This turns data into a verifiable, composable asset across the stack.

  • Proof Marketplace: Light clients can cheaply verify state from any rollup using the same DA layer, enabling new app architectures.
  • Shared Security: Rollups inherit cryptographic security, reducing their individual cost and complexity, freeing capital for growth.
~$0.001
per KB Cost
Universal
Proof Verification
04

The Arbiter: Interoperability Protocols

LayerZero, Axelar, and Hyperlane are the glue. They don't just pass messages; they define the economic terms of composability, creating markets for cross-chain security and liquidity.

  • Security as a Service: Protocols can rent security from external validator sets, a composable funding model for the interoperability layer itself.
  • Liquidity Networks: Enable intent-based systems like UniswapX and Across to source liquidity from any chain, capturing fees for routing efficiency.
Omnichain
Liquidity
Rentable
Security
05

The Enabler: Rollup-As-A-Service (RaaS)

Conduit, Caldera, and AltLayer abstract away rollup deployment. This commoditizes execution, forcing RaaS providers to compete on the quality of their integrated, composable ecosystem.

  • Revenue Share Models: RaaS platforms can take a cut of sequencer fees or MEV, aligning incentives with rollup success.
  • One-Click Composability: Launch with built-in connections to oracles, bridges, and data layers, instantly tapping into modular value flows.
<1 Hour
Launch Time
Ecosystem Cut
Revenue Model
06

The Result: Protocol-Owned Liquidity 2.0

The end-state is not a single funded app, but a mesh of economically inter-dependent protocols. Value capture becomes granular and recursive.

  • Example: A rollup uses a shared sequencer (fee), posts to a DA layer (fee), secures bridges with restaked ETH (fee), and its native DEX aggregates via an intent protocol (fee). Each layer funds the next.
  • Sustainable Flywheel: Fees are recycled as protocol-owned liquidity, funding grants, security, and R&D without infinite inflation.
Mesh
Economy
Recycled
Fees
counter-argument
THE TRADEOFF

The Security & Simplicity Counter-Argument

The push for isolated security and simplicity directly undermines the economic flywheel that funds innovation.

Composability funds security. Isolated chains sacrifice the pooled security and liquidity of the broader ecosystem. A standalone L1 must independently bootstrap validators, TVL, and developers—a capital-intensive process that most fail.

Modularity requires integration. A sovereign rollup using Celestia for data and EigenLayer for security is still a fragmented application. Its value accrual depends on seamless bridges like Hyperlane and shared sequencers like Espresso.

The data proves isolation fails. Over 50% of new L1s launched since 2021 have less than $10M TVL. In contrast, applications on Arbitrum and Optimism tap into a shared $10B+ liquidity pool from day one.

takeaways
COMPOSABILITY AS INFRASTRUCTURE

TL;DR for Builders and Funders

Composability isn't a feature; it's the foundational property that determines whether your protocol becomes a financial primitive or a ghost town.

01

The Problem: Isolated Silos Kill Network Effects

Building a standalone DeFi app is like opening a store in a desert. Without composable liquidity and state, you must bootstrap your own ecosystem from zero, facing exponential user acquisition costs and near-zero protocol revenue.

  • Result: >90% of TVL concentrates in the top 5 composable ecosystems (Ethereum L2s, Solana).
  • Reality: VCs fund traction, not whitepapers. Silos have no traction.
>90%
TVL Concentration
0x
Network Effects
02

The Solution: Become a Money Lego

Design your protocol as a public utility with permissionless, standardized interfaces (like ERC-20, ERC-4626). This turns your code into a composable primitive that other protocols will integrate, creating a flywheel.

  • Example: Aave's aTokens became the standard for yield-bearing collateral across DeFi.
  • Metric: Protocols with high composability see 3-5x more integrations and sustain fees during bear markets.
3-5x
More Integrations
Sustainable
Fee Revenue
03

The Leverage: Cross-Chain is Table Stakes

Composability now extends across chains. Ignoring this fragments your user base and liquidity. Use generalized messaging (LayerZero, CCIP) and intent-based solvers (Across, UniswapX) to abstract chain boundaries.

  • Outcome: Users interact with your logic, not your chain. TVL becomes omnichain.
  • Data: Leading dApps deploy on 6+ chains; their valuation is tied to total accessible liquidity, not single-chain TVL.
6+
Chains Deployed
Omnichain
TVL Access
04

The Funding Filter: VCs Scan for Integration Hooks

Sophisticated crypto VCs (a16z, Paradigm) evaluate your tech stack for integration surface area. They ask: 'What existing $10B+ ecosystem can plug into this on day one?'

  • Deal Flow: Funding rounds for composable infra (e.g., rollup SDKs, oracles) close 2x faster.
  • Valuation Premium: Protocols designed as infrastructure command 30-50% higher multiples than closed applications.
2x
Faster Rounds
+30-50%
Valuation Premium
05

The Execution: Audit Your Stack's Composability Score

Run a composability audit. Score your protocol on: Standardization (EIPs vs. custom code), Permissionlessness (whitelists?), Data Accessibility (subgraphs, events), and Frontend Agnosticism.

  • Action: If your score is low, prioritize fixing this before marketing. Builders will discover a useful API; they will ignore a branded UI.
  • Tooling: Invest in detailed docs and SDKs; this is your real bizdev team.
4
Key Metrics
SDKs = BizDev
Critical Insight
06

The Future: Autonomous Composable Agents

The endgame is protocols that are composable not just with other protocols, but with AI agents. Your smart contracts must be readable and predictable for agentic systems that will dominate future transaction flow.

  • Forecast: By 2025, >20% of on-chain volume could be agent-driven, bypassing traditional frontends.
  • Implication: The most valuable protocols will be those that are most machine-discoverable and integrable.
>20%
Agent Volume (2025E)
Machine-First
Design Paradigm
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team